Successful Do-Not-Call Complaints? 440
bcrowell writes "After some legal delays, today is supposed to be the first day that the Do Not Call registry will be enforced. Got my first illegal call just now, and strangely enough, when I said I was on the list and started asking for information, the telemarketer said my signal was breaking up (particularly strange since I wasn't on a cell phone.) Has anyone successfully gotten the necessary info from a telemarketer and then managed to file a complaint? You're supposed to be able to file a complaint at 888-382-1222, but their touch-tone system doesn't give you any way to do it. You're also supposed to be able to do it via
the web, but there doesn't seem to be any form, although they say "You can file your complaint on this Web site using the File a Complaint page, which will be available starting October 1, 2003." Remember, it may take up to 3 months after you register until they're required to stop calling you." Tales of success? Tales of failure?
Get the information first (Score:5, Insightful)
A jury (Score:3, Informative)
They are supposed to fully identify themselfs at the begininng of the call.
Re:Get the information first (Score:2, Insightful)
You don't need to say "My God! Thanks for calling, and I want to place the biggest order ever!! What is your company name?"
You can just say "That is interesting. Which company did you say you were calling from again?"
Of course, when you ask for the phone number, they pretty much know what you have in mind. They are legally required to provide it
Re:Get the information first (Score:2)
It'll probably help prevent them from just hanging up without saying who they are (so you can't complain about them).
Re:Get the information first (Score:2, Funny)
Yeah OK.
Judge: You made hundreds of calls to people on the DNC list.
Telemarketer: They fooled us into telling them who we are. If we hadn't told them that, we probably wouldn't have gotten caught.
Judge: Well! Why didn't you say so? Case dismissed.
Re:Get the information first (Score:2)
RE: caller ID and telemarketers (Score:3, Interesting)
I live in Missouri, so I was already on our state-wide "no call list". A firm called, trying to sell me something. (I can't even recall what it was anymore, but one of the typical things like life insurance....) Anyway, they called with an automated recording (which I believe is illegal to begin with?), and I noticed my caller ID actually did pick up a phone number and company name. At that point, I heard enough of th
Re: caller ID and telemarketers (Score:3, Insightful)
DNC Site (Score:4, Informative)
Link to DNC compaint form, but SSL problems? (Score:3)
By the way, what's wrong with their SSL certificate? It looks like it's supposed to be a Verisign-issued certificate, but it's coming up as "issued by an unknown entity".
- Peter
Re:Link to DNC compaint form, but SSL problems? (Score:2)
Re:Link to DNC compaint form, but SSL problems? (Score:2, Informative)
this might work (Score:2, Informative)
Good Luck (Score:2, Informative)
I forsee a large increase in caller ID being purchased.
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
In some states, such as Michigan, it is state law that if you ask a telemarketer operating out of Michigan for their information, they must give their information to you. That means their company's full name and address, their phone number, and their supervisors name. I'm pretty sure it can
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
As if it even helps. 95+% of telemarketers block it, and even on the off chance they forget and you get their number, it doesn't help much.
I've been on the Texas no-call list for quite some time. I received a local call from a telemarketer using a machine (no human) asking me to leave my name and number for more information. Caller ID gave me his (local) number.
I filed a complaint as we're supposed to. Two weeks later, I received a form l
Re:Good Luck (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
It is. Except that even including `all the pertinent info' doesn't make it legal. It's illegal, period, unless you already have a business relationship with them. (It might also be ok for charities, but I'm not sure about that.)
But illegal or not, it's not very actively prosecuted. I used to receive lots of telemarketer calls sent via machines like this. Fortunately, getting on the Texas do
Re:Good Luck (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good Luck (Score:3, Informative)
The federal law that accomplishes the same thing will take effect next year. From the FTC's page [ftc.gov]:
Requires caller ID transmission.
Beginning January 29, 2004, telemarketers must transmit their telephone number and if possible, their name, to your caller ID service. This will protect your privacy, increase accountability on the telemarketer's part, and help in law enforcement efforts.
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
Re:Good Luck (Score:2)
Just karma whoring.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just karma whoring.. (Score:2)
Re:Just karma whoring.. (Score:2)
The Continue button is nonfunctional in Mozilla. (I normally have pop-ups disabled, but enabling them doesn't seem to make any difference.) However, I just now tried it in Konqueror, and it works.
