Chinese Schools Ax Green Dam Censorship Software 53
eldavojohn writes "China's controversial Green Dam Internet Filter died on new PCs a month ago, but it wasn't until recently that Chinese schools silently removed it. Claims that the software inhibited work in schools was cited as the reason by Reuters. 'We will remove all Green Dam software from computers in the school as it has strong conflicts with teaching software we need for normal work,' said one school, while another claimed, 'It had seriously influenced our normal work.'"
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
This is Slashdot. Not only do readers need to be spoon-fed, they also need to be told which side of the spoon is up.
Re: (Score:1)
This is Slashdot. Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth. There is no spoon.
Re: (Score:1)
> Yay slashdot for not understanding UTF8. It's supposed to be ying xiang.
Yeah, that is irritating. Basically people used things like Unicode's Left to Right Override character to mess up the layout so someone who's language can be represented in 7 bit ASCII decided to clobber Unicode completely.
My Hanyu Pinyin dictionary says ying3xiang3 means influence and it gives one of the examples as "The crops have been influenced by the weather", so the connotation is clearly negative.
Re: (Score:2)
Basically people used things like Unicode's Left to Right Override character to mess up the layout so someone who's language can be represented in 7 bit ASCII decided to clobber Unicode completely
Apparently just excluding the relevant unicode ranges was too difficult. It's not like there are existing functions that you can call to do that or anything...
Maybe a Really Good Translation? (Score:5, Insightful)
So Green Dam was an influence and not a hindrance?
Perhaps in countries where you can be prosecuted and/or silently punished for criticizing your government the above ambiguity is a must for public statements made to newspapers. I would surmise that the translation was all too accurate. So that those who know what you mean know they are not alone and those who do not agree cannot hold it against you. Just speculation but I would wager these were carefully chosen words.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll ask the same question I ask every time I see this kind of material: How much real insight do you have into the workings of Chinese society and citizen/government interaction? I admit mine is heavily filtered through others with political agendas, and I'm guessing you're in the same boat.
It looks to me like your biases may be influencing your analysis. You think it's likely that the government is at once strict enough to punish someone for saying Green Dam was harmful but too stupid to impose the sam
Re: (Score:1)
Actually if you read www.danwei.org, www.chinasmack.com for example, there are lots of examples of people using irony, sarcasm, ambiguity, puns and homonyms to evade censorship and make political points that would be unsafe to make if they stated things outright. However I don't believe this is one of those cases - it's more like there's a mass uprising against Green Dam and the Chinese government is slowly backing down.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Most likely the work "influence" was translated from the Chinese word yinxiang [mdbg.net], which generally connotes a negative influence. A better translation in this context might be "disturb."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
(depending on your nationality you're either smiling or nerveously looking over your shoulder right now)
Not to worry, IANTCG (I Am Not The Chinese Government)
Re: (Score:1)
So Green Dam was an influence and not a hindrance?
Given that anything that is a hindrance is an influence (by definition), why would you conclude that it wasn't a hindrance based on the fact that it was an influence? That's a bit like me saying, "I ate a sandwich," and you responding with "So you had a sandwich and not a roast beef sandwich?" Nothing in what I said implied it wasn't roast beef. Nothing in the originally quoted sentence implies it wasn't a hindrance.
Kinda like my school last year. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
We had a SonicWall filter and it blocked pretty much everything. Not saying it was SonicWall's fault as we had a highly incompetent system administrator, but it was very detrimental to doing even the simplest of tasks. So I know how these students and teachers feel.
We've got a few clients who want things filtered, which means we've tried several different products to do that.
We ran a Squid/Dan's Guardian proxy for a while... But I was the only person here who could do anything with it, which made my job harder.
We set up gateways with built-in filters like the SonicWall, but I always felt their classifications were a little weird and arbitrary. Stuff got filtered that shouldn't have... Or got through that shouldn't have... And depending on how many users they had,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I have similar issues in my classroom. I would rather they leave everything unblocked and let the teacher keep an eye on the students. If the teacher is paying attention and makes sure everyone is busy, then there shouldn't be any issue.
