Thompson Stifled by Take Two Suit 55
Take Two has done something that many gamers have probably dreamed of: they've managed to make Jack Thompson shut up. In return for dismissing their suit against Thompson (and the dismissal of Thompson's counter-suit), Thompson has agreed to limit communication with Take-Two Entertainment. He's also barred for the time being from filing suit against games made by the company, ensuring we'll see a minimum of court drama around the release of GTA IV later this year. Ars Technica's Opposable Thumbs blog reports: "It appears that his once mighty roar is now to be temporarily quieted, as the well-documented case--which included numerous bold claims, outrageous scandals, and even a counter-suit--between Thompson and publisher Take-Two has reached a settlement ... Any statements or concerns that Thompson wishes to voice will now have to first go through Take-Two's lawyers."
Can I get a hell yeah! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing you included a link to his book then!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I wonder if this is the best decision for Take Two (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Awww... (Score:4, Funny)
That's it! (Score:2)
Jack Thompson is likely an Industry insider anyway (Score:5, Interesting)
Jack is actually our best friend because he's such a wack job that these things get overturned and set a precident for future legislation.
Thank you Jack. Don't ever change...
---S.
Re:Jack Thompson is likely an Industry insider any (Score:2)
Re:Jack Thompson is likely an Industry insider any (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That or just the worst lawyer, but if he is actually such a bad lawyer, how does he have any money?
Lawyers generally bill hourly for the work they do on a particular case. Sometimes they are willing to do the leg work for free in exchange for a portion of the winnings, but often they are either paid strictly hourly, or hourly unless they win whereby it goes to a percentage scheme.
A lawyer does not need to be a good lawyer to make money, they just need a consistent stream of clients. The fact that he hasn't been successful in video game suits doesn't detract from the fact that he's the only one making th
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
He's been giving (well, helping give) Florida a bad name since at least 1990.
Re:Jack Thompson is likely an Industry insider any (Score:2)
Let me be the first to say... (Score:3, Funny)
Please note: I tried to use the sarcasm tags, but the filter rejected them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
don't perpetuate stupidity please
Indeed. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Does anyone know.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Does anyone know.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Does anyone know.. (Score:4, Informative)
That must make conversations around the water cooler a bit awkward.
"So, I heard your nutjob husband's legal theories were ruled unconstitutional and cost [US state] $[legal bill]..."
Re: (Score:2)
Mrs. T: "Well it gives him something to do while I bring home the bacon. The tough part is turning him down when he wants to help with my cases. I tell him the firm can't afford someone of his caliber!"
Partner: "Yeah, can't afford to lose!"
Both: "Ha ha ha ha ha!"
Mrs. T: "But seriously, he has a huge johnson."
Partner: "Ah... I knew it wasn't his brains."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
He is already blaming video games for VT massacre (Score:4, Informative)
Despite several folks, including dorm mates, saying the Cho never played computers game (he spent most of his time writing)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weG7A4lTGtg [youtube.com]
Re:He is already blaming video games for VT massac (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:He is already blaming video games for VT massac (Score:2)
http://kotaku.com/gaming/feature/feature-dissecti
Why'd they stop? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why'd they stop? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
I wonder what the penalty will be when he finally is unable to keep in compliance with this agreement.
Thompson is really a game industry plant! (Score:4, Funny)
So could it be that Jack Thompson is really working for the game industry, out there embarassing into silence anyone who would voice a similar opinion if it weren't for his incessant babbling?
What's more, good ol' JT has done more to get consumers educated about game ratings with his public displays of affliction than the government and ESRB ever could have. Thanks to him and others like him, parents are aware of the ratings system that is the standard rebuttal by the game industry when they get airtime thanks to Jack.
I think we need to stop hating Jack Thompson and thank him. Thank him for crippling the efforts to ban or restrict violent games. Thank him for giving the game industry a voice in the national media in the form of rebuttals to his statements. Thank him for giving the media a reason to discuss how the game industry and retail stores already provide concerned parents with the ability to know what their child will be playing.
Thank you, Jack Thompson. Thank you. Your secret is safe with us.
Re: (Score:2)
No, but he's certainly a useful idiot to have on the other side. He's been tilting at various culture-war windmills for his whole professional life. I wonder how much 2 Live Crew eventually pulled in because of him.
Industry Plant? (Score:2)
Wow (Score:2, Interesting)
It makes you wonder just how deep seated his convictions really are.
New MSNBC article highly critical of Jack (Score:5, Interesting)
from TFA: "The shooting on the Virginia Tech campus was only hours old, police hadn't even identified the gunman, and yet already the perpetrator had been fingered and was in the midst of being skewered in the media.
Video games. They were to blame for the dozens dead and wounded. They were behind the bloodiest massacre in U.S. history.
Or so Jack Thompson told Fox News and, in the days that followed, would continue to tell anyone who'd listen.
Mod up (Score:2)
Lol, this article is funny (Score:3, Interesting)
He's talking about f'cking counter-strike.
What a dingus malingus.
Re:Lol, this article is funny (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I read some of his book "On Killing" a while back, and he made some valid points, but I believe he certainly overstated the potential harm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Grossman_(autho
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
I downloaded the actual settlement agreement (Score:3, Informative)
And all of God's Gamers said.. (Score:2)