Doubleclick Privacy Suit Settlement Approved 9
behrman writes: "This Yahoo-hosted version of a C|Net article announces that Doubleclick is now allowed to settle the class-action privacy suit against it. Terms include purging databases of personal information, hiring a third-party company to ensure compliance, running a 33-million-banner-ad privacy education campaign, and requiring opt-in for future marketing data collection. This makes the preliminary approval from two months ago offical. Other (older) stories: Privacy groups oppose the settlement, and the settlement is proposed."
Hello. (Score:1)
One freakin' reply in two hours? WTF?
On topic: Something finally going right for the consumer. The only downside to the deletion of customer data is that it was probably already sold and re-sold so it's no that big a deal.
doubleclick. (Score:1)
Opt-Out cookies and the rest of that BS won't help my Grandmother who just doesn't know the technology. We should be trying to protect the people who (by choice or not) are ignorant.
Opt-Out Cookies Suck (Score:1, Informative)
It would be nice if they were forced to use an opt-in policy. Of course this would destroy their database as no one would do so. Unless collection of personal information is made illegal, we'll have to put up with it indefinitely.
Doesn't matter much - I blacklisted them ages ago (Score:3, Interesting)
33 Million banner adds ? (Score:2)
Unpunished? (Score:2, Insightful)
DoubleClick was charged with violating state and federal laws by surreptitiously tracking and collecting consumers' personally identifiable data and combining it with information on their Web surfing habits.
But they agreed to delete this information after they were caught, so everything is ok now, isn't it?
What if somebody steals money?. Would he avoid jail just by returning the money after he is caught?
What if a hacker lets loose a virus but deletes the source on his machine after he is caught?