Buy.com Brags About SN+E-commerce Patents 16
RBAE writes "In an article in InternetRetailer.com,
buy.com CEO Scott Blum brags about how they will protect and enforce their (pending) patents that link social networking and e-commerce, so that anyone trying to integrate these two fields will have first to pay them a handsome fee, or else. Mind that buy.com hasn't even started to offer such service, while other sites like
Overstock and
eGrupos have already launched services integrating ecommerce (online auctions) and social networking.
A quote from buy.com's CEO: "We'll stand out with our patents on e-commerce and social networking, and we're big enough to protect them".
Finally an interesting way to apply social networking, and Buy.com wants it all for themselves."
well i have an answer for them... (Score:3, Insightful)
period.
good bye, buy.com. i never used you and i never will.
Re:well i have an answer for them... (Score:1)
You make it all sound so dirty... oh wait, it is!
Re:well i have an answer for them... (Score:2)
I'd like to cancel my account with buy.com, as I will no longer be ordering from a company that sabre-rattles over using patents. (article reference to slashdot) I am very much against software patents, and find dealing with companies that use patents as a competitive tool to be distateful to deal with.
I await your instructions on how to remove my account from your records.
Thank you.
Got a note today they they
Im not in the mood... (Score:1)
Corny schemes (Score:2)
There's Google.com. Not screwball, but definitely get-rich Internet. Their stock is still crazy expensive.
Shopping.com is another one of these IPO's that made big gains in value overnight. And their idea isn't even new - they just allow you to compare prices from many vendor.
And now this one. They add the patents, but otherwise they are just a get-rich Internet company.
I think this is Bubble #2.
Dot-corny schemes pay workers like you and me (Score:1)
Cool! Perhaps with a second bubble and the recognition of cultural problems with offshore outsourcing, recent BSCS grads like myself will finally find a job.
social networking patents VS social networking (Score:1)
So huge, your impending patents will be as a cork on the ocean--by far the influenced, rather than the influencor. You can't kid a kidder, and you can't socially engineer the social engineers (ehrm.. much). Business success may yet be yours however--comsumer whores may yet love your site, and lucky for you they abound.
* me throws a little karma on the bonfire
-g
Cat and Girl on Mora [catandgirl.com]
Buy.com Sucks (Score:2, Informative)
software patents suck (Score:1, Troll)
Anyone ever hear of referrer discounts? (Score:3, Interesting)
I fail to see how such a thing is novel, new, or full of such inventiveness as to warrant a patent. Then again, that describes a lot of patents.
Re:Anyone ever hear of referrer discounts? (Score:1)
Obligatory Prior Art: (Score:3, Interesting)
How about E-Bay? An auction requires a social network in order to really be effective, and if it's not E-commerce, I live on Mars. People have their own user accounts on E-Bay, can rate other people, contact info is there, etc. I'd say that is all that's required for a social network, no?