Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government Spam The Courts News

Germany Makes Arrests In Global Phishing Scam 56

Posted by Zonk from the little-less-processed-hog-in-the-tubes dept.
Monkier writes "PC World reports on a sting by German police resulting in the arrest of ten people suspected of a phishing scam. The group was targeted bank customers with emails from organizations like eBay and Deutsche Telekom. The team attached software to the emails that recorded data entered into the host computers. From the article: '"This case shows that criminal organizations are using the Internet more and more to gain enormous amounts of money with a supposedly low risk of being caught," said Crime Office President Joerg Ziercke in a statement. "The authorities face constant new challenges in the fight against computer crime where perpetrators are developing a higher degree of professionalism and specialization." The office said the suspects had led luxurious lifestyles involving expensive jewelry, cars and travel.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Germany Makes Arrests In Global Phishing Scam More

Germany Makes Arrests In Global Phishing Scam

Comments Filter:
  • Throw away the key.
    • Putting them into prison is too nice for these female donkey's external orifice. A slow torture of converting all of the spam they made into audio and listening it at 100db on a endless loop (I think they send out enough spam that wouldn't end anyways but just in case) would be sufficient suffering for this person.

  • Hah! (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 14, 2007 @09:31AM (#20602993)
    I've been scamming people for years now, but they're never gonna get me!

    -Bill G.

  • This is Germany (Score:3, Funny)

    by Billosaur ( 927319 ) * <wgrother@optonline. n e t> on Friday September 14, 2007 @09:34AM (#20603033) Journal

    It's "pfishing"...

  • Global crime, national governments (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 14, 2007 @09:38AM (#20603071)
    Face it, the world ain't divided into little independent fiefdoms anymore. Why do we keep acting like it is a good idea to have little nations all under their own regime?

    For a global order, we need a global system of governance. Lucky for us, open source is taking the lead:
    http://www.metagovernment.org/ [metagovernment.org]

    It's still young, but it's better than anything else out there.

    • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      Thanks, but I'd rather have the bastards sitting somewhere near, so it's easier to shoot them when the need arises. The EU is bad enough, faceless moloch that it has become...
    • Face it, the world IS STILL divided into little independent fiefdoms. And who is this 'we' that are acting like it's a good idea? Maybe you mean the people that recognize the nature of their power (of many types), and where it comes from? In other words, having a world government would severely hinder the "haves" in keeping themselves separate from the "nots".

      I read the Metagovernment website. Pie-in-the-sky ideas. Sounds good on paper but the only thing that would ever make it even remotely possible to implement is massive, worldwide violence on a scale never before seen which somehow only killed the people who wanted to maintain their power.

      Seriously, I mean, it sounds good but it's just not gonna go smoothly if it ever happens.

      • In other words, having a world government would severely hinder the "haves" in keeping themselves separate from the "nots".
        Not if that world government was designed, created and run by the "haves." [wikipedia.org]
         
        • The problem with the Bilderberg group and their meetings is, at least from my perspective, they never get anything really accomplished. Do you know of a place I can find a list of world changes and effects they've caused? It seems like they just go to these meetings to inflate their egos.

          For a "world government" they don't seem to do much governing.
      • About as close as we could ever practically get would be a diplomatic entity with limited scope and power, resulting in a loose confederation of nations that comes together for regular discourse. Oh wait, that's the United Nations.
    • Why do we keep acting like it is a good idea to have little nations all under their own regime?

      Because it is?

      I mean, let's try this braying poxy ass of an excuse for a "thought" in other arenas:

      "Why do we keep acting like it is a good idea to let everyone run whatever operating system they like on their own computer? We need a global standard OS that everyone has to use, so all the application writers can do their work most efficiently. (And so can the virus writers, ha ha.)"

      "Why do we keep acting like ev

      • Re: (Score:1)

        by MrDoh1 ( 906953 )
        "Why do we keep acting like everyone should be able to pick out their own mate..."

        Oblig Simpsons quote...
        Comic Book Guy: Inspired by the most logical race in the galaxy, the Vulcans, breeding
        will be permitted once every seven years. For many of you this will
        mean much less breeding, for

  • Tax rates and organised crime (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Just a thought I had a few months ago - the higher the income tax rate, the bigger the incentive is for economic crime. As a stylized example;

    In country A you earn 100,000, pay 25,000 in tax that covers your public health system, 25,000 in tax to cover your education system, spend 25,000 on other life essentials, and are left with 25,000 to spend as you like.

