Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Your Rights Online

Nextel Claims Trademarks On "Push To Talk" and "PTT" 44

dmurawsky writes "According to an article at Forbes, Nextel announced that it had been awarded a primary trademark for the term 'PTT' and a Secondary trademark for 'Push To Talk.' Now maybe it's just me, but this term has been used in the radio world for around 60 years. I would have thought it was in the public domain by now. I wonder how Motorola or other radio manufacturers are going to take this. Here's a discussion of the topic at QRZ, an amateur radio forum." Update: 06/24 01:03 GMT by T : Thanks to reader Dan Horn for pointing out the flubbed original headline: Yes, this is about trademarks, rather than patents.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Nextel Claims Trademarks On "Push To Talk" and "PTT"

Comments Filter:
  • by Tolchz ( 19162 ) on Monday June 23, 2003 @07:47PM (#6279661) Homepage
    From FM 24-19
    Radio Operator's Handbook
    http://155.217.58.58/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/fm /24-19/Glo ss.htm

    Glossary

    proword procedure word

    psi per square inch

    PTT push-to-talk

    pwr power

    qty quantity
  • Not A Big Deal (Score:3, Informative)

    by Bistronaut ( 267467 ) * on Monday June 23, 2003 @07:48PM (#6279672) Homepage Journal
    This is just a trademark. Not a patent. Trademarks like this are only applicable within their industry. Now, they may be some pretty silly trademarks, but they only affect how you can market you competing "push to talk" service - they don't keep you from making it in the first place.
    • But isn't it like an ice cream company trademarking the word vanilla? Its a term that is commonly used in the telcommunications field, is it not?
      • Yes, but not in the cellphone field. Nextel is still the only cellphone player with a "walkie-talkie" feature, although all the others are working on it.

        I'm amazed they didn't trademark "walkie-talkie" since that's how they advertise it.

        • The pimply faced guy at the Verizon store told me they were ready to roll out a clone of nextel's walkie talkie feature, called, you can guess- "Push To Talk." He said it was due next month, so this is some great timing by Nextel. Itll be interesting to see if it holds water.
        • Re:Not A Big Deal (Score:2, Interesting)

          by grahamm ( 8844 )
          But is cellphone not too narrow a field? I am sure that a company could not market slippers or boots and call them 'Nike' claiming that these are different fields than trainers.
      • Or like Spike Lee being granted an injunction against Spike TV for using his name for their TV brand name?

        After all, there haven't been any other "Spikes" in the history of popular culture. Certainly not Spike Jones (the musician) or Spike Jonze (the filmmaker).
    • But that has been the term used in the Radio industry for decades (25 years minimum that I can swear to directly - and more likely 60 years..)

      So they are trademarking it within the same area that it is already used?

  • Headline says Nextel Patents ... but the blurb says Nextel announced that it had been awarded a primary trademark ... and a Secondary trademark ...

    Geez, guys, think you could throw in a little consistency here?

    Keerist in a teacup.
  • by wolf- ( 54587 ) on Monday June 23, 2003 @07:50PM (#6279691) Homepage
    We also received notice today from Nextel informing us that some folks in our local exchanges may be charged to call our nextel phones.

    Nextel claims the decision was not theirs, but the paper states that Nextel used to absorb the call termination fees. Sure sounds like their "decision" to no longer absorb the fees.

    They can't tell us who they are in a pissing contest with, but from the wording on the notice, and from the wording on the nextel customer service reps screen, I would guess it is Bellsouth.

    As for PTT and "Push to Talk" I also would have thought those terms are "common usage" terms by now.
    • As for PTT and "Push to Talk" I also would have thought those terms are "common usage" terms by now.

      I'm sure I have an old crappy toy two-way somewhere around my parents' house with "push to talk" written somewhere on it.

      • I do, but it's not a toy. It's an old beat up Realistic TRC-214 3 channel CB Walkie T with "Push to Talk" still clearly stamped on the transmit button, which is amazing since almost every other marking on it is wore off from sitting in my pile of misc electronic junk. This thing is at least 15 years old.

