Tracking Your Employees, Children 262
Mattygfunk writes "Hong Kong has launched what's believed to be Asia's first location-based service which enables companies to locate their employees via their mobile phones signals." And in a semi-related story, Son-of-a-Geek writes "The BBC is reporting on a new GPS device for kids from Wherify Wireless. With the new device parents can track junior or he can call for help by pushing a panic button. Available only in the US for one penny less than 400 dollars it is a pager as well."
I get it... (Score:5, Funny)
Lovely.
(Don't get me wrong, I'm all for electro-gizmos, but I also believe that parents should be responsible for just that... parenting.)
Re: I get it... (Score:4, Insightful)
It maybe "en vogue" to blast parents for their irresponsibility, but there are some things that all parents are defensless against.
I have a little girl coming this January, and I'm terrified. We live in a world full of sick and twisted individuals and there are practical limits to what parents can do to protect their children.
Hell, my parents were the best parents anyone could hope for, but that doesn't mean they were permanently adjoined to my hip 24x7. I was often alone at the bus stop. Sometimes I decided to walk home from school or from a friends house. I would periodically walk to the store less than 1000ft from my house. And sometimes, I would run off somewhere to do something they expressly forbade me to do.
I think this device, as is, is perfect for its target market, small children. For my teenager, I would prefer a device that they could turn on and off, so that they can control when it should act like a distress beacon. There comes a time, where you have to respect your kids right to be a kid.
Re: I get it... (Score:3, Insightful)
Whether or not its being reported more or less, doesn't detract from the fact that there is a problem. And many of the cases reported recently were such big stories because of the audacity with which the crimes were staged. Some of the more recent stories, I will readily admit were more hysteria driven, like the shark attack stories last year. In many of those cases, this device would not have been of much help, except maybe the little girl in Philly, who fortunately got away in the end anyways.
Kids have been kidnapped for decades, and they always will be, sometimes from the most caring and protective of households, I'm not debating that, I'm saying that any device with claims to 'assist' the situation is only going to make it worse, as it takes yet another responsibility off the parental units.
I'm not saying that this tool is going to eliminate adbuctions. I am not saying that this device should be used as a form of babysitter for bad parents, because the truth is bad parents are going to be bad parents with or without this device. At the risk of sounding like some politician
Stopping kids from getting hurt is all well and good, having one of these is fine, as long as you don't for a second let yourself be disillisioned into thinking that it's really anything other then a "Toy" that your kid will undoubtly take apart to tinker with, trade to a friend for some baseball cards, or leave at home on the dresser on a regular basis. Not to mention that they'll never carry it anywhere once they get old enough to realize that "Mom and Dad know where I'm at when I've got this thing with me!" I guess I should have explained myself better in my original post... not all parents are bad parents, and not eveyrone who'd buy one of these is going to be an idiot about it.. but I'm just so tired and sick of watching people these days find new ways to pawn their responsibility off onto others and/or gadgest...
I agree with you completely, but the important thing is this device is no different than a car seat. If Joe Idiot wants to put a rear-facing seat facing forward, or any seat in the front passenger seat, then they have just graduated to the class of BAD parent. But, just because some idiot should have gotten a vasectomy at age 13, doesnt mean we should not bother with them.
Re: I get it... (Score:2)
Meanwhile, on the back page, the conservatives are tapping your phone.
Re: I get it... (Score:2)
-B
The real problem... (Score:2)
I'm not talking about the 17 year old with the 15-year-old girlfriend, crossing arbitrary legal lines. I'm talking about perverts.
I'd like to see a government sting, where somebody fakes up a NAMBLA cruise to southeast Asia(they go there to fuck children), get them in international waters, and drown the lot of them.
Every conviction on child molestation should be a mandator death penalty. The law tries to take the well-being of the offenders into account. I disagree. There are some crimes which bring the forfeit of status as a human.
I can see sparing somebody for a crime of passion. There are murderers among us who are good people and will never do it again.
There is no child molester who ever was redeemed. I'm sure there are some who were never convicted again, maybe even never charged, maybe even never did it again, but they must never be permitted the opportunity for unsupervised access to children again. The best way to do that is to kill them the first time they reveal themselves. Yeah, they were probably taught by getting molested themselves. That really is sad, but it doesn't change the fact that they should be dead. If the certainty of death keeps them from acting on their desires, they won't spread the disease. I'm perfectly willing to spare people with perverted thoughts that never have been put into action, but it's better that a billion repented criminals die than that one child should suffer.
