Drone Drops Drugs Onto Ohio Prison Yard 214
Okian Warrior sends a report from CNN about an incident last week at a prison in Mansfield, Ohio, where a brawl broke out after a drone dropped a package of drugs into the prison yard. Prison staff had no idea at the time what caused ~75 inmates to gather and fight, but surveillance tapes clearly showed a drone hovering over the yard and dropping a package that turned out to contain tobacco, marijuana, and heroin. A spokesperson for the prison said this was not the first time they've had an incident involving a drone, but they wouldn't go into specifics.
Makes me think about North/South Korea border (Score:3)
I wonder how long it will be before someone tries to fly a private drone into North Korea. No doubt they will try to shoot that sucker down, but this somehow made me think of that situation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Makes me think about North/South Korea border (Score:4, Insightful)
I wonder how long it will be before drones are more heavily regulated than firearms.
Prisoners are a capative audience... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
In all fairness it was a very secure yard. OTOH it was already full of thieves, so swings and roundabouts...
Re: (Score:2)
Can we please stop... (Score:2)
...calling hobby kit remote controlled planes 'drones?'
Please?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Can we please stop... (Score:4, Informative)
Drones are to RC aircraft what dogs are to wolves. They are almost the same and have 99% identical DNA, but there are a few key characteristics that set them apart.
First, drones require little to no flying skills on the part of the operator. Think RC helicopters from >10 years ago, very difficult to fly and maintain (especially piston-engine choppers, which you had to have if you wanted any kind of serious flying capability). You had to be an expert to not only fly one, but also build and service it. Nowadays you buy a quadcopter and it's ready to go, literally right out of the box with zero setup or adjustments. Modern electronics and gyros means you need no skill whatsoever to fly; just push the throttle and hold it and it hovers.
Second, some drones have autonomous capability. With built-in GPS and advanced algorithms, they fly themselves. You punch in pre-programmed waypoints and the drone will fly there, loiter and drop a payload or take pictures or whatever, and fly back to you. It's not remote controlled anymore.
Third, "drone" is easier to say than "RC model aircraft", which is a mouthful and requires explaining what RC stands for if you're writing a news article.
Re: (Score:2)
Main difference: realtime first person video downlink
Re: (Score:3)
Can you please stop starting comments in the subject line?
Anyway, how do you know that it wasn't a drone? A $250 plane, $50 battery and about $400 worth of assorted electronics including a Pixhawk autopilot module, a lidar, and an airspeed detector will get you 30+ minutes of flight time out of a fixed wing aircraft which can definitely carry and subsequently drop a cargo weighing a pound — and handle its own takeoff and landing. Is that enough like a drone for you? Remote telemetry costs more.
Another indication of the failed war on drugs (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Couldn't agree more.
As alcohol has proven, most people use drugs responsibly because there are social and economic pressures to do so.
Legalize drugs, make a huge revenue stream on taxation of said drugs and now you don't have an entire army to employ and equip and you put the people you are currently fighting against out of business.... It really seems like a no-brainer
Re: (Score:3)
Except when cities encourage irresponsible alcohol use [grist.org].
Re: (Score:3)
I live on a residential block behind a few bars. If they had less parking, there would be more people parking in our neighborhood. We got the city to create a residential parking zone, with towing for non-residents, but it's only for one block; drunks could just park deeper into the neighborhood and walk a little further. And the thing about drunks walking home at 1 AM from a bar is that they are obnoxiously loud, like to urinate on whatever they happen to be near, and occasionally toss a brick through a
Re: (Score:2)
If you wanted to open a bar in a city that doesn't stupidly allow people to store their personal property on taxpayer-owned land for free, wouldn't you be more inclined to either build abundant parking for your customers without the city forcing you to, or locate your bar near good transit options? See, both options eliminate customers parking in residential neighborhoods.
So it appears that in this case, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.
