Do Not Call List Under Attack 599
smooth wombat writes "Do Not Call. Those words are music to millions of Americans who have signed up for the list so they're not bothered by telemarketers. Not content to let things as they are telemarketers are now lobbying the FCC to have state laws which regulate the practice overturned. In April an ad-hoc group of firms ranging from the Direct Marketing Association to the National Children's Cancer Society filed a joint petition asking the FCC to declare that it has 'exclusive jurisdiction over interstate telemarketing calls.' The issue revolves around some states whose Do Not Call laws are more strict than Federal law and which prohibit telemarketers from calling anyone on a Do Not Call, regardless of an existing business relationship." Update: 07/21 18:42 GMT by Z : Official EPIC page, with contact info and background.
This could be VERY bad (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This could be VERY bad (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:This could be VERY bad (Score:5, Funny)
Exactly. Which is why I think there could soon be a market for the Do-Not-Call-Air-Horn ! Get your now, before supplies run out!
Re:This could be VERY bad (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe they can convince you. (Score:4, Funny)
wow, that's a really weird analogy. Time for my morning coffee.
I wonder.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~egbg/counterscript.html [xs4all.nl]
I keep a copy at the phone. If I don't have time for it I just hang up on them instead.
Really is fun. Two memorable calls:
1) I got yelled at by a super about wasting their time.
2) Some girl broke down at the "why are you doing it then" and started crying. I got uncomfortable and hung up on her
-nB
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~egbg/counterscript.html [xs4all.nl]
-nB
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
They send me emails that are barely legible, so that they can try to get around the spam filters I have set up. Do they really think, that if I've gone to that much trouble to block them, that if they do manage to get through, I will even give the spam a second glance?
These people need to get hit with the clue stick, and hard.
Re:I wonder.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Let's say I'm a tech-novice. To me, those emails look like the work of a semi-literate. Would I really want to buy medicine from them?
As a techie, I can see that they are dliberately trying to bypass spam filters which means that I instantly disregard their email.
Funny email arrived recently claiming to be from Wells Fargo. Of course I don't even have a Wells Fargo account but even if I did, would I really be tricked since they spelt their own company name as 'Wells Forgo'?
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Interesting)
It seems they want people in the habit of going to the web site instead of following links - thus fake emails with fake links won't work (one hopes, but many people, even with online banking, are clueless t00ls).
Re:I wonder.. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Some guy has some crap to sell.
A spammer offers to reach "3,000,000" e-mail addresses with e-mail marketing for a single flat fee. No promises are made about who is getting it, or if they are at all receptive.
The spammer could chose to write in a way which doesn't duck around word filters or pretend to be a "Re: Dinner tonight" message from some hottie... and that would mean that the
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Insightful)
How dare you not recognize the legitimate and in no way phony "existing business relationship". How do you expect Bruno's Mortgage and High Interest Loans to not communicate with you, their (possible, potential, maybe if they're drunk when we call, three times removed) customer?
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Funny)
I think it's the "NOT". They seem to have no problems at all with "DO CALL".
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Perhaps my logic is wrong- but wouldn't telemarketers like the DNC because it would save them wasted calls? I mean, if people sign up for the DNC, doesn't it mean that they hate getting these calls and would never buy anything from them?
It is like spam- if no one bought anything from these "tele-spammers," maybe they would go away....
My solution- one of those air horns people have at sporting events. My grandmother had one for obscene callers (Those over 25 remember obscene callers, in the days before caller ID when tracing a call meant "pulling the Logs"), she would toot the horn into the reciever- this really would hurt someone's ear drums....
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Whoa, politicians may be self serving assholes, but that exception makes 100% perfect sense, for legal reasons. Quite simply, it'd almost undoubtably be a huge violation of the first amendment in the US to pass a law which says "you can't phone people and promote your political views", and I can certainly understand it. Yes, politicians are assholes, but ba
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Interesting)
How so? While they certainly have every right to stand on a street corner and state their views (provided they don't violate any noise ordinances) they have *NO* right to interrupt me, use my phone's electricity, etc...
Just because they have a right to talk, doesn't mean I *have* to listen. And by calling me, they are forcing me to do that. Even if it's just long enough for me to realize who they are and hang up on them.
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Interesting)
when will telemarketers try to slip in a 'Vote Bob' at the intro then go into their pitch? is that then political speech?
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Free speech is restricted. Call your ex girlfriend 30 times tommorow and see if the poilce show up at your door...
