SCO Chairman Fights to Ban Open Wireless Networks 343
cachedout writes "SCO's Ralph Yarro had the floor yesterday at the Utah Technology Commission meeting in front of Utah lawmakers. Yarro proposed that free wireless sites and subscribers should be held responsible should any porn be delivered to minors because hotspots are apparently where kids go to watch porn all day long. Yarro told lawmakers that open wireless access points should be made a crime because we have an Internet out of control."
Ah come on... (Score:5, Interesting)
And I don't mean
WOW - and now they are child-porn fighters (Score:3, Interesting)
"oh look, we are 'thinking of the children' so give us some of ibm's cash already" ?
am i totally out of sync (end of a long workday) or did i nail it ?
Re:Really? (Score:3, Interesting)
I have another reason to believe kids are not going to Starbucks for free WiFi. Starbucks doesn't have free wireless. The service is provided by T-Mobile. I used to think Starbucks had free WiFi and went to one on my travels to use it. It was at Starbucks I learned the truth. While at Starbucks, I found an open WiFi network and used it instead. (not for porn)
Re:Ah come on... (Score:5, Interesting)
I call bullshit. (Score:2, Interesting)
1. This issue is so important to him but he can't remember what search term he used? He does not remember what he was doing on the internet and yet he wants to legislate it?
2. Just because you are not techno savvy enough to control what pours into your computer don't assume "the children" can't. They are most likely much more internet and computer capable then he is.
3. Kinda related to number 2 but if you can't figure out how to channel surf without accidentally tuning into a program that may not be good for children does than mean we need to ban Showtime, Skinamax or even FX (that "The Shield" is pretty violent, oh wait, violence is fine its boobies that are dangerous).
4. you dont get caught in a "Pornado" (I actually really like this term and will use it from now on) by going to Nickalodian.com(however its spelled)or other mainstream sites, you get them surfing for porn or warez... I wonder which he was searching for? (Doesn't it seem like these people who crusade against something end up being busted for it later 'see anti-gay preacher')
God I am so sick of these Smacktards.
Re:Out of YOUR control (Score:2, Interesting)
The Bubble (Utah Mormons vs Non-Utah Mormons) (Score:4, Interesting)
Mind you this is not the religion Joseph Smith re-organized. He made it clear man has to get knowledge from God, not from man. The current state of Utah Mormonism is due to years of isolation. Utah Mormons form a tight cliche and as a result, it is hard to break into that cliche for those who are not Mormons, or recent converts into Mormonism.
Sometimes I think if would be good for Utah Mormons to actually leave Utah, and live somewhere else where Mormons are in the minority. Then they would be forced to live with people who do not agree with them, and be able to expand there knowledge of the outside world.
At least that is why I am not in Utah.
(I served an LDS mission in Salt Lake City, which would take a novel to even summerize).
For the children you say, SCO? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Ah come on... (Score:5, Interesting)
Why not just ban children next?
Re:Out of YOUR control (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:JUST from entering a search phrase? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Ah come on... (Score:5, Interesting)
WTF? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:what's wrong with watching porn? (Score:2, Interesting)
Movies of homocidal violence, however, for some reason, do not.
Quite right too (Score:3, Interesting)
We also know that once a person is perverted, it is practically impossible for that person to adjust to normal attitudes in regard to sex.
(Free clue before you mod me troll: I'm referring to things which have been said in anti-porn propaganda).
Re:Ah come on... (Score:3, Interesting)
I normally get along with just about everyone, but the one type of person that always gets to me and confuses me are the ones who think their opinion is the only answer. Even if I have a firm belief, I always remember that my own opinion may be based upon faulty logic, conclusions, observations and other factors of human error. I'm actually looking for opinions that DISPROVE my conclusion and consider whether my argument would still stand in light of the new perspective/fact/etc.
Anyway, this is why I agree with your 2 posts (that I read) which are different from my point of view but I agree nonetheless. Just because I don't see a reason to leave a WiFi open doesn't mean I think you SHOULDNT. Guilt by association is a slippery slope. Imagine if we banned all paper and computer screens....because we all KNOW child porn is printed on paper or viewed on a screen. We must BAN these products which are OUT OF CONTROL.
Isn't control just an illusion anyway? When you say you've "lost control" it's actually an oxymoron...but I digress. :)