I keep close watch on my children. It would take overwhelming force to take one in my presence, or great stealth to get one out of the house while I sleep.
Re:The real problem... (Score:2)
whats hard is - if you think that all molesters should just be killed - then by extension should we just kill the child that they have just molested? Wont that child grow up to be a molester? so shouldnt we just kill them?
On days I think that we should just flat out shoot the people who are convicted of molesting/killing/raping/harming children. no prison time. just guilty - walk em out back and shoot them - or throw them in a crematorium... alive.
nambla should just be illegal period. they should all be drowned as you state.... its tough.
whats really really sad is the situation that people live in - places like thailand. forced prostitution of children, and the very very seriously rampant methamphedamine addiction that has swept thailand over the last five years. There are children as young as 5 that are drug runners for the dealers there - they use small girls because they know that the police will not stop and seach small girls. then as they get older they get them hooked on their meth. its called yahewa or something... and costs about a dollar for a pill. you can eat/drink/snort or smoke the shit - and it wrecks you.
this is very serious for several reasons: rampant drug use by the young populace who become addicted - and are forced into sex slavery - and spread aids. Thailand has very high HIV infection rates. (botswana is the worst, with something like 39% of the countries population having aids)
a very very sad state we are moving into in the next 20 years. They said that 60 million people will die of aids. and with the rate that things are going... nobody is going to care - so long as they have money.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
The reality is that there are any number of ways for a stranger to grab a hold of your child. I've seen studies (and video tapes) which show that a complete stranger can kidnap a child in under 60 seconds off a playground. Now, imagine a pair of mothers taking their children to the playground (especially if one of them has two children). Being people, the mothers might actually start talking to each other. Now, how easy would it be for a potential kidnapper to grab one of their children? And you would blame the mother for this?
It's not about a parent doing (or not doing) their job. It's about being able to undo the damage done by unscrupulous individuals as quickly as possible. Keep that in mind.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
This device will do nothing. Any child who wants to get it off or get away from it will. And any kidnapper with half a brain would
get rid of this thing. It's not like it's tacked on.
There is *no* substitute for a parent. Should you give your kids freedom? Yes. But you should still know where they are, where they're going, and how they're getting there.
Don't depend on a 400 dollar piece of equipment to do what you should be doing.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Don't give them any ideas. Pretty soon the paranoids will be right and people will have the ol'tracking microchip implanted under their skin at birth.
I'm lucky though... I move so little that they would assume the chip was broken.
Safety through sloth-
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Try reading it yourself. It's a wristwatch. Real easy to remove.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
http://www.wherifywireless.com/faq.asp#27
http
I'd suggest you read those. Thanks!
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
I read that, too. Note it said 'cut-resistant', not 'cut-proof'. All that means is that
it's not coming of with the greatest of ease.
Besides, this is market-speak. I still submit that cutting
these things off wrists would be a lot easier than
the site makes it out to be.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
The alarm going off is a minor issue in the grand scheme of things. Removing the watch means you get the kids last known position, which was probably known by someone anyways... So I really doubt this is going to help anyone that much.
Kintanon
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Re:I get it... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I get it... (Score:2, Informative)
You're confusing the two techs discussed. The employee tracking uses cell phones. The kid watch uses GPS.
A GPS receiver tells *you* your current location, and no one else. A cellphone (or other similar device) is still required to report that position back to the control center. That's where the PCS issue comes from: you need its coverage to broadcast the current position
Err, yes but.. (Score:2)
Re:Err, yes but.. (Score:2)
I think not... Yes, even before the days of such technological gimmicks, people did actually manage to exist...
Re:I was never lost. (Score:2)
And if some guy had grabbed me, I'd have had the common sense to scream my lungs out, bite the guy, etc.. etc... which may not have helped a whole lot to stop him but certainly would have had everyone looking at me.
Nowadays of course a child screaming at the top of their lungs in the store is no big deal, everyone just tries to ignore it...
Kintanon
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
So for just 399.99, I can have a little electro-gizmo that will do the job that I, as a parent, should have been doing all along (Tracking where little Johnny is, and what mischief he's been into)..