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Insightful)
No, that's probably not harassing.
Call your ex girlfriend 30 times tommorow and see if the poilce show up at your door...
That's probably harassing.
Free speech is restricted.
Not nearly so much as you seem to think, and ideally virtually (or absolutely) not at all. Far better to have an absolute first amendment, I think, than to have a bunch of holes in it.
Re:I wonder.. (Score:3, Interesting)
I just configured my Asterisk phone system to filter all toll free numbers (800,888, etc.), unknown and blocked numbers, and obviously fake numbers (000-000-0000) where the caller has to "press 5" to get through.
In addition, I have a blacklist of annoying callers that just get a recorded message, and calls outside normal hours just go direct to voicemail unless it's a known family member.
This has reduced my
Re:I wonder.. (Score:4, Funny)
"Please hold while we transfer you to the call handling system"
*cheesy music*
"Please hold. You are in a queue. We value your call and it's potential to offer us a great deal.
*cheesy music*
"You are now connected to the incoming call system - please hold"
*cheesy music*
"If you would like to talk to a human being press 1"
"Thankyou for you interest. Please hold while we transfer you to the call spooler"
*cheesy music*
"All call-lines are currently in use, please hold until one becomes open. We value your call"
*cheesy music*
"You have been transferred to the call spooling system. Please hold"
*cheesy music*
"You have been indentified as a telemarketer. Calls from telemarketers are prevented from direct contact to prevent abuse. Press 1 to leave a message"
"Thankyou for opting to leave a message. We will now transfer you to the messaging system. Please hold."
*cheesy music*
"Welcome to the messaging system. To record your message press 1"
"Please hold while we format the message-space"
*cheesy music*
"Please leave your message after the fifteenth beep"
beep.beep.beep.beep.beep.beep.beep.beep.beep.be
(1 second pause)
beep.
"You didn't leave a a message. We are now transferring you to the call handling system"
ad infinitum. If you can get a premium rate number, all the better.
Re:I wonder.. (Score:5, Insightful)
You're the one that has it wrong. They understand perfectly. They don't want to obey your wishes.
Re:I wonder.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Well, here's the thing, why do they even WANT to call you? If I were a telemarketer, I'd love do not call lists. Those lists would save me an awful lot of money calling people who are virtually guaranteed to not buy anything.
It's like, "Here, these people don't want to be your customers. They won't buy anything from you. If you call them, you will be wasting time and money." And the idiots whine, "Noooo! But I WANT to call them!!! Surely my slick salesmen can talk them into SOMETHING!!"
Man, I'd love a list like that. Talk about targeted marketing. These dorks don't seem to get it...
Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Insightful)
Tough shit if the only acceptable broadband Internet option is DSL, right?
While I use my mobile phone for long distance calling and only have the landline as required for DSL service I should still have to suffer with telemarketing calls because they whined to the FCC?
The American public whined far longer to get the DNC lists enacted. Now that we are comfortable we should lose them and have to move to mobile phones and no br
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
That probably wouldn't change the fact that you'd still have to pay for a residential land-line you never used.
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
I agree, but that's the fault of the greedy phone companies who force you to buy residential service to get DSL, although there's no technical reason you need a full fledged residential phone line just to use DSL on it.
I currently use Cable Internet instead of DSL for exactly this reason.
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Informative)
Anything I fill out, that requires a phone number, I use the landline number. The only thing on the line is an answering machine (that doesn't have a phone, so no ringer) and a fax machine. I am never bothered, and amazingly get very few messages.
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
For now, at least. (Score:3, Insightful)
I moved and did not get a landline phone in my new abode. It's illegal for marketing types to call my cellular phone
If these bottom-feeders manage to get the DNC laws overturned, what makes you think they won't then start whining^Wlobbying about how unfair it is that they can't call cell phones?
Re:For now, at least. (Score:2)
(and this is perhaps a good argument for why cell phones should remain measured rate indefinitely)
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:3, Insightful)
You know that the telemarketing industry is trying very hard to "fix" this "loophole". With out being able to contact people on cellphones, how can they do proper political opinion (and push) polls? How can legitimate companies keep in contact with their customers? This is all very damaging to the US economy. You can't trample on the people's rights to polit
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
No, it'll be "Only terrorists would want to hide like that.
