Slashdot Log In
Legal Music Streaming Site Launches In France
Posted by
kdawson
on Sun Aug 26, 2007 08:37 PM
from the trade-sanctions-coming dept.
from the trade-sanctions-coming dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The French website Deezer.com has struck a deal with the SACEM (the French equivalent to the RIAA) and is now legally providing Internet users around the world with more than 100,000 full songs, streamed on demand and without restrictions. The site, formerly named Blogmuzik.net, had had to close down last March under pressure from the recording industry."
Related Stories
Firehose:Legal music streaming site launches in France by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Legal Music Streaming Site Launches In France
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 161 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
it's cool i've tried it (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 25, @03:49PM)
Re:it's cool i've tried it (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.lazylightning.org/)
I tried a couple of albums at work late last week and then at home on Friday morning. Both connections (work routinely allows for 3MB/s from Apple -- just for reference and I have a 4200/500 DSL connection at home) were laggy with the music frequently pausing during the stream. I felt like I was using RealAudio back in 1999.
I wasn't impressed at all. My co-workers all use free.napster.com which works much better. YMMV.
Re:it's cool i've tried it (Score:4, Insightful)
This is the problem with the internet bottleneck. There is lots of complaints that BitTorrent is sucking all the bandwidth. A file downloaded can and often is played many times. Think of the internet meltdown if you switched all the BitTorrent downloaders to 100% streaming instead.
To fit the bandwidth now requires very high lossy streaming formats or a serious boost in bandwidth.
Welcome back to the days of Buffering............Buffering...........Bufferin
Re:it's cool i've tried it (Score:5, Informative)
(http://127.21.29.13/index.html)
I suspect that since they just scored this licensing agreement after a long legal struggle under new french obligatory licensing laws, they haven't had time to upgrade their servers or get better load offset architecture in place. Paying lawyers who saved their asses probably is a high priority for them.
I need to clear up the trollish flamebaiting headline, as the SACEM is nothing like the RIAA. They are the only group that collects royalties for authors and songwriters in France, and by law most of the money collected has to be distributed, despite their legendary corruption and incompetence. The SACEM has been forced to provide licensing to anyone who wants it, and I think Deezer was one of the first test cases for internet distribution. By signing a deal with SACEM, Deezer can now play any and all French artists, and any other country's artists who register with SACEM. This doesn't cover performance royalties, which are separate, all the songs on Deezer are performed by the original author. Since the Wu-Tang Clan (who I just saw on the site to use as an example) has registered with SACEM, ODB and MethodMan will get quarterly or yearly royalty checks directly from SACEM. Bands covering other author's songs can't be played under this agreement, at least according to the French press covering this.
It remains to be seen if Deezer can make enough to cover the royalties they've negotiated with SACEM. They were really over a legal barrel and if they hadn't signed they risked prison time for piracy. They could be a dotbomb2.0 fizzle, since they haven't dropped all the extraneous vowels from their name.
the AC
Re:it's cool i've tried it (Score:4, Informative)
(http://ronanian.googlepages.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday August 15, @04:54PM)
Re:it's cool i've tried it (Score:5, Funny)
We the Free people of the world thank France (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.users.qwest.net/~waffleck-asch/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 07, @04:46PM)
Information and music just wants to be free.
But...this doesn't make sense! (Score:5, Funny)
Are these the same innovation-stifling, reactionary French I keep seeing on Fox News and in the business press?
I mean, free music? That REEKS of socialism. I, for one, am enough of a proud American to do whatever the music lobbyists of this greatest country in the world demands of me.
What? (Score:4, Funny)
Goodbye Pandora, Bonjour Deezer? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.nightlifemagazine.ca/ | Last Journal: Thursday March 24 2005, @12:46PM)
32kbps MP3 (Score:4, Informative)
Sweet mama ! it really works well (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.webgeekworld.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday April 27 2006, @07:47AM)
its fast also.
Could me more secure... (Score:3, Funny)
(http://khendron.com/)
Oh, and after you've clicked the link they email you your password in the clear.
Friendly to what browser(s)? (Score:1)
Maybe the content will increase in the future. The songs I was looking for were in french so I thought they might have them.
I hope this is the start of a trend.
Worshipping Lord Cthulhu pays off... (Score:1)
Phnglui Mglwnafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah Nagl F'htagn!
imeem.com (Score:1, Informative)
Bitchin (Score:1)
SACEM != RIAA (Score:5, Informative)
(http://homepage.mac....eenewsome/index.html)
Re:SACEM != RIAA (Score:5, Informative)
"SACEM is the French performing rights organization, equivalent to either ASCAP or BMI in the US, or SOCAN in Canada. They're not a lobby group comprised of commercial record labels. They collect royalties from broadcasts and performances on behalf of French musicians."
This bears amplification.
SACEM, ASCAP/BMI, SOCAN, etc.: performing rights organizations which represent artists, composers and lyricists. THE GOOD GUYS.
The French equivalent of the RIAA is the IFPI. The RIAA and the IFPI represent the recording industry. THE BAD GUYS.
