Verizon Sues FCC over 700MHz Open Access Rules 115
Carterfone writes "Verizon is upset at the open access conditions for the 700MHz spectrum auction, and they're going to court to get them overturned. The company has filed a lawsuit in the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, urging the court to overturn the rules. 'In its petition for review, Verizon argues that the FCC exceeded its authority in mandating the two open access conditions, accusing the Commission of being "arbitrary" and "capricious," and saying that the rules are "unsupported by substantial evidence and otherwise contrary to law." Google is critical of Verizon's lawsuit: 'It's regrettable that Verizon has decided to use the court system to try to prevent consumers from having any choice of innovative services. Once again, it is American consumers who lose from these tactics.'"
Verizon. (Score:5, Insightful)
> Under the FCC's rules, whoever wins the spectrum auction must allow consumers to use any device and any lawful application on their networks.
No wonder they're pissed.
Verizon: We never stop working... for ourselves.
Re: (Score:2)
they really do have the best network. if only they didn't get everything else wrong...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shaking Heads (Score:2, Funny)
But there's no justice in the universe. Just judges.
Re: (Score:1)
But there's no justice in the universe. Just judges.
Re: (Score:2)
That will happen when the corporations have better access to the political system than you do. Shame you can't do anything about it, at least on a practical level.
Re: (Score:2)
I have to play devil's advocate here...
1. Are you SURE there's nothing to be done?
2. Would you please define "practical", as used above?
3. Are you including illegal methodologies?
I'm not trying to quibble, but I've rarely found a situation SO dire that NOTHING could be done...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
* - this was just picked as the first result I got for the search for the price. No need to pay too much attention
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Then again, the "Distributed Cash-Mob" model hasn't worked for very much in the past; using the very same models we could have financed legal playback for our favorite free software media players and the like.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"There's just one problem. The $65,000 rate is the Times' normal rate for an advocacy ad from a non-profit group, according to newspaper spokeswoman Catherine Mathis."
no suprise (Score:5, Insightful)
Verizon wants you to do it their way, and really wants to force it upon you. when they bought GTE they tried to treat landline customers the way they treated cellular customers, they got nailed hard in court over that one.
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
it's also worth noting that R-UIM uptake globally has been quite poor and the phone selection is much smaller (nice chicken-and-egg problem there).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
it's not just amongst the operators; device manufacturers have been very slow to produce R-UIM-capable versions of their phones. customer demand simply isn't there, at least not in North America. while you're correct about the technical and expectational (huh?) differences having a removable ID card makes, the practical matter is different. there isn't customer demand in North America because the artifici
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Really? Sprint will only activate phones that it has sold and verified by the ESN. I tried to activate a Quest phone that was the same exact model as the Sprint version but they refused to do it. I had the MSL as well. A side story but the most frustrating part of this is I had called Sprint before I bought the phone and gave them the ESN. They verified it was clear and that it could be activated. W
Re: (Score:2)
Re:no suprise-DETAILS PLEASE (Score:3, Interesting)
Details please. I love a good smackdown!
Re:no suprise-DETAILS PLEASE (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/006/ripoff0006518.htm [ripoffreport.com]
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/0c1rnew4.html?cntwelcome=1 [phoneplusmag.com]
tons more. Verizon has tried their hardest to screw the customer for a really long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
not always. for a long time, they repeated what every other operator in the country said about Wireless Local Number Portability: bad for the industry, unfair, will ruin everything, we'll all go out of business, and that won't help anyone. then one day they realized "hey, we've got the best network in the country. i bet people want to use verizon!" and they decided to support WLNP. first major operator in the country to do so. and they were right
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the world of Motorola. I used to work for Motorola and was thus somewhat loyal to their brand. The StarTac was great. But then every other Moto phone I tried after it had horrible software bugs. The T720 was actually so bad that Verizon sent everyone a text message saying to come into the nearest store to get a replacement. Even the replacement sucked, with frequent crashes and graphics corruption. I vowed never to buy a Motorola since, regardless of how cool they looked. And I'm gla
Re: (Score:2)
Surprise! (Score:5, Funny)
Can you hear me now? No? Good.
"for the consumer!" (Score:4, Interesting)
'It's regrettable that Verizon has decided to use the court system to try to prevent consumers from having any choice of innovative services. Once again, it is American consumers who lose from these tactics.'"
That's pretty funny, coming from a company which prohibited its Adword customers from discussing anything about the Adwords program with others.
Google late paying you one month? Don't post anything about it on your website, or boom, you weren't a customer anymore. I took a quick glace through the terms and couldn't find it; maybe they finally nix'd it.
PS: We're not CONSUMERS. We are PEOPLE, who MAY be CUSTOMERS.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Probably ad supported, but seems like we're getting closer and closer all the time to a Google antitrust investigation, the way that MS was investigated. To some extent it surprises me that Google was allowed to purchase double click. Should Google purchase that part of the spectrum and fund it w
Help the FCC lawyers! (Score:2, Interesting)
Wahhh (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
the FCC
I don't care what the FCC leads anyone else to believe. The FCC themselves believe that they own the airwaves and they have proven time and time again that they are going to do with them what they see fit.
