Microsoft Responds To Allegations That Windows 10 Collects 'Excessive Personal Data' (betanews.com) 159
BetaNews's Mark Wilson writes: Yesterday France's National Data Protection Commission (CNIL) slapped a formal order on Microsoft to comply with data protection laws after it found Windows 10 was collecting "excessive data" about users. The company has been given three months to meet the demands or it will face fines. Microsoft has now responded, saying it is happy to work with the CNIL to work towards an acceptable solution. Interestingly, while not denying the allegations set against it, the company does nothing to defend the amount of data collected by Windows 10, and also fails to address the privacy concerns it raises. Microsoft does address concerns about the transfer of data between Europe and the US, saying that while the Safe Harbor agreement is no longer valid, the company still complied with it up until the adoption of Privacy Shield. It's interesting to see that Microsoft, in response to a series of complaints very clearly leveled at Windows 10, manages to mention the operating system only once. There is the promise of a statement about privacy next week, but for now we have Microsoft's response to the CNIL's order.
As a frog, I do not care (Score:2, Insightful)
I am a superior animal and all my data attests to this fact.
Toads, on the other hand, have something to hide.
Re: (Score:1)
Water warm enough for you, dear frog? Lemme turn it up a notch so you don't feel no chilling effect.
Dear Mr. Frog (Score:1)
Is it possible for you to get Ethanol-fueled unbanned?
The toads took away his ability to log in and he eventually got frustrated with anon posts and gave up.
We need him back, as otherwise I think you are are the only in-character troll we have left at /.
Thank you and tell laura I said hi!
Re: (Score:1)
cold_fjord is probably currently pissed at me and not going to respond to anything I post, so you might have to look elsewhere.
Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:5, Insightful)
All of you who said that the privacy concerns were just FUD or that it's simple to turn off the surveillance, time to eat your crow.
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm not saying this tool will completely block all of the data collected but, it does block the vast majority of it and is simple to install and it's from a company I find reliable: Spybot Anti-Beacon [safer-networking.org].
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:4, Funny)
Is this one of those security tools that intercepts telemetry and redirects it directly to China or Russia instead of the NSA?
Not unless the IP 0.0.0.0 is going to China or Russia.
Now stop being a tool.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. An argument I have made repeatedly, but he is terrified that his software will be stolen and abused like Chrome if he open sources it...not even realizing that it just doesn't matter as his software is nothing special that people would have to "steal". Anyways, people can always get the source code directly and compile it themselves, so the whole argument is moot.
Re: (Score:2)
HILARIOUS!
Buddy, reading code is nothing, writing code is nothing.
What you have done is nothing special, as this "script kiddie" proved already to you by writing a script that duplicated your complicated program's functionality in a single line.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny how you make all these claims that are impossible to prove since your crapware is CLOSED SOURCE!
So, all we have is your word...the word of a spammer, that you don't use any functions you didn't write yourself. Yet again, silly arguments shot down without the barest effort. Once again, you resort to insults since you know your arguments have failed.
Also, it is rather rich when you call other's offtopic (AmicusNYCL) and troll (me), when you are the biggest offtopic troll of them all, proven by the mod
Re: (Score:2)
Then get off your arse and do your own research if you don't want to take my word for it.
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:5, Insightful)
Anything running in Windows 10 is useless for stopping Windows 10 from phoning home. Windows 10 bypasses the firewall and HOSTS file when shipping off your data.
Re: (Score:1)
HOSTS file
You sure about that? I want to hear from APK on the subject...
Re: (Score:2)
As if he is the final word on anything? He doesn't even understand the basics of how the hosts file works and why it is such a bad idea to overload it.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, overload it. Try going to any site not in your hosts file and you will see exactly what I mean. You are abusing a piece of the network stack and slowing your computer at the same time. Just because you are too inexperienced with computers to understand why, does not make me in any way wrong, and your consistent attempts to degrade me just prove me right.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, how you didn't prove me wrong, just attempted to appeal to authority as if that changes what I said. It is easy, I agree, that is why you lose every time.
Keep it up, this is fun to me; almost as much fun as reading AmicusNYCL tear you apart.
https://yro.slashdot.org/comme... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Yes because Windows 10 bypassing two internal windows processes which are well understood by Microsoft makes you instantly an expert on a 3rd party product combined with a broad generalisation that something can't be done from the host system?
Man you give up easily.