Re:Just karma whoring.. (Score:2)
play along (Score:3, Funny)
Its so much fun, too!
Wrong. (Score:5, Insightful)
I work at my county IS department and everything I do is proceeded by a phone book of paperwork. Expect the DNC list to not work for about a year, after which no one will want to file a complaint due to the 73-page form describing the callers information, company's information, their past credit history, and a ransom note for their 3-month old border collie.
New telemarketers tactic (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:New telemarketers tactic (Score:2)
Complain URL (Score:3, Informative)
Have you tried to complain at https://www.donotcall.gov/Complain/ComplainCheck.a spx [donotcall.gov]?
NOTE: Seems like only Mozilla will work when submitting a complaint. At least, that was my experience.
Re:Complain URL (Score:2, Interesting)
Joe IE user: "best viewed with a standards compatible browser, please upgrade to view"
Re:Complain URL (Score:3, Funny)
NOTE: Seems like only Mozilla will work when submitting a complaint. At least, that was my experience.
Ironic, considering that this is an asp.NET site...
Re:Complain URL (Score:2)
Re:Complain URL (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Complain URL (Score:2, Insightful)
The most ironic thing about that song, is that it doesn't actually contain any examples of irony [reference.com].
Re:Complain URL (Score:2)
One could almost term the song as being meta-ironic...
But that would just be silly.
Re:Complain URL (Score:2)
Uh... (Score:2)
Re:Complain URL (Score:2)
Because ASP.NET server side controls specifically render for IE 5.5+
You generally have to do extra work in ASP.NET to support other browsers; even if that extra work is to decide not to use server side controls, which drastically decreases the utility of the ASP.NET programming model...
MO No Call List (Score:5, Interesting)
I haven't heard from them about the federal list, so I doubt that they are compliant yet. They have voiced an interest in getting out of telemarketing altogether because of the growth/success of the Missouri no-call list; with any luck the federal list will be the last straw that makes them jump.
As an aside, I was surprised by how much money some companies are charging to subtract a list of numbers from a call list; I charged my regular hourly fee, which isn't too much for DELETE FROM call_list WHERE phone IN (SELECT phone FROM AGList)! I later found out that some companies were charging thousands for 'safe' call lists on CD!
Re:MO No Call List (Score:3, Funny)
Just by accident one time:
DELETE FROM call_list
Thank you.
did you check the front page? (Score:2)
Telemarketer Information (Score:3, Informative)
Got my first illegal call just now, and strangely enough, when I said I was on the list and started asking for information, the telemarketer said my signal was breaking up ... Has anyone successfully gotten the necessary info from a telemarketer and then managed to file a complaint?
As far as I know you just need a few details like the company name and maybe a phone number or something. I've had two telemarkers call since the DNC list went into effect, and both times it was relatively siple to get a website out of them simply by role-playing a "naive but cautious" person, saying something like "Hmm, the offer sounds good, but I'm not sure. Do you have a website where I can find out more infomation, just so I can see that you folks are legitimate?" Telemarketers are usually happy to do whatever it takes to make you trust them. If they don't have a website, you should at least be able to get a phone number out of them by letting them give their pitch for a minute or two, then saying you're in the middle of something really important, but what they're selling sounds very interesting, so if you could just get a number where you can call them back... "And what was the name of the company again? Oh, ok. Where are you guys located?"
Of course, if you start off the conversation with "Hey buddy, I'm on the Do Not Call List", you can't expect to get very far...
But if you're polite and play your cards right, you can easily get all the information you need out of them. (If you really feel the need to dig at them, just save the "Hey buddy, guess what" bit until the end of the call, after you have played the nice and interested consumer and gotten all the necessary information out of them.)
That said, both times I've gotten all the information I could possibly want about the telemarketer, but I'll be damned if I can figure out how to submit a complaint...
Re:Telemarketer Information (Score:2)
Reminded me of when I was calling this company about a laptop (still under warranty) that had kind of a flutzy floppy drive. I'd talk to one person, explain that the laptop was under warranty, can I speak to someone about getting it repaired.
