Trial Set To Determine What SCO Owes Novell 126
BobB-nw writes with word that this April will be the trial date for SCO's financial reckoning. Novell will discover via the courts how much (if anything) SCO is going to be compelled to pay in compensation for the lengthy trial over Unix code rights. The NetworkWorld piece also offers an overview of the case. "In September, The Wall Street Journal described the ruling against SCO as 'a boon to the open source software movement.' But experts say Unix is filled with technology that carries copyrights tied to many different companies and that it would be a nightmare to open source the Unix code collectively. Instead, Novell would have to pick and choose pieces to open-source, a process that could begin once the trial has ended."
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I hated SCO first (Score:3, Informative)
One thing that annoys me in these posts is all these Johnny Come Lately people who have just started to hate SCO as a result of their actions against Linux. I've been actively hating SCO ever since I had to use their piece of crap OS in 1993 on a 286 PC.
Then as you surely know, they aren't really the same SCO as that one.
Re:Quick question (Score:4, Informative)
Trademark - to brand a product in a particular category
Copyright - particular text experssion
Patent - invention
Novell used to own the UNIX trademark. They passed it to the OpenGroup when the sold the UNIX business to Santa Cruz Operating Systems. OpenGroup certifies systems as meeting the UNIX standard.
SCO has 2 versions of UNIX, I believe one is UNIX95(tm) compliant, the other UNIX98(tm) compliant.
IBM AIX UNIX is UNIX2003(tm) compliant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property [wikipedia.org]
Re:I hated SCO first (Score:5, Informative)
Shake your fist in impotent rage!
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:2, Informative)
BS&F *knew or should have known* that their legal position was untenable. They also *knew or should have known* what the contracts said. The bottom line is that they got paid with money that they *knew or should have known* belonged to Novell.
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:2, Informative)
Most likely, Novell may become a creditor in bankruptcy. It wouldn't surprise me if part of the settlement ends up being a junior security interest in major assets and a first-in-line security interest in lien-free assets.
it's not compensation for the trial (Score:4, Informative)
SCO does not owe Novell any compensation for the trial or lawsuit.
They owe them something like 95% of the Unix license fees they collected from Sun and Microsoft, as well as some others.
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:4, Informative)
Judge Gross does have the power to require a ROLLBACK of some of this money.
Oh and Novell would not be A Creditor since the funds have been ruled to be "converted" (humans would say STOLEN)
so Taxes and Novell get paid first then the creditors list rolls down.
Re:Just how much does SCO have? (Score:3, Informative)
The directors can pretty much dilute the value and rights of the common stock in any way they wish. So the value of the common stock does not mirror a take-over cost.
SCOX 10-K: http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?dcn=0000891020-07-000020&Type=HTML [edgar-online.com]
That would not end it (Score:3, Informative)