Re: (Score:3)
Or how about cops get off their asses and do their jobs and hang around the parking lot. Spot drunkard dave walking to his car, stop him.
Take away their cars and guns and force them to be civil servants they took an oath to be. So few cops get killed in the line of duty each year there is NO reason for them to be armed at all times.
Re: (Score:3)
Take away their cars and guns and force them to be civil servants they took an oath to be. So few cops get killed in the line of duty each year there is NO reason for them to be armed at all times.
I don't think the problem is the guns, I think the problem is the mentality, and hiring people with that mentality on purpose. And that mentality is that "civilians" (like the cops are, though they think otherwise) are a lower form of life.
Re: (Score:2)
I live on a residential block behind a few bars. If they had less parking, there would be more people parking in our neighborhood. We got the city to create a residential parking zone, with towing for non-residents, but it's only for one block; drunks could just park deeper into the neighborhood and walk a little further. And the thing about drunks walking home at 1 AM from a bar is that they are obnoxiously loud, like to urinate on whatever they happen to be near, and occasionally toss a brick through a car window just for grins.
So no thanks, I'd rather have mandatory parking on site. If you want to stop drunks from driving, catch them as they pull out of the parking lot. Or build cities to better support public transportation, and have that transportation run late enough into the night to service the evening crowd. Or legalize Uber and let their drivers///suckers deal with puke in their cars.
You can do what Australia does, give every police officer a breathalyser and training on how to use it. If you blow over the limit you have the option of accepting the punishment or requesting a blood test that will be more accurate.
High range drink driving is so rare over here that anyone blowing 0.10 or over (twice the legal limit) is national news.
Also make the punishment fit the crime. Not just fines, revoke their license or impound their car if they keep driving on a suspended license.
As for
Re: (Score:2)
Has it not occurred to you that people can go to a bar and drink, and upon leaving, still be under the legal limit?
Re: (Score:2)
If something is legal, does that automatically make it morally right?
Re: (Score:2)
I see. Cities must force bars to provide abundant, free parking where they've made overnight street parking illegal. So they "fix" problems caused by a freedom-robbing law by adding another freedom-robbing law. It's a comedy of errors!
So as you can see, once again, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Another indication of the failed war on drugs (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Colorado has $100M+ in tax revenue from pot. Not much of a black market either.
Re: (Score:2)
Colorado has $100M+ in tax revenue from pot. Not much of a black market either.
There's a tipping point. It's not that you can't have any taxes, it's just that you can't tax too much. However, I think if pot was legal, and I wanted to smoke it, I'd probably just grow my own. I have a bad enough memory as it is though, so i just avoid it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree for the most part; maybe not quite so much where the really hard stuff like heroin is concerned, and their addiction has led them to commit violent crimes.
That's not how it works. These drugs are cheap as hell to produce, that's why there's so amazingly much profit in selling them. Prohibition, yeah, but if they were expensive to make then the economics still wouldn't work out. The crime comes from junkies who can't get their fix... you can see where this is going.
The war on weed is certainly stupid, as are the ridiculous restrictions on sudafed because of meth cookers.
Now meth, that's a get-up-and-do-things drug. That's genuinely harmful to society. Sure, some people just get up and clean their bathroom. And some people go out and look for fun, in a condition in
Re: (Score:2)
Now meth, that's a get-up-and-do-things drug. That's genuinely harmful to society. Sure, some people just get up and clean their bathroom. And some people go out and look for fun, in a condition in which their judgement is severely impaired.
Meth used to be perfectly legal to buy and wasn't anywhere near the problem it is now. Just as with alcohol, and even "crack" cocaine, when you outlaw something, the potency tends to go up and the purity gets compromised because they cut it with whatever garbage they feel like adding.
Re: (Score:3)
If you could alter meth to be less of a "keep you up for days" thing, the judgment would be a lot less impaired. The impairment comes from lack of sleep and the hallucinations that brings.