You're either not a parent and/or have not thought the problem through very well. What about school? What about field trips? What about sleep-overs and birthday parties and outings with friends? What about visiting with Grandma and Grandpa? What about taking 15 seconds to roll the shopping cart away from your vehicle, turning around and seeing someone making off with your kid????
One cannot watch a child 100% of the time. Indeed, as a child ages, s/he should be gradually given more autonomy as part of normal development. My oldest just started kindergarten yesterday. I am not sure what all of the question is or whether something like this device is even part of an answer, but as my children grow this stuff sure does seem to strike a resonant chord in me. Life is a lot more complicated than simple slogans like "Parents should be parents!"
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
2. When you go places, leave your young children at home with someone you DO trust.
These two simple rules will knock out a lot of this problem, as well as letting me grocery shop or watch a movie without your little vermin screaming and banging into things.
Kintanon
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
These two simple rules will knock out a lot of this problem, as well as letting me grocery shop or watch a movie without your little vermin screaming and banging into things.
If you had actually read my post with more than a single functioning brain cell, you might have noticed that everyone I mentioned leaving my kids with would have some level of presumed trust relationship with me and my kids, e.g. Grandma and Grandpa, school and friends whose parents I know and trust. Also, although there is no such thing as a 100% solution, that still doesn't stop me from looking for one, or at least better ones than I have now. Finally, as you evidently didn't notice, I did NOT endorse this device. I, too, have serious reservations about its efficacy. However, its goal of being able to locate your child in an emergency is a laudable one and it is that goal with which I most sympathize.
As for the "little vermin" comment, well, just be glad that you did not make that comment to me or any other parent in their actual physical presence.
Later, troll boy.
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
I'm not a troll, I'm just not kidcentric. I realize you weren't endorsing the device. But if you don't trust your kids teachers, etc... that's not something that can be solved by this device, or any other locator system. Knowing your kids location does not stop bad things from happening to your kid. And heck, what are you going to do? Watch the monitor 24/7 to make sure your kid isn't going somewhere he isn't supposed to be? What if some stranger offers the kid 20$ to get in his car, it's not an emergency to the kid. He hops in, is overcome physically, tied up, still no alarm, abused, killed, and burried in a shallow grave. At which point I doubt you are getting any signal from the bracelet since most of this would be done indoors or some similar shielded area, or well out of range of the PCS network this thing relies on. So you've got a totally ineffective device that MIGHT let you locate your kids body. Woohoo....
And a lot of peopls kids ARE little vermin, for sure. If yours aren't great. You're doing your job.
Breeding should not be a right! You should have to go through the same process to have a biokid as you do to adopt.
Kintanon
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Thank you. Much better points this time around. I find that I agree at least partially with most of them, hence my own misgivings about the technology. Given that I am the father of 3 little girls, I am probably more rabidly kidcentric than many, especially in light of recent events in the USA. So even though my rational mind agrees with your misgivings in this approach, something in me wants to find something like this that works. Guess I'm doomed to a life of worry, eh? :-)
Re:I get it... (Score:2)
Of course, an unselfish/noble individual would prefer (A) and that the guy is caught quickly before any harm is done, but I think many parents would be happy with (B).
Excellent! (Score:2)
for 399.99 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
Only if you're a wimpy parent who can't discipline your kid. I'm not saying I would use something like this, but if I did, it's simple to make sure he doesn't forget.
Johnny, this is the rule: "You forget, you are grounded for the next week.". Problem solved.
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
And the proper reply would be "OK, two weeks". If the kid wants to escalate it, that's fine. No TV. No computer. No door on your room.
And if I had to implement the ultimate punishment, then so be it. I'll with him to school, and follow the kid around. He'll be begging for mercy after the first period.
Trust me, I'll win.
Re:for 399.99 (Score:2)
Oh, bullshit. In fact, it's exactly the opposite -- the best way to lose your kid's respect is to not enforce any discipline and be wishy-washy on the rules you set down. Then they just see you as weak willed.
The key is consistent rules and discipline. They should know what the rules are, and what the consequences are for breaking them. The other key is that they should always know that the rules are not arbitrary and are set down for a reason. They may not agree with the reason, and that's OK (and expected), but they should understand that there IS a reason.
As a parent, the trust of your children is invaluable and utterly fragile- and once you lose it, it's incredibly difficult to get back.
Wrong again. Children naturally trust their parents. It takes a LOT of abuse to break down bonds. Take a look at any child-abuse case, and you'll find children yearning to get love and acceptance from their parents. They'll start trusting instantly.