Performing rights organizations represent a potential revenue stream for artists, composers and lyricists that the record companies generally don't see and can't touch. You know how we all want the record companies to go away but for artists to be compensated, in a way which doesn't require us to pay for the music? Performing rights organizations are the way that can happen. The summary's statement that SACEM is the equivalent of the RIAA was dangerously misleading.
Making my work day better already:) (Score:1)
imeem.com Has Been Doing This In The US For A Whil (Score:3, Informative)
Who the fuck cares (Score:2)
and all the stuff that the RIAA has bullied people about for years
with no consideration of fair use.
I could give a crap about little pussy agreements with governments.
Fair use is dead and thats killing the internet
Damn Universal.... (Score:3, Informative)
(http://meuhlavache.enterinmydream.info/psp)
Excellent....pity it sucks (Score:2)
(http://not.a.valid.url.com/ | Last Journal: Monday October 02 2006, @07:51PM)
would've been cool 5 years ago, but . . . (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 18, @01:56PM)
The French equivalent to the RIAA???? (Score:2)
(http://www.geocodeengine.com/)
Ummm... let me be the first to point out that SACEM is NOT the French equivalent of the RIAA... at least not if they are allowing "more than 100,000 full songs, streamed on demand and without restrictions."
But maybe the RIAA will take a lesson from this and come to their senses and convince their member companies (themselves) to come up with and/or support more viable Internet distribution methods as a business model instead of their current "Sue 'em all and then some more people for good measure" attitude. In addition, their Internet Royalty Arm (SoundExchange) is still leaning the exact opposite way (making such things costly, and waffling back and forth between forcing the websites to add encumbering restrictions to the content - ie: DRM). While SoundExchange seems to be/have waffled on some of that, they are still a far cry from what SACEM seems to be allowing and setting up.
Hopefully this will prove to be enough of a viable business model in France that the RIAA/SoundExchange will take note and head down a different road than their current one...
The French out ahead again (Score:1)
(http://www.poleys.net/)
These days I pretty much exclusively get my music from http://www.jamendo.com/ [jamendo.com] where all the music is free (and much of it is pretty terrible, by the way, but there is also some excellent stuff.)
After observing the *AA fiasco, I've decided to vote with my wallet. Nowadays all my financial contributions are volutary. Jamendo provides me with a way to pay however much I like for the music I like, and just about all of it goes to the artist (for a change.)
Go the French!
The first nickel bag is free... (Score:2)
Nah, the RIAA wouldn't be that devious, would it?
Did you read their terms of use? (Score:1)
Sounds fishy (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.abcseo.com/)
Last.fm and Project Playlist (Score:1)
A better recap.. (Score:2)
(http://renaudguerin.net/)
It is the equivalent of the US-based BMI and ASCAP, and that makes a big difference : SACEM manages the rights of songwriters / composers / publishers, NOT the rights on actual recordings.
This means that what Deezer.com did is a first, necessary but not sufficient step, and at this point they would merely have the right to have someone perform those songs again and re-record them, then stream the result!
What they have yet to do, is to get a deal for the actual rights to the recordings, with the real french equivalent of the RIAA : the SCPP (major labels) and SPPF (independent labels). Not the IFPI (as I've read in another comment) which is just an international club of the RIA*'s.
And that's where it becomes tricky : the Deezer.com announcement comes 2 days after Universal Music France teamed up with France's 3rd largest ISP (neuf.fr, with whom they share the same parent company, Vivendi) to launch a heavily marketed, Windows DRM-based, unlimited music offering.
France's 2nd ISP, Free, probably the most innovative, net-savvy, and the last independent one, immediately decided to promote Deezer.com to steal Neuf's thunder.
Now, Universal is saying Deezer.com is illegal, and they're threatening to sue them and any entity that would overtly promote it.
They are technically right, but obviously you have to read between the lines to understand the real motive behind that potential lawsuit...
Streaming (Score:1)
Not so simple (Score:1)
(http://www.pive.org/)
Did anyone else read... (Score:2)
Perhaps it was too good to be true... (Score:2)
Not he RIAA (Score:1)
The SACEM ("Societe des Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musique", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_des _auteurs%2C_compositeurs_et_%C3%A9diteurs_de_musiq ue [wikipedia.org]) is the organisation that takes care of collecting and managing artists' fees.
Everytime you use a song from someone else (play it with your band, use it as a DJ...), this is where you have to pay in order for the artist to be rewarded.
This explains why they were able to strike a deal with them. Majors (Universal for example) are actually not happy about that site and are menacing to sue them (the deals are not signed yet, but the site is already up and running).
Re:So where is the money coming from? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.sofarida.com/)
-Give consumers a full and free access to all their favourite songs
-Pay artists and their producers through a revenue share based on our advertising revenues
- Help discovering new artists through a wide audience
from the about us [deezer.com] page on the site (emphasis mine)
Re:Call me paranoid, but.... (Score:1)
Something smells fishy and its not his feet.
Bah! (Score:2)
Re:Anything else? (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Re:So where is the money coming from? (Score:1)
(http://zcat.wired.net.nz/)
Re:Call me paranoid, but.... (Score:1)