Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship China Government The Internet

China Launches Hotline To Report Online Comments That 'Distort' History or 'Deny' Its Cultural Excellence (variety.com) 124

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Variety: China's internet regulator has launched a hotline for citizens to report online comments that defame the ruling Communist Party and its approved description of history ahead of the Party's upcoming 100th anniversary. The new hotline will enable internet users to stop the spread of "mistaken opinions" and create a "good public opinion atmosphere" to pave the way for the July 1 occasion, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said in a notice. People can also send in tip-offs via the CAC's website and app.

"For a while now, some people with ulterior motiveshave spread historically nihilistic false statements online, maliciously distorting, slandering and denying Party, national and military history in an attempt to confuse people's thinking," the notice said. "We hope that most internet users will play an active role in supervising societyand enthusiastically report harmful information." "Historically nihilistic" information, in official rhetoric, is content that incites doubt about the Party's account of the past.

It will accept four types of content complaints: distortions of history, attacks on the Party's "leadership, guiding ideology, principles or policies," the defamation of heroes and martyrs, and "denials of the excellence of traditional Chinese culture, revolutionary culture and advanced socialist culture." The CAC notice did not explain what punishments would be in store for violators. China already frequently detains and jails people for online speech deemed politically inappropriate.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Launches Hotline To Report Online Comments That 'Distort' History or 'Deny' Its Cultural Excellence

Comments Filter:
  • Ruling party is helping citizens to crimestop so they do not commit any more thoughtcrimes... More interesting - technology will be available to all others interested ... including even beginners autocrats in Hungary and Poland...
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by cayenne8 ( 626475 )
      In news coming up...

      "Biden administration announces a hotline, in association with Social Media giants to enable citizens to report...."

      • by BroccoliKing ( 6229350 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:48AM (#61276492)
        You mean like Trump's social media bias reporting tool? https://thehill.com/policy/tec... [thehill.com] Or Trump's voter fraud hotline? https://www.republicworld.com/... [republicworld.com]
        • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

          by DrMrLordX ( 559371 )

          Yes. EXACTLY LIKE THAT.

          Biden is Trump is Biden is Trump is . . .

          • by jimtheowl ( 4200185 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @10:12AM (#61276612)
            Except that one is imaginary and the other happened. How are they the same?
            • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

              by shaitand ( 626655 )
              Which is imaginary? Trump wanted to remove social media sites protections that currently enable them to both act as a publisher while protecting them from liability like a common carrier. Biden advocates directly legislating subjective requirements for 'truth', 'facts', 'racist', 'hate speech', etc which he can spin on demand and prosecute sites for... essentially forcing compliance to shape the platforms with his message. Both are real.

              'While media attention during President Biden’s first days in
              • ^ i don't like these facts. -1 Troll. Mod GP insightful, I like his 'facts' better.
                • it is hard to tell if astroturfers are downvoting, or if they have already influenced enough useful idiots to keep their memes rolling

                  I for one, hope it is astroturfers, because I want to believe that /.'ers have better critical thinking skills

                • by shanen ( 462549 )

                  Who or what is "GP"? Doesn't seem to match any of the posters? Perhaps "Good Poster" in a relative sense?

                  • Did you hack that account? Common Slashdot convention is that 'parent' would refer to the post one is replying to and 'GP' or grandparent refers to the post or conversation arc the parent was responding to.

                    Jimtheowl was the GP referenced in your post here. If you and I exchanged a couple posts back and forth from here without substantially changing topic we might continue to refer to Jimtheowl as the "GP" even though we are technically further levels deeper in comment hierarchy, logical context reveals our
                    • by shanen ( 462549 )

                      Okay, makes sense, though I confess that I probably don't pay enough attention to "common convention", especially not on Slashdot where there are so many noisy idiots and angry trolls running around. As I've noted a number of times over the years, the main reason I like Slashdot is for the feel of the editor. I used to like Slashdot for the Funny comments, but actually witty and humorous comments have become much too sparse in recent years.

                      By the way, your [shaitand's] ad hominem attack suggests you might b

                    • "By the way, your [shaitand's] ad hominem attack suggests you might be an angry troll"

                      My intention was to highlight that your unfamiliarity with an old and common convention was incongruent with the UID number on your account.

                      "I am pretty sure that we do agree that jimtheowl's reply [Now the G4P, if I counted correctly] should be modded up."

                      We do not. Perhaps a /s was required.

                      Trolls aren't simply angry but people who are deliberately inciting discord for their own amusement. The term refers to a specific c
                    • by shanen ( 462549 )

                      Good. I encourage you to ignore anything I write, and I will endeavor to reciprocate. Might be difficult, since you're "identity" is so unmemorable.

