Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Role Playing (Games) Entertainment Games

Australian Ban On Fallout 3 – Why? 166

LSU_ADT_Geek writes "What could possibly be so controversial in upcoming E3 2008 headliner Fallout 3 that the Australian government would impose a dreaded 'RC' rating on Bethesda's upcoming tertiary post-apocalyptic RPG? No one knows for sure, but speculation is that the optional use of drugs in the game — specifically the option to employ morphine as a stimulant — may underlie the Aussie classification board blacklisting."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Australian Ban On Fallout 3 – Why?

Comments Filter:
  • Gee, I wonder? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Grey Ninja ( 739021 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @03:10AM (#24130625) Homepage Journal
    I wonder if that [kotaku.com.au] might have something to do with it?

    Word has it that that the OFLC may only give out R18+ ratings on games when there is unanimous support from all the attorney generals in Australia. And they all agree it should be allowed, except for one asshat [wikipedia.org] who wants to think of the children.
  • by donaldm ( 919619 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @04:23AM (#24130961)
    The problem is that game censorship in Australia only goes to R15+ which still falls into the Child category. The only way to get games that are adult is to have a R18+ category however the present Government (Labour) as well as the previous Government (Liberal) don't appear to be interested in passing legislation for a R18+ category. It is not intransigence on the part of the gaming lobby groups since they really want this category it is the Government.

    Of course (puts on tin-foil hat) all Governments appear to like the "think of the children" slogan which can be a good vote getter, so if you can prevent or stall an R18+ classification the Government can milk the save the children platform (or rant) for all it's worth then they are perceived as protecting society.

    That is why IMHO I think most Government officials are "Technological Cretins" (we like to call them "idiots" and other more colourful words as well).
  • by donaldm ( 919619 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @04:35AM (#24131017)
    Actually the PS2 game called "Oni" and now the PS3 "Haze" (never played it) has drug usage. I wonder how these got passed by the censor. Of course you can look at most games that have "herbs" (eg Final Fantasy and Resident Evil) or those healing orbs (god knows what's inside of them) and medical packs and you have some sort of drug reference implied :-)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 10, 2008 @05:04AM (#24131165)

    Simple. Australian law only allows for games to be rated MA15+ (suitable for fifteen year olds and higher) at the strongest. In fact, this is the only restricted rating available to games in Australia; as all others are merely guidelines. This game was deemed unsuitable for fifteen year olds and therefore had to be unrated.

    NZ law allows video games to have the same ratings as movies, so the game could take an R16 or R18 rating here. It's not uncommon for us to see video games for sale that have "banned in Australia" as an advertising gimmick (and usually carrying an R16 or R18 rating). Also, the increased range allows the NZ cheif censor to have more descretion in dealing with things like this. See here [gameplanet.co.nz].

    US law doesn't have any ratings at all (merely industry guidelines.)

  • by drsmithy ( 35869 ) <drsmithy@nOSPAm.gmail.com> on Thursday July 10, 2008 @06:43AM (#24131561)
    "Refused classification" is not the same as "banned". There is a subtle, but important difference.
  • by westlake ( 615356 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @09:24AM (#24132619)
    More fool them. They don't seem to realise they're undermining their future vote.

    If teens are growing up without playing these games, why should they be miseed when he is old enough to vote?

  • by Deuterium224 ( 1136881 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @11:48AM (#24135995)
    Surely anyone importing Hentai games would enjoy being spanked by Customs officials?
  • by deek ( 22697 ) on Thursday July 10, 2008 @10:15PM (#24147001) Homepage Journal

    For the most part, Customs officials don't care, or just don't realise that something is on the Restricted Classification list.

    They're after the _actual_ dangerous stuff. Drugs, weapons, dangerous chemicals, etc. For the most part, they really don't give a stuff if some crusty group of conservatives say some movie or game is restricted. The customs officials will just go about their job as usual.

    Of course, if you get some overzealous official, then you'll have difficulty, but otherwise, they really don't care.

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...