I wonder... (Score:2)
Or better, just drop one into a Greyhound bus bound for the other coast...
Chip'em!!! (Score:2)
Anyway, as much big brother as this screams I think parents are going to jump all over the Applied Digital Solutions [adsx.com] chip. It is just a matter of time.
Things wrong (Score:2)
Re:Things wrong (Score:2)
Re:Things wrong (Score:2)
Does anyone remember that scene in _Casino_... (Score:2)
hyacinthus.
Wherify wireless device discussed earlier (Score:2)
The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:2)
I don't know about the rest of you, but I was not allowed more than a couple yards from my house until I was way more than 7.
I don't know where you lived, but screw that philosophy. I am NOT going to build a prison around my house and keep my kids "safe" from the 1 in a million chance they might be upducted.
Yes, there IS such a thing as too safe. The day my kids can't roam around our neighborhood exploring is the day I find a new neighborhood.
Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:2)
Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:2)
you're absurdly naive to reject the possibility of your child being abducted from your neighborhood.
No, you're absurdly paranoid. Way more kids are killed by lightning than are abducted by strangers. Should I never let my child play outside because some stray lightning bolt might get them? Way more kids are killed in car accidents -- should I never drive my kids anywhere? And I'm sure I could go on and on.
The odds of my kids getting abducted are literally millions to one. You'll pardon me if I live my life in a rational way and worry more about my developing my children's independence and trust than filling their mind with worthless thoughts that the entire world is crawling with people just waiting to grab them.
Sheesh, it's no wonder that kids are fat and lazy. Parents keep them chained up around the house all the time, if you're any typical example.
Re:The device LOCKS onto your wrist. (Score:2)
Hear, hear. I don't think that many of these paranoid parents have any idea of how low the real statistical risk is.
On the other hand, as the proportion of paranoid parents increases, the risk to children of the remaining laissez-faire parents probably increases -- when the kidnappers come around, they're the only ones left to choose from. In that sense, it is legitimately more dangerous to let your kids run free today than it used to be, but only because there are so few running free. This probably leads to a snowball effect similar to the one that's filling our highways with SUVs (it is truly more dangerous to drive a smaller car today, but only because there are too many of these ridiculous behemoths out there endangering you -- so you feel pressured to join them for your own safety).
Great concept but... (Score:2, Informative)
GPS signals are way too weak to be of any use in real-life situations. Go inside a building and the signal dies. Go under some trees and it's one. Heck even state of the art GPS receivers require a 30-second interval to get its initial coordinates.
Re:Great concept but... (Score:2)
Window of opportunity (Score:3, Insightful)
-the lower boundary being the age where a child can reliably keep this thing on all day without messing with it, taking it off, or letting somebody "borrow" it
-the upper boundary being the age where the child is savvy enough to put a bit of distance between him/herself and the device.
If your child is young and loose enough to warrant a $400 tracking device, perhaps your parenting techniques need to be reconsidered. If your child is older and warrants a tracking device, he/she will soon figure out a way to defeat it, whether by losing it, throwing it away, etc. Older children who do not want to be tracked will find a way not to be tracked. The window of age where this device will be an effective tracking solution is pretty narrow, as I see it.
Re:Window of opportunity (Score:2)
Now, while I'm not saying it's not possible to take the device off, if you put a lot of time and energy into it, the device is specifically made to be difficult to take off or cut off. Attempts to do so will trigger the alarm feature.
- Young kids will have trouble letting someone borrow it without parental permission or loosing a hand
- Older kids who try and remove it will find it triggers an alarm to let their parents know. Nice try.
Your last paragraph seems to be a little strange
Re:Window of opportunity (Score:2)
Kintanon
Re:Window of opportunity (Score:2)
Are you saying kids have to be doing something stupid to be abducted? I'm sure there are numerous victims of abuse who'd find your suggestion that they only got abused/abducted/whatever because they were raised to be stupid as highly ignorant, misinformed and offensive.
Re:Window of opportunity (Score:2)
The following situations would in no way be alleviated by this device:
Child is grabbed off of street by random person, random person cuts off bracelet thing with bolt cutters and tosses it out the window. Now, you have the last known position of the kid, which you would have anyways unless the kid is wandering around on deserted streets alone, which he shouldn't be, Stupid Kid.