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:4, Informative)
You don't have to be an expert to know that you can't control Windows from within Windows. We've already seen Windows 10 lie about its behavior.
You need an external device not running Windows to ensure you're not leaking. That means tracking every outbound connection from a Windows 10 host at the switch/router, investigating every IP, and blocking anything affiliated with Windows 10 "telemetry" or "updates". Then you'll need to manually download every actual security update, possibly from another system, and install them individually. Because yes, you still need security updates.
Windows 10 is a shitshow and a complete non-starter for anyone who cares at all about security or privacy.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't have to be an expert to know that you can't control Windows from within Windows.
And yet that's precisely what many low level tools are capable of. You don't think Microsoft's web facing keylogger is running in the lowest levels of the kernel do you? If so here's a picture of a tinfoil hat for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
There are no "low level tools". Nothing within the OS operates at a lower level than the OS. Windows 10 can and will intercept everything and lie about anything.
If you haven't stocked up on tinfoil hats for the past 15 years, you've got your head in the sand and your ass in the air.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. The entire Windows 10 system runs with identical privileges and there's no such thing as privilege rings, and Microsoft run all high level data gathering and network facing telemetry right at the lowest level to thwart all efforts to stop the data collection, everyone who never took a computer class knows that.
Maybe some tinfoil body armour would be better: http://thegatewaypundit.com/wp... [thegatewaypundit.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Your link was wrong. I fixed it.
Re: (Score:2)
I tried this but suddenly my windows programs don't work, the start menu looks different and when I said I was happy with the look and feel of what I had the elitism of the community gave me cancer.
Re: (Score:2)
We should probably be clear on what you mean by "vast majority" of data.
For example, suppose that the tool blocks 99% of Windows' phone-home calls, and reduces the number of bytes sent by 99%. But what does get through is all of my important passwords, PKI private keys, and bank account numbers.
Perhaps all we can really say is that using Anti-Beacon is probably better than nothing?
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Well they're shills so they'll keep posting pro-micro$ comments. Those of us who will never upgrade to spydows 10 (and never buy a micro$ product because they now put their spyware in all their new products) don't really care what the shills have to say.
Re: (Score:2)
How could you deny what is blatantly obvious? Basically what they did was to say "Yeah. So?"
Re: (Score:2)
Even Microsoft themselves aren't denying Windows 10 is a spy machine.
You're reading too much into this. They simply have not denied the allegations yet. They have not really responded.
Re: (Score:2)
Even Microsoft themselves aren't denying Windows 10 is a spy machine.
The definition of personal data is broad and should be carefully reviewed in this case. Them knowing what you clicked and the failure attached to the series of action is hardly personal data that anybody truly cares to protect. Same goes for hardware specs. If anything, most users would be happy to hand over that data to help their favored platform become more stable.
All of you who said that the privacy concerns were just FUD or that it's simple to turn off the surveillance, time to eat your crow.
The situation is still the same. What is the collected data? last time MS responded, the data collected was no more than what you search engin
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:5, Insightful)
last time MS responded, the data collected was no more than what you search engine collects. It was definitively less harmful than the data your GPS or cell phone carrier collects. Christ, your credit card, your bank and your air miles card have far more important data
You've clearly demonstrated what's wrong: way too many organizations collect way too much data, and there's little we can do about most of it short of withdrawing from society.
You also said no one has been particularly harmed by this. I can't argue this either way, but what is harmed is our right to have a private life. To some of us that still means something.
Re: (Score:2)
At this point, it's useless to argue that data collection harms the public. They don't care.
We should be arguing that not all businesses or professionals can afford (or even qualify to buy) Windows Enterprise, and therefore business assets and confidential customer data are at risk. If the majority of people won't stick up for the rights of the minority, then you just have to appeal to the "right" minority to make a problem a proper legal issue.
Re: (Score:2)
At this point, it's useless to argue that data collection harms the public. They don't care.
Explain how.
I can come up with plenty of examples where data collection has actually resulted in lives being saved. Not to confused with this data collection but I'm just saying you statement is horribly wrong.
We should be arguing that not all businesses or professionals can afford (or even qualify to buy) Windows Enterprise
Convince 10 people that have full time jobs to ditch all their mobiles devices and we can start making of case of how MS is evil and must be stopped.
Re: (Score:2)
You've clearly demonstrated what's wrong: way too many organizations collect way too much data, and there's little we can do about most of it short of withdrawing from society.
