German Court Fixes Book Prices On Ebay 77
krez writes "Yesterday, a German court decided that it is illegal to sell books below the prices set by publishing houses. In the court's view, German books are exempt from EU free-market restrictions because they represent an "important cultural good". I guess this is what happens when the rights of collectives, and groups of peoples supersede the rights of the individual to do with his property as he/she sees fit. The implications of this could be far reaching, having an impact on your right to sell old CDs, DVDs, perhaps even art?"
At least it does in Germany.. (Score:3, Interesting)
nothing new at all (Score:5, Informative)
Re:nothing new at all (Score:1)
What this ruling (and the law it's based on) also does is prevent companies like Barnes & Noble from selling at prices below cover, to the detriment of smaller book-sellers who don't get the same volume discounts. Wonder if this applies to the German arm of Amazon, too?
Note: I do
Re:nothing new at all (Score:4, Informative)
Exactly. The German "Buchpreisbindung" is only in effect for new, but not for used books.
Re:nothing new at all (Score:2)
No your honor, I was not selling new books below the legally permissable price. These are used books. I read the title on the cover before selling them.
-
Buchpreisbindung (Score:1, Funny)
Bush preisbindung
Bush pres bindung
Bush pres dung
Bush president dung
i can see it now. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:i can see it now. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:i can see it now. (Score:2)
I've never heard of it done before, b
ridiculous.. (Score:2, Redundant)
The publisher sold the books anyways already ONCE...
.
Re:ridiculous.. (Score:2)
Do you know anything about the German legal system? Or do you just think that a higher court should overturn this decision because it's unreasonable?
Re:ridiculous.. (Score:2)
huh, they could always go bitch about into the EU's legal organ meant for such bitching after they run out of german systems to bitch in. that's what we Finns do anyways when we think that the parliament is trying to give us only the parts of EU it wants(look, we want to bring cheap cars and cheap booze from other EU countries, we really do! but that didn't
Re:ridiculous.. (Score:2)
Did you even RTFA? That was ONE case. The law applies to all literature sales. The review copies was just one single case and it was unclear how the law might apply to used books. If it applies to used books then you can't sell a tattered, weathered copy of a book with missing pages for less than the value set by the publisher? Surely a review copy could count as a "Used" book. (taken literally of course) I wonder if that's the case?
Re:ridiculous.. (Score:2)
He simply couldn't sell shrink-wrapped new books as new anymore.
Not that I'm for the law, or the petty lawsuit, but there certainly are ways around it.
D
Right of First Sale? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Right of First Sale? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Right of First Sale? (Score:2)
So yeah, this decision is specifically about the right of first sale; or rather, it's saying that there is no such right in Germany when
Re:Right of First Sale? (Score:2)
Re:Right of First Sale? (Score:2, Informative)
There's two simple answers to this:
First, you don't know the publishing business. (I've spent 6 years in it.) Publishers deal with bookshops on a "sale or return" basis. The publisher only gets the money on books that are actually sold by the bookstore; unsold ones are returned. So really, there is no sale from the publisher to the bookstore: the publisher just supplies the bookstore with books and takes a cut on whateve gets sold.
Secondly, the publisher can set a resale price with the bookstore as part o
RTA (Score:5, Insightful)
"The court's decision made clear that even private sellers have to stick to the fixed book price if they regularly sell new books. "
Looks like if they are used books, you have no restrictions... now we have to have "used" defined...Re:RTA (Score:4, Funny)
It's not over yet... (Score:2)
Re:It's not over yet... (Score:1)
Like scalping tickets... (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, expect it's the opposite (Score:2)
If someone was buying up every copy of a book and then ransoming them on EBay for huge prices, that would be a different situation. It also wouldn't work, as if a book is scarce they just print more. They can't just print more seats in a stad
Re:Like scalping tickets... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Like scalping tickets... (Score:3, Insightful)
First Sale Doctrine? (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm no expert on this though, especially not for European laws -- can someone comment on why Germany can get away with this?