Child is raped/molested by random stranger. Bracelet sounds alert for the entire 15 minutes it takes for kid to be traumatized for life. Not the kids fault, but the bracelet didn't help.
Kid gets hit by a car, falls out a window, lights himself on fire. Bracelet doesn't help at all.
Sooo... What is this bracelet designed to do exactly? Let paranoid parents track their kid... Umm, apparently they don't trust their kid, because this thing certainly doesn't stop anything from happening TO the kid.
Kintanon
Re:Window of opportunity (Score:2)
Well, not maybe watch the children 24 hours a day, but at least be aware of when you should watch them and where they are. When me and my brother went out to play, my mom said you stay in this area....meaning we stayed with in the block. We were not allowed to walk to the store by ourselves or anything until we were much older. We were raised to respect our parents, so we knew we had better listen or we'd get the proverbial beat down (spanking, priviledges taken away or something to that effect). Now alot of folks want to be buddies with their kids. I will be their buddy sometimes, but, I hate to break it to ya, sometimes I gotta lay down the law. No you must not watch your kids 24 hours a day, but you should at least know where they are at and hope they actually go where they are going. A prime example of being aware of your kids.....that lady in Texas thought the baby would be fine if she just ran the cart back to the corral. We all know what happened. Personally, when in that situation, I will take my son with me to the corral unless I am parked next to it. Only then would I actually leave my son alone in the car and I would possibly lock the door for the minute I would be away. I feel sorry for that lady that she had to go through that and I am not validating what the snatcher did in any way, but that lady could have been more careful when doing what she did. Personally, if I had to take 3 kids to the store, I would not go or if I had to, I would have tried to take another adult or possibly parked next to the corral even if I had to park in the boonies. No blame being placed on that lady and she doesn't deserve to have the wrath of children services come down on her, but she should be more careful (and probably will) in the future.
Not too new in the US, either. (Score:4, Informative)
(Disclaimer: Used to work for SAIC.)
Two things about "child abductions" (Score:5, Insightful)
Second, GPS signals and wireless signals are quite easy to block. GPS doesn't work indoors and the most common place to lose a child is a large department store or mall. So, it doesn't do you any good there.
Finally, battery life. How long will this thing run before recharges? If it doesn't last long then you can just wrap some tinfoil around the thing to block the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die.
Though, you have to admire how quicly companies can market to the latest paranoia.
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
I don't know where you got this statistic, but, let's assume it's true. Your argument is a little like saying:
"90% of car crashes are non-fatal, thus airbags are pointless"
Yes, it's conceivably possible to block off the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die. Assuming your child's abductor knows the child wears it, knows what it is, and knows how the GPS signal can be blocked. Even with these assumptions, it's still then possible to get the last location of the child before the signal went black, and thus probably where they were abducted. Perhaps you think this is useless information?
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
The issue, to use your car analogy, isn't that airbags or this particular device are pointless, it's that they don't provide the protection that you think they do. (Though arguably air bags are quite effective.)
As far as I know, this system would not be sending in its location all the time. Maybe it would send updates every minute at the fastest. The issue is the effectiveness of the data that it gathers and transmits. Additionally, the issue is about how parents would treat this tool. This is not a substitute for watching your kid and escorting them from place to place.
(As for the 90% I think the number is actually MUCH higher: from http://www.lostchildren.org/STATISTICS.htm we have over 350,000 family abductions in the US yearly. How many stranger abduction cases have we heard about lately? 3? 5?)
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
They already have a battery that gets it's energy from body heat, this is not going to be a problem in the very very near future.
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
However you know they are confined to the mall (which empties and closes at night), otherwise you get a signal.
Finally, battery life. How long will this thing run before recharges? If it doesn't last long then you can just wrap some tinfoil around the thing to block the GPS signal and wait for the battery to die.
Howabout the same technology that works your watch from arm movement/heat/electricity or however.
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
First off, you've got a watch that SCREAMS out its identity (look at the pictures of it on the site). Second, it requires two different technologies (GPS and Digital Cellular) to work. Finally, it requires that you have it on the kid all the time. Is it water proof? (They talk about being able to remotely unlock the watch so they can participate in a pool party) How shock proof is this thing? How heavy is it?
Risk management is also about avoiding a false sense of security (like people who eschew escorts because they have pepper spray). Personally, I think this device has far too many shortcomings to it. (And yes, I'm a recent father so this will become more and more of a concern for me.)