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
Are you familiar with the concept of targeted marketing? The "customer" is very much considered a victim to be attacked from the marketing perspective. The goal of targeted marketing is to maximize the body count. You're a wallet with their money as far as they're concerned.
Re:Doesn't bother me anymore (Score:2)
Stay off my phone! (Score:4, Interesting)
Wah! I can't bother people and piss them off during dinner, quiet evenings, and fill up their answering machines with partial recordings not knowing how long the machine's message was.
Businesses are busy scrambling to create new and interesting ways to get your phone number so that they, and their subsidiaries and sister companies, can contact you with their telemarketers. Companies telling me that they cannot process an order without my telephone number, companies telling their employees that they must take a telephone number down for pickup orders placed over the phone, and requiring a phone number to ship a package [lazylightning.org]. Most employees are doing their job and refuse you service (which is a company's right to do at any time) but I find it increasingly annoying. I'll do anything to not give out my phone number including asking for a supervisor, giving out a phone number with the area code and all zeroes, or just giving the switch board number out at work.
I really have no sympathy for companies that are crying to the FCC about this. The public had been whining to the FCC for how many years to get telemarketers to stop? They finally did, creating a list that the telemarketers can reference to narrow their endless search of a customer to people that might be interested in their products, and they still complain?
Give me a break and stay off my phone.
Re:Stay off my phone! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Stay off my phone! (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, I think this is a very reasonable question that needs to be addressed. If I have a company (and calling center) operating out of Minnesota and we have customers/former customers scattered around the country, I don't want to have to keep up on the particulars of laws in 49 other states
He obviously was born before it took effect (Score:4, Insightful)
More Feds (Score:5, Insightful)
/sarcasm.
8:00am wakeup (Score:4, Interesting)
--
Check out the Uncyclopedia.org
The only wiki source for politically incorrect non-information about things like Kitten Huffing [uncyclopedia.org] and Pong! the Movie [uncyclopedia.org]!
Good Afternoon, How Are You? (Score:5, Funny)
On top of that, as one of our lucky winners, you're eligible to recieve outrageous discounts on subscriptions to all your favorite magazines! Exciting, huh? Which magazines do you like to read? Entertainment Weekly? Sports Digest? TV Guide?
Clearly for Federal Regulation (Score:5, Insightful)
Better to have one federal law to simplify things.
And I still wonder, why do those telemarketers want to call me if I'm on this list. Seems like they are being done a service here. I'm not going to buy their crap so no sense wasting time on a call.
no. no... we need international laws (Score:3, Funny)
the marketing firms will find arguments to postpone laws that make it harder for them to harrass customers. when the do not call list went into law, all the dish and satellite calls stopped comming from new york, and started comming from Canada. who do i sue to stop those calls? do i sue AT&T?
i can appreciate the argument for a federal law regulating telemarketing. but mayb
Re:Clearly for Federal Regulation (Score:2)
Many people feel the federal law is inadequate - it doesn't affect charities, political organizations, or surveys, and any company you have an "existing business relationship" with. Many state laws take care of these gaps, but elminating them at the federal level would be an easy way to nullify their effects.
And I still wonder, why do those telemarketers want to call me if I'm on this list. Seems like they are being done a service here. I'm not going to
Re:Clearly for Federal Regulation (Score:2)
Except telemarketers probably have POPs in each state (each area code even) to avoid long distance fees. Technically, they're doing business in every state. They just want it both ways.
Re:Clearly for Federal Regulation (Score:2)
Incredible (Score:5, Insightful)
How is it possible that a democratic governing body, which is supposed to be looking out for the people, is taking a direct stance against them? Which American citizens are rallying against the DNC list?
Yet more sad evidence that the government is more concerned with corporate interests than those of the people.
Re:Incredible (Score:3, Insightful)
Max
It is called harrasment (Score:5, Interesting)
The law we need even more than "DO Not Call" is a law which says "You can not sell data about people unless that person gives you consent". There must be a way to opt out of having your information added to a sales list. For example, how can anyone opt out of the bank sales lists? Banks are well known for taking their clients data, and selling that information to credit card companies. Credit card companies use this information to mail solicitations for their services.
Likewise, when I go buy a DVD from a store, why do they need my phone number? They want to sell that information to someone, here is a good lead for a guy who buys DVD's?
The Do Not Call list is a great start, but consumers need more protection from harrasment. We need our information kept confidential. When we do buisness with a company, the company should not be allowed to sneak some fine print in the contract which allows data to be sold. God knows what rights I signed away when I applied for my grocery store shoppers card.