Twice, I got put on hold, and then hold turned into *disconnected*.
So the third time I called I told the person that I had an expensive repair for a laptop not under warranty, got through to a tech,
Availability of the DNC (Score:4, Interesting)
I know... I know... not a lot of sympathy, but still, I work for a business who would like to do nothing more than play by the rules, but all kinds of barriers have been put up in our way.
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
I don't believe you. I don't think anyone in the telemarketing industry wants to follow any rules but the rule of the jungle. I think you, personally, should either kill yourself now, or take up a more respectable profession, like prostitution, or child pornography, or maybe masturbating zoo animals for breeding purposes
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually, you do not get any sympathy from me. There are whole industries that are counter-productive and a pain in the ass for normal people like me. There are a thousand things you could have done to prevent people from getting really annoyed by your calls. You could have requested the permission to call and thus made
I see a marketing opportunity here (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:3, Informative)
Oh, WAAAAAAAAAH! Poor telemarketers.
From FTC's info page [ftc.gov]: (my emphasis added)
How much does it cost to access the registry?
Data for up to five area codes will be available for free. Beyond that, there is an annual fee of $25 per area code of data, with a maximum annual fee of $7,375 for the entire U.S. database.
That's so much less than a penny per phone number that you don't get any sympathy at all.
If you're a national telemarketer, you pay your $7,375.00 and download the 1 [donotcall.gov]
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
for crooked telemarketers the staff is (half) free, the staff does change A LOT though(which is also why they have ads on newspapers on easy desk job, 200$ for 2week training perioid & yadda yadda, call now). basically they don't except people to meet the 'expected' performance one would need to get really paid(like you do get paid from a real job). they also pref
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:4, Insightful)
No you don't, because the rules have always prohibited "telemarketing".
The fact that these were rules of etiquette and not of law is no excuse.
If people commit sufficiently egregious etiquette violations for a sufficiently long time, then eventually they irritate enough votors that the law steps in. The violators may then attempt to paint themselves as the innocent victims of changing times, acting suprised that it has "suddenly" become against the rules to interrupt people in their homes without their permission to make a sales pitch, or to pinch their secretary's butts, or whatever.
The rest of us will be less than impressed by this rather disingenuous plea for sympathy.
--Bruce Fields
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
I suggest you communicate this sentiment to your industry association lawyers, who have created most of these barriers with their stall tactics in the legal system. If the FTC had simply been allowed to go ahead with the original plans then you would no doubt have had a copy of the list in a timely fashion and there'd be no doubt or uncertainty about whom you may call and
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
Why not just buy a copy from somebody else? If it costs $X to buy the list, offer somebody who has it $X/2.
To my knowledge, in the US, databases still are not copyrightable. Even if they were, I don't think that the government is allowed to copyright its own work.
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
"Data for up to five area codes will be available for free. Beyond that, there is an annual fee of $25 per area code of data, with a maximum annual fee of $7,375 for the entire U.S. database."
If you're a small company calling a few low-population states, or a single larger metro area, you will not see any costs.
My thought is that $7,375 per year is not a lot of money. If you have enough personnel/equipment that you ca
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, they have to pay for the noose around their own necks, and for the hangman, and for the guy tying the knot, and for the disposal of their corpse, and for...
The telemarketing industry can complain all they want, but if they hadn't been so annoying in the first place, and if they had played by the rules already in place (i.e., not harassing or hanging up on someone when they ask to be put on that company'
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:3, Insightful)
You forget that the DMA had a "voluntary DNC registry" [dmaconsumers.org] for a long time. Did the DMA strap its members to the mast who disobeyed it? Hell no. The industry did it to themselves. This is a classic "if we don't educate, they're gonna regulate" scenario. Had the DMA done what the hell they said they were gonna do, they wouldn't be in this bind. It's very telling that this sweeping regulation went into effect with a Republican at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. A LOT of people were and are pissed off at telemark
Re:Availability of the DNC (Score:2)
I will say however that I do sometimes get calls for polls and some orginizations that are somewhat worthy of calling me up. And to he honest these people are not that bad. As has beeen pointed out in this thread and in others that not all telemarkters are bad but they have such a horrable image problem right now that they are being shun
Too many ways around this (Score:4, Interesting)
Can the do-not-call law be enforced if, when you ask what company they represent, they suddenly don't speak-ee the Eeeenglish? (or "My supervisor is not here, sorry " is the other one I get a lot)
What are you supposed to do when the call is an automated recording?
