Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Cryptome to be Terminated by Verio/NTT

Posted by CmdrTaco on Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:33 AM
from the is-this-the-whole-story dept.
George Maschke writes "Cryptome, a website concerned with encryption, privacy, and government secrecy, has received two weeks' notice from Verio that its service will be terminated for unspecified "violation of [its] Acceptable Use Policy." Cryptome has a history of making publicly available documents and information that governments would rather keep secret. For the notice, and a public response by Cryptome webmaster John Young, see Cryptome Shutdown by Verio/NTT."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 29 2007, @10:38AM (#18918929)
    No need to wait for two weeks to shut down a site. Just submit it to slashdot
    and get it shut down in minutes.
    • by eneville (745111) on Sunday April 29 2007, @10:40AM (#18918945) Homepage

      No need to wait for two weeks to shut down a site. Just submit it to slashdot
      and get it shut down in minutes.
      mirrored: http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/e231a81023b07bf39 9b68b2c295e9736/index.html [mirrordot.org] http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/deb36db488f175511 ebd77b98603b50f/index.html [mirrordot.org]
    • by johnyoung (204516) on Sunday April 29 2007, @12:09PM (#18919481)
      Right, Cryptome happily chokes on slashdot, but not to worry, mirrors are available as noted below.

      Cryptome and its affiliated sites will continue with another ISP, in the US or elsewhere. Or if necessary, underground, or via means not easily shuttered, or by way of whatever is invented for opposing technologies of information control (credit to Steven Wright, author of The Technologies of Political Control: http://cryptome.org/stoa-atpc.htm [cryptome.org]).
    • So the British "intelligence" services, the same ones that said Saddam Hussein had huge stockpiles of WMD that could strike the UK in 45 minutes, can get a website turned off it America? The ISP just weasely pulls the plug without negotiation just because some guy with a British accent rings up?

      Come on America, we all used to look up to you as the beacon of freedom, but now your country is being turned into a Tudor monarchy, within a few years there will be no freedom left, will the last one out please turn off the lights when you leave.
      • So our "intelligence" services specifically gave some Libyan a Visa to come to Britain and hopefully be recruited, and he instead set up a terrorist network, what a load of monkeys. Then they tell a US ISP to help cover up the truth that they were actually making Britain less safe. A bunch of public schoolboy hooray henries, sack the lot of them I say, out source it to India.
      • by NormalVisual (565491) on Sunday April 29 2007, @02:46PM (#18920517)
        The ISP just weasely pulls the plug without negotiation just because some guy with a British accent rings up?

        I don't think that's what happened. I suspect what happened was that someone in the US government saw something they didn't like, and sent a National Security Letter or other such silliness to Verio. Verio of course can't legally disclose that, but given that Verio had been always been very forthright with John Young in the past but is being tight-lipped about the situation now, I think it's quite possible that something like this is behind Verio's actions.

        Gotta love living in a nation where the government makes you do their own damn police work against someone else against your will, and then threatens you with jail if you say anything about it.
      • So the British "intelligence" services, the same ones that said Saddam Hussein had huge stockpiles of WMD that could strike the UK in 45 minutes, can get a website turned off it America? The ISP just weasely pulls the plug without negotiation just because some guy with a British accent rings up?

        First they invent global warming as an issue (Margaret Thatcher, of all people). Then they give us bad intel, embroiling us in an unwinnable quagmire of a war. Now they attempt to close down our only source for rea

  • any good soul? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by eneville (745111) on Sunday April 29 2007, @10:38AM (#18918931) Homepage
    Is there anyone who would like to put up some bounty for having this hosted in a country with liberal hosting rules, such as Sweden perhaps?
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      He might want to host it where he hosted it so far, simply because he is aware of the legal dos and don'ts of the current setup.
    • Re:any good soul? (Score:5, Informative)

      by rs79 (71822) <hostmaster@open-rsc.org> on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:09AM (#18919109) Homepage
      Why bother?

      I was able to read all of the pages peviously withdrawn with the exception of one (the Irish injunction) in minutes without going to cryptome. The rest of the site can also be found in the usual places.

      If people are dumb to know about things like this I suspect we sholdn't go out of our way to tell them.

      Here's an excerpt from a document withdrawn in 2001:


      UNDERSTANDING AND HELPING INDIVIDUALS WITH HOMOSEXUAL PROBLEMS

      Copyright 1995

      LDS Social Services

      USE OF THE DOCUMENT

      This training document has been prepared for the exclusive use of LDS Social Services to assist staff, interns, and contract providers in their work with individuals having homosexual problems. Because the document is approved only for "in house" use, it should not be reproduced nor distributed to others outside of LDS Social Services.