And did anyone here about the lawsuit against the company that made the small gadget you connect to your phone line. When you get a call, the device lets out some small noises. These are noises the phone companies use to signify a line is disconnected. Marketing companies that use computerized auto-dialers recognize these noises and immediatly hang up. The marketing associations sued the company of this product saying it violated the marketing companies first amendment rights.
And while we are making laws protecting consumers, lets do away with the mail in rebate.
Re:It is called harrasment (Score:3, Interesting)
If you don't like these things, give them bad information. Memorize the address of a crack house and the phone number of your local police department's fraud bureau. Nobody checks this information before reselling it. The more the databases are poisoned, the less value the data will have.
Re:It is called harrasment (Score:4, Interesting)
Can't say I've been to Radio Shack much, but the last time I went was to pick up a $9 cable while I was out running some errands. Went up to the counter, plunked down the cable and a $10 bill, and spent the next five minutes telling the obnoxious little shit at the register that he wasn't ever going to get my name and phone number no matter what he argued. This conversation wouldn't even have lasted that long had I not been startled and more than a bit confused over why the snot-nosed punk was asking for personal information when CASH was sitting on the counter.
Finally it came down to me telling him to either sell me the damn cable right then and there, or forget about the sale altogether. I walked out with both the cable and the resolve to never, ever set foot in a Radio Shack again, anywhere, for any reason. And I haven't.
Perhaps there aren't enough folks like me to make much of a difference, but when a company pisses me I tend to boycott it - forever. And that includes companies who've called my home when I've expressly told them to piss off and never bother me again. I eventually ended up terminating my land-line service, but not before a number of companies ended up on the Eternal Shit List (e.g., AT&T).
Max
Attention DMA.... (Score:5, Insightful)
The FCC has no power to overturn state laws or find them unconstitutional, this is the Supreme Court's job.
The FCC is not the way to go. Lobby Congress.
And watch how they laugh in your face as they think "I don't want these whiny bastards calling me everyday trying to get my money that I just weaseled from the taxpayers."
Re:Attention DMA.... (Score:2)
They are an agency which is given power from Congress to pass and enforce regulations. So they can make "law" so long as it is within the restrictions Congress has placed on them.
Re:Attention DMA.... (Score:2)
they do have a point (Score:2)
Although I have little sympathy for pesky telemarketers they do have a point. It is a burden to have to deal with 50 different state laws. Having a uniform national standard does have a lot of virtues.
Rather than doing what the telemarketers are asking for and relaxing the rules to the lowest common denominator, I wonder if there isn't a straightforward technological solution: create a database containing all of the state rules that telemarketers can use to filter their call lists. When a telemarketer p
Re:they do have a point (Score:2)
And there is the rub. If the telemarketers were looking to deal with this problem then they would go for the straight forward solution. But to be honest most of these companies are really looking to call as many people as possible in as little time possible to pitch products and services...and repeat.. Using this 'problem' as a leve
Consumer products severely lacking! (Score:2)
Uniform standards (Score:3, Interesting)
Re the automated dialing, back when I was a kid and you called a phone # and hung up it was called crank/prank calling and it was a crime. How is their machine dialling different (aside from the fact that kids don't contribute to politicians)?
Re:Uniform standards (Score:2)
I'd be more than happy with a 'No Soliciting' sign to hang on my phone and let that be that. Its something you're allowed to do at private property physical locations, so why not electronic locations?
Business vs People (Score:2)
What part of (Score:3, Funny)
Are these people so F-n brain dead that they can't take a hint? I think the list is way to lame. I think they should have a "will beat your ass if you call" list.
That's right. If you call me to peddle bullshit I will come find you and beat your ass. Now that would be an effective list.
Really, I don't understand why they don't flat out outlaw all telemarketing. It's intrusive and obnoxious at the very least.
Calls aren't like emails at least (Score:5, Funny)
--
Check out the Uncyclopedia.org
The only wiki source for politically incorrect non-information about things like Kitten Huffing [uncyclopedia.org] and Pong! the Movie [uncyclopedia.org]!
Movie quote: I'd RATHER... BE... DEAD! (Score:4, Funny)
He would receive a call from an insurance salesman, and begin saying yes to most things until they arranged an appointment.
Then, after making him waste 2 or more hours, when the insurance salesman was leaving, he'd say:
"There's one little... problem.