Tone down the super amphetamine aspect but leave the enhanced sexual pleasure aspect and you have yourself a real drug there...
Re: (Score:2)
Meth used to be perfectly legal to buy and wasn't anywhere near the problem it is now.
But then we started administering it to combat troops, who came home hooked on it. And they proceeded to get their friends and lovers hooked on it.
Re: (Score:2)
antihistamines??
I can buy loratidine over the counter - in fact my local supermarket has it next to the tampons and bandages.
Re: (Score:3)
It would be far better to spend the massive amounts of money it takes to house non-violent drug offenders in prisons on rehabilitating them in environments where it is cheaper to do so and won't make them want more drugs. Additionally, legalizing these drugs means that they generate taxable revenue which can be spent on rehabilitation programs and reduce the amount of money that needs to be spent on drug enforcement a
Re: (Score:3)
maybe not quite so much where the really hard stuff like heroin is concerned,
The problem with that is that from a pharmacology perspective, opiates aren't even as dangerous as alcohol. You can be on a maintenance dose of opiates for the rest of your life -- it's actually the preferred treatment for addiction via methadone or buprenorphine maintenance.
The problem with opiate use usually involves IV injection and addiction to the "rush" that comes after injection and the need to consume increasing amounts
Re:Another indication of the failed war on drugs (Score:4, Insightful)
-Cocaine and heroin represent the vast majority of global organized crime and related violence. The exact same points about never stopping other substances apply even harder here. Doesn't matter how "bad" the drugs are, you're never ever going to stop global organized crime from reaping billions upon billions of dollars through prohibition.
-Locally, it's these drugs that are responsible for the large majority of secondary crimes against non-involved parties, such as robbery and property crimes, to fund addictions. People aren't robbing and stealing for their pot or MDMA habits, which I assume aren't "really" hard by your standards. These crimes aren't committed because of the drugs inherent biological response pattern in an addict (unlike alcohol, which DOES make violent behavior more likely), they're committed because prohibition results in a cost structure that puts maintaining a habit very difficult without wealth or crime. Alcohol and cigarettes are cause dependence just as strong in an addict, and I guarantee if an addiction to those cost hundreds of dollars per day, you'd see the exact same related violence.
-Even when it comes to "really hard" drugs, there's simply no evidence that legalization would lead to increased addiction, because do you really think there's thousands and thousands of people just waiting to go out and get addicted to heroin if only it were available from a doctor or pharmacist? It's legal to possess all drugs in Portugal, and they have no such usage spike. When you redirect money towards education and treatment and provide an environment where there's no fear of arrest for admitting you're a user, usage rates actually drop.
-With the financial and other aspects of acquisition, addicts are unable to hold jobs for a variety of reasons, and as heroin maintenance programs in other countries have shown, a steady cheap legal supply returns these people to functional, contributing members of society that can hold down jobs. And obviously there's health benefits associated with a legal pharmaceutical supply like OD prevention the most well known.
-People like to talk about "the children"... what kind of world do you want for yours if they wind up experimenting? A felony where getting caught twice or violating probation requirements means a lifetime of stigma. Interacting with dangerous criminal gangs to get an unknown product. Prison. Stigma attached to getting help. There is ZERO evidence that if we just crack down harder we're suddenly going to win the war on drugs and heroin, meth, and coke will vanish from the world, so no matter how much you wish that were the case, you're stuck with the reality that drugs are everywhere and kids experiment. If my kids made that mistake, I'd want them to get a safe product from a medical professional and be provided with non-abstinence-based education and have stigma-free access to well funded help and not be labeled a criminal and tossed into a cage and branded for life if they get caught. What do you want for yours? "a drug free world" is NOT an option.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, certainly laws against drug -users- are certainly ineffective and very much harmful in any form of rehbilitation or 'common good'. Even if they limited the crime to a slap on the wrist non-criminal fine, it would probably be sufficient to keep drugs out off the (literal) streets.