      UNDERSTANDING AND HELPING INDIVIDUALS WITH HOMOSEXUAL PROBLEMS

      HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

      For more than 100 years homosexuality has been a topic of scientific and psychotherapy inquiry and debate. Freud and his contemporaries viewed homosexuality as a deviation or "inversion" of natural psychosexual development, the causes of which being as varied and numerous as the theorists espousing them. According to Freud, the deviation resulted primarily from a distorted parent-child relationship which led the child to reject his or her own gender role and identify with the opposite~sexed parent. This view received considerable empirical support later in this century through studies by Irving Bieber and a number of other researchers (Siegelmm, 1987).


      But! These things hang by a thread. I would posit that people who want them archived should post them to usenet. A lot. In a world where news postings are routinely made into "google ad blogs" there'll be lots of copies on many servers around the world.

      Some people think you can delete things off the Internet. They are fools.

      (Note the invalid copyright notice on the above document. You have to say who it's copyrighted by, not just a date. Of course as an excerpt here for academic purposes it's covered by fair use under US copyright law).

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        If people are dumb to know about things like this I suspect we sholdn't go out of our way to tell them.

        Don't be like that. Those are the people who need the most help. They really can't help it. It was part of their conditioning as they grew up. It actually is very difficult to overcome. Believe me, I know. We all need help more than ever now.

        Some people think you can delete things off the Internet.

        We show them otherwise and problem solved. But we must show them, however graphically as necessary and by what
          • ALL people :-) In fact, you look like you could use some help, my son. Meditating and concentrating on your navel might lead you to the path of righteousness. Then just watch the signs...until you get to the...fork..in..the..road. There you will get stuck to see if you are done.
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            "Corporations and governments have been trying to get the internet "under control" for maybe 10 years now,"

            Haha. Longer than that. There was a CIA study in the 1970s about this that concluded as long as there are modems and phone lines nothing about the network can be controlled. But who reads those things anyway?

            I understand very well the implications of the US adopting the Berne convention rules on copyright on Jan 1 1990, I was just pointing out that a badly formed copyright notice looks foolish. With a
      • wrong. (Score:5, Informative)

        by sethawoolley (1005201) on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:51AM (#18919361) Homepage
        The Berne Conventions eliminated the need to even post a copyright notice. Copyright automatically falls into the hands of the "creator" the moment it is created.

        if you want to go after somebody with a DMCA notice on something with no notice and no registration, you can easily register the copyright years later, then go after them.
        • Re:any good soul? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by fwr (69372) on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:48AM (#18919339)
          It's even worse than that. You don't actually need a "valid" copyright notice in the US anymore. Works are copyrighted automatically. It certainly helps to have a copyright notice. It also helps to have your works registered with the government, but that is usually not necessary unless you are about to sue someone (just like Novell and SCO scrambled to register their claimed copyrights in the Unix source; funny they didn't feel the need to register them before the lawsuits).

          Now one can argue that as soon as the owner places a work on a publicly accessible location, such as a blog or on Slashdot, that you implicitly grant others the right to copy that work. That may be a stretch, and would depend on the situation. If the acceptable use policy of the site says that all submissions are reproducible that is much different than if you have a site in which you have to login and pay a fee in order to retrieve documents or other works (think DRM free pay music sites). However, just because some information is "leaked" one way or another, such as the LDS document sited, it does not mean that the owner of the work gave the permission or relinquished their rights. Hence, even the "fair use" of a small part of their work may not pass muster. One could argue that their internal documents on how they treat homosexuality are not only copyrighted, but in fact Trade Secrets, and there is no fair use of Trade Secrets. As long as they took reasonable steps to protect those items the leaking of them does not change their status. So it could be said that the web site should not have published the documents has they done something as simple as read the beginning which indicated they were confidential internal documents.
  • explination (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Dont they have to tell you what violation you commited?
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Now that you mention it, the US actually *was* a democratic country at one point.

      That was quite some time back though.
      • I bet Cryptome was brought down by special request of George W. Bush himself! The guy is an evil super-villian behind everything.

        Yesterday I couldn't find my goddamned keys anywhere; I put them right there on the side and the next day they were gone..
        Bush won't think twice about shorting your car battery, rusting your bike chain or cutting holes in the bottom your pockets; he's just that evil. My co-workers say I need to stop ranting about Bush and that I should get back to work.. Clearly a violation of
        • My co-workers say I need to stop ranting about Bush and that I should get back to work.. Clearly a violation of the 2nd amendment!

          Unless you're about to "go postal" you should be thinking 1st Amendment, not 2nd.

          More on-topic - maybe they should look into moving to ibiblio.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          Banter aside, I'll make the argument simple for you.

          1. A leader of a country conducting a war of aggression [wikipedia.org] against another has committed a crime against humanity.
          2. George Bush has conducted a war of aggression against another country.
          C. George Bush has committed a crime against humanity.

