Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Businesses The Almighty Buck Your Rights Online

Buy.com Brags About SN+E-commerce Patents 16

RBAE writes "In an article in InternetRetailer.com, buy.com CEO Scott Blum brags about how they will protect and enforce their (pending) patents that link social networking and e-commerce, so that anyone trying to integrate these two fields will have first to pay them a handsome fee, or else. Mind that buy.com hasn't even started to offer such service, while other sites like Overstock and eGrupos have already launched services integrating ecommerce (online auctions) and social networking. A quote from buy.com's CEO: "We'll stand out with our patents on e-commerce and social networking, and we're big enough to protect them". Finally an interesting way to apply social networking, and Buy.com wants it all for themselves."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Buy.com Brags About SN+E-commerce Patents

Comments Filter:
  • by Naikrovek ( 667 ) <jjohnson&psg,com> on Wednesday October 27, 2004 @12:43PM (#10644305)
    ... if you can't play nice with others, then i'm not going to play with you.

    period.

    good bye, buy.com. i never used you and i never will.
    • then i'm not going to play with you

      You make it all sound so dirty... oh wait, it is!
    • I told them to cancel my account because of this. Here is the text of my letter to them:


      I'd like to cancel my account with buy.com, as I will no longer be ordering from a company that sabre-rattles over using patents. (article reference to slashdot) I am very much against software patents, and find dealing with companies that use patents as a competitive tool to be distateful to deal with.

      I await your instructions on how to remove my account from your records.

      Thank you.

      Got a note today they they

  • buh-buy.com
  • Anyone noticed the recent uptick in screwball get-rich Internet companies?

    There's Google.com. Not screwball, but definitely get-rich Internet. Their stock is still crazy expensive.

    Shopping.com is another one of these IPO's that made big gains in value overnight. And their idea isn't even new - they just allow you to compare prices from many vendor.

    And now this one. They add the patents, but otherwise they are just a get-rich Internet company.

    I think this is Bubble #2.
  • [quote]Don't underestimate the power of social networking," Blum says. "It will be a huge force to reckon with."[/quote]

    So huge, your impending patents will be as a cork on the ocean--by far the influenced, rather than the influencor. You can't kid a kidder, and you can't socially engineer the social engineers (ehrm.. much). Business success may yet be yours however--comsumer whores may yet love your site, and lucky for you they abound.

    * me throws a little karma on the bonfire

    -g

    Cat and Girl on Mora [catandgirl.com]
  • Buy.com Sucks (Score:2, Informative)

    by Jeff321 ( 695543 )
    Lately their service has gone down the drain. Reviews [resellerratings.com]. I speak from firsthand knowledge too. Ordered and they said it wasn't in stock so I cancelled and they sent it anyway, charging me more than the original price because when I cancelled my discount disappeared.
  • Blah blah blah preaching to the converted for attention blah blah.
  • by zymurgy_cat ( 627260 ) on Wednesday October 27, 2004 @03:08PM (#10646182) Homepage
    I wonder how they can patent this when referrer discounts (electronically implemented) would seem like prior art. I can hand out a code from Crutchfield.com. When someone buys a product of enough value, I get a coupon. As for these group discounts, people have already built sites/services where people get together to get a group discount. Then there's the "free X" (iPod, phone, whatever) deal. Put that in your blog, and you've got e-commerce and social networking.

    I fail to see how such a thing is novel, new, or full of such inventiveness as to warrant a patent. Then again, that describes a lot of patents.
  • by Slime-dogg ( 120473 ) on Wednesday October 27, 2004 @03:44PM (#10646618) Journal

    How about E-Bay? An auction requires a social network in order to really be effective, and if it's not E-commerce, I live on Mars. People have their own user accounts on E-Bay, can rate other people, contact info is there, etc. I'd say that is all that's required for a social network, no?

Single tasking: Just Say No.

Working...