                      But I still resent how many seconds of my time you wasted with your vacuous trolling.

            • Give him time. He's taking notes from China, of course.

        • by DrSpock11 ( 993950 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @11:50AM (#61277096)

          The difference is that Trump's grievances (both real and imagined) that led to those hotlines were with institutions (governments and corporations). The current Cancel Culture sweeping the nation targets private individuals firstmost and foremost, which is much closer in concept to what China is doing here.

    • by mi ( 197448 )

      including even beginners autocrats in Hungary and Poland

      You forgot Washington [senate.gov].

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by shaitand ( 626655 )
        Excuse me sir! I am a highly offended patriot. How DARE you suggest the folks in Washington are beginners!
        • Well, the country is only ~250 years old, compared to China, which is about 3E3. So, more like grade-schoolers?
          • by shaitand ( 626655 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @12:45PM (#61277354) Journal
            Actually China is 110 years old. The US is twice as old. Fun fact, it is also older than India despite common claims to the contrary and not nearly so much younger than most European nations as they'd like you to believe. In all cases those 'old' nations are trying to lay claim to the history of their predecessors. If you want to speak of heritage the european culture which founded the US doesn't lose the european heritage simply for having crossed the pond and is therefore older than 250 years and the domestic heritage of the US is thousands of years old.

            https://history.state.gov/milestones/1899-1913/chinese-rev
            • by shanen ( 462549 )

              Not how the Chinese see it.

              Hey, any country can have a couple of bad centuries.

              • A country is a government. New government, new country. That is why Britain and Egypt aren't considered Rome under new management, Ukraine isn't the USSR, Russia isn't the USSR, Iraq isn't Mesopotamia, etc. The bottom line is that the US Constitutional nation has had a longer run than most.

                A young upstart who murdered his national daddy trying to paint a country as being ancient, invincible, having stood the test of time is pretty common in oppressive regimes. It is a very useful form of psychological warfa
                • by shanen ( 462549 )

                  That obviously isn't how everyone else thinks. Have you ever heard of the "Mandate of Heaven"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

                  However, judging from the content and tone of your two recent replies directed at me, I think it safe to conclude that rational discussion is not possible. First you would have to understand that other opinions exist and might even be valid. Therefore I ask you to ignore my comments in the future, and I promise to reciprocate, at least as long as I can remember and recognize your i

                  • "That obviously isn't how everyone else thinks."

                    False equivalency. Everyone's position is not equally sound.

                    "First you would have to understand that other opinions exist and might even be valid."

                    The burden is on others to establish the presence and validity of their other opinions. It is not for me to assume their validity. The "Mandate of Heaven" concept does not establish a continued political state and also represents circular logic.

                    He who says not most likely knows naught.
    • Or established ones like the new United States.
    • This is no different than the disgusting german laws that imprison you if you dare to doubt the holocaust.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world... [bbc.com]

      So yeah, China is far closer than you think.

  • look out for the snitch at
    The non state church
    Tiananmen Square
    Olympics 2022
    and more

  • by infuriatedweasel ( 1326439 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:16AM (#61276332)

    Let's not call them snitches. They're just doing a service of independently fact checking to make sure that everyone knows that we've always been at war with Eastasia.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by sinij ( 911942 )
      Exactly. Not that different from what SJWs and Social Media already doing in US. For example, Twitter locks out journalist over tweet criticizing BLM founder [nypost.com] is not fundamentally different from someone in China getting locked out due to bringing up Tiananmen Square.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        i have mod points and should probably -1 Flamebait this, but hey, i'll bite.

        the fundamental difference is between FB/Twitter/... bannig the post from their own private forum, albeit publicly accessible one, and the Chinese party banning the poster from living outside prison.

        • by sinij ( 911942 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:54AM (#61276522)
          You do realize that we are just now arguing where on the spectrum of the same phenomenon these things are? Essentially, your point is to be understood as "SJWs are not yet jailing people, so it is entirely different".
          • by sinij ( 911942 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @10:00AM (#61276552)
            The "I don't want to listen to what you have to say" is entirely different from "I don't want anyone else to listen to what you have to say". One is freedom of association and the other is censorship and you are trying to gaslight everyone that these are the same thing.
          • You do realize that we are just now arguing where on the spectrum of the same phenomenon these things are? Essentially, your point is to be understood as "SJWs are not yet jailing people, so it is entirely different".

            Even if they are on the same spectrum, a point I don’t necessarily agree with, they are separated by a vast distance. FB/Twitter are private companies and will act in what they perceive as their own best interests. Anyone is free to leave, go to another service or start their own; that efforts to start a competing service fail due to lack of interest is a commercial problem. People are still free to express a different viewpoint. China is not allowing dissent from the official party line, and punis

            • by sinij ( 911942 )

              Even if they are on the same spectrum, a point I don't necessarily agree with, they are separated by a vast distance.

