Infinium vs. HardOCP Court Docs 14
jtcm writes "In a follow-up to several previous articles, The Inquirer has obtained a copy of of the suit filed in the Infinium vs. HardOCP case. It's certainly worth perusal."
Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.
Re:Obligatory.. (Score:1, Funny)
What's worth reading? (Score:2)
They're Kidding, Right? (Score:4, Interesting)
I had to stop reading after the first 8 pages I was in such hysterics! Some sig-worthy lines:
Infinium was positioned to become an industry leading global entertainment and interactive game company.
Severe damage has been caused to the Plaintiffs reputations in the business community...
The Article was published with the specific and malicious intent of causing damage to the reputations of Roberts, Infinium, and the Infinium Phantom Game System.
While Mr. Roberts is right that his reputation has been tarnished, [H]ardOCP just reported on the obvious. Roberts did himself in with his spotty history and lack of forthrightness.
As a gamer, I'd like another capable system to choose from. But I don't think these guys have it. Or maybe they do. Someone should check if they've got DNF as a launch title...
GTRacer
- Really, this is a joke, right?
Re:They're Kidding, Right? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:They're Kidding, Right? (Score:5, Funny)
ROFL.
Whatever their lawyers are smoking... I want some.
Oh, and on a more serious note... Infinium is claiming they lost more than $20 mil (in capital) because of the article. Riiight then.
Re:They're Kidding, Right? (Score:3, Insightful)
A. The facts in HardOCP's article were false and could be readily determined to be false with the most minimal of investigation.
B. They lost venture capital because of the HardOCP article.
Now, unless the court is willing to believe that all of those investors made their decisions solely on the basis of one single article on a game website without investigating either the statements made in the article or the company itself, both A. and B. cannot both be true.
Plus of course
Serious? (Score:2)
Seems to me that it's really all about the games. If they can get a library that's interesting enough, not even necessarily expansive enough or having the big names, but one that sparks enough gamer interest, they might have a shot at, at the very lea