Russia Proposes Banning Foul Language On the Internet 239
eldavojohn writes "In a country where it's illegal to insult a government official, State Duma Deputy Yelena Mizulina has proposed an amendment to ban swearing on social networks, bulletin boards and all websites. The website would be blocked if the offending material had not been removed within 24 hours. The name of the law this would be added to? "On the protection of children from information harmful to their health and development." Mizulina's title in regards to this legislation? Chairwoman of the Committee on Family, Women and Children (No joke!). Of course, Yelena Mizulina is no stranger to unwarranted censorship as she was behind the law banning gay propaganda to minors and invoked laws to try to silence critics on twitter. The article also notes, 'United Russia deputy Vitaly Milonov put forward a similar initiative on 25 July. He proposed to tighten control over social networks and allow people to dating sites through their passports.'"
Obligartory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
In Soviet Russia, o just bend over and take it, you are in Russia sucker.
Re: (Score:3)
In post-Soviet Russia, government offends you!
Re:Obligartory (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Profanity, motherfucker! Do. You. Speak. It?
Fuck yeah.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Obligartory (Score:5, Funny)
Not use foul language? On the Internet? How will I Tweet?
Switch to fowl language?
Re: (Score:2)
America, FUCK YEAH!
Coming again, to save the mother fucking day yeah,
America, FUCK YEAH!
Freedom is the only way yeah,
Terrorist your game is through cause now you have to answer too,
America, FUCK YEAH!
So lick my butt, and suck on my balls,
America, FUCK YEAH!
What you going to do when we come for you now,
it’s the dream that we all share; it’s the hope for tomorrow
FUCK YEAH!
Re: (Score:2)
Fcuk you mothertrucker!
Now...was I profane or not?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Regardless of whether you're right or wrong it's so far off topic. We're talking about foul language here, a fun subject and you gotta drag fucking politics into it. Fuck you, dickhead!
Re: (Score:3)
It's so. March 7, 2013 Gosduma (State Duma) has been named Gosdura (State Dumbass) by TVman Pozner in liveTV transmission. And this name came to our lexicon.
The Future (Score:2)
I can see the future of the internet. There will always be somebody in authority wanting to ban something.
Future? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
And the past. The only question is how successful these people are.
As you probably saw recently the UK will be getting a their own Great Wall type censorship soon...which you can opt out of. Great way to get the "troublemakers" to identify themselves, I bet the Chinese wish they'd thought of that first.
Re: (Score:2)
Hugely successful.
After all, who doesn't love the rulers? they are so awesome, always care for our well being. Take Putin, he's is sooo gentle with his adversaries, to the point of giving up his positions. He's also a nice man. Not as sexy as His Honesty Berlusconi, who has to run away from hordes of horny chicks, but almost there.
I wonder if this law will make any difference, since all we want to do is to praise the leaders who constantly succeed in making this planet the best possible place in the entire
Re: (Score:2)
And the past.
Ever since the Neolithic Revolution screwed things up.
Re: (Score:2)
And the past.
Ever since the Neolithic Revolution screwed things up.
Yes, new rock is revolting.
Re: (Score:2)
... and claiming that they want to ban it in order to protect children. Because then it puts any opponents to the ban in the position of seeming to say, "I don't want to protect children."
And I think what you'll find is that, in each case, the proposed ban is just a way to get a foot in the door, so that they can build more invasive systems for monitoring and filtering what we access in general.
Re: (Score:2)
Because then it puts any opponents to the ban in the position of seeming to say, "I don't want to protect children."
Well, I'd just answer, "Why don't you protect your own children, instead of outsourcing your parental responsibilities to the rest of society?"
"Charity begins in the home."
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I'd just answer, "Why don't you protect your own children, instead of outsourcing your parental responsibilities to the rest of society?"
"So you don't want to protect the children?! You monster!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I am my 15 year old son's friend. We share common interests (computers, video games, technology, etc.) and so we get along great. But his computer is in the basement right next to mine and it's going to be that way until he moves out. It has worked well, and while I did have parental control software on it when he was younger, I removed all of it and gave him admin access a couple years ago. Raise them right, give them some freedom, but supervise, and it all works out. Can he access porn when I'm not around? Sure. But at 15 1/2 I'm not too worried about it.
