California Wants GPS Tracking Device in Every Car 1351
HTS Member writes "California has a new excuse for more taxes. Claiming losses due to fuel-efficient cars, such as Gasoline/Electric Hybrids, California is cooking-up a new system to punish people who aren't using enough gasoline. They want to tax commuters by the mile. How would this be accomplished? By requiring everyone to install a GPS device in their vehicle, and charge them their "taxes" every time they fuel-up. From the article: 'Drivers will get charged for how many miles they use the roads, and it's as simple as that.. [a] team at Oregon State University equipped a test car with a global positioning device to keep track of its mileage. Eventually, every car would need one.'"
Written warning for violating Slashdot dupe law! (Score:5, Funny)
November 17, 2004 [slashdot.org] was your first offense. A warning was sent via email prior to the story posting on February 15th, 2005 at 2:39pm CST but daddypants ignored our notification.
Please note that future violations will result in a hefty fine!
Tin Foil Hat for the GPS (Score:5, Funny)
Brilliant! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Patriot Act (Score:5, Funny)
I can see it now, you get to the petrol pump and it says
Welcome to Texaco
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Your total bill including fuel, taxes and fines is $600.
Please insert your credit card here.
Re:Patriot Act (Score:5, Funny)
I have one word for them (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Tin Foil Hat for the GPS (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah? So I mow the lawn a lot.
faraday car (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:5, Funny)
But how would that allow them to accomplish their real goal of tracking you everywhere you go?
Re:Obviously (Score:5, Funny)
Goon2: Right you are. Let's start taxing based on mileage instead.
Goon3: Well that just sucks. You could drive half your miles in Arizona and get taxed in CA for that.
Goon1: Good point. Any solution to that?
Goon2: Well, I own stock in this company that has a lot of IPR in GPS equipment...
Goon3: How can I get in on that?
Goon1: Hold it! Let's *all* call our brokers before we go any further. We'll meet back next week.
Week passes...
Goon1: Ok. I propose we force everyone to install GPS modules into their cars.
Goon3: I second!
Goon4: Really? Isn't that just adding a horrendous one time tax to all car buyers? Increasing the number of goons needed to police the system...
Goon5: Hey! I'm one of those goons.
Goon4: Oh yeah. Sorry 5.. I know you'd never make it in the private sector. I guess I'll vote for it.
Goon3: Anyone worried about the people getting pissed?
All Goons: Laughter...
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:4, Funny)
For a second there, I thought your next words were going to be, "quick, Vyvyan! eat the telly!"
My favorite entry from the last coverage of this (Score:1, Funny)
Existing technology (Score:4, Funny)
If they're really just interested in taxing by the mile, check the milage each year as part of the safety/smog inspection and charge accordingly.
Not to mention the inaccuracy or GPS.. If a car suddenly appears to jump 70 miles due to interference, will the driver be charged for that? And I guess it's free miles when solar flares drown out the GPS signals? Come to think of it, I like the idea of GPS much better than an odometer.. "I'm not sure who keeps stealing my antenna, officer. Damn kids."
Robbery (Score:4, Funny)
Watch out, Norway (Score:1, Funny)
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:5, Funny)
Are you a terrorist? All that time we spent crushing innocent women and children heads in Iraq to steal their oil, now you should have the goddamn decency to buy that fucking fuel, at the price of our choosing. Why do you hate our troops?
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:2, Funny)
The bottom line? The same-ish number of people smoke and cause themselves harm, but smoke somewhat less than before, maybe about 20% fewer cigarettes.
That's not what's happening. People are smoking just as much, they're just being more resourceful.
Ever time taxes go up, a new batch of smokers discover the joy of buying tax free over the internet. Some of them may actually end up smoking more, because their smokes are now so much cheaper.
And then the state spends money trying to vilify these citizens, who are simply throwing their own tea party, and recover the "lost" taxes that they never would have lost in the first place if they hadn't been so greedy.
Re:A lot less invasive (Score:5, Funny)
This is California we're talking about.
Re:1) Dupe of a dupe. 2) Stupid. 3) Corrupt. (Score:3, Funny)
> Let me guess, you were so much happier back when the president was a pot smoker?
Well, he probably was...