What about when half the calls you DO get are from exempt organizations, like police fundraisers?
This law is a good start, but don't for a minute think that it's gonna make more than a small difference by itself. Neither does CallerID, at least in my case - between my Mom's number being unlisted, my wife working at a place which shows up as "Anonymous", and her family calling from overseas ("Unavailable"), I'm just lucky my number is new and I only get a couple bad calls a week, 'cos I have to answer them all...
Re:Too many ways around this (Score:2)
It's all in the phrasing.
Re:Too many ways around this (Score:2)
>
> Check your state laws. In many states, even those without
> their own do-not-call lists, it's illegal
Sure, illegal... I ask again - what are you supposed to DO?? If the originating phone number doesn't come through, how do you pursue a complaint? If you call them back at the business number provided, they can easily claim that they hired a subcontractor and never authorized them to perform that sort of marketing. (a
My experience (Score:2)
Since then, I have not recieved ONE telemarketing call.
"National Consumer Council" (Score:3, Informative)
I filed a complaint, though that "nonprofit" bit might shield the bastards. Other than those folks, I don't think I've received a telemarketing call in the past few days. Good riddance!
Re:"National Consumer Council" (Score:2)
I'm guessing we'll start seeing a lot more of these tactics now that the regular telemarketers can't call.
We'll get lots of calls from "non-profit" organizations and charities where the large % of the donation goes to the fund-raising company.
We'll get surveys with leading questions designed to promote some specific company, and "vote Bob Smith for congress sponsored by AT&T. Members of our campaign staff can help you save
Anti-Telemarketing Script (Score:4, Informative)
One of the most useful resources I have found is the Anti-Telemarketing Script [junkbusters.com] from Junkbusters.com [junkbusters.com]. Apart from this, they also have tons of information on how to stop snail-mail junk, etc. Check them out.
Re:Anti-Telemarketing Script (Score:2)
Telemarketers are just smarter. (Score:2)
I too am on this list, and while the donotcall.gov legality was being discussed I tried to gather telemarketer info as the site suggested, name of company, phone number, and address (if possible) to see how effective I could be when it became legal. What resulted is telemarketers just hanging up when they realized the direction I was taking and trying again later in the day or the next day. A game of cat and mouse it turned into as I masqueraded my interest and used t
Re:Telemarketers are just smarter. (Score:2)
No, actually, that has been a federal crime all along, far more serious than a mere fine.
Re:Telemarketers are just smarter. (Score:2)
Wouldn't that be considered about the same as "fleeing from the place of accident"? Additional charges for attempt to avoid law consequences?
Not active yet (Score:2)
Re:Not active yet (Score:3, Informative)
Illinois (Score:3, Informative)
Luckily for me, I have privacy manager, and the only way that calls come through is if they're identified on caller ID in the first place. So I pulled the name and number and had exactly the same problems trying to find a place to file my complaint. Ultimately, linking from my state do-not-call page (which is really only a front for the federal stuff), I got to a generic FTC complaint page here [ftc.gov]. So that's where I filed my complaint. Good luck.
How about adding a * number? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How about adding a * number? (Score:2)
An easy solution (Score:2)
Re:An easy solution (Score:2)
Nope sorry. For you it might have worked. For the rest of the US the dnc list seems a far better solution. Hopefully for once the european goverments will do the smart thing and adopt something similar witho
It's a pity ... (Score:2)
BBB and Attorney General (Score:2)
I've only had one call (Score:2)
It works in the UK (Score:2)
That's right. I never get any direct sales calls. Ever.
It works for us - I hope it can work for you too.
My horror story and solution. (Score:2)
My girlfriend was home and I was at work. She got a call from a telemarketer. Said telemarketer (a woman) asked for me, and my girlfriend informed her that I was not home and that we were on Minnesota's do-not-call list before hanging up.
Where it gets really frightening is that the telemarketer called my girlfriend back and started an ill-adv
Re:My horror story and solution. (Score:2)
That's not the good part, that's the rip-off part.