At 15 1/2, I'd be worried if he didn't try to access porn...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are correct and I am all for freedom of speech. As for foul language I rarely use it and those that know me well know that when I do I mean serious business. That however is a personal choice.
Re: (Score:3)
I can see the future of the internet. There will always be somebody in authority wanting to ban something.
It will also be nothing but teletubbies. Plus, you get an award for logging in.
In the immortal words of Frost... (Score:2)
"Well what the hell are we supposed to use? Harsh language?" ...aww crap....dang....errrm....!@#$%^&*(
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, simply swap to words with dual meanings which would be very difficult to ban ie fuck vs screw, dick vs cock, pussy vs cunt. Given enough time should they be serious enough, the use any words could be banned.
That's the BBC too then (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
BBC - no. Just because the English word "fuck" has no meaning in Russian.
But - this site is already banned in Russia
http://ironscheme.net/
Enjoy.
In defense of the cursers (Score:2)
They DO live in Russia, after all. Come to think of it, that probably explains the drinking too.
yes of course... (Score:2)
its for the CHILDREN FOR GODS sakes!!!
Re: (Score:2)
the CHILDREN FOR GODS sakes
Wait, are we doing human sacrifices again?
The more things change... (Score:2)
Wow (Score:2)
We russians don't curse - (Score:4, Informative)
- we just use bad words as ordinary speech (My russkie matom ne rugaemsya - my matom razgovarivaem).
And all this curse-banning circus has the only purpose that isn't exposed: To promote Internet filters that will be (and are) used for any purpose THEY like. No wonder that I2P NetDB contains more Russian nodes than any other country's.
Well (Score:2)
State duma != Russia (Score:5, Insightful)
News sites should quit doing this, Russia is a land mass and can not ban anything, the asshats in the State Duma otoh might come up with crap like this.
'USA thinks it should invade North Korea'
See how that works, propagandist news style that is 99% lie.
Russia would shut down (Score:4, Funny)
How would Russians communicate without cursing?
Re: (Score:2)
Something like a drunk Swedish chef. "Vodka vodka, vodka vodka borscht."
Lame Excuse to censor (Score:3)
"The website would be blocked if the offending material had not been removed within 24 hours. "
Snowden better get his shit straight soon. He's not going to be able to reach anything but fuzzy kitten websites within a couple weeks and even then... one bad translation of "Pussy" and there goes lolcats.
Illegal to insult a government official? (Score:2)
Lame attempt to spice up the intro.
It's the same in many countries, including many democracies such as France, India...
Regardless of your constitutional rights, I suggest it's also a very bad idea in the US of A.
That said, I have travelled and worked a lot in the USA and Russia, plus other more 'exotic' spots such as the Middle East, (including Israel), North Africa, Central and South America....
Never had any problem with the police or other officials, at all...
(Indeed, one time in the USA, the officer who
Re: (Score:2)
Written by someone who has never been to a town-hall meeting in the USA.
Or witnessed the screaming invective thrown at both Bush and Obama.
No, in the USA you don't get in trouble for insulting a government official - shooting him might get you jail time, insulting him...nah.
Re: (Score:2)
I've often thought it would be fun to have a contest based on insulting the US President. To make it interesting, it would only be open to people visiting the US.
Contestants would stand outside the White House fence and publicly insult the president, loudly and with a sign, while videoing it. All videos would be posted to YouTube. Winner would be the one with the most views. Threats of violence would be disqualified.
The contest would serve two purposes: a bit of fun and showing the world that, despite o
How? (Score:2)
So, let's pretend for a moment that banning foul language isn't completely ridiculous, but a worthy goal from Russian government. There's still a practical problem... how?
First of all, the censorsh... (oops, "child protection") department will need to monitor consistently all sites in the Russosphere, and maybe some in the Anglosphere. Some of those won't reside in Russian Federation, and RF's gov asking the responsible countries' govs for info about the criminal swearing scum will at least result in a "lol
Re: (Score:2)
Foul language, sex and violence - the new DRM! (Score:3)
All this internet censorship of foul language, gratuitous sex and graphic violence (possibly all at the same time) is really just HBO's latest scheme to stop people torrenting Game of Thrones...
