Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Software The Almighty Buck IT

Massachusetts Set To Repeal Controversial IT Services Tax 122

Nerval's Lobster writes "Massachusetts lawmakers have agreed to repeal a six-week-old tax on computer services that generated such outrage that even the governor who proposed the tax in January now opposes it. The 6.25 percent sales tax on 'computer system design services' was proposed by Gov. Deval Patrick in January, but got little notice before it was slipped in mid-July into a $500 million supplementary funding bill meant to pay for improvements in the state's public transportation system. It was passed by the legislature with almost no debate, was signed into law by the governor with little public outrage, and went into effect – theoretically – July 31. IT businesses in the state used social media, business associations and angry letters to both lawmakers and local media to describe problems with the tax and show their opposition. Confusion over what qualifies as a 'computer system design service' and how to actually implement the tax – which was supposed to generate $161 million in revenue for the state – has been such a challenge to implement that the state has yet to collect a dime. The main logistical problem is figuring out what is covered and what isn't: data access, data processing and 'information services,' for example, are not taxed, which exempts most hosting, cloud, outsourcing and remote-access monitoring or security services. Democratic leaders announced Sept. 12 they would support repeal of the tax, which could be completed within weeks. 'It is now evident that the impact of the tax is broader than any of us ever anticipated or intended,' according to Mass. Senate President Therese Murray at a press conference Sept. 12."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Massachusetts Set To Repeal Controversial IT Services Tax

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Idiots (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GoodNewsJimDotCom ( 2244874 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:57PM (#44842981)
    Well at least they're smart enough to try and repeal it. It takes one kind of fool to get involved with a stupid thing. It takes another kind of fool to not change course when it is evident they made a horrible mistake.
  • Death and Taxes (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:59PM (#44843005)

    Death and Taxes. Two things you can always rely on.

    Oh, and more NSA spying.

    Death, Taxes and NSA spying. Three things you can always rely on.

  • by BitwizeGHC ( 145393 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:00PM (#44843013) Homepage

    I swear, the way laws get passed in this country is like pushing any commit from a developer straight into production based on its commit message, without even a code review process.

  • by SirGarlon ( 845873 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:04PM (#44843065)
    That is completely accurate. Though to perfect the analogy, the legislatures take the extra step of giving major customers (lobbyists) commit access to the same code repo (draft laws are frequently written by lobbyists).
  • by ScottCooperDotNet ( 929575 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:49PM (#44843389)

    In Massachusetts, one party is completely dominant, to the point that 81% of the House, 90% of the Senate, and the Governor are all from the same party. It doesn't matter which party, this kind of stupidity is rampant in one party states because there is little criticism in most areas of law until after the fact. Utah has similar numbers for the other party, so I imagine the same stupidity happens there.

    Software is big business in MA, and one of the few growth areas outside of biotech. Did we want to kill a golden goose?

  • by Lucas123 ( 935744 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:51PM (#44843397) Homepage
    Believe me, we were all in shock over this. You cannot create something in this state without the government hanging a tax on it. And, once that tax is in place and the bureaucracy suckling on the tax teat it is established, it's a permanent fixture. You'll never see a bureaucracy go away. Years ago, after returning home from a five-year stint in California, to my surprise, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts sent me an "excise tax" bill on my beat up car; the tax is, in fact, an ad valorem tax (based on the value of the car). I called my mom to ask what the heck it was and she simply stated: "Yeah, they tax driving in Massachusetts. Is it any wonder the Bay State got the moniker: Taxachusetts?
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday September 13, 2013 @04:31PM (#44843707)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday September 13, 2013 @05:09PM (#44844059)

    But without even knowing what it was taxing, they determined it would add $161 million in revenue!

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...