data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92ec3/92ec3a8bb51cd25da9a36d7360c786d62625a43b" alt="The Internet The Internet"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fe91/2fe91f7c1bc601dca306860ed552b9e3bb258039" alt="Your Rights Online Your Rights Online"
.Eu TLD to be Created? 15
ksw writes: "CNET has this story about the proposed .eu tld. So all we need now is the EU-Parliament's blessing and we're on our way. I wonder what their take on squatting will be......." I'm not quite sure how this is going to play out ... The European government has no particular authority to simply order that new domains be created in the root servers.
Waddayamean, choose? (Score:1)
I'm not sure this is a good thing... (Score:2)
Poor planning, IMHO.
Yours truly,
Mr. X
...unintended consequences...
What about .NAFTA ? (Score:1)
Re:Needs to go through ISO (Score:2)
On September 25, 2000 ICANN issued a resolution providing that alpha-2 (&) codes are delegable as ccTLDs only in cases where the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency, on its exceptional reservation list, has issued a reservation of the code that covers any application of ISO 3166-1 that needs a coded representation in the name of the country, territory or area involved . Such conditions are met by the EU code which is therefore delegable to the Community.
In other words, the delegation from the commission offered the ICANN some money, and the ICANN quickly added an exception to the ISO 3166 rule.
the AC
more info than slashdot deserves... (Score:3)
[as a brief digression, fear and loathing of the dreaded DG-13, errr... ISPO, is directly proportional to the closeness to the commission. Americans have very little to fear, but I live no more than 40Kms from them, and they equal micro~1.oft for my disdain. Think "living in the shadow of the land of Mordor"]
Last year, the ISPO put out a CFP to the big-5 usual suspects, (i.e. PWC, E&Y, D&TT, AA, KPMG) about creating a new TLD, back when ICANN was asking for new TLD proposals. But the RFP was, as the norm, heavily stacked to be given to whoever bought the last round of beers. [/rant]
The proposal called for a consultant group to approach ICANN, IANA, IETF and any who might influence the decision, on how to create a
Moving with great haste, for the commission, just one year after the idea was proposed, a report [eu.int] (sorry, PDF) was given to the commission, and now they are going ahead with the creation of a registry to administer the new TLD. A longer, more detailed report [eu.int] was submitted at the beginning of this year.
It is interesting to note they ignored calls for the registry to be run as a business (as NSI) and they want to make it "a not-for-profit organisation operated in the public interest."
the AC
Re:I'm not sure this is a good thing... (Score:2)
... maybe the EU countries will one day have
- - - - -
Re:Needs to go through ISO - no it doesn't (Score:1)
The RFCs are silent on both points, though there is a internet draft that mentions reserving two-letter strings so as to prevent collisions with ISO namespace. But even if this were spelled out explicitly in a published RFC, the RFCs are not standards and are not enforceable except by consensus. There are plenty of examples of code or protocols or procedures that blatantly violate one or more RFCs. All it takes to destroy either "tradition" is for one two-letter TLD to be issued that is not a ISO code. Dot-eu stands the best chance of being that TLD.
Needs to go through ISO (Score:2)
Reading the rules for adding a name to the ISO-3166 standard [www.din.de] you'll see that the only way that
Is the UN likely to recognize the EU as a nation any time soon? No. Is there likely to be a
Re:Needs to go through ISO (Score:2)
No. Under procedure B you need to satisfy I, II, and III. I don't think that the EU counts as a "region geographically separated from its parent country".
Slashdot news rule ? (Score:1)
__
Re:Portuguese-speaking countries will love that (Score:1)
Portuguese-speaking countries will love that (Score:2)
beija.eu == kiss.me ;-P
sou.eu == its.me
sefud.eu == yourefuck.ed -- all right, not the same thing but what the hell.
Root Servers (Score:1)
If they really want it to go through, I'm sure some monetary compensation could get it on the root servers.
.eu registry proposal (Score:1)
.int (Score:1)