There are laws and MS like many other abide by them. MS however has an option for their support to collect more data but no different than LogMeIn, is intended to be turned on for specific cases and specific periods or time.
You also said no one has been particularly harmed by this. I can't argue this either way, but what is harmed is our right to have a private life. To some of us that still means something
It comes down to what most want and don't want. If people were that concerned with the data collected they would actually look into it. Fact is that most people don't care. I say this because I've had people approach me (being the IT reference at work) and ask what they collect after see
Re:Got that, Microsoft shills? (Score:5, Interesting)
When you use a Google product, like Maps for instance, there's something of informed consent going on. You know you're being tracked, it's right there on your smartphone screen. But it gets weird where the OS itself may be doing the snooping, regardless of whether you're using an app or not. Microsoft has this past reputation of baking things deep into the OS (*cough* internet explorer *cough*) in order to gain an advantage over its competitors, and here there's a case to be made that they're leveraging their dominance on the desktop to get with modern times and start making money through targeted ads, STARTing with their lackluster app store (heh heh, see that I did there?)
I have yet to hear a case where this collection of data was detrimental to an individual. And please, don't bring up the bandwidth usage because that's a drop in the bucket compared to what ads run on most websites.
You're right. All we know definitively is that there's a lot of traffic sent by Windows back to Microsoft, but there's little reliable data concerning what it is. We have to take on faith that the data does not include information about the contents of your C drive. But think about it. You can choose not to store anything on Google Drive if you are paranoid about their search routines, but if Windows is gonna index everything from the C drive to the "secure" thumb drive in the USB port, where are you gonna save to?
This is a big deal. Like it or not, people use Windows for work, medical records, attorney docs and shit, and not all of them can pay for a fancy Enterprise license which permits a trained Microsoft nerd some control over what's going on. A statement from Satya [wikipedia.org] to the effect of "we will not spy on your shit, nor will we give up what we do have even if the FBI comes knockin" would be most re-assuring (even if non-binding), but we don't even get that!
Re: (Score:1)
You don't think it sends stuff from your c drive? Run wireshark between the win10 box and your router and then create a new file with notepad and save it. Watch the instant traffic from that box to ms telemetry servers.
Re: (Score:3)
The definition of personal data is broad and should be carefully reviewed in this case. Them knowing what you clicked and the failure attached to the series of action is hardly personal data that anybody truly cares to protect.
I care deeply about it and will take any action necessary to deny any OS vendor this capability. None of their goddamn business period.
Same goes for hardware specs. If anything, most users would be happy to hand over that data to help their favored platform become more stable.
It is nice they are given a choice... oh wait those ever forgetful levers in the privacy settings don't actually stop anything now do they?
The situation is still the same. What is the collected data? last time MS responded, the data collected was no more than what you search engine collects.
None of Microsoft's business what I do or where I search.
It was definitively less harmful than the data your GPS or cell phone carrier collects.
Is Microsoft the same company whose Windows 10 mobile platform collects your GPS location without your consent or any ability to stop it whenever you want to use your GPS locally?
Christ, your credit card, your bank and your air miles card have far more important data and they use it in whatever way they see fit (within the confine of the law).
N
Re: (Score:2)
Your responses and links do not AT ALL present an argument towards the actual speculations. All I hear in you arguments is that you hate MS but your ok with everybody else screwing you. Actually, if anything the links you provided state that MS is compliant and reasonable (which I'd argue is only partially true).
If you truly care about any of the things you said then I must assume you do not own a mobile device otherwise your a hypocrite.
Re: (Score:3)
So, you woul
Re: (Score:2)
So, you wouldn't mind if we put webcams in every room of your house and streamed live 24/7 because hey, it wouldn't harm you, would it.
The fact that you think MS's data collection practice compares with your statement tells me you're clueless about what MS actually does. Come back when you've actually read more than the headlines.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact is you're avoiding the point, the point is that to some people privacy invasion is a harm like verbal harassment is a harm. Google are worse in reading peoples personal communications of course but there is better competition in email providers, if you're a PC gamer then there is nothing on a par with windows for the number of games available and at far better prices via seasonal sales etc.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact is you're avoiding the point, the point is that to some people privacy invasion is a harm like verbal harassment is a harm
People are too butt hurt these days. You can't use the word retarded without a bunch of people getting their panties in a knot.
if you're a PC gamer then there is nothing on a par with windows for the number of games available
That is not true. Playstation and Nintendo make great products. The steambox is another alternative. The fact is that it can't bother users that much if they are willing to stick with MS. 350 Million installs is not all gamers.
