EFF Forces DMCA Abuser to Apologize 222
destinyland writes "The EFF just announced victory over a serial abuser of DMCA copyright notices. To set an example, their settlement required Michael Crook to record a video apology to the entire internet for interfering with free speech. He's also required to withdraw every bogus DMCA notice, and refrain from future bogus notices, never contest the original image again, and take a remedial class on copyright law.
He'd attempted to use flaws
in the DMCA to censor an embarrassing picture of himself that he just didn't want appearing online — but instead the whole thing backfired."
That's it? (Score:5, Insightful)
That's it? They finally get a serial abuser of the DMCA to apologize, and it's just some guy with a nudie picture that he didn't want people to see? How about getting an **AA or something to apologize for *really* infringing on free speech/expression?
Oh, the irony... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Copyright Ownership? (Score:1, Insightful)
Fox owns this image... (Score:4, Insightful)
It's not even that bad...hehe.
Okay...? (Score:2, Insightful)
Humm, well, OK then -- Michael Crook says he's sorry. I'm just so thrilledto have this new information. I guess this is a victory for some website having to do with monkeys, and FOX News is somewhere in there too. Gee, well, huh. So there it is then. All right. Swell. Thanks.
On second thought, can I have back the five minutes of my life I just wasted watching this apology?
Re:First you go after an obvious scumbag ... (Score:3, Insightful)
This case was not decided by a judge. It was settled out of court.
I may be wrong, but I'm fairly certain that there is no legal precedent set when someone settles.
Aero
Re:First you go after an obvious scumbag ... (Score:4, Insightful)
This guy is not normal (Score:3, Insightful)
Taken from http://www.michaelcrook.org/thedmcacase.html [michaelcrook.org], where he's talking about this (http://www.michaelcrook.org/extrafiles/crook.jpg
"And hey, I rather like this screenshot. It makes me look like Hitler and shit. Cool beans-- it was exactly the statement I was trying to make."
I'm still sitting here with my jaw hanging down after having read this! I think not only should he be sent to a basic lesson of copyright law, but also to a history lesson focussing on WW2!
Apologetic (Score:5, Insightful)
It's good to see that he has learned his lesson, instead of revelling in the destruction caused by the inefficiencies of the legal system.
What a seriously evil asshole.
Wrong (Score:2, Insightful)
This is NOT rocket science.. If I appear in public, that changes the outcome.
Re:First you go after an obvious scumbag ... (Score:3, Insightful)
With one difference: you don't get caught. So don't send them out about content related to you, or from an e-mail address that is traceable back to you.
If lots of people started doing this, ISPs would get the hint that maybe, just maybe, they should examine a copyright claim before acting on it.