Groklaw No Front for IBM 206
A Groklaw Reader writes "After all the wild speculation SCO put forth about Pamela Jones, her alleged subpoena by SCO, and her recent vacation due to illness, we now have Stephen J. Vaughan-Nichols writing to say 'Yes, there is a PJ.' In his own words, he says, 'Let me address this directly. Yes, Pamela Jones is a real person. I've met her several times [...] I consider her a friend. She is not a front for anyone.' Hopefully, this statement will be enough to put those SCO-induced conspiracy theories to rest."
Re:Dear Darl McPumpndump... (Score:2, Informative)
SCO got a stalker, not a PI (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Seeing is believing. Conversely.... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Photos or she ain't real! (Score:2, Informative)
The MOG, Maureen O'Gara, was fired because of that.
Oh, since the MOG apparently knows Darl McBride since before, I wonder why they could subpoena her. I guess it might be considered the bitter harassment technique...
- - -
Re:Seeing is believing. Conversely.... (Score:5, Informative)
Personally, I don't see any reason for Novell to issue a subpoena to PJ in the Novell case. In all probability, anything that she has that relates to Novell is already on Groklaw. Given that SCO, and it's agents have already tried to stalk PJ, I'd say that she's got good reason to avoid any possible subpoena from them, unless they show that they actually have real questions to ask her that relate properly to the Novell case, and that SCO couldn't get from their own (or Novell's) files.
Of course,
Re:Stephen J. Vaughan-Nichols (Score:2, Informative)
So yea, I believe SJVN is a real person.
And yes, the company calling itself SCO is so totally screwed!