Solar Company Folds After $0.5B In Subsidies 694
First time accepted submitter dusanv writes "Solyndra, a Silicon Valley solar energy firm, subsidized to the tune of $500 million and held as a 'gleaming example of green technology,' announced bankruptcy yesterday. 1,100 employees fired."
Re:Solar dies, RADIATION LIVES. (Score:5, Informative)
This is so much BS - what killed off Solyndra was competition from off-shore competitors. Even with 0.5B infusion from the DOE - they couldn't build a factory that was cost competitive. Oh - I live in the town where the factory was built - they wasted huge amounts of money building a second fab when they had one two blocks down the street of similar size and capacity. There is nothing magical here - it is simple economic forces that killed them off. Get over your Evil Big Oil conspiracy theories.
It also proves that the government does a lousy job of picking economic winners and losers. That is a game the government should stay out of.
National Debt (Score:1, Informative)
Current National Debt =~ 14.7 Trillion Dollars
Debt per Citizen =~ 47,000 Dollars
Debt per TaxPayer =~ 131,000 Dollars
US National Spending: 3.6 Trillion Dollars
US Federal Budget Deficit: 1.3 Trillion Dollars
Source: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ [usdebtclock.org]
Re:Extra, extra! (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, it succeeded in establishing itself. But it was outrun by its competition and there was no way to make it run faster. Rather than attempt to continue in a race it can't win, it abandoned.
The assets and goodwill will be sold, and the creditors, including the government, will get back a portion of their investment. Business as usual.
what isn't being said (Score:5, Informative)
Not really a $535MM subsidy loss (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Funding production != funding development (Score:5, Informative)
although certain examples, like sick shrimp running on treadmills, should be an obvious choice for budget cuts...
Why exactly is that obvious? Because it sounds silly? Apparently it didn't actually cost $500k
"The treadmills were just a small part of it, a way to measure how shrimp respond to changes in water quality. Burnett says the first treadmill was built by a colleague from scraps and was basically free, and the second was fancier and cost about $1,000. The senator's report was misleading, says Burnett, "and it suggests that much money was spent on seeing how long a shrimp can run on a treadmill, which was totally out of context." http://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139852035/shrimp-on-a-treadmill-the-politics-of-silly-studies [npr.org]