          We are looking at 600,000 dead [mit.edu] between 2002-2006 as the result. Not to mention the thousands of maimed and dead U.S. soldiers. If the 600,000 people that died were people that lived in the U.S., would you be talking

          • This has what to do with Cryptome?

            "Bush" is not a synonym for "American foreign policy" or "the American government" or "the Bush administration" as you seem to think it is. If the government requested that the site be taken down, and the site actually didn't violate any of the terms of service, that's fine and I'm interested to hear it.
            My only point was that it's not "Bush", it's the FBI/whatever organization/bureau/agency. People who think everything bad the government does can be attributed to the pr
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              "Bush" is the reason why shit like this is happening here and now. It's entirely reasonable to blame him for an abusive law enforcement agency. Of course you could then blame "us" for letting him into office.
              • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                That *is* Bush, because he's sits above them.
                It's so much easier to blame one person for all the country's problems. Much easier than looking for people who are actually to blame.
      • Hmm, that must have been some time before the civil war. The war increased the power of Washington and nullified the power of most states - especially southern ones. Democracy in the US got watered down accordingly, since there are no more proper 'checks and balances'.
  • by nurb432 (527695) on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:13AM (#18919125) Homepage Journal
    Sites like this could simply be 'blacklisted' if no ISP wil pick them up due fears of prosecution.

    Good way to restrict 'evil' information dissemination to the masses.

    What is next, 'hate' sites being cut loose? Or 'independent freedom talk' being removed from the digital landscape?
    • Sites like this could simply be 'blacklisted' if no ISP wil pick them up due fears of prosecution.

      The problem here is not the ISP but with the laws that cause those fears. The blacklisting is done with laws, not AUPs.

      Spammers being okay with Verio/NTT, what we see here is an illustration of the kinds of behavior the relevant laws were meant to circumscribe. It's harder to make a legal and business case for a political speech site than it is to send people fake ads.
  • mirrors (Score:5, Informative)

    by e**(i pi)-1 (462311) on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:15AM (#18919133) Homepage Journal
    cryptome has several mirrors. Here is one:
    http://cryptome.quintessenz.org/mirror/cryptome-sh ut.htm [quintessenz.org]
  • Of course, it's VERIO's network, they're free to have whomever they like as customers. I just find it dubious that they're TOS'ing Young for abuse or violations of their AUP when they simultaneously decide to host spamming scum:

    http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=ver io.net [spamhaus.org]
    • Er, I see four listings there. While not anything to be proud of (there shouldn't be any), I imagine most other large hosting companies have at least that number.
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Of course, it's VERIO's network, they're free to have whomever they like as customers. I just find it dubious that they're TOS'ing Young for abuse or violations of their AUP when they simultaneously decide to host spamming scum:

      http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=ver io.net [spamhaus.org]

      I think they might be, actually - in several of the emails in the linked conversation between Verio and Cryptome, it warns them that people repeatedly receiving DMCA notices are in violation of the AUP. Doesn't sound like it matters whether the notices are fair or unfounded.

  • by k1e0x (1040314) on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:29AM (#18919223) Homepage


    We don't allow this kind of dissent in Soviet Amerika. If your not with us your a terrorist.

    Ok so that's a bit over the top but really what's this coming to? Where do we draw the line on Police state America?
    • I honestly don't see what your comments have to do with this discussion. I'm not really surprised you were modded insightful, as insulting the US is one of the new cool things around /. but this is a single corporation making a decision about not allowing a single site due to violations of what it deems acceptable use, nothing to do with the government far as I can see...
      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        Im gonna risk it and respond to this. I think I have found the lowest rated ./ user out there.. believe it or not this is not the first time he has made coments like this.. I'm ahh also going to type like I talk to make ya even MORE pissy.

        I'm going to assume from "you're" (har har) comments that ya'are a Republican. Its that or you'r just a spelling natsi.

        So at what point do you think we are safe enough? How many freedoms must we loose? Will you allow the government to post guards in shopping malls and nigh
  • Argh! This sucks (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:34AM (#18919251)
    Cryptome has been an indispensable ally in many wars against secrecy, ineptitude, corruption, and evil-doing conspiracies all over the place. John mirrored a couple of separate batches of stuff I had a minor involvement in, and in both cases the world was made (in a tiny way) a less crappy place by his actions.

    It's also a sad day in it's message that there is now, ultimately, no genuine free speech left on the net. If the state really really wants to suppress your message, it can do so. It's slow, labour intensive, and expensive for them to do this, so they don't usually bother; but when they need The System to function, it does.

      • By your logic, even the most oppressive oligarchy is "free".