Re: (Score:3)
Them knowing what you clicked and the failure attached to the series of action is hardly personal data that anybody truly cares to protect. Same goes for hardware specs.
Says you. I, along with many others, very much want to protect it.
If anything, most users would be happy to hand over that data to help their favored platform become more stable.
Perhaps so. There's an easy way to make all users happy: provide a way to turn off all telemetry. Why won't Microsoft do that?
I have yet to hear a case where this collection of data was detrimental to an individual.
This is irrelevant. It's my data, and I should be able to choose who I share it with and who I won't. Whether or not that data is sensitive according to others shouldn't factor into it.
Re: (Score:2)
Says you. I, along with many others, very much want to protect it.
Says the 350 million users that accept to use it this way knowingly. I know many don't know but many do and still use it the same way you still use your cell phone regardless of the fact that you're location is tracked 24/7.
Perhaps so. There's an easy way to make all users happy: provide a way to turn off all telemetry. Why won't Microsoft do that?
Totally agree but they figured the flak was worth the data yielded. Considering how much press they got over it they would have backed off otherwise.
This is irrelevant. It's my data, and I should be able to choose who I share it with and who I won't. Whether or not that data is sensitive according to others shouldn't factor into it.
You can't fix this with MS or any of the other companies that does this. You need to fix this at the core (through laws like the ones in ex
Re: (Score:2)
What is the collected data? last time MS responded, the data collected was no more than what you search engine collects.
1. I don't recall Microsoft ever detailing exactly what data is being collected.
2. It's encrypted, so we can't examine it for ourselves.
3. Microsoft has been deceptive and even telling outright lies since the beginning [arstechnica.com] of the Windows 10 rollout.
I have yet to hear a case where this collection of data was detrimental to an individual.
See 2, above. No one can look and see what data Microsoft is collecting from their Windows 10 PC, so how is one to know whether or not they've been harmed? Your argument is the same one NSA uses to claim they can't be sued over warrantless wiretapping. "No one can pr
Re: (Score:2)
1. I don't recall Microsoft ever detailing exactly what data is being collected.
MS revealed it a while back. Here's a link summarizing it.
http://www.windowsecurity.com/... [windowsecurity.com]
2. It's encrypted, so we can't examine it for ourselves.
It should be encrypted. Why would you have it any other way.
3. Microsoft has been deceptive and even telling outright lies since the beginning [arstechnica.com] of the Windows 10 rollout.
Unclear, not deceptive. They said it would be free and didn't know what direction the licensing would head. That's perfectly fine as fine as most are concerned.
See 2, above. No one can look and see what data Microsoft is collecting from their Windows 10 PC, so how is one to know whether or not they've been harmed? Your argument is the same one NSA uses to claim they can't be sued over warrantless wiretapping. "No one can prove they specifically were wiretapped, so no one has any standing to sue." I say bullshit to that argument.
That's your paranoia kicking in. Do you think you matter that much that you will be harmed by your data? If the government wants to take you out stop trying to find an out because you're already cooke
Re: (Score:2)
First: I'm not a shill, second: there's no need to eat crow given that the article doesn't say what you say it does, third: Microsoft doesn't deny that _some_ people think Windows is a spy-machine.
Re: (Score:2)
More than that, Microsoft freely admits that there is no way to turn off all telemetry. In other words, they freely admit it's a spy machine.
Re: (Score:1)
Also the fear of telemetry being used to spy on users is overblown. More and more software products add telemetry to be able to improve how their software works. It allows them to spend time improving the features users actually use and fixing their pain points. As a result
Re: (Score:3)
Also the fear of telemetry being used to spy on users is overblown.
This misses the point. The point is that there's no way to stop it if you find it objectionable. If someone is collecting data on my against my will, they are spying on me. Whether or not they use that data for malicious purposes is irrelevant.
More and more software products add telemetry to be able to improve how their software works. It allows them to spend time improving the features users actually use and fixing their pain points. As a result they can build better products.
