Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government The Media Your Rights Online Entertainment Games News

Infinium vs. HardOCP Court Docs 14

jtcm writes "In a follow-up to several previous articles, The Inquirer has obtained a copy of of the suit filed in the Infinium vs. HardOCP case. It's certainly worth perusal."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Infinium vs. HardOCP Court Docs

Comments Filter:
  • Having read the previous stories, I didn't find anthing new here, it's just the same old whining dressed up in badly written legalese. Oh, and a badly scanned in black and white print of the website.
  • by GTRacer ( 234395 ) <gtracer308@@@yahoo...com> on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @10:16AM (#8713998) Homepage Journal
    I mean seriously, this is Tim Roberts' idea of a great April Fool's joke, innit?

    I had to stop reading after the first 8 pages I was in such hysterics! Some sig-worthy lines:

    Infinium was positioned to become an industry leading global entertainment and interactive game company.

    Severe damage has been caused to the Plaintiffs reputations in the business community...

    The Article was published with the specific and malicious intent of causing damage to the reputations of Roberts, Infinium, and the Infinium Phantom Game System.

    While Mr. Roberts is right that his reputation has been tarnished, [H]ardOCP just reported on the obvious. Roberts did himself in with his spotty history and lack of forthrightness.

    As a gamer, I'd like another capable system to choose from. But I don't think these guys have it. Or maybe they do. Someone should check if they've got DNF as a launch title...

    GTRacer
    - Really, this is a joke, right?

    • When you're less credible than the people responsible for DNF, you know you're in trouble. ;-)
    • by MachDelta ( 704883 ) on Tuesday March 30, 2004 @01:59PM (#8717038)
      Aw man, you missed the best line right at the top of page 9! (The filing is only 12 pages of text btw).
      Infinium had a good reputation in the gaming and high tech industries.
      ROFL.
      Whatever their lawyers are smoking... I want some.


      Oh, and on a more serious note... Infinium is claiming they lost more than $20 mil (in capital) because of the article. Riiight then.
    • According to Infinium:

      A. The facts in HardOCP's article were false and could be readily determined to be false with the most minimal of investigation.

      B. They lost venture capital because of the HardOCP article.

      Now, unless the court is willing to believe that all of those investors made their decisions solely on the basis of one single article on a game website without investigating either the statements made in the article or the company itself, both A. and B. cannot both be true.

      Plus of course
  • You know...as much as I love laughing at Infinium, I do have to wonder what kind of impact the system will have when/if it is released. Going up against the big 3 will be an uphill battle to say the least, but maybe it'll become a successful "fringe system?"

    Seems to me that it's really all about the games. If they can get a library that's interesting enough, not even necessarily expansive enough or having the big names, but one that sparks enough gamer interest, they might have a shot at, at the very lea

Trap full -- please empty.

Working...