              Reasonable people can agree to disagree on this. My position is that distance is minuscule, it is intent that matters and actualization of that intent is dependent on available power. I believe that these SJWs would be jailing people if they had power comparable to CCP. More so, even CCP rarely jails dissidents. Instead, they make people's life difficult - like making it harder to get a job or start your own business. Sounds familiar?

              FB/Twitter are private companies and will act in what they perceive as their own best interests.

              I disagree that these companies are acting in their own best fiscal intere

              • Reasonable people can agree to disagree on this. My position is that distance is minuscule, it is intent that matters and actualization of that intent is dependent on available power. I believe that these SJWs would be jailing people if they had power comparable to CCP. More so, even CCP rarely jails dissidents. Instead, they make people's life difficult - like making it harder to get a job or start your own business. Sounds familiar?

                Yeah CCP never jails people, except all those they're keeping in re-education camps. Exactly the same as n@zis and racists getting fired.

                I disagree that these companies are acting in their own best fiscal interest. Instead, I see this as exerting raw political power on behalf of a few powerful insiders. In doing so, they are not acting as a corporation but as a power center for a few powerful insiders. A more accurate framing of this issue is to decide if it is desirable to allow few unelected and unaccountable technocrats dictating the terms of acceptable discourse in our society. To demonstrate this point, imagine if social media emerged somewhere in Texas instead of California and anti-gun, pro-immigration, and pro-choice views were banned from social media as "problematic".

                Ok, are you ready to repeal the 1st amendment then and have the government determine what is allowed and what isn't allowed on social media? When the democrats have the majority?

                This "free to start their own" is entirely false narrative. These competitors did not fail due to lack of commercial interest, they fail due to anti-competitive collusion of existing players. For example Gab was banned from hosting, accepting payments, individuals in leadership positions even had their own personal credit cards canceled. They had to resort to Pirate Bay-like tactics to stay online. So no, don't give me this "You could always build your own Internet if you don't like conservative views getting banned on Twitter" line. Likewise, Parler had their AWS hosting yanked in days in breach of service contract that mandated 30 day termination notice.

                Don't worry, Frank is going to save the right-wing social media now.

                • by sinij ( 911942 )
                  If you are going to mischaracterize what I posted, at the very least do not directly quote what I actually said so everyone can immediately see that you are full of it.
          • by jpapon ( 1877296 )
            Of course they're on the same "spectrum", what a meaningless point to make in bold. A lightbulb is on the same "spectrum" as the sun, that doesn't mean you should be scared your lightbulb will suddenly start fusing hydrogen and consume your house.
        • "the fundamental difference is between FB/Twitter/... bannig the post from their own private forum"

          Not when FB/Twitter/etc are artificial government created and protected monopoly entities which are largely funded by tax dollars (in the form of breaks and credits) and special protections under law.

          And no, it has little to do with who is in prison and everything to do with shaping public perception and opinion, which in turns allows you to manipulate consent of the governed, rulings by juries, and support f
        • The lesser of two evils is still evil.

  • Do you think they'd take a collect call about Tiananmen Square denials?
  • by sabbede ( 2678435 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:34AM (#61276416)
    Mao was a mass murderer. Tiananmen Square happened. The CCP is committing acts of genocide and cultural annihilation. The CCP is engaged in slavery. The Party rules through lies and terror. The Party and its members are corrupt thieves who oppress and enslave the Chinese people. Each one deserves to be stood against a wall and shot.

    The Party defames itself by existing. Communism is dictatorship.

    Feel free to report this to that Pooh-looking, shit-eating monster Xi.

    • by mobby_6kl ( 668092 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:42AM (#61276454)

      Just reported you! Hope you enjoy your stay in the re-education camp.

      • Just reported you! Hope you enjoy your stay in the re-education camp.

        Sorry. Am quarantined, can’t go to camp this year and be around people. Be sure to send me a postcard.

      • Kind of funny, though the story isn't.

        Unfortunately, considering the state of the educational system in America, I'm not sure about casting stones. Yeah, a few of the universities are top notch. Ditto a few of the high schools. But most of the lower public schools are indoctrination centers that could be compared to "re-education" camps. Similar to incarceration and with a heavy focus on building "disciplined" and "passive" habits for future wage slaves. And based on some of the resulting characters I've me

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by Coren22 ( 1625475 )

      You forgot that China infected the whole world with COVID because of their desire to save face and act like there was no outbreak in the beginning.

