Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Government Security Software The Internet United States Your Rights Online

US Security Classifications Needs Re-Thinking, Says Board 76

Posted by timothy
from the this-post-is-ultra-double-secret-probation-only dept.
coondoggie writes "The U.S. government's overly complicated way of classifying and declassifying information needs to be dumped and reinvented with the help of a huge technology injection if it is to keep from being buried under its own weight. That was one of the main conclusions of a government board tasked with making recommendations on exactly how the government should transform the current security classification system (PDF)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Security Classifications Needs Re-Thinking, Says Board

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 06, 2012 @03:42PM (#42208029)

    US Security Needs Re-Thinking

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 06, 2012 @04:38PM (#42208869)

    Here is the thing about security, you want it simple. You need people to easily understand what they can and can't access. The Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret classifications do that. But at the same time, when your security classification is too broad, then people without a "Need to Know" can access items they don't need to within their security classification. The Jonathan Pollard case is a good example of this. Due to his style of espionage, things like SCI were invented that further restrict sensitive items to only those who have a "Need to Know". Now your security system is complicated. Who do you give SCI tickets to and how do you track them and adjust over time? There is no simple solution. SCI complicates security and makes it difficult to work or share work with people that can help you out. It prevents people from knowing the Big Picture. But it also prevents assholes from selling major national security secrets to foreign countries.

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

Working...