Re:First Sale Doctrine? (Score:2)
At any rate, l
A Good Thing (tm) (Score:2, Insightful)
In France the price of books is fixed by law, and is allowed only a very small variance (along the lines of 5%, and only for special operations i think). The direct consequence of this is that you can still find small and/or specialized bookshops in almost every part town .
Now, this is not the case for records. As a direct result there is very few specialized/independant recordshops left since the buying power of them hudge megastores allowed for unrivalled price and almost no independant recordshop surv
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:1)
If people demand the products that the small stores are selling, they will continue to buy it
That's theory. Real life is like this : small shop sells product XYZ, so does Megastore but cheaper. Small shop closes. Megastore discontinues product XYZ because it doesn't sell enough and is therefore more of a cost than a gain. Megastores eventually keep some XYZ variants as an alibi.
Forcing prices to be abnormally high
Things have a value. This phrase should be : fixing price so they don't fall abnormally
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:1)
This phrase should be : fixing price so they don't fall abnormally low.
What if "abnormally low" is where the supply curve meets the demand curve? Then any price floor creates a net deadweight loss to society.
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:2)
(Sarcasstic, but not really) Wow, everyone pays more so that some businesses can make a profit. I had no idea Europeans were, despite protestations to the contrary, so dominated by the concerns of business!
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:1)
everyone pays more
I don't know : my music is cheaper in indie stores, because it does not come with expensive ad campains et al.
Granted it's not the same music but I think it's a general consensus that the price of records is too high, and this is in a model that includes the no-price-limit & megastore.
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:2)
but I think it's a general consensus that the price of records is too high
A general consensus? A consensus consisting of who exactly? The millions of people who buy CD's? If there was truly a consensus as you claim, people wouldn't buy CD's.
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:1)
A consensus is an agreement, that is all. What action is taken from there is up to the parties involved.
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:2)
If people are buying CD's at there current cost, people clearly value CD's worth Y dollars. This is a personal decision. Where do you get this nebulous concept of a imaginary consensus, and what prices "should" be? Prices are what they are, and as long as people are buying, this isn't likely to change.
Re:A Good Thing (tm) (Score:1)
Books (and newspapers) are also except VAT.
Used to be similer in UK (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Used to be similer in UK (Score:2)
They won against the Net Book Association because the legislation was a restriction of trade between the states, as it also restricted the sells in Ireland, and from other countries to the UK. This is prohibited by the EU.
The publishers simply gave up, because the sellers imported the books from the US.
> I encourage Germans to ignore the rule and hope the law sees sense.
A similar law in France was abolished in 1979. After seeing the detrimental results
Re:Used to be similer in UK (Score:1)
Effectively kills 1st sale law and used market (Score:1, Redundant)
So now the german book publishing industry has neatly buried its biggest competitor (their own customers!) through litigation. This is a sad day for individual freedoms.
Re:Effectively kills 1st sale law and used market (Score:2)
Only for New Books (Score:5, Insightful)
If you didnt read the article, it was a suit brought about by a bookseller against a reviewer who was selling unread review copies of books on ebay for under the new selling price.
I know its slashdot, but try reading the links sometimes. It helps when you want to discuss it.
Re:Only for New Books (Score:1)
Re:Only for New Books (Score:3, Informative)
That would fit the definition of used to most people.. It was sent via mail to someone who took it out of the package and let it sit around their house.. Whether or not you actually read a book doesn't matter. I've sold tons of used college books where the only thing used about them is that they sat around for a semester.
Re:Only for New Books (Score:1)
about European price fixing on books: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:about European price fixing on books: (Score:2)
Re:about European price fixing on books: (Score:1)
And the rest of copyright as well? (Score:2)
If people are truly demanding the varied specialized books the government is supposedly protecting, why should they need special welfare from the government?
One might use almost exactly the same argument against all of copyright as well, as like the price floor on new copies of a literary work, all other monopolies granted under copyright law exist to promote diversity and progress of knowledge (at least in the formulation used by some countries' constitutions). If people are truly demanding the varied
Just one more restriction on top of so many (Score:1, Flamebait)
Your right to sell art is already controlled in at least three ways:
And of course books are sold shrink-wrappe
Germany is a socialist country (Score:1, Funny)
Applies only to new books (Score:5, Informative)
always costs the same in every bookstore, including web
bookstores like Amazon, so that bookstores don't compete on price.