Remember, we don't get to choose who runs the FCC and that's a serious ****ing problem. We own the spectrum and thus the FCC should be a group of elected officials that can be ****ing bounced when the general voting public decides they should go. Unfortunately, they're not and they
Re: (Score:2)
Writer not from Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
I'll bet a couple of people around here were wondering how they misspelled "loose".
Re: (Score:1)
Man, no kidding...
Hmm...let's try the New Slashdot Spelling on for size...
"It makes me loose confidence in the American education system when people have such lose spelling standards. When you can't even spell such simple words, you're hopelessly loost. Heaven help us when such people are losed upon the world."
Bah. I think I'll stick with my old, curmudgeonly way of spelling these words. Damn kids these days
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They also misspelled Rumpelstiltskin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He did!
Re: (Score:2)
I dont' like companies like Verizon (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I dont' like companies like Verizon (Score:5, Insightful)
If it makes you feel any better, I'm in the same boat until March. I do plan to terminate my service with them primarily on their constrictive practices. What I find particularly distasteful is that they push legislation that practically makes it a legal requirement to bleed their customers with fees. Fees that seem to inevitably return to Verizon's pockets.
Re:I dont' like companies like Verizon (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Sign up for their "unlimited" data plan, plug in your phone, get a nice big SD card, and download like crazy. They'll get rid of you as a customer within 10 days and release you from your contract.
Just so you all know, their "unlimited" data plan does not allow you to download music or video... You can do it, but it's technically against what they authorize.
Re: (Score:2)
Call customer service..... a lot.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Does Verizon want to piss off even more people.... (Score:2)
You also lock down your phones to fore people to use the data planes so they pay to get photos off of the phone.
You hire people who don't know that $0.002 and 0.002 cents are not the same number.
You also put your poor UI on most of your phones.
What do you want to do next to rip us off?
This maybe way you did not get the iPhone.
Re:Does Verizon want to piss off even more people. (Score:2)
Just to be pedantic, $0.002 is actually 0.2 cents, if I'm not mistaken. I'm sure you meant to say something slightly different.
Re: (Score:1)
Look at http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
For details on this event... (Score:2)
*I have no affiliation with this site, I simply did a search to find the "Verizon Can't Do Math" YouTube video, but it appears to have been removed and this site came up first in my results.
Re:Does Verizon want to piss off even more people. (Score:2)
But then, I should not be surprised by this. After all, its j
Re: (Score:2)
Until I see consiste
Running Scared (Score:5, Insightful)
Verizon's move vacates its primary contention. The open access rules are going to make the bidding intense because those who want to keep the other two open access rules off the table are going to being bidding heavily. Moreover, it is quite likely that Verizon and others will, if the two existing open access rules stick, attempt to buy up the bands and then simply not build or activate the infrastructure, thereby trapping consumers into the other bands where they are not subject to these rules.
Point being, this is sleight of hand. Their real move is going to be trying to buy the bands and keep them dark. Therefore, the bands are worth more with these rules in place than without and Verizon's contention that the FCC is disenfranchising the government of revenue by adding these rules is void.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If you would have read those very same rules a bit more closely, you would realize that the Public Safety bands and the Commercial bands are two different bands being auctioned off independently. The "C" block auction is the one that has these two rules attached that Verizon is trying to get thrown out.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070815
Re:Running Scared (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What they didn't say is This spectrum should be available to the public under fair and decent pricing or anything of the like; they only added the two "Google Caveats". The phone companies could build up the entire infrastructure on top of existing infr
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, as if that's going to deter the telcos from not breaking the agreement, just like they didn't build out the internet infrastructure the way they promised after getting a pile of tax breaks and other "incentives" from the government. What was the smackdown they got for that? Nothing? Yeah, that's what I thoug
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Running Scared (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
What?
Why does Verizon care if the Government gets the revenue?
I don't understand why the open access rules would make any difference to the existing carriers if they just want to leave the band unused.
Re: (Score:2)
They
Re: (Score:1)
Those who want to keep open access rules off the table would still have to outbid companies lik
Oh Poor babyyyyyyy !!! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Why Verizon's Claims are Total B.S. (Score:3, Insightful)
Total B.S.! If I can use any device, then I can use the most innovative devices from anyone building them. If Version provides the most new and innovative wireless services at a fair price, they get my business. If someone else does, my business goes there. In short, Version contradicts themselves in the very same sentence.
As for reducing the revenue the government will receive from the spectrum auction, like how does that happen? Is Verizon going to pay a bazillion dollars for the spectrum if you have to buy only their devices and services afterwards, and that no one will buy a single Hz of it otherwise? I doubt that!
It's all such total B.S. from Verizon that nobody should be taking them seriously for a single instant -- and throw those blighters out of court!
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is, is that this is a national resource and the decision should also consider what the bidder is going to do with the spectrum and how much they are going to charge the consumer. These resources should be used in interest of citizens and not the monopoly which would like to hoard a limited resource which it uses as bat to beat it's own customers.