I'D RATHER... BE... DEAD!!!" (Then he shut the door on the poor salesman)
Oh joy. How I loved that moment. I know it's cruel, but it vented my frustration towards spammers and the like.
Lobbying (Score:5, Funny)
Charities (Score:5, Informative)
I have blown off PBS because of this!
Re:Charities (Score:5, Informative)
Since then, Samaritan's Purse has spent a hell of a lot more than $5 sending me full color documents printed on nice glossy cardstock, begging for more money. Every couple of weeks I get another one of these in the mail. Now tell me why I'd donate anything more to them when they completely wasted the $5 I gave them? That was supposed to help get my package to the poor little african kid, not be spent begging me for more money.
(yes, I know *my* $5 wasn't used to mail me, but the point is they're massively wasting money, and I'm not going to contribute to that. If I were out begging for money I'd be mailing cheap newsprint once or twice a year, so as to use the money given to me appropriately)
Re:Charities (Score:3, Informative)
Sometimes they'd juxtapose the gift of a delightful teddy bear with a story
State DNC lists are redundant (Score:5, Informative)
I also have the misfortune to need to telemarket in two states, one of which has it's own state list. As it happens, we only call five small towns in this state. In order to get access to the State's DNC list we have to purchase it for the entire state. To make matters worse, this state has a very different set of rules.
On a federal level, you are allowed to call customers you formerly did business with for 18 months after the termination of the business relationship. Not so in this other state. Apparently you aren't allowed to call even the day after the relationship ends. The federal system actually allows the people who get called some recourse. The state system I have to deal with makes it very clear in their fine print that you are allowed a certain amount of accidental calls. Because you are a paying list subscriber, they actually have a department to handle these situations. If you get caught calling people on the state DNC list, you had better have paid the man or else it's game on for lawsuits. What it ends up being is simply extortion. You want to call people of that state, you buy the list, which costs more annually than the entire federal list, for what that's worth.
I really feel sorry for the people who live in that nameless state, because they are payin a ton of taxes to manage a list system that offers them no protection whatsoever. The federal list is a big pain for telemarketers, but at least it has and element of fairness, and really attempts to protect the people who want not to be called.
I'm not interested in arguing the notion of whether the freedom not to be bothered should trump the freedom to call any phone number you want without fear of prosecution, but for the nerds out there, here's some technical details:
The federal list can be downloaded in it's entirety or in updates by date selected once a day by any business who pays the fee. The list is numbers only, no names at all. The state list I have to work with is available by e-mail or on CD-ROM. I picked e-mail, and the updates are entirely at the discretion of the state. So every month or so, my office e-mail gets choked with the list in several parts, so I had to work a special deal with the MIS guys to get extra space on the server. When I first signed up for it, the state didn't send a file until the next scheduled update, but made it clear that we'd be covered in the event of accidentally calling somebody on the list we didn't have access to! Of course almost everybody in the state list is also on the federal list, so we never got a complaint.
I imagine the only people on that state list that are not on the federal list are people looking to sue somebody. They are out there; we've encountered them before. I'm not a fan of telemarketing and would support it if I didn't have to. The federal list makes sense, and really does eliminate any reason for states to keep their own lists, except that grand-daddy of all reasons for government programs - the pork. It's all about the pork, folks. Always has been; always will be.
Good for them (Score:3, Insightful)
Cool, not only do they make it difficult to telemarket in their state, they're probably turning a profit on those that do call in their state.
Looks win win for the citizens to me.
My Tactic (Score:3, Funny)
I always tell marketers to "hold on" and then I lie the phone down until they hang up. It usually takes about 60 seconds. I figure that if everybody would do that, then it would make the practice unprofitable and they'd stop.
Previous business relationship termination? (Score:3, Interesting)
Could you state to one of the harrassing business' callers that you have "terminated the business relationship" and have that be enough? How can you create a "do not cross this line", after online purschase for example?
Re:Previous business relationship termination? (Score:3, Informative)
You could also organize a protest outside their place of business, if you're feeling peckish.
oops (Score:3, Interesting)
I truly didn't have an answer for him. That is, until he started getting calls to donate for a firemans' ball in another county (where he once had a speeding ticket). Then it was a policemans' ticket raffle in our county, then there was the half dozen calls for the American Heart Association. I think it was the worst though when the CDC called on a "marketing study". Last but not least, I saw a paper survey from the US Postal service. Call it coincidence.
