Indian Government Lifts Ban on Blogs 135
iDope writes "The Department of Telecommunications of the Government of India has lifted the ban on blogs (reported previously on Slashdot) following pressure from the Indian blogger community and the media. Even with the lifting of the ban several bloggers from BloggersCollective are getting ready to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) (similar to a Class Action Lawsuit in US) in the Supreme Court of India against the Government censorship of the Internet."
Re:Okay (Score:3, Informative)
Indian Supreme Court Can Strike Down Laws,Bans,etc (Score:3, Informative)
You have to bear in mind that this govt is a Left-wing coalition, and so their willingness to resort to things like censorship will be greater.
The center-right political opposition, the Bharatiya Janata Party, have in the past championed laws such as the Prasar Bharati Act to protect independence of the media from arbitrary government censorship, precisely because the Indian Left have a long history of playing these types of games.
That's why th
We are rejoicing! (Score:5, Funny)
- Steve.
(Yes I am really being named Steve, and the weather here in Bango...r, Maine is wonderful! We in America are overjoyed to be reading this and posting about it on your Slashdot!)
Slippery slope! (Score:2, Funny)
If the blogs were illegal, why is the Govt. caving in to such criminal 'blogger' community. This is pandering to the criminals. What next, Pakistan O.K.ing manufacture of C4 by terrorists?
India is on a slippery slope here; today they allow bloggers, tomorrow they got homosexuals burning Indian flags at their weddings to celebrate partial birth evolution.
Re:Slippery slope! (Score:1)
Re:Slippery slope! (Score:1, Funny)
Good news, I guess (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good news, I guess (Score:1)
Minor picking of a nit (Score:3, Funny)
I think you need to use preview, you mispelled worthless!
Plus blogs are usually fairly worthless.
Ahhhhhh, much better
Feel Bad For Me (Score:1)
Re:Minor picking of a nit (Score:2)
"Your mother was a typo, and your father overdosed on apostrophes, you, you.. you misspelled worthless!!" *shakes fist*
Would've been a rather biting insult.
Re:Good news, I guess (Score:1)
Re:Good news, I guess (Score:2)
Re:Good news, I guess (Score:1)
Great ... now ... (Score:4, Insightful)
I doubt it (Score:5, Insightful)
Democracies can be imperfect; democracies like India can make mistakes, or do things (like this Blog censorship program) which are wrong. But at least in a democracy, there is some kind of mechanism in place that can be used to eventually fix the mistakes and correct the wrongs. China has no mechanisms in place to correct the wrongs of those in power. And so you can wait, but the wrongs are not going to just go away.
Re:I doubt it (Score:2)
Re:I doubt it (Score:2)
Gasp! You need to go talk to Papa-Bear O'Reilly *right now*!
Re:I doubt it (Score:3, Interesting)
The Government back-pedalled on the Blogging ban because they were afraid of getting their heads slapped around by the Supreme Court. This Government is the first in recent times (past 20 years) that
Re:I doubt it (Score:1)
Re:Great ... now ... (Score:1)
Unfortunately I think the only thing that they might learn from this is that you must rule with an ironfist and keep people from organizing in protest.
keep up the coverage :) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:keep up the coverage :) (Score:1)
Re:keep up the coverage :) (Score:1)
Can we also file a Public Interest Litigation... (Score:2)
Re:Can we also file a Public Interest Litigation.. (Score:2)
Re:Can we also file a Public Interest Litigation.. (Score:2)
Re:Can we also file a Public Interest Litigation.. (Score:1)
Re:Can we also file a Public Interest Litigation.. (Score:1)
Finally! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Finally! (Score:1)
Official Circular (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Official Circular (Score:1)
Is it so difficult for ISP's to filter only some particular blogs in Blogspot & not all blogs on Blogspot ?? Isnt there a technological solution ? or Is it that they didnt want to do it?
Technical error? (Score:1)
Good, they need the manpower... (Score:1, Offtopic)
"India's ruling party takes legal steps to stop a film director from making a movie about Sonia Gandhi." BBC story [bbc.co.uk]
Really? (Score:1)
Re:Good, they need the manpower... (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't usually complain about moderation, especially that of my own posts, but WTF?
If you feel you must protect your county no matter what it does, why not reply and explain to me how culturally insensitive I am in thinking that censorship sucks.
If, however, the moderator was on crack or just wasted, please accept my apology and enjoy your experience.
Thank goodness (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:It's always a ruse (Score:3, Insightful)
As for "censorship is always bad except
Re:It's always a ruse (Score:1)
You can draw the line in many places, but it is too simplistic to just say "censorship is always bad" (although it is amusing that you write that and then start on a list of exceptions).
