Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Your Rights Online

39 Web-Service Patents Snatched At Auction 12

JerryP writes "According to this article, an unknown firm called JGR Acquisitions has acquired some 39 patents that apply to a set of key technical protocols known as Web services. The patents offered for sale as part of the liquidation of Commerce One."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

39 Web-Service Patents Snatched At Auction

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I hope this doesn't affect email. Those elderly Koreans will be sorely disappointed.
  • Non-news (Score:2, Insightful)

    Unless we know what patents changed hands, there's not much to see here. And, why would the new owner be any worse than the old to the future of the Internet?
    • Re:Non-news (Score:3, Informative)

      by albalbo ( 33890 )
      Here is a list of patent application numbers:

      http://kwiki.ffii.org/?CommerceOne [ffii.org]

      I think basically they have a load of US patents, and the applications above are the EU applications for the equivalent of what they already have in the US.

      A search on the USPTO database for that company and those inventors would probably yield a list of the Commerce One patents.

      I think some of them are going to be big-bucks patents too, sadly.

      European Patent News: European Council's bad 18th May "agreement" seems to have
  • by St. Arbirix ( 218306 ) <matthew.townsendNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday December 08, 2004 @11:52AM (#11033104) Homepage Journal
    What did they have patents on???

    The article says "web services" about 10 times over and says many companies have been using them license free for ages and yet they won't say exactly what those web services are. If any cover Active Directory or LDAP (personal thing) I'm going to laugh. If any cover XML-RPC or SOAP I'll cry.

    Wait. I wouldn't cry.
    I have an assignment due tomorrow morning and I've been using XML-RPC to get it done. If they hurried up and threatened litigation I could probably get out of it...
  • by Jumbo Jimbo ( 828571 ) on Wednesday December 08, 2004 @11:54AM (#11033127)
    The winning bidder was a company called JGR Acquisitions. An attorney representing JGR was mum about his client, dodging reporters' questions as he rushed out of the court room at the close of the auction.

    snip

    A document the company filed with the court was scarce on information as well, so JGR's business, its owners, its location and its plans for the newly acquired patents all remain mysteries.

    This sparked my curiousity so I googled them so see if there was any info. Not too much, but I came across this piece in the New York times on the same story, which says [nytimes.com]

    Mark X. Mullin, a lawyer for a Dallas law firm representing a company identified as JGR Acquisitions, put forth the winning bid. Mr. Mullin said he would file further details as required by the bankruptcy court.

    The mystery company has a real Mr X working for them (well, kinda stretching it). I was most impressed. Anyway, still couldn't dig up anything on JGR at all.

Every cloud has a silver lining; you should have sold it, and bought titanium.

Working...