Re: (Score:1)
CC.
Hey Verizon! (Score:2)
If you don't like the rules, then don't participate in the auction. You won't be missed. In fact, given that you already have the phone service side of the duopoly, I'd prefer that you not be part of this anyway! Pick up the toys you tossed out of the pram, and just go home.
A good example here (Score:4, Insightful)
If any of you ever felt like you might want to write some letters or make some phone calls, this would be a good time. Keep in mind that Verizon won't be hurt in any way if they don't get this frequency band. It's you and I that'll get hurt if they do...
Re: (Score:2)
The American courts will probably follow the law as written. If it gives the FCC the power to make this decision, they'll tell Verizon to go whistle, if it doesn't they'll say the same to the FCC. In great detail.
The place to buy the law is in congress. Federal judges are pretty much immune to external pressure due to the appointment system. In high-profile stuff
Regrettable but predictable (Score:5, Informative)
I hope Google is willing to go to court because this simply will not end. Verizon will sue infinitely to delay the auction if they don't get what they want, and if the auction happens they will sue infinitely to block usage of the spectrum or to block open access. They've proven that nothing is enough for them.
I'm not sure I understand all the ins and outs but (Score:1)
Not one bit!
Selling spectrum is short sighted idea (Score:4, Insightful)
Imagine the day you are carrying a little device in your pocket. This device is an all in one thing. It has a software defined radio in it, a reasonable sized display (3in diagonal maybe, 800x600 pixels?), some kind of keyboard, a microphone and a speaker. You can make phone calls, instant message, and almost any other form of communication. The infrastucture is WiFi, WiMax, CDMA, GSM, 3/4G, point to point, HDTV, AM, FM, XM, Sirius, GPS, pager, bluetooth and zigbee on whatever frequency is appropriate (remember software defined radio, it can do all of this in software).
You pick up the device, it has an address. You wish to communicate with someone else, they have an address. The device knows them, and their address. Through the infrastructure, Your device can find their device, picking the most suitable communication mechanism available. If they are in the same room, it'll do point to point, if they are in the same building, it'll do WiFi. Across town, maybe your device will do CDMA, and theirs will do GSM. Want to send email to someone, it'll figure out a route.
The only way this will work, is opening up everything. The spectrum, especially will have to be unencumbered (not owned). The carriers will have to act like carriers, accepting these all purpose devices, without a monopoly.
Sure verizon and ATT will scream, it isn't good for anyone. But actually it will work in their and our best interest. Their infrastructure could be more efficiently used (won't have to handle calls to the guy in the next cube). Sure we may have to pay what it costs to utilize their network instead of a flat fee, with silly gimicks. Initial purchase price will a little high (device not bundled with the service). They won't have to service the devices, or they could, if they build their own.
To get here, the spectrum that has already been sold will have to be returned to the rightful owners (us), and that will be expensive!!! The government could claim eminant domain, but that would probably be even less popular, and the lawsuits would probably cost even more money. We need to stop selling spectrum NOW!
Re: (Score:2)
The only way this will work, is opening up everything. The spectrum, especially will have to be unencumbered (not owned). The carriers will have to act like carriers, accepting these all purpose devices, without a monopoly.
That would be too logical. Sure would be nice though.
I'll say this, I'm disgusted with everything about the US cellphone market. From its backwardness in technology to vendor lock in and thoroughly crappy service. Recent phones are almost caught up to where Japanese domestic cellphones were four years ago and my Cingular sim works better in my wife's phone (a Nokia purchased in a random store in Manila) than on the phone I purchased when I started the account (I've only paid one of the two fines needed
Re: (Score:2)
The spectrum is not sold, it is leased under contract. The only difference here is that the price of the lease is determined by auction and not simply set ahead of time by the seller. If the winner of the leasehold does not meet the terms of the contract then the FCC should turn around and re-auction the lease to somebody else. However, the scheme that you suggest would result in a very serious case of Tragedy of the Commons [wikipedia.org] as every device fought for spectrum and in
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Digging their own grave (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By in large the US telecommunications market is not very innovative. US telecom services are like US food: cheap, plentiful, but not very good.
Boycott (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I recently renewed my Cingular/AT&T contract with the AT&T 8525 which I'm very happy with... I ch
Re: (Score:1)
Rules (Score:1)
classic clueless libertarian (Score:2)
You're quite wrong. If the government (ie the people) doesn't make those rules, the corporations sure wont. So where will these regulations come from? What will keep those telephone companies from only allowing us to use one phone, rented from them (as they use to do in the old days?) What will keep th
Verizon sues FCC over Open Access Rules (Score:1)
A modest proposal:
What if there was an "X-prize" in the mould of the private competition to spur on space travel, to push an open source CITIZENS-BAND SATELLITE into earth orbit? Now my guess is that with lobbyists and all, such a thing could never get off the launchpad in this country. So maybe Larry Ellison or Google (or some other ambitious visionary bunch) in collabo
People will catch on (Score:1)
just a thought... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)