Committee name says it all (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Sorry but men that protect their childen are systematically incarcerated here. Especially if the criminals are from Chechnya (remember Tsarnaev).
Go Putin Yourself (Score:2)
You can just go Yelena your Mizulina, you filthy Vitaly Milonov.
Language is not constant (Score:5, Interesting)
If you ban all curse words then people will simply invent new curse words and, most likely, words that you can't ban. Or words that if they ban them have hilarious side effects. Like, say, Putin.
Go putin yourself. You're such a putin. Your mother is such a putin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
in latvian the surname of that stupid fucked up bitch sounds somewhat similar to "the one who pees". :)
the ignorant censorship promoting always-peeing shithead
fhew. i'm not used to throwing that many curse words in, i should practice. a target is available :>
Re: (Score:2)
This women (Score:2)
This women can go and fuck herself. This is a excellent example what is happening in Russia, as this is nothing but censorship China style. Democracy is dead in Russia today, thanks to Putin and his evil minions.
Re: (Score:2)
She may not go and do a non-traditional sex, sex with a non-traditional partner or a sex in non-traditional position since her previous law proposal banned just it. At least her speech in Duma has been understood just so.
Well, let me be the first to say (Score:2)
Fuck that. Fuck your censorship. Fuck YOU.
The entire world doesn't need to be made safe for children.
Shit piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker and tits.
Re: (Score:2)
You forgot to insult their worthless sack of shit dumb-ass motherfucking government officials. But we're good now with this thread.
welcome (Score:2)
I for one welcome all such draconian laws, just moves the revolution that much closer, if they do get carried away.
yayy ammo
Think of the children (Score:2)
First, stop daddy from chugging vodka and beating the wife and kids in a drunken stupor. I'm sure that does a lot more damage than the occasional What-The-Fuck.
Re: (Score:2)
Daddy drinking vodka and beating the wife and kids has a better chance to vote politically correctly. You understand. The sober daddy loving his relatives makes too much damage with his ballot.
Lets Consider Russia's Concept (Score:2)
slippery slope (Score:2)
Protect the children? (Score:2)
This law is enacted nominally to protect the kids from foul language? What about us poor adults? 99% of the time I read or hear somebody egregiously misusing foul language, the author or speaker is underage. Ever go on XBox Live? Yeah. Tweets? Blogs? It's the same. That's not to say their elders don't drop a few cuss words here and there but by and far, in my experience, it's the younger set that are abusing those words. And I'm fairly certain they didn't learn those words from the Internet.
So Russia, pleas
Meanwhile... (Score:2)
A solitary figure in 10 Downing Street wonders why he didn't think of this?
For the children! For the women! For decency! For Czar Putin!
Curse Word Definitions (Score:3)
I don't curse. Ever. (Yes, I know I'm a freak of nature.) However, even *I* see this as a horrible thing. Why if people curse it's their responsibility. I'm also the parent of young kids and the fact that people curse online is the least of my concerns when my kids go online. (Higher up on the list are people who would try to scam them or harm them in some way.)
Once Russia bans curse words, I predict a rise in "alternative" curse words. Instead of saying "the F word", they could say Frell. Instead of "the S word", they could say Scrap. Kind of like how the producers of MASH weren't allowed to use the word "virgin" in one episode so, in their next episode, they had someone say he was from the "Virgin Islands." People will rebel and find ways around the system. Then either the system will need to expand to include all possible words that could be used as curse words (pretty much the entire dictionary) or it will become so ineffective as to be useless for its intended purpose.
To putin (Score:2)
Poshel na hui! Idi ebyai svou mat!
A classic poster (Score:4, Interesting)
An oldie, yet very apropos [artlebedev.com], from Artemy Lebedev of the OLED keyboard fame.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Be careful before joking on the Internet. In the US that is enough to send you to jail.
Re: (Score:2)
And you ass clowns want to take control of TLD's away from ICANN
I personally don't care. There are 2 kinds of Internet activity. First one uses some domain names given by authorities according to specific rules and revoked or banned by censors. The second one uses cryptographic hashes as addresses and cannot be banned.
And the faster the censors kill the DNS the sooner the uncensorable Internet will appear.
Re: (Score:2)
Well... They can probably never agree on anything so no new regulations will be introduced :)
Re: (Score:2)
Better with the UN than with the U$A...