As for dealers (carrying pounds of coke for instance), I'm all for locking them up the same as always. Its one thing to be supportive of those in the worst situations, and its another to carte-blanche welcome harmful drugs int
Re: (Score:2)
The entire system is not for criminals it's for profit. Anyone thinks that a prison is keeping you safe is incredibly delusional.
The really scary violent ones, put down, like the guy eating a bag of human ears at his trial... safe to put that one to death. The rest community service.
EMP (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Hmmm... I hear sound waves are also effective against drones...
Re: (Score:2)
Did you miss the bit where nobody noticed the drone until they checked the CCTV after the event?
Re:EMP (Score:4, Interesting)
Is it possible to fashion an 'EMP gun' to at least direct the majority of the pulse at a target?
And then that pulse hits parts of the security system and it goes offline.
Maybe just a jammer to interrupt either the GPS signal (or more likely) the remote control signal.
It is against FCC rules to deploy radio wave jammers. The FCC won't even allow prisons to jam cell phones.
Re: (Score:2)
http://hacknmod.com/hack/diy-e... [hacknmod.com] would do it, and probably be highly dangerous to anything else along the beam -- such as a jetliner.
Re: (Score:2)
doesn't stop the police and security services deploying jammers that aren't FCC certified
Citation please. Even if true the police are allowed to a lot of things the others are not.
Doesn't stop me from keying a bleedbox at 934MHz when I'm out on my bike either,
Like the guy in Florida [fox4news.com] who was arrested for using a jammer. The issue is that jammers also interfere with legitimate calls like 911 and emergency vehicle communication.
you should be driving not fucking Facetiming with your lover.
Your jammer does not differentiate between driver, passengers, pedestrian or people parked on the side of the road. Basically you are causing no one to be able to use a cellphone near your bike. I would call that entitled. In fact, jammers decrease saf
Re: (Score:2)
search for PKI jammer, ESC Law Enforcement Supplies, the Homeland Security Act 2002, the fact that CELL PHONES COME WITH WARNINGS THAT THEY'RE NOT TO BE USED TO MAKE EMERGENCY CALLS, the Apple IMEI killswitch patent, the fact that TETRA (ERT radio systems) uses UHF rather than VHF hence is not vulnerable to commercially available jamming equipment, oh this is a pearler: the Metropolitan Police Service (a CIVILIAN agency) claims National Security considerations as an excuse to refuse to confirm that it is in
Re: (Score:2)
by the way, it is NOT illegal to OWN jamming equipment in the UK. A 934MHz PMR is considered jamming equipment but since the band was co-opted for GSM mobile services way back when, it's been illegal to OPERATE IT. Notwithstanding the fact that the police RARELY pursue such usage since it is practically impossible for them to differentiate between a 934MHz rig pair and a GSM phone conversation. They would have to literally catch you in the act of keying with the radio's display clearly showing Tx in the 934
Re: (Score:2)
PKI jammer, ESC Law Enforcement Supplies, the Homeland Security Act 2002,
Like I said, law enforcement is allowed do things the general public is not.
CELL PHONES COME WITH WARNINGS THAT THEY'RE NOT TO BE USED TO MAKE EMERGENCY CALLS
The FCC even has a page [fcc.gov] about it.
the Apple IMEI killswitch patent,
That kills one phone not all phones in an area.
confirm that it is in fact using IMSI catchers and other equipment to interfere with OTA communications
IMSI catchers do not interfere with communication
As for law enforcement using cellphone jammers try this scenario. Someone finds a bomb with a cell phone attached to it. Wouldn't it be prudent to jam cell phone signals in the area so it can not be remotely detonated while it is being defused? It might go off when the jamming starts but one can clear the
Re: (Score:2)
Is it possible to fashion an 'EMP gun' to at least direct the majority of the pulse at a target? Maybe just a jammer to interrupt either the GPS signal (or more likely) the remote control signal. Have to add it to the guard tower arsenals.