Yes, and in every case that they do this without informing the use and providing a means to stop it, they are behaving badly. That this is happening with increasing frequency is precisely why I started firewalling off all applications by default, so they can't send an
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't just deny it, they went to the mat to lie about it. It wasn't FUD, by in large is was outright lies. Everyone who spoke out were called tin foil hat wearing, paranoid, delusional loons.
The need to get on their knees and suck dick. Eating crow doesn't begin to address it.
Yu'd actually let them come into physical contact with your private parts? Give them your DNA too? I think they'd like that.
What are they planning? (Score:5, Funny)
There is the promise of a statement about privacy next week
So after the final date for free Windows 10 then?
Why do I have the feeling that statement will be "Gotcha! Suckers!"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Gatcha Suckers! https://youtu.be/NQFMeyWVe3g?t... [youtu.be]
They didn't really respond (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:They didn't really respond (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow, what a fucking shock: a multi-billion dollar company doing business in nearly every country around the world requires more than 24 hours to make a substantive response that's been properly vetted by their legal department to a governmental order involving possible fines and other legal sanctions.
You'd think that the CEO of Microsoft could just, you know, whip up a quick 140-character tweet clearing the thing up within an hour of being notified of the legal action. I mean, it's not like you want to be very careful when punitive fines and sanctions are on the line, or anything.
Fucking retard.
You must be forgetting that Windows 10 has been out for a year and under constant public criticism about their data collection/retention/usage policies. Considering Microsoft, Google, Apple and Amazon have been under fire for the Safe Harbor agreement, Microsoft should have seen the inquiry coming a mile away. While it's true any response needs to be vetted to PR and Legal, you'd think they'd at least have some canned statements at-the-ready.
Given how public this botnet/mass surveillance/skynet of Windows 10 data collection is, I'm surprised it took this long for a Gov agency to speak up.
Re:They didn't really respond (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly. The core issue is that Windows 10 is collecting personal information that is not required for the functioning of the OS or the services it provides to the user. There doesn't have to be a discussion over where Microsoft stores the information, since they shouldn't be collecting it in the first place.
Re: (Score:2)
Unacceptable? Is this Wikipedia?
I know it's defying tradition, but you could, you know, RTFA. (The first article, describing the allegations.)
Anyway, it's about the telemetry data.
Re: (Score:2)
You read it wrong. You have to read this part:
As the European Commission observed, Microsoft's January 2016 Privacy Statement states that the company adheres to the principles of the Safe Harbor Framework. Microsoft has in fact continued to live up to all of its commitments under the Safe Harbor Framework, even as the European and U.S. representatives worked toward the new Privacy Shield
This is not just a problem for MS but MS tends to make the headlines even when it's a non issue.
Response: (Score:2)
A non-reply reply (Score:1)
tl;dr version of the reply (Score:2)
UP YOURS!
Re: (Score:1)
It only collects public information. (Score:2)
Your name
Your Date of birth
Your SSN
You current address
You last 7 years of taxes.
All public info that the government has already. So no worries.
I can imagine... (Score:3)
I haven't RTFA, but I expect the response is something like "Excessive?!? Are you kidding me? It's not even close to what we need. We've barely gotten started!"
Re: (Score:2)
My SIN (the Canadian equivalent of a SSN) is NOT public. The government now advises never to carry the certificate (we no longer issue cards) on you. It's only for government use (employers can have it for reporting earnings, and banks for financial transactions. If you don't want t o give your SIN, all mone entering the account will be subject to a percentage being withheld.
Your taxes are NOT public - otherwise why the big deal about candidates revealing (or not) their personal tax records?
We have univer
Re: (Score:2)
Ironically, the government used to be one the biggest abusers of the SIN. I stopped carrying my card 20 years ago when I worked for DND; it was used for so many things (just about every piece of paperwork and front-and-center on your id) so often that you couldn't help but memorize it.
Re: (Score:1)
(...) they log all your searches
That's good. It means that I can use this feature to spread disinformation about me.
they know what you buy, what you read, they cross-track your identities between sites...
I'd say "they think they know". I know that they don't know anything useful about me.
Re: (Score:1)
However, Google collects far more info about you, and it's very hard to avoid that even if you try
Yes, it is very difficult to not use Chrome and use a different browser with all Analytics turned off. Don't like Gmail then don't use it. Change your search engine to DuckDuckGo for example. Even if you do use Google software and services you don't have to log in to Google which limits their data collection and profiling of you considerably.