That's like saying it's better to leave your kids in the care of Albert Fish [wikipedia.org] than John Gacy. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the hope is that the UN will be so split about any minor issue concerning the internet, that they will at worst endlessly debate and vote on censorship, but nothing will ever get done. So basicly the internet will forever be left to it's own devices.
This hope is not unfounded, given the previous record of the UN not getting stuff done.
Re: (Score:2)
No I don't think so, If there's one thing that all the members of the UN Security Council can agree on it's that its imperative to have total control over the message. Whatever message that might be. Anyone who doesn't love and respect their great leaders are terrorist and their message can't be allowed to be heard or else others might become infected with ideas. Idea's that are not approved by our great leaders are dangerous and can spell disaster the likes that have never been seen on earth. We have to th
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, unless you want freedom loving organizations like the islamic controlled 'human rights commission' to have say in running things.. While rampant socialist (and, yes, that includes the corporate sponsored variety) censorship and 'political correctness' are squeezing through the cracks and politician-punched holes in the US constitution, the other major powers represented by the UN are decidedly NOT in favor of things like free speech or calling out the emperor's stupidity for what it is. America is get
Re: (Score:3)
We nearly had it far worse than this. In 1996, a law was passed called the Communications Decent Act. Initial drafts made any ISP where a packet of someone writing "fuck" criminally liable for the traffic (it made all ISPs considered as content makers, thus they "owned" any traffic coming from their peerings). The final draft made it a Federal crime of 2-10 years to use profanity.
The law never saw a day of enforcement. It was soon struck down by a lower court, then killed forever by a 7-2 verdict by SCO
Re:Dear Russia, (Score:5, Funny)
Anonymous Cowards proclaiming their freedom to swear and not even daring to spell out "fuck" properly. Cunts.
Re: (Score:3)
Anonymous Cowards proclaiming their freedom to swear and not even daring to spell out "fuck" properly. Cunts.
But that's how they spell it in their country. D*mned arrogant *mericans! Don't even have the letter "*" in their alphabet!
At least he didn't spell out l*wy*r.
Re: (Score:2)
Dronestrike in 3, 2, 1...
Re:Dear Russia, (Score:5, Insightful)
Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k
I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
That's just because his password contains u, c, and i.
Re: (Score:2)
Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k
I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.
[Insert Slashdot/UTF-8 support joke here]
Re: (Score:2)
ç"YããZãç"Yã"ããç"YãYã¾ã"
Re: (Score:2)
Go F**k Yourself. And, after that, Go s**k your own d**k
I think you might need to get some of the crap out of your keyboard. Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.
That's not garbage in the keyboard, it's backed up garbage between the ears. It probably has a tendency to leak out of the mouth too.
Re: (Score:2)
Your "U", "I" and "C" keys seem to be outputting asterisks for some reason.
No, those are the places where his password hiding browser extension works. The "f", "s", "k", and "d" keys are broken and are leaking his password information.
Re: (Score:2)
"Go F**k Yourself."
You mean " "?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
how cute, slashdot doesn't support UTF-8 in 2013. :(
either that OR PUTIN HAS GOTTEN TO THEM
Re: (Score:2)
And has steadfastly failed to do so for years -- not exactly news.
Re: (Score:2)
What is wrong with "Committee on Family, Women and Children"?
That this Committee is a mask of "United Russia", universally named here "Party of Crooks and Thieves" (See Wikipedia article "United Russia" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Russia [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Any serious answer to that will involve the word "privilege". The person writing it will use that word in a way that doesn't match any definition you have ever heard used before. As they explain their use, your blood pressure will steadily increase until your eyes start bulging and you start screaming at the monitor at the almost inconceivable suppression of rational
Re: (Score:2)
Even suggesting these hypocrisies might exist will get you labeled a 'hater'. Welcome to the newspeak/doublethink world of political correctness. You are, in fact, correct: People who are not on the current in-play protected list (whether it's race, gender or something else), have no rights. They are expected to shut up and pick up the slack when 'equality' becomes inconvenient for those on the list.
Re: (Score:2)
Fucking tanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Pardon my French...
Re: (Score:2)
We already are committing ethnic suicide. Or, more precisely, we are being replaced with more controllable electorate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)