    In country B you earn 100,000, pay 5,000 in tax that covers your public health system and 20,000 in further insurance, pay 5,000 in tax to cover your e

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Silver Sloth ( 770927 )
      Poor and sick person in Country A receives the health care required without resorting to crime so as to pay for it.

      Poor and sick person in Country B has to balance health care against other basic needs and is tempted into crime to pay for it.

      So, the higher the tax rate the lower the basic incentive to comit crime.

      Ok, so this is a hopelessly simplistic broad brush picture of a very complex situation, but, so was the OP.

      • Mod parent up (Score:1, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward
        The parent makes the ideal counterpoint to the grandparent. Both are in my opinion valid arguments and deserve some thought. The question is, which society would you rather live in...

      • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward
        No, in country B, if you cannot afford healthcare, the Hospitals cannot refuse you. It comes out of taxpayer pockets at that point usually.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Detritus ( 11846 )
          All the hospital has to do is stabilize you and kick your ass out the door. They are under no obligation to provide non-emergency medical treatment. Have a serious illness? Sucks to be you.
      • A poor and sick person almost by definition can't commit economic crimes, crimes that requires some capital to get going, like phishing scams.

        The argument that poor and sick people steal or rob in order to afford health care is one of the oldest and most ridiculous canards there is. Can you think of anyone, ever, anywhere who has been arrested repeatedly for, say, felony auto theft -- and it turned out he did it just to afford his cancer medicine? Neither can I.

        Modern society is not Dickensian England, no

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Detritus ( 11846 )
          It may not be Dickensian England, but the idea that anyone can make it in this society with a little effort is laughable. Many people have problems that make it difficult or impossible to get and hold a job. Some are self-inflicted, some are a result of genetics, their upbringing, location, or bad luck. Getting any job, let alone a job with health insurance, is difficult. Even in a healthy economy, they are the last to be hired and the first to be laid off. It doesn't help that there are a large number of i
        • The poor can still commit insurance fraud, they can still commit welfare fraud (25 fake accounts) with little effort but high risk. And if you get caught, bingo free health care in prison.

          The poor can also get their health poor brother or cousin or father to commit some skimming or sly on the side jobs for high cash, zero tax rewards.

          You could argue banks are criminals for charging multi layer fees for 2 seconds of computer work, they still make money and profit.
    • Smart criminals pay income tax on their gains to avoid getting nailed for tax fraud.

  • Bedfellows (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Stanistani ( 808333 ) on Friday September 14, 2007 @09:43AM (#20603125) Homepage Journal
    This is an example where customers and businesses are on the same side, with governments and law enforcement actually protecting them by catching the bad guys.

    I'd like to see more of this.

    Of course, with eBay still sending me emails with links, telling me not to trust emails with links...

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by dada21 ( 163177 )
      This is an example where customers and businesses are on the same side, with governments and law enforcement actually protecting them by catching the bad guys.

      Even though I'm an anti-state kind of guy, it is times like this that I can at least applaud government for doing something right, although probably very inefficiently.

      I coaxed my retired father to join the web a few years back (e-mail, slingbox, casual web browsing) and I get 5-10 e-mails a week from him forwarding some bank notification that is a ph
    • Are you _sure_ they were from eBay?
      • Unfortunately, yes. I called eBay's tech support and emailed their anti-phishing folks, and they confirmed that the emails were part of their anti-phishing efforts.

        The folks I communicated with could not see the logical fallacy.
  • But don't say anything about people who sold them the brain dead computer that will allow drive by downloads. Protect companies that sold insecure software. But these damn phishermen, lock them away in prison. These blokes probably get better food in a German prison than in their farm in Ukraine. But that is not the issue. And there could be more phishermen from where they come from, but that is not an issue.