Qwest works both sides of the game - they sell your information to telemarketers, then they offer to sell you a service to keep them from calling. In the mean time, they're selling technology to telemarketers to help them get around the blocking service that they're selling you.
When pressed on the matter, Qwest representatives have simply said th
Re:My horror story and solution. (Score:2)
At work, I'm so incredibly mean and berating to telemarketers that they often call my boss to try and get me in trouble. My boss tells them that they deserved it. It makes them furious ever time.
steve
I like the female telemarketers (Score:3, Funny)
If it's a guy I pull a Jim Florentine and start talking about how lonely and depressed I am, or I act retarded (just like in real life!) and confused just to waste their time. They bail olut, but I never had anyone call back angry because I'm a decent voice actor. I think they feel bad sometimes.
Fun, but I still signed up for the DNC list.
Slightly off-topic story (Score:3, Funny)
The neighborhood kids and I had tons of fun each summer listening for a call "coming down the block". You could actually hear a sales call working its way from house to house, and amazingly they usually went by street address (accending).
So, when we heard a call we'd all take off "racing the call". The idea was to get to a each house right before the call got there. If you were successful (and the house was someone willing to play along) you picked up the phone and instead of saying "hello" or something, you'd say something along the lines of "we don't want any!" *click*. And then off to the next house we'd race.
It was great fun to listen to the telemarketer getting more and more confused as to what was going on. I have no idea if it cut down the calls, but it was great fun.
I'm pissed off about the latest trick (Score:2)
Two calls, both telemarketing. I eagerly got my pen and paper out and awaited the contact information. There was none. Instead, the messages, after chewing up three or four minutes of digital memory, ended with "If you would like more information, press 1. If you would like to remove yourself from future calls, press 8."
Those f'ing creeps. Knowing that if they had left any
Constructive idea. (Score:2)
None of us has the time to go through the legal process and then waiting to collect.
Nothing satisfies as much as causing physical harm to your opressor.
Get one of those compressed gas air horns people use at baseball games and the next time you get a call, talk to them and then blast the horn in the mouthpiece and see if you can make them deaf in one ear.
Re:No calls today (Score:2, Funny)
Re:No calls today (Score:2)
Second mortgages (Score:2)
First, second, third, etc. refer to the priority of the liens on the property. So it isn't possible to have a second mortgage without a first mortgage. Nor is is possible to have multiple second mortgages.
Home equity loans are usually second mortgages, and it is, of course, possible to take out a home equity loan on a property that is not otherwise mortgaged. In this case the home equity loan would be the first mortgage, which shoul
Re:stuff complaining... screw 'em instead (Score:2)
Quoting directly from the site:
"Under Government legislation introduced on 1 May 1999 It is unlawful to make unsolicited direct marketing calls to individuals who have indicated that they do not want to receive such calls.
You can either do this by contacting companies directly and
I keep hearing this... (Score:2)
This is, as everyone says, about profit. So for what reason would any potential seller view this list as anything but what it is: a list of people unlikely to deliver any profit, and thus should be avoided as they wish?
You must be new here... (Score:3, Insightful)
In short:
Telemarketers get the bulk of their sales from people they can pressure into a sale: elderly, mentally infirm, emotionally insecure, whatever reason, some people can't say "no" over the phone. If those people are on the Do Not Call list, then telemarketers will not get those high-pressure sales, and they will lose money.
Jay (=
Re:First Amendment Misinterpretation (Score:2)
No, we aren't in charge of the country, our elected representatives are. And they're so worried about getting campaign contributions or other types of moneatary perks that they'll cater to whomever gives them the most money.
Now, who gives the politicians the most money - you, or the DMA?
Yes, I know, you can vote them out of office. Unfortunately, in most races, the winner is determined by who has the
Single nationwide phone company (Score:3, Informative)
This has been done before. Aren't you old enough to remember Ma Bell? C'mon now, ask your parents if you're a kid. The AT&T company (motto: "We don't care. We're the phone company. We don't have to care.") forced you to lease your "terminal" (phone), didn't allow you to connect a modem on your phone line (remember the accoustic couplers?), took forever to start providing what's regarded today as basic amenities...