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
You assigned the watch a 0.01% probabilty of working. I'd contest that number and probably put it at 0.00001% or lower. Why? The technology required for it to work is just too fragile for the application.
First off, it's simplicity itself to block the signals needed for the watch to function. Second, because of it's high visibility it's also quite easy to merely cut it off the child's wrist (I can see it now, cut it off, toss it in the back of a truck and let the would be rescuers go off on a merry chase while you casually walk off in the other direction.) Finally, the parents who will use this device will use it as a substitute for good parenting. Thus you've INCREASED the risks to the child without a matching decrease from the device.
Finally, as we've explored the true abduction danger is from other family members. So, as I've said we're selling to paranoia here. (Look at the number of stranger kidnappings we hear about in the news and we realize that more good can be done by buying bicycle helmets for all kids then this device will accomplish.)
Re:Question... (Score:2)
the faraday effect [mmresearch.com]
and the faraday cage [gla.ac.uk]
I can block a 20 Bajillion watt transmitter with tinfoil.. I am sure that the signals from 6-12 sattelites overhead can easily be blocked by it.
so your answer is yes.
Re:Two things about "child abductions" (Score:2)
or perhaps even... (Score:2)
I've already got something that can track my kids (if I had any) it's called a large network of friends in my city.
Re:or perhaps even... (Score:2)
Friendfinder (Score:2)
Basically you can enable a service which lets your friends locate your phone. The triangulation part is not working yet I think. But the location of the closest GSM station is usually enough to find someone.
It's SMS/WAP based and can be enabled and disabled easily. It could ofcourse be used by corporations also, they would just have to require the employees to have the service on at all times.
Oh wonderful world (Score:2)
First we get it to the kids so they don't get lost or abducted... Pretty and nice toy that kids love to carry.
Then we keep track of teenagers and where they get lost by night and if they go to school... We stick a superminiature device to their shoes...
Later your boss keeps track of your wanderings and why you get late to work... All under a new fresh product "Window to worker(TM)" sold by another politically correct privacy corp...
First? (Score:2, Informative)
Chldren != people (Score:2, Insightful)
A kid can't pursue happiness if their particular brand of happiness conflicts with their parents' wishes. Think of the standard example of a kid who is gay, and whose parents are religious or otherwise intolerant. Generally what happens is the kid either represses his normal, healthy urges and becomes miserable or rebels against his parents, often being punished for it, often hating his folks for the rest of his life.
A kid can't pursue liberty if his parents don't want him to. A kid (with this or any other tracking device) doesn't have the privacy [slashdot.org] that we all strive for [eff.org] all the time. The implication is that a child's life is not his own. He is free to live his life until his parents decide he's stepping on their toes or they decide they don't agree with the way he feels about stuff.
Kids' right to life is a whole big bucket o' worms, so I won't go into that -- but you get the idea.
There seems to be a pervasive attitude (not just in North America) that until we reach the age of majority we are not fully human. Speaking in American terms, two of the so-called "self-evident" and "unalienable" rights are waived or subjected to editing according to what the child's parents think.
Re:Chldren != people (Score:2)
Security/privacy concerns... (Score:2)
Duh! I hate to be the one suggesting it but what if - and believe me this is entirely hypocri^H^H^Hthetical - someone isn't using it "properly" ?
Serisouly, the concern would ofcourse be that it might allow tracking of people who are now aware of it. Although it doesn't mention much of the technical side in the article, I doubt that the technology requires more than software in the phone system. This means that in the wrong hands, any phone could be tracked.
Still, it'd be cool to install it in your car so you could track that when it's stolen.
As a parent... (Score:2)
3 years ago we were at sea world and I was watching my 3 year old on their giant playground. She went behind a slide and disappeared. I immediately ran over to find her, and she was gone. My heart sank. 30 minutes later my wife and I found her 1/4 mile from where we had lost her.
So say all you want about "well, the parent should be watching the child." Blah. Things happen. Kids run. I'd love to have something to help me find them.
That said, an even better technology would be one that would use short-distance (0-5 miles) wireless and simply point in the direction of my child's signal. That would be even more helpful when they wander unexpectedly at sea world or wal-mart or...
Get off your high horses. After all we can do, parents still need help sometimes.