It actually is a lot harder than you think.
EMP has to be REALLY powerful to do something like fry circuits, and you can imagine the havoc that could cause in general (that drone is far away, lots of other computers are a lot closer even if not being aimed at). I don't know how long-range you can even direct EMP generated using conventional means - the stuff that wipes out cities is basically a byproduct of a nuclear explosion (as far as I understand it this is basically just synchrotron radiation from ioni
Re: (Score:2)
a SMALL EMP pulse can be had by ramping an arc welder to the max and shorting it through a four inch bolt.
The war on drugs: (Score:2)
Obviously a wise policy because it's clearly working great.
Radio jamming needed (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I guess the low-tech solution would be to just cover the open yards with some kind of mesh.
Re: (Score:2)
Jamming is not all that selective or containable. The FCC does not allow prisons to jam cell phones because it can effect cell phones outside of prison and interrupt emergency services. What do you think would happen if someone died half a mile from the prison because they could not contact 911?
Re: (Score:3)
Aside from the illegality of jamming radio frequencies, drones can be programmed to guide themselves to and from a destination without requiring an operator to fly them via real-time radio control. Jamming would be a very expensive solution that would be completely irrelevant before it was even deployed.
Drones mirror the Internet (Score:5, Insightful)
I like these precise little drones, I think they're pretty damned cool, really, especially since I saw the earlier videos of whole fleets of them, flying in complex, dynamic, ever-changing formations, like some aerial court dance; it made me wonder what incredible things can we do with this? But then people had to get their hands on them, and do stupid things with them, and now criminal things with them. Now they're going to be on a downward slide towards being illegal for the average person to own, or at least so highly regulated that you may as well not bothers. Nice going, people, great job fucking up something cool for 99.99% of us yet again.
I'm more concerned with the people being (Score:2)
assassinated by them than by prison yard drops.
Drone used by lazy drug dealer. (Score:2)
What a stupid idea to use a drone. you can EASILY use a trebuchet or other setup to lob them into the yard from a distance. hell you can set up a nice big slingshot to do it without attracting any attention.
Unlike a slow moving device that is obvious as hell as it sounds like a large hive of angry bees.
Re: (Score:2)
at 1500 feet you won't even hear a micro UAV like a quadcopter, much less see it.
NCIS (Score:2)
I thought this sounded familiar.
(not "Kill Chain" or "Twilight", I'm thinking the one where a drone bird (a toy, pretty much) was used to drop something into the yard of a Federal slam and McGee has a play with the retrieved vehicle, much to the amusement of DiNozzo).
Re: (Score:3)
Even with the relatively high value of the cargo, it is still hard to see how the person who delivered it could reasonably expect to be paid for it.
Doesn't have to be a payment. "Deliver this package into the jail, and we don't hurt your wife / children / etc". Coercion can be a wonderful motivator, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely. Prisons are full of gangsters and organized crime members. It is very common for them to threaten or coerce employees to smuggle drugs inside.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely. Prisons are full of gangsters and organized crime members. It is very common for them to threaten or coerce employees to smuggle drugs inside.
Or maybe those people involved with organized crimes, I don't know organized it?
Re: (Score:3)
And with that, you then just call the cops.... if someone is actually capable of hurting your wife and children if you don't do what they say, they are also capable of doing so even if you do... The reality is that in that situation, you are completely powerless to determine your family's future, as much as one might wish it to be otherwise, and the smartest thing you can do is get help, if you can summon it. If someone is willing to be so morally bankrupt as to do such a thing in the first place, why wo
Re: (Score:2)
If someone is willing to be so morally bankrupt as to do such a thing in the first place, why would you think they should be somehow morally obligated to be telling you the truth about not hurting your family if you do what they tell you?
The answer is contained within what you already said. If there is no trust in the person being coerced and the coercer, then the coerced really will have nothing to lose by going to law enforcement.
