China Cracks Down on Non-Compliant Internet Bars 31
phreak404 writes: "According to this article on CNN.com, over 197 bars were closed for apparently violating licensing laws that require bars to censor content."
The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing and to watch someone else doing it wrong, without commenting. -- T.H. White
sad (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:sad (Score:1)
Restricted speech is probably more attractive. (Score:2)
Perhaps the goal is to identify those who are dangerous by leaking just enough that only those who would like basic human rights for the citizens access it so you can send out the death squads more effectively? Makes you wonder how many people no longer exist due to weblogs...
Re:Restricted speech is probably more attractive. (Score:1)
Yes, but you have to _know_ that the content has been forbidden.
From what I've read about the Chinese 'megafilters' is that they don't return a page that says <B>Access Denied</B> but more along the lines of <B>Connection timed out...</B>
The Internet in countries in opressive countries doesn't spark off the free speech thing as much as people expect... the people have to <i>realise</I> that they're being fed horse dung first.
Dissent Requires Effort (Score:2)
It's too bad that China's official government is so fearful of alternative ideas. Everyday Chinese have got to figure out sooner or later that the reasons for this are no more complicated than the government has no inherently optimal basis for existence - the existing government just wants to retain power and control whatever the case.
Dissidents will have to go to greater measures to communicate with one another. Let the Internet Bars install official blocking software that is probably as porous as a moquito net. Then, communicate via a commercial and politically-correct sounding language.
"Enemies of the people" could refer to the government of China. Etc. Turn their own doublespeak back on them.
Re:Dissent Requires Effort (Score:1)
My brother-in-law... (Score:2, Insightful)
Falun Gong. (Score:2)
Re:Falun Gong. (Score:1)
HTTP 404 - File not found
Re:Falun Gong. (Score:2)
Re:My brother-in-law... (Score:1)
doh (Score:3, Funny)
Re:doh (Score:2)
Re:doh (Score:2)
Whoa, no way! (Score:1)
- A.P.
Well I'm shocked...not (Score:3, Insightful)
Look at it this way: In most of the US you can't brew and serve alcoholic drink publicly without some sort of licence. In the Republic of Ireland you have to have a licence to own a TV. In China, you need a licence to run an internet cafe.
In the US you don't need a TV licence if the TV is for private use. In the Republic of Ireland you can brew alcohol if it's for private use(maybe you can in the US as well - I don't know). In Ireland and the US, most internet cafes aren't required by law to restrict access to sites. But a good few places - whether by law or by a policy mandate - do restrict access to porno sites and certains sites with a 'speciality' interest(aren't US libraries required to restrict access to certain sites?). In China, all public internet terminals(including internet cafes) are required to have filtering software. From what I've heard on the 'net, the myth of 'the Yellow Firewall' is just that - a myth. Chinese PC users can access the entire internet from their homes.
8)
Re:Well I'm shocked...not (Score:1)
there's been alot of huff about wether or not it's legal or not to censor various things (aside from porn, like pro-animal abuse, KKK, ect.). schools have the right to censor their web access, i think they're required to do so. public librarys shouldn't but do so anyways alot of the time.
Re:Well I'm shocked...not (Score:1)