MS is bad, absolutely. So is the Goog - worse, in my opinion.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, however, it is very easy to prevent Google from collecting data on you since you don't need to use their applications or th
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
And you can be sure Apple would do the same.
No. They learned their lesson with LocationGate. They are headed HARD in the OTHER direction [idownloadblog.com] at this point.
Re: (Score:3)
How many times do I have to say this to you idiots?
A person doing something wrong is not fine as long as you can point to someone else who did something worse. The wrong thing is still wrong!
I am constantly seeing "GOOGLE IS EVIL!!" as if Microsoft is any more moral.
No, you're just reading between the lines something that isn't there.
If what is collected is benign ... (Score:4, Interesting)
and nothing that any of us should worry about, then why is there not a way in which the PC's user can view all of the data that is sent to Microsoft? This should include a plain English [plainenglish.co.uk] explanation of everything. After all: why should a PC's owner not see what it sends ?
Disclaimer: I do not have any MS product
Re: (Score:2)
If it were benign they wouldn't be fighting so hard to keep it in :P
Hey, look... (Score:5, Funny)
I know you're typing right now how you're suspicious that Windows 10 watches your every move, but you can rest assured no such thing occurs.
Also you forgot the comma on the line 3.
Re: (Score:2)
I know you're typing right now how you're suspicious that Windows 10 watches your every move, but you can rest assured no such thing occurs.
And you know this how, exactly?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Whoosh
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, completely missed that one :) But at least I'm not an AC.
Win 10 - Illegal for doctors and libraries? (Score:4, Interesting)
With MS's failure to address this, I wonder if this confirms that Windows 10 is essentially illegal to use in Doctor offices across the US, as well as Public Libraries? Both institutions have federal laws on records preventing the sharing of information with third parties unless noted by the patient/patron specifically.
As such, the use of Windows 10 for either may well be illegal.
Re: (Score:2)
The Enterprise edition is sufficient for those cases.
Even if it were an issue, they could block the machines from communicating with Microsoft.
Updates can be distributed via WSUS, so there is no need for business workstations to connect to Microsoft servers at all.
Re:Win 10 - Illegal for doctors and libraries? (Score:4, Informative)
I have never been required to sign a HIPAA waiver. I have, however, always been required to sign an acknowledgement that I have read the HIPAA fact sheet.
Re: (Score:2)
Every single doctor's office in the country requires you sign a HIPAA waiver in order to obtain services, and unless life-threatening, it is perfectly legal for them to deny you service if you refuse to sign.
And so when someone does show up with a life-threatening condition and doesn't sign a HIPAA waiver, do they have to replace all their Windows 10 machines with ones that don't spy?
Solution: Show us the source code (Score:4, Insightful)
Hey MS
If you want to _prove_ your innocence then show the source code so we can audit what, when, where, data is being collected.
Because you have ZERO trust at this point.
What's that? Have "faith" in you? BWUAHA. Fuck your arrogance and spying. PROVE IT.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft is dealing with a regulatory body that has issued them a warning. They don't need to "prove innocence". They need to demonstrate compliance with the law by the deadline.
It doesn't matter if they convince CNIL that their current regime is adequate or if they change the telemetry behavior on French installations.
Until CNIL imposes a penalty, they have every reason to be cooperative and accommodating.
It must be nice to live in a country where laws protect the privacy of citizens from corporate intere
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
In the Year 2121: Windows 7 is still the OS everyone uses despite being out of service. Since everyone turned off updates in 2016 no one noticed...
Your Penis Size to Boot Windows? (Score:2)
Where do you draw the line?
Re: (Score:1)
"Microsoft responds..." (Score:5, Funny)
"Microsoft responds..."
We have no idea what would lead Jeremy Archibald Plevin of 2217 Sand Fort Terrace, Blivet Michigan, whose social security number is 555-666-7777, and who only has $9,472 in his bank account and that $100 savings bond his grandfather gave him when he turned 13, and tends to watch an average of 17.3 cat videos per month, and whose favorite search term is 'midget porn' (seriously, Jeremy?1?) to make such unfounded accusations. However, we'd like to assure you, they are unfounded.
France just wants their share of the data (Score:2)
" Microsoft has now responded, saying it is happy to work with the CNIL to work towards an acceptable solution."
I bet the acceptable solution will be sharing some of that "telemetry" data with the French government to look the other way. Similar to the deal Microsoft worked out with the NSA.