One easy way to destroy this trust is to do very things that you seem to be suggesting they will actually do (e.g. killing wives and kids despite cooperation, and/or not killing wives and kids despite lack of cooperation)
And no, criminals are not very reliable. But it doesn't take a lot of trust. Even a 50% ch
Re: (Score:2)
And with that, you then just call the cops.... if someone is actually capable of hurting your wife and children if you don't do what they say, they are also capable of doing so even if you do...
But, as an organised criminal, why go to all that trouble?
People put under pressure react in strange and unpredictable ways. Why do all of that when you dont need to. You just set up the drone and let it work automatically. Not as if there aren't enough people who have the knowledge and lack of scruples who wont set all of this up for money. Hell, they've probably got a few who are part of the organisation.
As for payment, the people on the inside have already paid for it, some with money, others with
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Some people love their families enough to try to save them, even if they are not 100% certain that the criminals they are dealing with are trustworthy.
I sure hope I am not related you.
Re: (Score:2)
sure. go to the FBI with that story: "Some guys I never met before, and don't have a picture of or know their name, came to my house and threatened to kill my family if I don't do this illegal task. I want witness relocation".
your savings will run out before you get it. and you probably will die [either of natural or unnatural causes] before you get it.
Re: (Score:2)
So you'd actually rather blindly choose to cling to what must be the tiniest shred of *hope* that people who would threaten your family's well being might somehow actually not hurt you or your family if you just do what they tell you before you'd trust the police to help? Wow... a true skeptic. I'd dare say that your mistrust is founded more on emotion than reason, however.
Of course, the police might not be able to save your family... I can't refute that possibility remains, but that's entirely outside
Re: (Score:2)
"Deliver this package into the jail, and we don't hurt your wife / children / etc"
Or they could just call up this delivery to settle an existing debt, OR make a deal with someone to deliver the package in exchange for some benefit or favor.
Coercion is harder and riskier.
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Interesting)
You don't watch many movies, do you? Or missed the whole thing where the Mexican cartel guy had a tunnel excavated under the prison and "nobody noticed"?
As much as it sounds like a Hollywood fantasy, it's not like people in prison have no contact with the outside world, and don't have a lot of time on their hands to come up with new ways to work around the system.
Hell, you could do a Tarantino plot about the shit you could drop into a prison yard to create unrest.
Hell, have one drone drop in a bag of weapons and have another with a long zoom televise the the gladiatorial games which ensue.
It really was only a matter of time until drugs and other stuff started getting dropped into prisons. People have been doing low tech versions of this for decades, if not centuries.
Re: (Score:2)
contraband cellphones are persistant problem (Score:3)
I remember a wardens petitioning the FCC for a jam-zone. But the FCC universally denes such requests, Plus the legal workers like using their phones anywhere.
Re:contraband cellphones are persistant problem (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.ibtimes.com/new-tec... [ibtimes.com]
I was never a gang member, but due to my background I was the 'fix-it' guy. See if you can make a soldering gun out of pencil and an AC adapter. Then use it to desolder parts from devices to fix others...
I was a fair hand at this trade, and because it was pretty harmless, most of the guards ignored it. I was however trusted, and often phones came to me to either fix a busted charger/charge port, or for flip phones with a hard to conceal charging base, wire in a different charging mechanism. Those were fun jobs. Far better than replacing the thermal fuse in a fan coil.
Re: (Score:2)
So how many layers of chicken wire do you have to hang to completely block cellphones? Is it just one? That stuff is cheap enough to where it's fairly feasible to actually do that.
Re: (Score:3)
Heck, I'm surprised prisons haven't started putting up nets to prevent this. Especially after a helicopter (full size) was forced to land in the middle of a prison yard in Quebec so two inmates can escape.
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, I assume for every new thing you put into stop one thing it just creates another class of problem for you.
