Do You Need to Surf Anonymously? 301
An anonymous reader writes "Computerworld has up an article entitled 'How to Surf Anonymously without a Trace'. It purports to offer tips on how to avoid detection by anyone attempting to monitor your internet access. 'If you don't like the limitations imposed on you by [proxy] sites like the Cloak or would simply prefer to configure anonymous surfing yourself, you can easily set up your browser to use an anonymous proxy server to sit between you and the sites you visit. To use an anonymous proxy server with your browser, first find an anonymous proxy server. Hundreds of free, public proxy servers are available, but many frequently go offline or are very slow. Many sites compile lists of these proxy servers, including Public Proxy Servers and the Atom InterSoft proxy server list.'"
What if you're already behind a proxy server (Score:3, Interesting)
What I need is a meta-surfer, a free port 80 VPN with a built in browser on the client side....maybe one day I'll build one myself.
Do it with Google (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Public Proxy != Anonymous (Score:5, Interesting)
How about a battered wife looking for a way out of her marriage, and a husband who clams to be able to read whatever she writes? (for the record, this really happened to someone I know, but luckily she's free of him now)
There will always be cases where you don't want people to know what you're doing. Many of these cases are legitimate interests in preserving mere privacy, and some are because there really is avoiding oppression.
Re:Public Proxy != Anonymous (Score:3, Interesting)
Back to the proffit issue, if anyone is going to make money selling my viewing/buying habbits (which many sites do), its going to be me. I do not need those damn statistics sites that almost every damn web page has selling my info....
Change MAC when renewing DHCP? (Score:3, Interesting)
Doesn't seem like it would really be all that hard on a Linux/BSD system, no idea what it requires on Windows to script that sort of thing.
Re:Public Proxy != Anonymous (Score:3, Interesting)
The experience makes me definitely second what the OP said about proxies being unreliable. I ended up having to not only have a system that would detect when my domain name was blocked and re-register domains (using a bit of wget magic), but also have a script that would constantly check to see if my proxies were alive. Whichever ones died, the script had to go back to a proxy list site, and (using a bit of trickier wget magic, since the listed IPs were images to discourage scripts like mine) grab new ones. I initially tried running without this, but I quickly discovered that 90% of the time, when a connection that was working fine wouldn't work any more, it wasn't that the voting site blocked me: it was that the proxy was down. The average proxy probably worked for perhaps ten hours, and of the proxies on the list (narrowed down by ones that supported POST -- which was, sadly, perhaps only 10% of them), only about one in four worked at all.
Re:cite please (Score:3, Interesting)
This doesn't sound right, but
[I'm not suggesting that you agree that the above is a good reason to crack down on libraries in any way, I'm just being annoyed that people seem to think we should "crack down" in this kind of thing. I suppose most such people don't even know where their local library is located
-scott
Re:Starting at the desktop (Score:3, Interesting)
You don't. It's even more fundamentally impossible as DRM, because you're de/encrypting it on the machine you're trying to hide it from. Certainly you can encrypt past a proxy, but if they see encrypted traffic coming from your machine, they have every right to capture it locally. Their computer, their network, their sensitive data on it.
Re:honestly... I was thinking about this (Score:3, Interesting)
and the only time the average user would need to surf anonymous is when he/she knows he is doing something wrong. I mean, i'm not trying to start anything here, but rather understand WHY you would need to do this.
BS! Something does not need to be bad to a reason to remain anonymous. Politics and political speech are very good reasons to be anonymous. If someone can't remain anonymous then they can't enjoy free political speech.
Falcon
Re:Pot, meet kettle; kettle, pot. (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm surprised nobody has brought up the identity theft argument yet, but there we go.
I think that there is a difference between privacy to the average internet user, and to police/government agencies.
Sure, I don't want average joe idiot getting hold of my name here on /. and having him start calling my house. I don't give out my home phone number for that exact reason.
But privacy against the police or government can (in most cases) only be for less than virtuous reasons. Now buddy up above in China who claimed to be studying democratic groups is an exception, I suppose although, if he is acting against his government, how is that different than somebody else acting against their government. An issue for another day, I suppose.
I know that freedom is important, but it has to be weighed against "the common good". For instance, school is a right. If someone has a mono, they should not be allowed their right to education until they are no longer infectious. It is just better for everybody, it seems to me.
Re:Public Proxy != Anonymous (Score:3, Interesting)
Would you wear a shirt with your address on it? (Score:3, Interesting)
Would you be confortable with that? Are you so free of enemies or sure of the people who watch you that you'd wear that shirt? Or would you rather just walk around without that highly informative piece of clothing, as free men have always done?
Re:Pot, meet kettle; kettle, pot. (Score:3, Interesting)
Okay, Mr. RecklessWanderer. Here's a quick example of why someone might want to remain anonymous online.
According to your posts in the thread, you're Canadian [slashdot.org].
A few seconds on Google brings up this post [mywildvacation.com] by a Canadian named "TheRecklessWanderer". The message board discusses experiences at an "adult-oriented resort" where paying customers get to "mingle" with women of indeterminate age and questionable virtue.
Now, I'm not implying that you and the poster on the message board are the same person; in fact the huge popularity of the internet makes it unlikely. But for many people, being mistakenly associated with questionable activities could be awkward or embarrassing at best, devastating at worst. Luckily, the anonymous nature of the internet prevents future employers or current spouses from jumping to such hasty conclusions.
Re:Pot, meet kettle; kettle, pot. (Score:2, Interesting)
That was one of the most impressive proof of concepts I've seen in a slashdot post for a long time. Hell, if I were him/her I'm pretty sure that would send a shiver down my spine.
All that and you're just a slahdotter who knows the magic word for getting information, google.com.