      • Yeah, didn't realize I left that off till it was too late.
  • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by hyades1 ( 1149581 ) <hyades1@hotmail.com> on Thursday April 15, 2021 @09:43AM (#61276464)

    ...if every time they went on-line, thousands of people made it a matter of pride to mention Tiananmen Square, the genocide against the Uyghurs, attempts to push Tibetans out of their country by flooding it with squatters and/or China's attempt to create a totalitarian surveillance state that would make Big Brother blush?

    Sometimes the best data pool is a poisoned data pool.

    • Uyghur-genociding, protester-murdering, religion-oppressing, melamine-poisoning, Panopticon-deploying culturally excellent overlords!

    • ...if every time they went on-line, thousands of people made it a matter of pride to mention Tiananmen Square, the genocide against the Uyghurs, attempts to push Tibetans out of their country by flooding it with squatters and/or China's attempt to create a totalitarian surveillance state that would make Big Brother blush?

      Sometimes the best data pool is a poisoned data pool.

      That's an exercise in game theory aka the prisoners' dilemma. In other words, it won't happen.

  • America's current cancel culture is a first step down a slippery slope to what China is doing.

  • The US Liberals(!) are doing their damndest to achieve the same with their cancel culture.
  • by v1 ( 525388 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @10:26AM (#61276688) Homepage Journal

    Germany did this in WW2, kids were encouraged to enroll in the "Hitler Youth" program. Had to be terrifying for the parents, basically your kids could rat you out for anything you did that wasn't PC, or flat out make something up if they were mad at you for punishing them for something or not letting them do/have something. Must have been an absolute nightmare for the parents! The kids could basically do whatever they wanted, the parents lost every shred of control and discipline.

    GREAT for the state, HORRIBLE for the people.

    Though in the last weeks of the war, Hitler Youth were called on for the final defense of Germany, and a lot of those kids were given guns and grenades to go die. It was sad from start to finish.

    • by Bongo ( 13261 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @12:04PM (#61277170)

      And obviously that was only 80 years ago.

      What's dizzyingly complex about the world today is that we have almost every period in history represented... right now, somewhere on the planet: warlords, authoritarian empires, modern individualism, sensitive egalitarian inclusiveness, and a small percentage of a few others...

      And technology is an enabler FOR ALL OF THEM.

      I'd like to think that there's a sweet spot between extreme authoritarian social order, and greedy globalisation where corporations run the world through the UN, but that might be too precarious a balance -- we may need to leap to a new kind of culture altogether, where most humans are genuinely... intelligent and compassionate.

  • Can we flood it with reports of official propaganda? Would it help?
  • I've seen quite a few dashcam videos on youtube where someone comes out of nowhere, cuts in front of you, and brake checks / drives slow, etc, all to egg you on to speed around them to get away from them, then a week or two later you get a ticket with a pic from that driver's cel phone for speeding or illegal lane change etc. The reporter gets PAID for reporting you. So, naturally, they drive around all day driving dangerously to get others to break traffic laws.

    Incentivizing law enforcement ALWAYS leads

  • Oh, I see the Chinese are drawing inspiration from the US Democratic Party.

  • by v1 ( 525388 ) on Thursday April 15, 2021 @10:52AM (#61276836) Homepage Journal

    Interesting doublespeak from the country known to deny events (Tiananmen Square) to put up a hotline to report people doing what the government already does.

    Sad though, since a lot of people would report someone for "spreading false rumors" about Tiananmen Square when the false rumors were actually the truth. Just helps the Chinese govt track down the truthers for detention and punishment.

    But I suppose suppression of information in a digital age is a big job, and enlisting the people to suppress the people will probably end up being a pretty effective tactic. If nothing else, it scales well.

  • Fuck the

    China
    Censorship &
    Propaganda

    Censoring and ignoring history doesn't make it go away no matter how many times you try.
    --
    Only children censor. Adults discuss and even laugh at "taboo" subjects because they are not insecure.

  • Must be a bestseller within Chinese government circles.
    "Rat out your neighbor!"
    Seriously, I feel sorry for the average Chinese citizen. They're truly living in a dystopia.
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • acting on behalf of the government. Once could even consider CNN and such as propaganda arms of the DNC. The Atlantic Monthly had an article describing China's use of the software Google wrote for them which created their "Social Credit System". We are almost at that condition here in America.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/in... [theatlantic.com]

    The social websites in this country have been in a long campaign to silence opinions that differ from the narrative they allow. If your opinion promotes the Constitution and th

  • Trump, Xi, and all the others, always the same boring old lies, claims and methods. These people are not only evil, they are _boring_.

  • Made up history is a worldwide passion for nationalistic fanatics.
  • with their own actions.

Only God can make random selections.

Working...