A Number For Everything 598
jtcampbell writes: "Whilst reading the Times today I found this article about a U.S. government idea to give everyone a unique 'ENUM,' that serves as a universal phone number, email address, and fax number. Quite a cool idea, but will everyone adopt the standard? besides, i thought we left numeric email addresses with compuserve a few years back. And remembering these 11 digit numbers could be fun ..."
It isn't a US govt scheme (Score:5, Funny)
Kanji is the way to go! (Score:3, Funny)
Not such a good idea. (Score:5, Funny)
The problem with that is that it opens you up to two things: abuse and honest mistakes. Both for obvious reasons would be real problems.
Example. The credit agency in Canada seems to think I owe BMW money for a car. That is long gone (when the lease ended, I sold that car and bought a different make). Still, it's well neigh impossible to get that off the record. Now imagine everyone had that info!
And another example. I recently changed medical insuramce companies at work, and that needed an AIDS test. Negative, I am happy to say. But if it had not been: if all these systems had been tied together (as they will be soon, with one number) that information would quite easily have got back to the bank, or the employer, etc.
I think we need to be very careful indeed with systems that make it easier for people bad or good to track us and what we do.
Who is Number One? (Score:3, Funny)
The Times. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Revelations 13:16 - 18 (Score:1, Funny)
Yea, I think it goes something like that. After we're done with the devil's government it's on to those bastards at TRW and Equifax.
Ooh man, I bet I'm setting off those Echelon alerts up the ass with this post.
Re:Kanji is the way to go! (Score:4, Funny)
60,000^3 = 216 Trillion combinations.
Chinese people typically have 3-character names. A one-character family name and a two-character first name.
So all we really need to do is give everyone on Earth a unique Chinese name! And since the characters might be hard to remember, you can tattoo it on their foreheads so the won't forget it.
I know Southern Baptists especially will just love this idea!
Re:Changing numbers (Score:2, Funny)
Of course not! This way you can always be spammed, AND Microsoft can always keep track of you!
The Prisoner (Score:2, Funny)
Number Two: "In the Village."
Prisoner: "Who are you?"
Number Two: "The new Number Two."
Prisoner: "Who is Number One?"
Number Two: "You are."
Prisoner: "What do you want?"
Number Two: "Information."
Prisoner: "Well, you won't get it!"
Number Two: "By hook or by crook, we will."
Prisoner: "I am not a number, I am a free man."
Number Two: (laughs)
Someone had to post it. I figure since I used to actually watch "The Prisoner" it's not entirely out of line. First it starts with the "Dr. Who". Next think you know you're watching "The Prisoner" and "The Avengers". That damn anglophilic PBS.
Re:Revelations 13:16 - 18 (Score:1, Funny)
This could be loads of fun if they just started numbering people from 1 instead of using a proper key. It'd mean somebody would wind up with 666. Maybe we could hack the system so that it winds up going to Falwell.
An old "Peanuts" comic strip (Score:2, Funny)
I remember reading an old Peanuts comic strip (bless Charles Schulz's memory), where Charlie Brown and Lucy meet a kid whose name is '5'. He explains that his parents gave him and his sisters ('3' and '4') names as numbers as a protest of sorts. Then Charlie Brown muses that what if everyone had numbers for names, and thinks that he'd have 3.1416 as his name...
Just a silly thought...looks like your government is insisting that everyone have numbers for names. :)
Re:What about identity theft? (Score:5, Funny)
Prof: So, of these fields for the employee database, which would you use as the primary key: SSN, LAST_NAME, FIRST_NAME, or STREET_ADDRESS?
Me: None of the above.
Prof: Oh? The main requirements for a primary key is that the field be unique, and that the field not change. The SSN seems to fit that bill doesn't it?
Me: No, not everyone has a SSN.
Prof: This is an *employee* database. Of course they're all going to have SSNs.
Me: But these are not in anywway guarnteed to be unique or not change.
Prof: Oh, you're just talking silly things. Of course they're not going to change or be unique.
Me: Do YOU trust the government that much?
Prof: Stop being ridiculous.
So, you see... I *was* right!!! Heh.
Re:Revelations 13:16 - 18 (Score:5, Funny)
When I worked at Packard Bell tech support, my friend got a call from a woman who was distraught that her AUTOEXEC.BAT file was exactly 666 kilobytes. My friend had her edit the file and add
REM SATAN I CAST THEE OUT
to the end of the file. Did a DIR and checked the filesize -- 682k (or something like that.) Problem solved. The woman said "thank you" and hung up.
I claim 8675309 !! (Score:1, Funny)
i was curious (Score:1, Funny)
Re:It isn't a US govt scheme (Score:3, Funny)
Since the entire population of Luxembourg is only 35 the devising of such a scheme can hardly have taxed the inventor.
Re:It isn't a US govt scheme (Score:3, Funny)
Thank you for your input, Slashdot user #202465.
Your sentiments have been duly recorded for posterity in comment #2251343.