MySpace Users Revolt Against Murdoch 393
arclightfire writes "Looks like Murdoch's News International have stired up a revolt within users of the MySpace file-sharing site they purchased for $629m (£355m) last July, reports the Independent; "Angry members of MySpace, the personal file-sharing website for young adults, are accusing Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation of censoring their postings and blocking their access to rival sites. The 38 million subscribers to MySpace...discovered that when they wrote to each other about rival video-swapping site YouTube, the words were automatically deleted, and attempts to download video images from YouTube led to blank screens. The intervention by News Corp in the traditionally open-access world of the web - in particular the alteration of personal user profiles - provoked a storm of angry posts...The protests gathered pace, and when 600 MySpace customers complained and a campaign began to boycott the site and relocate to rival sites such as Friendster, Linkedin, revver.com and Facebook.com, News Corp relented and restored the links.""
Net free? (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously.
just a minute (Score:4, Insightful)
Wouldn't the world actually be a BETTER place if all the users revolted, and the site shut down altogether?
Communities (Score:5, Insightful)
So much for corporations being less in control at the hands of the communities.
Way to go, MySpace users! (Score:4, Insightful)
"Freedom of Speech" (Score:4, Insightful)
"My Space." That's funny.
Re:Net free? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Way to go, MySpace users! (Score:5, Insightful)
The dot com bubble taught us one thing ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Communities (Score:2, Insightful)
Stop being so cheap (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Stop being so cheap (Score:2, Insightful)
My hat's off to the MySpace users for thier democratic approach. Sometimes it works, Note to selves though, MURDOCH=FOX=FNC=Very Large Corp=Very Right Republican. Not always the best friend to the youth and their movements.
Easy to keep an eye on things when all on your servers it is.
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJR J8OVF&b=122948 [americanprogress.org]
Who is Rupert Murdoch?
How one right-wing billionaire uses his business and media empire to pursue a partisan agenda at the expense of democracy.
Re:What's with all the Independent lifted stories? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Shut it down (Score:5, Insightful)
A social network imitating society.. what are the odds?
Re:Way to go, MySpace users! -- All in Vain (Score:2, Insightful)
Then they pile on some fried chicken and 400calorie dressing. And charge you more by unit weight for it than just about anything else on the menu.
--Compulsion
Re:File Sharing? (Score:2, Insightful)
As stupid as I think the censorship of the internet is, it IS the site of the corporation. They can limit what you do on the site.
Oh well, more reason for me to steer clear of the stupid community.
Re:Shut it down (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Er... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Net free? (Score:3, Insightful)
No one said that... The saying goes, "The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."
Clearly this is one of those times.
Of course, had there never been censorship on the net then there wouldn't be any of this routing.
Re:Shut it down (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Way to go, MySpace users! -- All in Vain (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:File Sharing? (Score:3, Insightful)
What you say it true and I have been modded down to -1 for pointing this out in the past. At the same time trying not to be evil is also a great way of winning people over. When a company takes an anti-social tactic on a social site, then people will get unnerved and feel upset about it. Censorship is a great way of scaring people off, especially if you did not indicate clearly that it was one of the rules of the site.
The other problem is we see companys say one thing and then saying the opposite in the small print. I get fed up with small print licenses that I need a lawyer to decipher. How about providing some of that info in a FAQ?
Re:just a minute (Score:3, Insightful)
True, it shows a remarkable lack of taste in most pretty young girls' minds, but there are always the rare exceptions.
I admire myspace because it gives people what they really want, not what marketers say they want and not what software developers say they want. They want to be able to use any color in the world and they can. They want to put horrible music up on their profiles and so they can.
"People Power" made myspace and people power can destroy it. It looks like Murdoch's people are sending it straight down the tubes.
I hope Tom cashed the check.
D
Re:Stop being so cheap (Score:4, Insightful)
You want to set up your own site on your own domain/hosting, go right ahead. Good luck getting any visitors. You want to make contact with new people, communicate with them, set up a virtual social network of people who you can later meet up with in real life, well you need something like MySpace. It's the users, stupid. Oh, and you get to discover cool new bands as well.
And another thing - is the irony of a lot of Slashdot users making fun of a lot of "12-year-old goth" MySpace users lost on everyone but me? I frequent both sites, and let me tell you, MySpace has a LOT more "normal" people on it than Slashdot.
So in summary, shut up.
Re:File Sharing? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who's the bigger losers: the people who post on MySpace, or the people who take the time to troll around MySpace for pictures of people to ridicule?
Re:Communities (Score:2, Insightful)
And the corporation still won't explain why it censored, or what the criteria for censorship is.
And the corporation deleted the blogs covering the subject. No explanation. One can only conclude that any content that the corporation interprets as objectionable will be deleted, with no notice and no explanation.
A state of terror doesn't exist when everyone is being nailed. It can happen to only a few, and then everyone else learns the lesson, internalizes the fact that they must watch what they say, watch what they do, or SOMEthing might happen. People automagically line up in ranks for very little reason, something Goebbels and Hitler knew well. McCarthy knew how it worked, and so did Nixon and Bush II.
The users are NOT in control there.
Huey Long, I think, once said that fascism would come to America (extend it to the world, same idea), but people would call it democracy. If there's no place to speak, freedom of speech is de facto curtailed, if not dead.
Boots marching, boots marching...
Murdoch was this administration's Hearst. He doesn't enjoy freedom of speech when others are practicing it. He thinks it so precious that he thinks only he can use it safely.
Free market concept: no regulations vs competition (Score:3, Insightful)
Customers of Company A (MySpace) don't get what they want. Company B (and C and D and E, etc) offer a better product. Customers complain, customers change hands. Company A either listens to the mass choice making going on, or they go out of business.
Isn't freedom awesome? Hundreds of thousands of people who don't even know each other are able to make a decision together without actually having to decide on what they want. The desires of the masses is met by open competition, not forced by regulations.
Up until 15 years ago, I could understand the regulations debate. Now that the Internet allows millions (billions) to review companies on a whim (and soon via WAP and SMS), the need to regulate would be better covered by more competition. Regulations raise the cost of entry to a market, decreasing competition, decreasing choice, and increasing prices.
We've attained perfection? (Score:2, Insightful)
Before you go speaking in generalizations about everyone who uses is site, even if they are by and large scene kids with poor taste in music who take bad photos, remember that the road goes both ways. There are plenty of useless trolls on Slashdot that you wouldn't want to be judged with, and there are scores of people on Myspace who feel the same way about all the people you're mocking them with.
Re:Shut it down (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh, and hacking your son's private stuff is also a great lesson on trust. My father pulled that stunt too and it cost him bitter tears of regret a few years after the fact. I hope your son educates himself on the practical uses of cryptography and cuts you off from his digital life as he probably already did from his "real" life.
Motorcycle Stunts? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm probably wrong, but (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Net free? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Er... (Score:3, Insightful)
I've never been to MySpace, but I know a LOT of girls with Livejournals, versus a handful of guys. I think it's the social aspect.
And yes, if you look at teenagers' livejournals as an aggregate, most of them are pretty similar, because the amount of unique experiences in a teenager's life is generally far outweighed by the normal ones.
Re:just a minute (Score:5, Insightful)
Myspace is a social networking site, and is introducing millions of kids to the ability to create their own web sites, code/design, and get online in general. There's a ton of crap there, just like there's a ton of crap on fark, and slashdot, and the internet as a whole. But the elitist "wow, we hate it because it seems shallow to us" attitude is unproductive and mean spirited.