Do-Not-Call Registry Coming to Canada 37
The Fred writes "The Globe and Mail reports that the Canadian federal government is looking to devise a national do-not-call registry to match the US attempt. Issues regarding the impact on charities are being analyzed."
Re:Charities probably will be ok (Score:1)
Surely it doesn't cost $70 per person.
It would make sense to charge telemarketers for the cost of running it. Since it would make sense, I seriously doubt this is how its actually funded.
Telemarketers for charities == phone spammers (Score:3, Informative)
The overhead for telemarketing for charities is horrendous - something like 60 - 90% goes to the telemarketers. Avoid them at all cost.
And for those who don't believe it, here's a link http://http//www.forces.org/evidence [http]
Fixed link (Score:2)
Re:Fixed link (Score:2)
Oh, well ... maybe one day they'll fix it.
Re:Charities probably will be ok (Score:2)
To be honest, since moving away from Toronto two years ago, the number of unsolicited calls have dropped significantly. I like the idea, it's just as strong of a motivator for me to worry about where I currently live.
That said, I can completely understand your point - calling me during regular supper hour is just plain annoying. (Having supper at 8 or 9PM is more understandable interruption.) And, as it's your money, you can choose your basis for supporting/not supporting causes completely as you see fi
Will this stop annoying autodialers? (Score:2)
Nothing like running for the phone, only to get dead air and a "click".
Re:Will this stop annoying autodialers? (Score:2)
Re:Will this stop annoying autodialers? (Score:1)
tell them to move you to their internal do not call list
Yeah, I've done this quite a few times. I keep one of those lists by the phone that runs you through all of the things to say, regarding call lists, parent-company lists, etc. It's had a bit of an effect, and has reduced the number of calls I get, but I still get too many for my liking. Maybe I've pissed somebody off, and they're signing me up. Who knows?
Also try the CMA do not call list
Well, I moved into the new place in June, and added my
Here's why it takes months (Score:1)
I've no idea how frequently these books were replaced, but it didn't happen in the two months that I was working there. There was no training to speak of; if you'd asked not to be called again you would hav
Re:Will this stop annoying autodialers? (Score:1)
It's usually just outdated information. I've had one on occasion someone had the name of the previous owner of my parents place and she hadn't lived there for 10 years.
Presumably
Re:Will this stop annoying autodialers? (Score:1)
see, are you sure you don't have a stalker?
Charities (Score:2)
> Issues regarding the impact on charities are being analyzed.
So if a group decides that they solicit for a "noble cause"(*) they can bother me whenever they want?
(*)
Miracle Max: You got any money?
Inigo Montoya: Sixty-five.
Miracle Max: I've never worked for so little. Except once, and that was a very noble cause.
Inigo Montoya: This is noble, sir. His wife is... crippled. His children are on the brink of starvation.
Miracle Max: Are *you* a rotten liar.
Inigo Montoya: I need him to help avenge my father
Yay Eh! (Score:1)
So... ? (Score:1)
Re:So... ? (Score:2)
You'd think that their left hand would know what their right hand was doing. You'd think wrong.
CMA already has a do-not-call list (Score:3, Informative)
They are pissed off [the-cma.org] that marketeers who do not belong to their organization are not required to do the same.
Re:CMA already has a do-not-call list (Score:1)
On a similar note, I received a telemarketing call from one of the Big Banks (tm), CIBC actually, and when I asked that I be put on their Do-Not-call list the saleswoman was very helpful and gave me instructions on how to be put on the CMA DNC list. Actually made me want to do business with them, except I won't respond through those channels.
You can have my phone number... (Score:2, Insightful)
... when you pry it from my cold, dead Nokia.
I'd love to see a do-not-call registry in this country. However, given the track record of this government, I'll make the following not-so-bold predictions:
Re:You can have my phone number... (Score:2)
Re:You can have my phone number... (Score:1)
If they say it will cost hundreds of millions of dollars, it will cost billions. Even in Canadian currency, that's a fair sum.
You mean like our 2 billion dollar gun registry? [garrybreitkreuz.com]
Advertised cost 2 million. Actual cost? who knows, we're still counting...
Re:You can have my phone number... (Score:1)
It will have Loopholes big enough to (Score:2)
How odd. (Score:2)
Can't see the need to organize this at a government level, given how successful the DMA dnc list is.
Calls from US to UK (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Calls from US to UK (Score:1)
In the states we're used to this kind of problem between states, guess that's why we have a federal goverment to work out the interstate issues.
The rest of the truth ... (Score:2)
If you inform them not to call you, they are required to not call you for a period of at least 3 years!
BUT
No one enforces the law. No one spreads the word that the law even exists.
So, I usually remind the bastards that I have told them not to call, and that they are breaking the law. If its a bank trying to sell credit card insurance I get particularly nasty and
Re:The rest of the truth ... (Score:1)
That's fine for some people. It's a bit of a nuisance if you want to receive a subset of phone calls from people who withold their number. For example, I often get called by agents for potential employers.
Perhaps telemarketers should be obliged to have a number that shows up. Preferably something with a consistent area code.
Simple solution (Score:1)
THE 'DO NOT CALL' LIST IS THE *PHONE BOOK*!
Attempting to post that got me:
Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
But what if you _are_ yelling? And have been doing so for decades.