    Let us say people park their cars without locks in a high crime neighborhood and the car gets sto

  • I just wish the "victims" were more careful (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I realize that I'm imposing my North-american-centric, socially-unfriendly view here, but why can't people just be a little LESS trusting. These problems would go away quickly if people would just educate themselves a bit and learn that the Internet is a "wretched hive of scum and villainy" and you just HAVE TO BE CAREFUL.

    yeah, yeah... I'm blaming the victim...flame on

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by hiryuu ( 125210 )
      These problems would go away quickly if people would just educate themselves a bit and learn that the Internet is a "wretched hive of scum and villainy" and you just HAVE TO BE CAREFUL.

      I don't think you're blaming the victim by stating a fact - and I think it is likely fact that a significant proportion of these crimes occur because the victim either didn't know better or didn't think it over in an adequately critical fashion.

      In an offline example, I got beaten and mugged earlier this summer while walking h
  • I have no pity for commercial spammers, phishers, profit-driven crackers, and other slightly techno-savvy common criminals.

    But, can we also take computers away from the people who endlessly fall for these scams and make work for the rest of us? I understand that Grandmaw wants to email, but no operating system on earth can keep her safe from running corrupt executables. Maybe she needs a blackberry instead.

    • Perhaps this illustrates a significant problem with the current computing paradigm that everyone has their own PC. I mean, it's fine for anyone reading /. to perform administrative tasks, mess around with the operating system, etc. etc., but for most people this doesn't really make sense. For a common user who only wants to do basic things like web browsing, email, or maybe word processing, wouldn't a thin client on a not-particularly-powerful machine with most applications and things server-side make more
    • Could we hang the idiots next to them, who make it trivial to turn their machines into spambots and ddos-sheeps?

      The fools who're gullible enough for phishing at least are also the ones who are damaged. That's ok. With spambots and sheep, they hurt someone else. And that's where I ain't really relaxed anymore, especially when looking at the size of Storm. This has the potential to become more than a mere nuisance.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by Detritus ( 11846 )
      Why not have an operating system that only runs code that has been audited and signed by a trusted party? You might not want such a thing but many people would be better off with a system that was more difficult to exploit.
  • The core problem is that the client system was compromised and as a result all the SSL in the world won't help. Clueless users will always be with us. It will always be the case that if you send out enough emails with plausible links, someone will click on them.

    Banks should make greater use of authentication tokens like those provided by SecurID, because they offer a secure platform that is much more difficult to compromise with fishing attacks.

  • ... Crime Office President Joerg Ziercke ...

    Crime Office President? I thought that was George W. Bush.

  • I'm glad someone actually did something about this problem, although this is just a drop in the ocean - if even that. I got a scam email from "ebay" the other day, I onticed that it was obviously a scam, but more importantly it was a scam from within the UK (my country). I looked up and found out the guy's name who was running it (or at least the name he used to register - which he would need a credit card to buy, which has to be registered somewhere).

    This would be trivially easy for the police to sort

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by cdrguru ( 88047 )
      Most registrars will allow phony names to be used and they do not do any cross-checking. If I want to registe a domain to "Santa Claus" I can even though I used my credit card to do it.

      Police? They pretty much say they have bigger problems or it isn't worth their time. In the US you need to get at least $25,000 worth of damages and then the FBI will look into it. Just to be on the safe side, you better have lost $100,000 to get any real attention.

      Nobody cares and enforcement actions like this are less t
  • Deal with it. If you are too stupid to not get taken in, then you probably deserve it.

    Trying to stop it is like trying to stop panhandling. It may be disgusting and annoying but there isn't really anything that can be done about it. Educated people know not to pass out money to people on the street. Sympathatic folks that have a good heart make sure these people keep coming back for more.

    Just like the people that buy stuff from spam and click links in emails.
  • U.S. Director of Intelligence Michael McConnell said the surveillance program had made "significant contributions" in discovering and breaking up a suspected plot in Germany to bomb , err, rather..., Inconvenience American installations? He cited them as a reason that the U.S. Congress should reject attempts to restrict it.
  • They used all that money for a luxurious lifestyle.

    Presumably if you defraud people for large sums but use the funds to live quietly in the suburbs, its not a crime.

  • "... Attached to the emails was so-called Trojan horse software which records data entered in computers using the Windows Operating System."

    Fixed your typo!

    HTH!

    HAND!

Slashdot Top Deals

An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.

Close