Instead, I have to worry about nytimes.com or Google getting blocked, or getting accused of looking at porn when a certain string of characters appears in an encrypted site address.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. A GOOD internet filter should essentially mean that an honest user almost never notices it unless they attempt to go somewhere on accident. Our internet filter at work I've hit a blocked site maybe 3 times in 5 years of working there. That's not bad IMHO. We had an internet enabled filter on the computer at my high school too. This was 15 years ago before I actually had internet at home (or at least not consistently - I signed up for 1 month trials and canceled them again as often as I could :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
(the name means "emperor")
Re: (Score:1)
You are aware the Wang is the most common surname in China [highbeam.com], I assume? (the name means "emperor")
What a coincidence! Where I live my "emperor" is called (a) wang.
Controversial? (Score:1)
Ok, I'm curious now. Exactly what was the controversy about it? Whether it sucks or it blows? :P
Re:Controversial? (Score:5, Informative)
The controversy was that the Chinese government was requiring this software (I believe developed by the Chinese government) to be installed on all new computers sold in China, including those sold by U.S. manufacturers.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Here is the Austrialian news article linked to in the original Slashdot post: News article [news.com.au].
CHINA plans to require that all personal computers sold in the country as of July 1 be shipped with software that blocks access to certain websites, a move that could give government censors unprecedented control over how Chinese users access the internet.
While in practice that could mean essentially all Internet cafe users, in theory, it would have applied to everyone.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Chinaâ(TM)s industry and information technology minister Li Yizhong said manufacturers, internet users and organisations opposed to the plans had received the wrong message from his department and that installation was never planned to be compulsory.
He said Green Dam would be installed in public places and schools, but would be âoevoluntaryâ for ot
Re: (Score:1)
China's industry and information technology minister Li Yizhong said manufacturers, internet users and organisations opposed to the plans had received the wrong message from his department and that installation was never planned to be compulsory.
I think they've backed down.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Whether it sucks or it blows?
Apparently, it sucks... and spits.
Yes, Impressively Controversial (Score:3, Informative)
Ok, I'm curious now. Exactly what was the controversy about it? Whether it sucks or it blows? :P
You only list two but I was fairly impressed with the number of dimensions of controversy this effort managed to accrue. You have (and this is by no means a complete list) accusations of copyright infringement and stealing code [slashdot.org], unencrypted transmission from every machine to the server [slashdot.org] and accusations that said vulnerabilities make way for a possible government botnet tool [slashdot.org]. And that's aside from obvious controversy of the citizen privacy violations and the Chinese government manipulating PC manufacturers.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
And that's aside from obvious controversy of the citizen privacy violations and the Chinese government manipulating PC manufacturers.
Controversy? Every government invades the privacy of the citizenry and exists to manipulate trade and other conditions. China has a long history of doing more than average in both areas.
Except that's not what "controversy" means (Score:5, Insightful)
Except that's not what controversy [wikipedia.org] means. Controversy means basically an unsettled and ongoing debate as to whether something is good or bad, black or white, etc, and usually neither side really has more than opinion to support their version. But anyway, the jury is still out on which of them is right.
Exactly which of those aspects you've correctly linked to is still a controversy? Is the jury still out on whether vulnerabilities that could get your machine pwned are good or bad? Do we still have compelling arguments for both sides of the issue of whether private and sensitive user information should be encrypted when sent over the internet? Or what?
It seems to me like nowadays "controversial" has become the euphemism for, basically, "I think it's bad, but I want to pretend to be nice and balanced, so I must find another word."
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it's like MegaMaid? IOW, a transformer!
It was more like this.... (Score:1)
Really means:
"We (the teachers and staff) were no longer able to watch porn during recess and testing periods."
-Oz
Re: (Score:1)
All your porn are belong to us.
--
We do not repeat gossip, so listen carefully.
Re: (Score:2)
In other news Monster.com reports... (Score:2)
----------
Scuba Diving [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The good news is that the Ministry of Health reports that organ banks have a surplus of "donated" organs!
In other words... (Score:2)