It does, however, not apply to (a) used books, (b) books
where the rest of an edition is being discounted by the
publishers, (c) books imported from other countries, (d) any other media, like music CDs, DVDs, software etc..
This law was made to protect small bookstores with chiefly literary,
cultural and academic programs from the competition of bookstore
chains (like Barnes & Noble in the U.S.) and mail order bookstores.
While one might have different opinions about free markets and free
pricing, this system indeed works as intended. Unlike in other Western
countries, Germany and Austria benefit from a wealth of small quality bookstores
in every town. In addition, there exists - since decades - a very efficient
national book wholesaler system,
so that any bookstore, regardless the size, can get any available book
for a customer usually on the next day (if it's not on stock in the
store already). Despite all this, Amazon still managed to
establish a hugely profitable business in Germany for various reasons -
the comfort of browsing an online catalogue and because
they offered, for the first time in Germany, an efficient way of ordering
English-language books.
The court decision simply maintains the fixed book price law for Ebay sales of
new books by commercial traders. It does not apply to Ebay sales of
second-hand books.
-F
Re:Applies only to new books (Score:2)
Well, I've lived in London, Paris and Boston, and didn't notice any shortage of independent bookstores in any of those places. They survive because they specialise in the sort of books you don't find in Barnes & Noble or Borders. E.g. in London there are many thriving bookstores specialising in travel, cookery, art, politics, law, poetry, feminism, foreign literature and many other topics.
It's true that there are not that many independent bookstores surviving on selling popular titles, because they can
Re:like all things German (Score:2)
Re:like all things German (Score:1)
RTFA (Score:1, Insightful)
See this [mackensen.net] (translation [google.com]).
This ensures that everyone is able to read books he or she likes, and not only what the masses dictate. Also it allows a publisher to try out
Re:RTFA (Score:1)
Speaking as ignorant American... but the biggest variance in prices for books [fiction] is the format you buy them in (hardcover, paperback, trade paperback). I can find old E.E. Smith trade paperbacks for $13. And there is whole piles of rarely bought books... all for the same price as that POS bestseller.
Or does this specifically include things like technical manuals and academic text books?
Nephilium
- "ALL YOU CAN HOPE FOR IS THE MERCY OF HE
So what if it only applies to new books? (Score:3, Interesting)
What they are really saying is that they want to protect the inefficient companies that have handling costs of $10, at the expense of the effecient internet sales companies with $1 handling costs.
Because if the free market was to rule, the idiots that can't sell it for less than cover price would be forced to either go out of business, offer service WORTH the over-charging they ofer, or learn how to be more effecient.
This ruling prevents the growth of the companies that could sell the books for $1 handling instead of $10, thereby artifically propping up the ridiculous over-priced book stores.
I read a lot. I buy my books from Barnes and Nobles. I get paper back, not hard cover because of the huge number of books that I buy. I do not use internet services because I like the speed of going in to a book store, picking one I did not know I wanted and begin reading it right away.
Re:So what if it only applies to new books? (Score:2)
Maintaining a supply of books on low profit topics is NOT dependent on book stores making profits.
You can buy the books from internet companies, who if they are smart, set up warehouse in each country.
If you want to acutally maintain a supply on low profit books, you have to affect PUBLSIHING costs, not SELLING costs.
But no one is doing that. Why? Because publishing costs have dropped so much that you definitely do NOT need to protect them. Curr
Re:So what if it only applies to new books? (Score:1)
Re:So what if it only applies to new books? (Score:2)
When I was in college, they also had independent bookstores. I shoped their.
I love books. I read probably a book a week. Good ones, I re-read multiple times.
I have heard a lot of people complain about the walmartization effect. They complain about it re drug stores, book stores, even coffee stores.
They always sound like fools to me.
First of all, I have found that GOOD independent stores stick around. It has been YE
Re:So what if it only applies to new books? (Score:1)