        I can't find the manual for that model, but here's an example [radioshack.com]. A lot of the Walkie Talkies have Push to Talk on the transmit button.
        • Ah, I think that this one handy-talky is probably not much for anyone to worry about.

          AFAICT, most old Radio Shack radios are Motorola products, cleverly branded Realistic or Radio Shack or Optimus or whatever.

          Meanwhile: Nextel is Motorola's own creation. Aside from creating the company itself, Motorola also makes all of the head-end equipment, phones, and whatever else they might need to go about business.

          Nextel exists merely as an avenue for Motorola to have its own, tightly-controlled cellular telepho
          • by Anonymous Coward
            Motorola does not "own" Nextel.. they didn't create Nextel at all. Motorola
            came up with iDEN and several carriers around the world use it. Motorola
            happens to own stock in Nextel (which they sold most of earlier this year),
            but they definately don't own or didn't create the company. I think many
            people needs to do some investigation before they make thenselves out to be
            an ass and post/say stupid things like that :-)

            The reason Nextel is all Motorola is because iDEN was made and is Patented
            by Motorola. Theref
            • *sigh*

              I believe that you think you're right.

              I work for one of the most successful full-line Motorola two-way radio dealers in the US. As it happens, parts of the company also work closely with Nextel service agents.

              The dirt from the chiefs who create my payroll say this: Motorola wants a cell phone network, and starts making noises about creating one. Regulatory bodies get outwardly twitchy about it. Nextel is born.

              I'd rather believe my well-informed rumors than your polished-and-pretty SEC garbage,
              • There are two iDEN providers in the U.S. - Nextel and SoutherLinc. Are you telling us that Motorola wanted a cell phone network so bad that they only created one large enough to scope out part of the country, then they let some other company come in and use their technology on another part of the country? That just doesn't make any sense to me. And then there's Mike (service provider) in Canada who also uses iDEN. Does Motorola own them too? If they wanted one so badly they would have gone all the way l
              • found a website you should take a look at adolf http://www.mobileinfo.com/Wireless_Networks/wirel e ss_wan_esmr.htm Here we go: ""a start-up company named FleetCall aggregated the assets of several fleet dispatchers (taxi companies, construction companies and others in similar businesses) and implemented a completely new digital wireless network called Nextel. Nextel also has an equity share in Clearnet in Ontario, which has implemented a similar network in Canada. Nextel and Clearnet combined provide a
          • Nextel is not part of Motorola in any way, shape, or form. They're a cellular provider that happens to be by far the biggest customer of Motorola's iDEN cellular system, which has the push-to-talk system. Nextel's cellular system is not completely 100% Motorola - there are a few parts to the system from other companies, though I believe they are parts that Motorola does not currently make.

            Nextel's done some looking for an eventual replacement/compliment to the iDEN service, and I believe has received a n
            • Actually they are going to keep the iDEN network for the direct connect from what I understand. They are only going to change the cellular side of things to possible CDMA (in the talks). So it's likely we will soon see dual-mode/tri-mode phones.
              • Hmmm, seems possible, as the direct connect and the cellular parts of the systems are pretty distinct. They've been unclear to us about what's been happening with Nextel and their possible future cell choices. Regardless, there's plenty coming on the direct connect end for years. I have a hard time believing that other cell companies can just start offering a walkie-talkie service that has enough features to compare with iDEN, considering the amount of time it's been around, and the amount of development
  • Looks(tm) like(tm) someone(tm)'(tm)s(tm) got(tm) too(tm) much(tm) time(tm) on(tm) their(tm) hands(tm).
  • Amateur Radio (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tiny69 ( 34486 ) on Monday June 23, 2003 @08:39PM (#6280124) Homepage Journal
    I wonder how the HAMs will take this. They've been using Push To Talk switches for at least 50 years (being generous for Nextel). I hope Nextel is smart when it goes after people over TM infringement. It would be really easy for a court to rule that term is generic. If Nextel does go after HAMs or those that make amatuer radios, Nextel may be surprised when they realize that HAMs can have deep pockets and are great at pooling resourses. Shit, HAMs have been building their own satellites for some time now....
    • Re:Amateur Radio (Score:2, Informative)

      by Micro$will ( 592938 )
      Shit, HAMs have been building their own satellites for some time now....