        As industry becomes the defacto policy-maker by blithely re-establishing the rule of cartels and monopolistic reach, purchasing political loyalty or even installing their own CEOs to government posts, then they will be judged by governmental standards. One of those standards is censorship.

        The function of government in the USA has been subverted by a political class of corporatists who, more often than not, literally write the bills they expect thei
  • Pcik a new ISP (Score:4, Interesting)

    by DogDude (805747) on Sunday April 29 2007, @12:23PM (#18919543) Homepage
    So a web site has a problem with their ISP. So friggin' what? Pick a different ISP. There are millions of hosting companies out there. Everybody has problems of one kind or another with their web host, and switches. These guys should pick a new ISP and be done with it. I mean, tell people that Verio sucks for these reasons, but there's no reason the web site should shut down permanently... this whole thing sounds like drama for the sake of drama.
    • Drama for the sake of drama? Perhaps, but I don't think so. I think it's more an attempt to shame Verio. After all, Cryptome has been providing an important public service for years, and Verio shutting it down is not good for their public image.

      Personally, I think the energy should be spent finding better hosting. That is one problem with the activist types - any setbacks become a part of a larger conspiracy. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

      And sometimes a cigar will cause a president to get impeache
    • Re:Pcik a new ISP (Score:5, Interesting)

      by sphealey (2855) on Sunday April 29 2007, @12:54PM (#18919755)
      > So a web site has a problem with their
      > ISP. So friggin' what? Pick a different ISP.

      Cryptome IS watched by various intelligence, counterintelligence, and law enforcement agencies. Young posted a funny exchange he had once with the "duty officer of the day" at a TLA; the guy told him that a certain document had been released accidently; could it please be withdrawn? Young of course said no, so the guy then said "I guess it is too late for this conversation not to be posted too?" - making it clear that he knew very well how Young runs Cryptome.

      So it may be very difficult for him to find another ISP. Maybe one related to Qwest will take him on, but they ISP has to know they WILL come under additional law enforcement pressure just as a result of hosting that site.

      sPh
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward
        Cryptome IS watched by various intelligence, counterintelligence, and law enforcement agencies.

        Yes it is, and so now the burning question is which document of the
        thousands on Cryptome caused someone at one of those agencies to turn
        some powerful-enough screws to make Verio pull the plug without
        breathing a word about which document it might be.

        We must find what the government wishes to keep hidden and shine a
        spotlight on it, because that's how free and open nations remain so.
  • This sort of thing always makes me want to check the site out for juicy stuff.
    archive.org wayback machine cache [archive.org] is my friend.
  • by fuckeverything (525664) on Sunday April 29 2007, @01:43PM (#18920055)
    from their acceptable use thingy: "Other Activities -- Engaging in activities, whether lawful or unlawful, that Verio determines to be harmful to its subscribers, operations, reputation, goodwill, or customer relations." so they pretty much tell you straight away, that they pull your site once they dont like what you are hosting anymore.
  • by Deagol (323173) on Sunday April 29 2007, @01:54PM (#18920107) Homepage
    I recently signed up with them. Aside from their quirky/cool pricing scheme, the site's strong stance against censorship and privacy sold me on it instantly. All sites that get the ISP boot for unpopular (but not illegal in the US) should check out nearlyfreespeech.net [nearlyfreespeech.net].

    My only relation is a happy, new customer. It may not be the best fit for Cryptome, but there are at least hosting providers that do give a shit about not bowing down to the status quo.

  • Why he stays in USA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Frozen Void (831218) on Sunday April 29 2007, @02:15PM (#18920269) Homepage
    I would suggest he move somewhere safer like Switzerland or Sweden.
    This should be done BEFORE making his site.
    • by bhima (46039) <.Bhima.Pandava. .at. .gmail.com.> on Sunday April 29 2007, @11:01AM (#18919069) Journal
      No it is *not* 6 years old.

      No everything on the page is not six years old.

      Go back a reread it.

      There is a whole email chain included, on the mirrordot link, stretching back to 2001 (and probably further I did not read the whole chain)

      I doubt cryptome will have trouble finding hosting, honestly I'm sort of surprised that they use Verio/NTT
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Which is great until Freenet decides to host someone's kiddie porn collection on your computer. Then you get to smile at the nice FBI agents as they escort you to your court date. It's great that someone's thought of encrypting and decentralizing what gets published to the internet, but it's not practical until I can have control over what gets put on my node. Their FAQ handwaves the hell out of this essentially by suggesting that true freedom means I have to host something I find personally disgusting or t
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Aside from the morality and legality of all the kiddie porn on Freenet, such content amounts to a crapflooding sort of DOS attack. A bedrock principle of press freedom is being free to choose what to publish and what not to. Freenet forces you to be part of what is basically an already wrecked commons. Decentralized torrents seem to me to be a much more palatable alternative.