Playing The Freedom Angle (Score:4, Interesting)
But I would guess that the less than free and open society in China coupled with China being looked upon, by the U.S. at least, as a dangerous competitor on the world stage, is putting a brake on IT work freely flowing into China. Seriously, China and the U.S. could be at war tomorrow if Taiwan declared independence. India can play this to their advantage by doing as much as possible to resemble the free and open society that Americans claim to love so much. India is, afterall, the world's largest democracy, so playing the freedom angle isn't too much of a stretch with the right marketing.
I'm not saying that there is any concious orchestration going on. But stories like censoring the internet don't help the image the government probably wants to project, so reversing that can only be to their advantage.
Re:Playing The Freedom Angle (Score:2)
India gained its freedom from the british in 1947, when neither USA or China, were the world powers that they are today, and it has been a democratic nation since then.
Re:Playing The Freedom Angle (Score:2)
India gained its freedom from the british in 1947, when neither USA or China, were the world powers that they are today
You mean the same 1947 in which the USA was the ONLY nation in the world with a nuclear weapon, and the only major nation not to have lost a significant part of its population and industrial power to war? (Pearl Harbor didn't exactly contribute much in the way of industrial production) I'll give you China, but the US has been a bona fide world power since shortly after we joined WWII.
Re:Playing The Freedom Angle (Score:3, Interesting)
In short, India's tryst with freedom (to echo Nehru's words) isn't to grab that one extra consulting project; it is, let's face it, the only way so many ethnicities can share a common space and prosper.
alls well that ends well (Score:2, Interesting)
We're all having to learn how the internet works. Governments, great lumbering beasts that they are, are prone to dumb decisions when it comes to new technology, at least at first.
I wonder what unseen pressure group was responsible for that. Google's blogspot was blocked. Hmm, I do wonder what microsoft were whispering in the ear of indian politicians before the decision.
So (Score:2)
Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:5, Informative)
a) The govt. had infact NOT asked for all blogs to be banned. It was just ISPs being clueluess. Repeat after me
b) The govt. had infact asked for 20 odd blogs and sites to be blocked - these were allegedly trying to incite hatred against certain minority communities, by blaming them for the recent bomb blasts in Mumbai. It was felt that such hate campaigns may lead to a violent reprisal against these communities.
c) While banning said sites may also be an attack of freedom of speech (though I think this is similar to the ban on Nazi propoganda in Germany). it is NOT in the same league as that in China and North Korea.
d) This (and by this, I mean blocking the original 20 sites, not the whole of blogspot, etc) is ALSO different from the US govt's reaction after 9/11. There was no attempt to use temporary public anger to justify aggression, infact quite the opposite - the govt. has tried to defuse such tensions and ensure sanity prevails.
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:1)
going to block http://blogspot.com/badguy [blogspot.com] with out blocking all
of blogspot.com?
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:1)
Difficult, but not impossible. Since the civil servants who issued said orders knew that their own ISP was capable of blocking out particular subdomains/urls even on multihomed IPs, they assumed every ISP could do the same. The "withdrawal" came after they realized that most
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:1)
I don't know whether the ISPs were clueless, but they certainly revealed the rot in what the Indians like to call democracy.
What the government asked for is worse, it was a slap in the face for freedom of speech. There was NO due process. It was a "silent" order given to the ISPs by some anonymous bureaucrats asking for _specific URLs_ to be blocked, regardless of legal merit (look at princesskimberly.blogspot.c
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:2)
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:1)
What we see here is nothing less than blocking sites some random bureaucrat didn't like. To use a legal phrase, there is no bright-line definition for what cannot be ban
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:2)
No, that's my point. If you look at the censorship regimes, if you will, for other media, things are much more clear-cut; movies have the Censor Board (and its subsequent process of appeal), books can't be censored per se, but can be banned for security reasons. Overall, when a movie or a book is restricted in some way, we Indians get to know. With websites, we simply don't know. Therefore, in my book, the IT Act is much more draconian than earlier laws.
While I'm
Re:Did anyone RTFA ? (Score:1)
Even otherwise, hinduunity.org etc publicize organizations like the VHP and Bajrang Dal in India. Now, I don't like these parties (hoodlums mostly) but if they are legal in India then their beliefs oughtn't be blocked from the 'net.
> And while India is not a declared Muslim co
So, you can blog, but they'll still censor it. (Score:1, Flamebait)
So while you will still be able to pick up your buddies favorite curry recipe, anything really interesting or political will go back to being blacklisted.
Awesome.
Re:So, you can blog, but they'll still censor it. (Score:3, Insightful)
NO.
Okay, I lied, there are more words. This was a big fubar on the ISP's part, *NOT* the government. Didn't you RTFA? (I actually decided to, for once.)
Democracy != freedom, but it sure makes it easier. (Score:5, Interesting)
Legitimate Ban (Score:5, Insightful)
Trains in Mumbai (Bombay) were recently bombed in what many people suspect was an act of Islamist terrorism to further the separation/Islamistization of Kashmir.