      HAMs don't need no stinking satellites, that's what the ionosphere is for. As for pooling resources, they've been chatting it up around the world before the Internet was a gleam in Al Gore's eye.
      • During the day? (Score:3, Insightful)

        by siskbc ( 598067 )
        HAMs don't need no stinking satellites, that's what the ionosphere is for.

        At night, yeah. But for those who would like to bounce signals a long way during the day, satellites might be nice.

    • They are going after Verizon, who claimes to be rolling out a new walkie talkie service called "Push To Talk." From what I can tell, Nextel is a decent company, and probably is just doing this to yank on verizon's hot dog.
  • Why the heck if Nextel pushing a PTT button as a feature when nowadays the $20 FRS radios at Walmart have a VOX circuit in them?
    • Because your FRS goes possibly a mile and a half, yet I can call a tech in Mississipi from Miami using a nextel radio now.

      The key is no dead air time with radios like you get with cell phones.

      Radio:
      *chirp* jim
      *chirp* yeah?
      *chirp* the ip address is blah blah blah
      *chirp* ok

      Cell:
      *ring* *ring* *ring*
      hello this is jim.
      hey jim, got that ip address for you
      excellent
      the ip address is blah blah blah

      They are rolling out their nationwide radio plan right now.
      • Re:Better question (Score:2, Insightful)

        by DigitalJEM ( 684259 )
        It's so nice using DC over a standard phone for the meer reason that it cuts out so much of the BS chitter chatter :D
      • And that matters how? VOX circuits are dirt cheap, why don't they add one? I do realize the internal differences between NexTel and Cellular (half duplex vs full, intermittent channel usage vs fulltime channel allocation) but that is no excuse not to make the TX/RX switching automatic.
        • Because the PTT feature is what makes it different from a phone. If you had VOX on all the time, the phone would just always transmit every conversation you have, while the PTT allows you to use the phone like a big giant 2 way radio network. VOX tends to be useful only when you are in a quiet place and the only reason to speak is to speak into the radio. Almost nobody in Amateur Radio uses VOX. PTT gives you some control over what is heard.
          • I've seen people use VOX even at field day for 15 meter phone...its a lot easier because that way one person can work the stations and log the contacts..not very good for a noisy place or if you want to talk to that opperator.

            PTT is just as bad at times, people sitting on their 2m microphones when they're mobile because they put the mic too close to where they're sitting. The repeater is keyed up the whole time. You can hear some intresting stuff...

            -Mike
            KD5UTQ
  • My first response was 'Oh F*** off!!!' push to talk has been around almost as long as marconi. then I took a moment to think. My response was unaltered. this situation calls for some serious dark alley and baseball bat (I'm australian but the baseball bat makes a better club than a cricket bat) action. I am sick to death of this bulls**t!!! This is like someone claiming a trademark on 'press five to delete'. I repeat this is BullS**t!!!
  • Even if they do really get to keep such a trademark, there's not a chance in hell that they'd dare deny Motorola the use of the trademark whenver they want. After all, their current cellular system, iDEN, is completely done by Motorola - and surely Nextel wants to continue to get new features for their system, right? If they get all uppity, how might Motorola start treating them?
  • This has been used by the military since World War II. The only thing they could have done that would be more stupid is if they had tried to patent the phrase "walkie-talkie" (incidently, a walkie-talkie was strapped to the GI's back. The hand-held unit was referred to as a "handset". Take that, Civvie!)
  • by sulli ( 195030 ) *
    Last time I checked, this referred to "Postes Telegraphs Telephones," the old name for the French postal service and phone company (now La Poste and France Telecom). It's come into common usage in the telecom industry meaning a state-owned telecom provider. I suspect La Poste and France Telecom might have something to say about this proposed trademark, since Nextel is in their business.

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H.L. Mencken

Working...