Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime The Internet

FBI, International Law Units Smash Infamous Hacker Bazaar Darkode 56

coondoggie writes: The FBI in concert with Interpol and other worldwide law enforcement teams say they have taken down the international cybercriminal site marketplace Darkode and arrested 70 people involved with the site. Darkode was an online, password-protected forum in which hackers and other cyber-criminals convened to buy, sell, trade and share malware, ransomware, information, ideas, and tools to facilitate unlawful intrusions on others’ computers and electronic devices, the FBI said.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FBI, International Law Units Smash Infamous Hacker Bazaar Darkode

Comments Filter:
  • Hackers (Score:5, Informative)

    by farrellj ( 563 ) on Friday July 17, 2015 @02:30AM (#50126437) Homepage Journal

    Not all Hackers are cyber criminals. Despite what CSI:Cyber might say.

    • Most Slashdot readers know that hacker does not correlate to cyber criminal, but that it is sometimes the case.

      Imagine an article that says a few black men raped a woman. Would you feel the need to post that not all black men are rapers?

      So I say to your post, DUH
    • by Anonymous Coward

      Absolutely not. If they sell their exploits to governments, they become security professionals or even law enforcement officers! Unless they sell to the wrong government, in case of which they become terrorists or enemy combatants.

      Then again, in reality hackers are people who can manipulate systems (locks, vending machines, humans, computers) in unconventional and unforeseen ways with minimum effort. But who cares about definitions.

      • by Anonymous Coward

        The issue here is criminal intent.
        Many jurisdictions have a "criminal tools" statute. Criminal tools are intentionally left vague - the specific circumstances then determine whether a crime exists. A classic example is lock picks owned by a locksmith vs lock picks found on a person at 2 AM while loitering near someone's homer. Criminal tool possession is hard to prove, it normally requires intent to commit a "real' crime. I presume in these cases various computers logs and intercepted emails or phone call

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Being a s'kiddie does not a hacker make.

      The thing is, it's now enshrined in law, after hollywood made the case and the security industry cemented it with the "ethical haxx0r" shtick and the hat colour discussion. It's quite clever how they deliberately went for the scare words tactic of cheap marketeering, only to find themselves utterly confused as to who was whom again.

      "Hacker" was originally a badge of honour, given and never claimed, for mindbending creativity with great technological skill. Clearly, th

      • "Hacker" was originally a badge of honour, given and never claimed, for mindbending creativity with great technological skill.

        I thought it was a term given to trial-and-error programmers, who just kinda "hack things together" when there is no documentation or direction.

    • Not any remote controlled toy airplanes are drones, but put that one in the dictionary with hackers and move on.

    • by ubrgeek ( 679399 )
      > Despite what CSI:Cyber might say.

      I'm proud to say I have no clue what CSI:Cyber says.
  • Arent botnets (Score:2, Insightful)

    a primarily windows thing?
  • The irony of the FBI, an organization which is demanding the ability to access your data whenever they choose, taking down an organization involved in making similar tools is beyond description.
  • Thought crime (Score:4, Insightful)

    by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Friday July 17, 2015 @05:46AM (#50126851)

    The FBI goes after thoughtcrime, ideas and tools that _may_ be used to commit a crime who would have thought.

    How about guns?

    • The FBI goes after thoughtcrime, ideas and tools that _may_ be used to commit a crime who would have thought.

      How about guns?

      Almost all crimes have a thought element. It's not a crime to take someone else's car by accident because you're color blind and someone left the key in it. It's not even illegal to break in and hotwire the car thinking it's yours. (Good luck convincing a jury of that, of course.) Crimes have thought elements.

      Tools which are designed to commit crime and are primarily used for that are regulated. I should probably be able to pick up one of those locksmith's guns because they're really cool and I'd enjoy

  • After Hacking Team got hacked and all of the exploits that they used became known and got patched, they just needed a new source for their "malware, ransomware, information, ideas, and tools to facilitate unlawful intrusions on others’ computers and electronic devices."

    When you can simply take what you want, you can't beat the price.
    • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
      Re "just needed a new source"
      How many nations are setting up front group "contractors" and "private sector" teams that are a direct link back to their own military counterintelligence units?
      Watching diverse state and federal police forces offer complex tenders for and accepting code thats then used live around the world.
      Front door, back door, trap door, skylight.... just watching day to day network use would be useful to see what is been whitelisted, tracked or allowed to go under patched for week, month
      • How many nations are setting up front group "contractors" and "private sector" teams that are a direct link back to their own military counterintelligence units? [emphasis added]

        If they are smart, "zero."

        If they are smart, national police who set front groups will make sure it's done indirectly enough that it will be hard to tie the "front" group back to the government entity in question.

        As to the number of nations whose police forces use private groups as fronts in some way, shape, or form? The answer is probably close to or equal to the total number of nations with police forces. Sigh.

    • If all they just wanted the materials they could get from the website, I don't see why they would take it down and therefore break the supply. I'm sure they could get access to the forum somehow without rendering it useless. Though I could imagine a scenario in which this would serve to help them move these users to a website they control. It wouldn't be without precedence either; I remember information about a government-controlled forum coming out after another agency took it down.
  • They arrested one of these guys in my area. This is of no real importance, just makes me shudder a little bit. Eric L. Crocker, aka Phastman, 39, of Binghamton, New York,

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...