Re:As a parent... (Score:2)
To try and use one of these with my daughter when she turns 16 is a joke. She's only 9 now and thinks she knows everything and doesn't need any help. I couldn't imagine trying something like that with a teenager.
like that AT&T labs thing (Score:2)
You would wear a tag on your shirt, presumably part of an id badge system already in place (or not). In that badge was... something magic - I'd assume a chip of somesort and maybe a transmitter.
Then using the gridwork of a hanging ceiling, you would setup monitors at central places in each room (or several over large spaces).
Then this would talk to your servers... or maybe the servers would talk to it... whatever.
The end result was you could finger someone and it would say where in the building they were - even with the ability for a graphical system as well (technically could even tie into a camera system, but that wasn't something they showed).
So you could be sitting in a meeting, waiting for Larry (Larry is always late, that bastard), and then on your laptop there finger Larry and see that he is in the kitchen and has been there for 3 hours... perhaps Larry had a heart attack and is lying there dead (or just took off his id badge there and ran away, frolicking merrily in fields of poppies... you know, those fields that are near all offices).
You could also finger rooms and see all the people in that room - so you could finger the bathroom and see who is in there, or who is gathering around the water cooler.
That alone made me want to start a company. Just to dick around with that.
Employer tracking me? (Score:2)
1984 gets closer and closer (Score:2)
I've said this before, and I'll say it again: The sole responsibility for monitoring your child's safety is yours. Technology like this is merely a false sense of security. In the case of companies using it on employees, it's a disgusting invasion of privacy, and I'm surprised that it's legal here in the states. (Of course, I'm also upset that companies, under threat of terminating your employment, can extract bodily fluids from you in the name of a "drug test".)
Even more of a kick in the teeth is the cost.. $400 bucks to lose all privacy of where I'm at at any given time? No thanks. If I run an errand during my lunch hour, it's nobody's business but my own.
Growing up == being independent (Score:2)
Somewhat ironic, conisdering that part of growing up is learning to be indipendent from your parents.
Remember when you first got lost as a kid?
Tears... upset.... A learning experiance wasn't it! Maybe someone had to call a policeman for you? All turned out right in the end didn't it. (Kiddy fiddlers are few and far between)
Maybe parents dont want there kid go grow up or something....
Employee rights? (Score:2)
This seems to create a big brother culture, track all your employees, log their phone calls, watch there network usage.. it's 1984.. just a little later. This seems to create a hostil work enviroment rather then one geared towards a happy workplace. You don't want your employees feeling like prisioners while at the jobsite.
Than again.. if it's based on a cell signal, we all know how well they work.. just turn off the phone!.
Cheaper and easier solution (Score:2)
Seriously though, people have got to stop getting their worldview from the media. 500 kids a year disappearing (the vast majority at the hands of divorced parents) out of the millions of kids is pretty small when you look at the number who die from such unglamorous fates such as car accidents or fires. People need to maintain perspective.
Soccer Moms, SUVs and LoJack for children (Score:2)
Point being you still need to be a parent. You can strap whatever you want on your kid, be it this a leash, a small ferocious otter, what have you, BUT you still have to parent your child.
Hopefully this will on be a tool not a solution. I don't want soccer mom trucking down Main Street in her 5000lb Ford Leviathan looking at the web page showing her that her kid is next door. I also don't want people to think this is some kid of auto pilot for resposibilty.
My daughter can't be pregnant! She has a GPS.
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:ATT Wireless has this (Score:2)
I love my T68i!
-Pat
When do Impants Become Mandatory (Score:2)
Its all 'for the children'...
yes this is sarcasm.. For those sheep out there that dont have a clue..
Still vaporware, and on Slashdot before (Score:2)
This thing is suspicious. It's not shipping until September, but they're taking orders, with "4-6 week delivery". That's a bad sign.
The pricing is terrible. The thing costs more than a cell phone. There's a $340 up-front cost (there's an "activation fee" hidden in there), plus a monthly fee of $25-$50 per month. You can get a good cell phone and cell phone service, maybe even with GPS, for that price. The service is way overpriced, considering that it is basically a 2-way pager.
It's also on a 1.9GHz PCS network, only. So there's a coverage problem. It doesn't have backup capability to go out to something with broad coverage, like AMPS analog cellular, or something cops have, like Lojak, or, ideally, a satellite.
It does, though, have the cool "locks on the wrist" feature, with remote unlock, no less. And if you cut the wristband, it calls for help.
