Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

MPAA Under Investigation for Illegal NYPD Payoffs

Posted by Zonk on Sat Apr 23, 2005 05:49 AM
from the but-they're-so-pure-of-heart-and-purpose dept.
An anonymous reader writes "The New York Post is reporting that two NYPD officers are being investigated for taking illegal payoffs from the MPAA for busting sellers of pirated DVDs. According to the article, MPAA investigators would tell the cops where pirated movies were being sold, which is perfectly legal, but, after the bust, they'd give them several hundred dollars in gratuities, which is illegal. Naturally, the MPAA denies all of this."
+ -
unknown
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Money making (Score:5, Interesting)

    by markild (862998) on Saturday April 23 2005, @05:56AM (#12321724)
    "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that it loses $3.5 billion in potential worldwide revenue because of movie piracy."

    Surely the can't expect that their raids of arrests will provide them with more sales.

    Where they thinking that as long they're already on the red number side, they could just buy themselves some police forces?
  • by BrookHarty (9119) on Saturday April 23 2005, @05:59AM (#12321733) Homepage Journal
    The MPAA giving to someones campaign funds is perfectly legal, lets say a Police Chief, who then in turn is tough on copyright crimes.

    Yup, business as usual.

  • Which it be? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by n0dalus (807994) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:04AM (#12321749) Journal
    FTA: Two NYPD veterans are being investigated by Internal Affairs...
    From title: MPAA Under Investigation for Illegal NYPD Payoffs

    So, who's under investigation here?
  • by William Robinson (875390) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:05AM (#12321752)
    Uh.. No Officer.. I just read it on slashdot that you accept cash.
  • I am not surprised (Score:5, Interesting)

    by andydread (758754) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:22AM (#12321783)
    The MPAA and the RIAA will stop at nothing to protect their monopolies. These 2 corrupt officers are just a tip of the giant iceberg of people that recieve huge sums from the MPAA and RIAA. Some others - Several politicians, Virus writers. Yes they employ these people to create nastyware to disrupt p2p networks. and many many more people are bribed by these organizations. The MPAA and the RIAA are among the most corrupt organizations in America. And the blatantly lie about their the root cause of their losses almost every year. It is about time they are investigated but I fear they may buy out the investigation.
  • by Adult film producer (866485) <van@i2pmail.org> on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:46AM (#12321840)
    Living in New York is an expensive lifestyle. But on the other hand, New York cops really seem to enjoy themselves when it comes to corruption. Take for example last year's Republican convention. New York Cops did their best to round up thousands of people, stick them in an asbestos contaminated concentration camp and then charge them with crimes they never committed.

    The Banno Story - Corrupt nyc cops lie, the DA encourages and participates in the lies.. get caught red handed [indymedia.org]
    Police Perjurers [yahoo.com]
    another story related to the new york DA editing/manipulating video tapes [pacifica.org]

    Google the story, hundreds of cases have been dropped because the Police were inventing stories that never happened and then having the DA charge innocent people with full knowledge.
  • how ironic (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Sv-Manowar (772313) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:49AM (#12321847) Homepage Journal
    the MPAA breaking the law to enforce the law. oh the irony.

    People have been saying for years that the MPAA need to try harder to stop piracy before the movies get leaked. Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Maybe it's time they started listening.
  • by sugapablo (600023) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:53AM (#12321861) Homepage
    Why is it that this makes me want to do a little happy dance? :)

    I bet the MPAA thought that while their actions might have been *technically* illegal, they certainly weren't hurting anybody.

    Sound familiar?
  • by AtariAmarok (451306) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:59AM (#12321878)
    Bad cops, bad cops

    New York's finest paid by MPAA
    Bust down your door and take your movie away!
    In de car or on de horse,
    They'll take your DVD's with excessive force.

    Bad cops, bad cops.

  • Hypocrites (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Kaorimoch (858523) on Saturday April 23 2005, @07:06AM (#12321896) Journal
    I think we should run an ad in every movie theatre for MPAA members and affiliates to remind them that "Paying off cops is a crime". We could even show the cops who were paid off in the ad to remind them what happens if you bribe law enforcement officials as part of the cops settlement arrangement.