The blogs in question were inciting violence against India's muslim population in response to the train attacks. The blocking of these blogs were done to prevent the incitement of retalliatory attacks and to prevent the issue from escalating into an unmanageble situation like what is currently happening in Israel/Lebanon. I for one think this is the only legitimate use of censorship and applaud the Indian government for its foresight and action.
Many people fail to realize that India is not only the world's largest democracy and for the most part has a responsible government. Unfortunately, India too often gets lumped in with the Islamist extremests to the west (of India) or the Communist despots to the east (of India).
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:2, Insightful)
Do you know that for a fact? Why didn't government inform about thiTill now the government has not even given an explanation on why each of the sites were banned. Couldn't have said it better than this guy (read carefully why this is
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:2)
India, like many European countries and unlike the US, has no absolute right to free speech; even according to the Article 14 (which defines the Fundamental Right to free speech), there are many conditions under which the right to exercise speech may be abrogated. In an ideological sense, you could say that the Indian Constitution is actually libertarian in spirit, but liberal in character; so within the parameters of Indian legal tradition, it is very much the G
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:2)
Who are the dorks who modded such utterances insightful???
North western border of India has Pakistan which is not "Islamist extremests" (is Germany only "neo-nazis"?).
West Bengal [wikipedia.org] which is to the east of India and the southern state of Kerala has communist parties in power. Both the states are topping in literacy, education, and other welfare related indic
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:2)
No. They. Weren't.
This is simply, completely, utterly untrue.
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:2)
1) Hate Microsoft.
2) Love Linux.
3) Be a Java or C++ code monkey.
4) Live in your parent's basement/grandmother's garage.
5) Not have a steady girlfriend.
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:1)
Do you know that for a fact? Till now the government has not even given an explanation on why each of the sites were banned. I quote from an article, maybe you'll see the light:
Re:Legitimate Ban (Score:1)
But Is censorship justified...? (Score:1)
Re:But Is censorship justified...? (Score:1)
Re:But Is censorship justified...? (Score:1)
(all) blogs were never banned (Score:5, Interesting)
Govt of India never banned all blogs. After terrorist attack in Mumbai, 22 sites were ordered to be blocked to prevent communal hatred and riots. The order was misinterpreted [hindustantimes.com] by ISPs who blocked blogspot.com (this was just a mistake).
I am against all kind of govt censoring (including this). But this ban should not be compared to one in China. The two are fundamentally different as India is a democracy and Indian Constitution provides freedom of expression. But this ban was not unconstitutional as freedom of expression does not allow one to spread opinions of hatred.
Re:(all) blogs were never banned (Score:1)
Cool... (Score:1)
Blogs? We need food! (Score:2)
Re:Blogs? We need food! (Score:2)
Where is the outrage over that?
nice rant (Score:1)
Re:nice rant (Score:1)
PIL not at all like Class Action (Score:1)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:1)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2)
Just out of curiosity, do you really believe that his BMI is more significant than his politics?
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:1)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:1)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2)
You have the right to speak freely using your body, your tools and your property. No law and no politician can change that.
Actually, yes it can. A human being does not have any god-given de-facto right to own property any more than a llama does. It is the law that gives you right to own property, and the law could just as easily take it away.
The only "right" you are born with, the only "right" granted to you by nature, is the right to live, think, and die as you please. Any other "rights" you have are gra
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2)
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:1)
YOU ARE THE LAST PERSON I AM SAYING THIS TO. DEMOCRACY != VOTING. Democracy = the ability for the people to decide their governmental actions. Thus this was an action of democracy, not the free market. Free marketeers really have very little to gain from preventing the censorship of a myspace or blogger
Re:Proof of the market versus democracy (Score:2)
Add more freedom, you allow imposition. Take more freedom, and that is an imposition. Libertarian anarchy sits precisely where the curve crosses the zero.
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow, I have never seen a more rhetorical question from a guy who comes from India and is apparently settled in US (visit his website [tripod.com]). Somehow I feel that you are one of those millions of Indians in US who feels they care about their country and express it in soulless words. If you were all that concerned, you wouldn't be waving racing flags at Nascar races, but instead be in India and help the poor in that country get education or something goddamit.
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:1)
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:1, Insightful)
First, you should not look at the percentage of 1 billion but actual numbers. If 2 million people (or 20 lakhs as we call it) read the blogs, then its lot of people who are affected. Also, you seemed to miss my point. This is not just about blogs. Its a slippery slope when it comes to freedom of press. Yes, blogs are the least influential media and if there is no resistance next will be local cable channel political programs and then governemnt will move up to mainstream news and news papers.
Also I want
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:2)
Numbers don't tell you anything about impact. Recent experience tells us that blogs are one of the best ways in organizing people; consider how blogs disseminated information during the 2004 tsunami, or the Mumbai blasts.
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:1)
Re:Now that the ban on blogs has been lifted ... (Score:1)
Re:India & China (Score:2)
Yeah, or the difference between India and America...
Re:India & China (Score:2)
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
Re:India & China (Score:1)
Re:A government (Score:2)