This sounds like a market test. If enough preorders come in, they'll actually make some. Maybe. More likely, some cell phone manufacturer will do this better and take over this niche.
Useful in some situations (Score:2, Informative)
I doubt the average person would poney up $400 when 99.99% of the time there isn't any real concern. I'd be more curious how a 3 year old deals with a device being attached to his/her wrist. Mine would start screaming after a few minutes. He doesn't like paper wristbands from a local amusement park being on his wrist for more than 5 minutes, much less a device which is bulky & he can't remove.
And for the people who raise privacy concerns, get over it. Kids have no privacy, they never have and never will.
Before technology parents still spied on their kids. They put a phone in a central location, searched rooms when the kids were not there, watched the odometer on a car to see how far they've been driving. 20 years ago, few kids had a television in their room because parents actually cared what their kids were watching.
As a parent, the idea isn't to be a friend to your kid. When they are young you protect them. As they get older you give them more freedom. The difficulty is that too much freedom and a kid can hurt themself, too little and they don't learn what they need to survive on their own.
Sometimes the need to protect & the need to give freedom are very conflicting and, when in doubt, some parents go for the hyper conservative approach.
prior art (Score:2)
The Gamesters of Triskelion [startrek.com]
Or maybe the Providers will start selling their collars in the US market.
The concept of this technology (Score:2)
The accuracy is only up to ~25M diameter. However it's still good as civilian GPS does not give accurate result due to the fact that US Government deliberately inserting noise in GPS reading for non-military use. (it's THEIR GPS satalites nevertheless.
However, it has several problems:
1) Special GSM sim must be made
2) It's very proprietary that different telcos have different implementations of it
3) The worker can always turn off the phone to hide his location(it can only be solved by firing that insubordinate staff
4) Last but most important, it does not work on the sea, because there are no base station there. The tracking system will always return the location of the nearest shore.
If look as if 4) is not a big problem, but don't forget Hong Kong has a pretty big harbour in the middle, and in fact people working on the sea needs this technology badly!
Re:The concept of this technology (Score:2)
It's more accurate that civilian GPS system as I mentioned above. Besides, Pinpoint relys heavily on the telco providing that services to them. They are only marketing this technology. Besides, they sell security system and GPS too.
Re:Easy to Defeat (Score:2)
Re:Easy to Defeat (Score:2)
The same goes for the watch. I'm sure it isn't easy to cut the band, but I gurantee it can be done. If the motive is kidnapping for profit, then they are going to grab your kid no matter what. The random sexual predator however, is going to go for an easy mark. If you don't believe that just read your local paper and see how many aborted kidnappings happen because the kid squirmed away or started screaming. Most of these perpetrators are not persistent, patient maybe, but not persistent.
Re:Easy to Defeat (Score:2)
Re:Easy to Defeat (Score:2)
Not so (Score:2)
That being caid chipping your pets is a "Good Thing" and is one of the most effective things you can do to help ensure you will recover your pet if it gets lost.
Re:Super geek-on-the-playground toy (Score:2)
"Help! Help! Help! Help!"
"Can't you read?! Call the police!" Thwack.
Maran
Re:medical/emergency workers (Score:2)
This made me think of another use, albeit a niche use. It could seriously aid rescue workers looking for a child in a burning building.
Re:medical/emergency workers (Score:2)
The other application for this technology would be the tracking of personnel on the fire ground. Currently we do that with PAR cards, which is a laminated card you give to whoever is watching an "area" before you enter it. However, in this case we DO need pinpoint accuracy. So what we have thought about is on major incidents setting up two or three mini-towers around the building and tracking off of the radio that the firefighter carry.
All in all, I think this has some very good applications in the real world. Let's just hope the bad ones don't squash them.
Re:You guys are missing the point... (Score:2)
Too many people say, when confronted with this topic, that devices like this somehow harm or constrain children in ways that they shouldn't be constrained. What you said is exactly right. Children need freedom within limits. They don't need the capability to deny their parents knowledge of their whereabouts. It is a parent's right and obligation to set boundaries, their responsibility to provide a safe way for those boundaries to be explored. If I can have reliable assistance from modern technology, I can enlarge those boundaries. If I can't then they remain more constrained.
As for employees, I don't think this is useful in many cases, but perhaps in some. It's entirely reasonable, IMO, to GPS an armored car and possibly the drivers for the duration of their work day.