I also assume there's nothing so far fetched it hasn't been tried.
Re: (Score:2)
Next step - drone drops cutters to cut through the nets, or something to burn them. How long before people start sticking guns on drones to take pot shots at the guards? If done from enough altitude so that the drone or muzzle flash isn't easily spotted the thing is going to be invincible to anything short of radar-guided AAA (which might just be radar-driven shotguns, but still).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Any drone capable of handling the kickback from a gun is going to be easily spotted.
Recoilless rifles [wikipedia.org] have been around since WW2. Most of them are big, but the design could be scaled down to fit on a drone. They not only eliminate the recoil, but are lighter than a same-caliber standard weapon.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if anyone bothered to check at Skybox Packaging, right next door to the prison [google.com].
Re: (Score:3)
Helicopter... (Score:2)
A guy in Quebec got boosted from prison by a helicopter coming to pick him up. A *Helicopter*. Drones are cheaper and an easy way to get stuff in.
The end result will be prisons will likely be given permission to shoot down drones within a geofenced area.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hmmm (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Right, and a drone dropping drugs into the prison yard is in no way like something out of a movie.
Honestly, the world is a screwed up place, and this entire incident is meta enough to seem like something out of Hollywood.
Life imitating art and all that.
Re: (Score:2)
And I'm not disagreeing with that, not even a little.
I'm saying it isn't possible to make up something and say "but that could only happen in a movie". Sometimes you see stuff in movies and go "yeah, no way" only to find it has a basis in truth.
I
Re: (Score:2)
I always assumed payment was easy, you have friends who aren't in prison who pay on your behalf. An escrow economy.
Re: (Score:3)
Some people just want to watch the world burn.
Drop small packets of heroin all over the yard. From 30 different drones. All at once.
Just for the LOLz.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
That's my primary Xanatos gambit, honestly.
Fix education and solve poverty; repeal minimum wage; end all government intervention in education above the K-12 school level. End of homelessness causes major upheaval of market systems, as individuals no longer face starvation and death in the streets as counterpoint to low wage slave job, completely changing our culture. This allows repeal of minimum wage, which can be used as a published standard to make low wage values seem fair to the employee (strong di
Re: (Score:2)
Even with the relatively high value of the cargo, it is still hard to see how the person who delivered it could reasonably expect to be paid for it.
Perhaps the operator never expected payment and is just some psychopath performing an experiment on the prison inmates and guards to observe what would happen. Round one was some drugs, perhaps round two will be a few knives or even a firearm.
If your goal is to instigate mayhem and destruction, a $600 quadcopter could offer a pretty high return on investment (but unfortunately to the detriment of others using them for benign purposes).
Re: (Score:2)
Or far more worryingly, the possibility that explosives might be dropped on public events or something similar. A co-ordinated attack could do a lot of damage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or far more worryingly, the possibility that explosives might be dropped on public events or something similar.
The good news there is that the weight capacity of consumer class drones is still pretty low. A pound of heroin is a lot. A pound of explosives really isn't. You could kill a few people in a crowd. But if your goal is a large scale terrorist attack, that's not a very effective method.
Re: (Score:2)
And yet, this'll make your hair stand on end, an M67 hand grenade weighs less than a pound and has an effective kill radius of five meters and casualty radius of about 15 meters.
Now imagine someone buying a dozen drones and wiring them to work on a preprogrammed flight path over a busy sporting event.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder what else could be dropped into a prison yard by drone just to cause unrest?
The ultimate contraband....a 3d printer!
Re: (Score:2)
This is why prisons, or something like them, should be open to everyone, without having to commit a crime or join the military.
Re: (Score:3)
You mean "healthcare", "lodging" and "food". Haven't been paying attention to the medical neglect in the prison system I presume? Or the roach infested prisons, and the prisons handing out green bologna sandwiches and moldy bread?
It's like the good old days from a Dickens novel in some cases.