Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Your Rights Online

Five Webloggers Jailed In Iran 21

Posted by timothy from the but-everyone-was-doin'-it dept.
Free Speech Geek writes "Reporters Without Borders recently published an article titled 'Five Webloggers Jailed' on their Web site. In this article, they list the names of 5 Iranians who have recently been jailed for no other reason than the fact that they published Web logs that were critical of the government. This story is timely because the UN has recently convened a 'UN Working Group on Internet Governance' and one of their key agenda items seems to be to take over the Domain Name System from ICAAN. One can't help but noting that the Iranian delegate to the UN is on the UN Working Group and conclude that control of the DNS is going to be the next big battleground for freedom of speech." (These arrests follow those reported in mid-October.)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Five Webloggers Jailed In Iran More

Five Webloggers Jailed In Iran

Comments Filter:

  • No fucking way.

    ICANN sucks but the UN is a corrupt and filled with pompous idiots. Next thing you know, the Secretary General's son will own your domain name, and you'll have to pay his Swiss lords a monthly fee to use it.

    I'll take the regular idiots at ICANN, thank you.

    • Next thing you know, the Secretary General's son will own your domain name, and you'll have to pay his Swiss lords a monthly fee to use it.
      Can you give any examples of similer things happening in the past?
      • Can you give any examples of similer things happening in the past?

        Yes.

        The Secertary General's son worked for a Swiss company that was monitoring the Iraq oil-for-food program. The old-for-food program was corrupt, and could be better descriped as an oil-for-palaces program.

        more info [nysun.com]

    • The UN's constituents are governments not people (Score:4, Insightful)

      by FreeUser ( 11483 ) on Wednesday December 01, 2004 @12:34PM (#10964468)
      No fucking way.

      ICANN sucks but the UN is a corrupt and filled with pompous idiots. Next thing you know, the Secretary General's son will own your domain name, and you'll have to pay his Swiss lords a monthly fee to use it.

      I'll take the regular idiots at ICANN, thank you.

      I concurr.

      The UN as a mechanism to facilitate inter-government communication and consensus is invaluable. But it it a profound mistake for anyone to look to the UN for anything more than occasional, unreliable, passing help on any humanitarian issue, be it prevention of disease (by far their best effort of any), prevention of genocide (Dafur, Ruanda, Kosovo, etc.), or freedom.

      People forget that the UN's constituency is governments, not people, and that the majority of those governments are corrupt, repressive, and kill scores of said people. Even if the US were a perfect democracy (it is anything but), its constituents are by and large repressive, corrupt, and often murderous regimes.

      Bush's anti-UN stance is terrible -- the UN is the best mechanism for diplomacy and international consensus there is. But as a world government the UN would be far worse than the Bush regime ... or just about any other regime, for that matter. Food-for-oil scandals, the blind eye being turned toward [insert any of several hundred genocidal atrocities committed by member states over the last fifty years], and the empowerment of governments at every level over that of people, human rights' charter notwithstanding, and you get a taste of what will come should the UN begin to control human issues directly, including that of internet speech vis-a-vis the DNS domain name system.
      • Even if the US were a perfect democracy (it is anything but), its constituents are by and large repressive, corrupt, and often murderous regimes.

        Gurr! That should of course read:

        Even if the UN were a perfect democracy (it is anything but), its constituents are by and large repressive, corrupt, and often murderous regimes.
    • No fucking way.

      ICANN sucks but the UN is a corrupt and filled with pompous idiots. Next thing you know, the Secretary General's son will own your domain name, and you'll have to pay his Swiss lords a monthly fee to use it.

      I'll take the regular idiots at ICANN, thank you.
  • Reading some stuff on the INTERNET, and in the NY Times these days I was under the impression that here in America we were the 'official police state of the world'. Now I see the difference! We don't jail people for there speech. Well at least not yet although I biddy that some people wish we could.

    • Two words (Score:2, Informative)

      by antizeus ( 47491 )
      Sherman Austin [google.com]
      • Sherman Austin admitted to defacing corporate web sites and leaving behind a program that attempted access to military computers. His political views and linking to instructions on making bombs are only part of the case. It is pretty clear that he was involved in illegal activities.
  • I don't see how governing DNS by international body could be any worse than current situation where it is governed by private entity incorporated in US. Remember that PSTN is governed by international body, ITU, and it works.

    One way or another, I don't see a connection between jailing bloggers in Iran and the question of DNS governance. I guess, every opportunity is good to sell your agenda.

    Robert

    PS Is this perhaps something related to "Chewbacca defence"? ;)

    PPS Ceterum censeo Karthaginem esse delendam
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • I think they hae a point. No WAY the UN are taking over ICANN. OK it's not that cool, but the UN? There a bunch of imbociles as far as I'm concerned.

Slashdot Top Deals

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Close