Ironically, he still gets credit card calls, mostly from Puerto Rico or some other location where I suppose this doesn't apply. He told the last one he was on the do not call list, and the guy promptly took him off.
I asked what the policeman said who called about the raffle, "We don't have a list to take you off of." That was last year.
He got another call from the same officer last week. It's a small county/town too, so there really is no excusing it. He told me (over the phone) he was just going to buy a cell for my youngest sister and remove the phone.
I told him he'd lose Internet, but he said the phone line would still be there, just not the phone.
I guess drastic times call for
Personal experience (Score:4, Interesting)
We were told to keep the customer on the line, interacting for as long as possible. If they were not interested, we were supposed to weasel more 'leads' out of them; meaning we asked them for the names/phone numbers of their friends that might be interested. This constitutes a business-relationship which we could exploit.
Another business-relationship was when we'd call everyone within 20-25 miles of our recent customer. The sales pitch went like:
Hello, this is X calling from Y. Your neighbor, Z, living at Z has recently purchased our product and since we're in the area, we're offering special discounts....
We'd use their address and names to get their neighbors to start listening to us.
When we got somebody that was obnoxious, or just didnt like that we disturbed them, we'd often set them up to be called back in the next few hours. Asking for a supervisor most often yields a hang-up as well. What we were supposed to do is fill out a form stating that the customer didnt want to be called back but since it takes a second to press the 'next' button and a lot longer to fill out a form, virtually nobody was taken off.
Actually, even then I dont think it was possible to permanently remove yourself from our list - even with the form you'd get maybe a few months of respite but after a while, all these forms were just added back to our database. Although this was before the DNR, I cant imagine anything's changed.
Business Relationship In a Pig's Eye (Score:3, Interesting)
I actually wandered into your store (online or otherwise) and bought something. You call it a business relationship. I call it a purchase.
DO NOT CALL ME at me home because I bought cheetos from you. DO NOT START SPAMMING me left and right because I bought something from your online store AND for heaven's sake don't start sending junk mailto my house! And what's worse, don't give my name to all YOUR FRIENDS (people who paid for you to give up my info) and have them start calling me, spamming me, and sending me crap!
You are not my business partner just because I bought something from you once or twice and you certainly aren't entitled to anything from me but fair payment for what I bought.
If I want to buy something else from you, I'll find you or one of your "friends". Otherwise, LEAVE ME ALONE.
Re:worth while calls (Score:2)
Re:worth while calls (Score:2)
Unfortunately "Asian Amputee Lesbians Shaving Each Other Monthly" doesn't try to get subcribers via telemarketing.
Re:Why no marketing on cell phones? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It alarms me (Score:2)
That would be easy if they had write access to the database. The problem is that this database is read-only and (most of the time) does not even belong to them (like a huge spam list provided by another more specialized company).
Re:It alarms me (Score:2)
Since you don't seem to mind I'll make sure to set a modem and computer up to call you at all kinds of odd hours and let you listen to all kinds of
Re:It alarms me (Score:2)
Re:It alarms me (Score:2)
I get riled up over the inability of the telemarketers to accept it when I say "Thanks, not interested, take me off your list.". After telling the same company that 18 times in one month, it gets a tad old.
Re:Your right to swing your fist.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Get the landline, for 911 only. It is federally mandated to be free. I have the landline with that alone on it. I recently got a phone number on it for DSL, and I'm in the process of working out what I need to do to keep the DSL, but go back to 911-only service. Then I can use my local 911 with asterisk, have a plain old "red phone" for 911-only calls in case asterisk goes down, and I get my DSL service.
Re:I cant be the only one thats ever wondered (Score:2)
These people actually ENCOURAGED deceptive practices to get people to agree to have these extortionate fees on their store credit card, the axiom being "they can always cancel later". "Little old ladies" were the best,
Re:Simple Solution (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Simple Solution (Score:4, Funny)
1. Age
2. Name
3. Sex [usually obvious]
4. Location [ask them tough questions about the locale]
Those are the easy ones, here are more fun ones
5. How long and many breaks do they get
6. Salary
7. Benefits
8. When their last holiday was
9. What school they went/go to
10. Whether they think this is a worthwhile job
11. The name of the last person they called
12. The name of the person next to them
13. The first 4 digits of their phone number [home]
and so on...
keep a scorecard handy and see how much you can get.
Tom