Silicon Valley Anti-Poaching Cartel Went Beyond a Few Tech Firms 137
The gentleman's agreement that several Silicon Valley firms are now widely known to have taken part in to minimize employee poaching within their own circles went much further than has been generally reported, according to a report at PandoDaily. The article lists many other companies besides the handful that have been previously named as taking part in the scheme to prevent recruiting, and gives some insight into what kind of (even non-tech) organizations and practices are involved.
Do the crime, do the time (Score:5, Insightful)
So, can look forward to anyone doing jail time? That is the really the only way this will stop. That or directly start suing the individuals who implemented the policies and make them pay. After that I am willing to bet once a few executives lose their hard won millions will be a little gun shy about conspiring to do anything.
Actually the more I think about it, the best way to reign these practices in is directly suing individuals. Once they can no longer hide behind the corporate veil, the less inclined they will be collude together.
Re:Capitalism at its finest (Score:3, Insightful)
Ah, yes, the "no true capitalism" defense. The final and greatest argument Randroids resort to when faced with the reality of their idiotic beliefs.
Collusion vs no solicit (Score:4, Insightful)
The article mixes two things:
Collusion between the companies to not recruit from each other, which is apparently illegal (since the DOJ stepped in).
No solicit agreement with employees. That's part of a contract, I'll hire you but you have to agree that you won't refer my other employees to the headhunter who placed you. That's pretty standard and presumably is legal.
Re: Collusion vs no solicit (Score:5, Insightful)
Not in California it isn't, same with non completes. Edwards decision killed non-solicits. You want capitalism then have captialism and make sure you pay your employees well.
http://www.hrthatworksblog.com/2013/01/30/the-difficulty-of-enforcing-non-solicitation-clauses-in-california/
Re:is it illegal? (Score:5, Insightful)
Making employees sign Non-Compete Agreements are illegal in California. But by preventing employees from moving around freely, that could have restricted them from getting pay rises and consequently depriving the state and federal government from getting income taxes.
Re:Do the crime, do the time (Score:5, Insightful)
The executives essentially formed their own union. The gentlemen's agreement (which is anything but. A crony capitalists agreement is a better name for it) is simply their by-laws.
To counter this, every tech worker in the entire valley should form their own union and stick it to the fucking executives for a change. I moved from the valley 15 years ago because of shit like this. I'll never return but would love to see these mother fuckers get what is coming to them.
Re:Capitalism at its finest (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Capitalism at its finest (Score:5, Insightful)
Capitalism is whatever rehtorically useful construct I define it to be. For example, today, capitalism is a system for distracting me from my overloaded inbox to post on Slashdot. Capitalism is the oppressive system that prevents me from sleeping in on the weekends.
What's your Capitalism today?
Re:Capitalism at its finest (Score:3, Insightful)
List of Companies (Score:4, Insightful)
which the TFS failed to include, as contacted by the publisher:
AMD
AOL
Adecco
Adobe
Apple
Best Buy
CDI Business Solutions
Cingular/AT&T
Clear Channel
Comcast
Dell
Dreamworks
eBay/PayPal
Foxconn
Genentech
Google
IBM
Illumita Inc.
Intel
Intuit
Jcrew
Kelly
Kforce
Lucasfilm
Mac Zone
Microsoft
Nike
Novell
Nvidia
Oglivy
OpenTV
Oracle
PC Connection
PC Mall
Pixar
Sun Microsystems
Virgin Media
WPP
It would be interesting to see the connectedness of the Boards of Directors graph for the set.