    They want us to obey the law but forget to do it themselves. Great example guys.
  • by bani (467531) on Saturday April 23 2005, @07:32AM (#12321961)
    It's not the first time [nytimes.com] the RIAA has been involved in criminal activity.

    Law enforcement goes wild and imprisons students for sharing a few thousand dollars worth of mp3s. It's about time we start imprisoning music industry CEOs who steal $143 million from the public.
  • come on (Score:5, Funny)

    by nomadic (141991) <(nomadicworld) (at) (gmail.com)> on Saturday April 23 2005, @07:51AM (#12322027) Homepage
    You're SUPPOSED to tip police officers, it's only common courtesy.
  • by bcmm (768152) on Saturday April 23 2005, @07:51AM (#12322029)
    How much does this great service cost? I can think of people I would like to have arrested...
    • Re:Umm. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Omniscientist (806841) <(ten.tsitneicsinmo) (ta) (dog)> on Saturday April 23 2005, @05:59AM (#12321730) Homepage
      No. Law enforcement is a public service. What they do is to be expected, not rewarded. Tipping will lead to favoritism which must be avoided.

      Telemarketer called you; you're on the do not call list?
      click here [donotcall.gov]

                • by AtariAmarok (451306) on Saturday April 23 2005, @07:11AM (#12321910)
                  "What is the problem with underpaid law enforcers from accepting tips?"

                  Aside from the fact that they are not underpaid, there is this problem. If you have a "tip" system, pretty soon they only enforce laws to benefit those who tip them. Want that burglary investigated? Tip them, or they will "ignore it due to more pressing matters".

          • Re:Umm. (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Triskele (711795) on Saturday April 23 2005, @08:00AM (#12322065)
            I'm a Brit and we generally don't tip. It used to be considered insulting in many sectors - "I work for a living I don't need charity" or "Am I a serf?". In fact I will tip if service and the meal is particularly good.

            Though when I'm in the US I do try to remember that the waiters really are serfs and if I don't tip they'll starve. What a lovely system you guys have...

    • Re:Umm. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ForestGrump (644805) on Saturday April 23 2005, @05:59AM (#12321731) Homepage Journal
      So where do you draw the line between tipping an officer for doing you a "favor" and bribing him to do you a "favor"?
      • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:44AM (#12321836)
        So where do you draw the line between tipping an officer for doing you a "favor" and bribing him to do you a "favor"?

        I tip
        You bribe
        The MPAA induces massive police corruption
    • Re:Umm. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:29AM (#12321797)
      Then you get a situation where whoever pays the cops the most gets the most justice.

      We already have a problem with police going after more high profile crimes involving a lot of money, rather than going after less high profile crimes which involve less money but more harm to the individual.

      For example, if a little old lady is scammed out of $10,000 by a guy who says he will fix her leaking roof, that causes her a lot of harm.

      In contrast, if someone distributes music online and costs the music industry $100,000, which is highly unlikely, the police will go after those guys with more vigor, even though the music industry won't feel the sting of that guy's actions much if at all.
    • Re:What's worse? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by vadim_t (324782) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:50AM (#12321854) Homepage
      Not every crime is equally important.

      I think I can see the logic of this - most cops probably don't give a damn about who's selling DVDs, especially since the people who do it (at least here) are usually immigrants (sometimes illegal) who have a very poor knowledge of the language and can't get a job.

      Doesn't seem to be much point to me in arresting some guy who managed to get some income that way, when there are much more harmful people out there. I think most cops would be pretty happy with that at least they're not selling drugs or mugging people.
      • Re:What's worse? (Score:5, Informative)

        by Sparxter (878278) on Saturday April 23 2005, @06:55AM (#12321867)
        Maybe because some of the cops already break the law at home, away from work. Personally if I was a cop I wouldn't give 2 hoots about piracy. I'd care more about the person being mugged 2 streets away

        As a cop I can tell you that this is indeed the case. As a small department with a lot of area to cover, piracy is the LAST concern any of us have. To put it in perspective I would rather write someone for J-walking...