RIAA Moves Against College-Network Fileswapping 692
pazu13 writes "The RIAA is taking action against college "Napster networks". It's suing four network operators, two at Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute, one at Princeton University, and one at Michigan Technological University. Don't know where this is going, but I'm afraid it might get significantly harder for humble college students such as myself to sample an artist's music before going out and buying a disc... my speed across the network is ridiculously faster than when I try to access outside sources."
DMCA? (Score:4, Interesting)
By reading this you have broken the DMCA as this message is encrypted with the English Language Cypher. I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV.
No. (Score:5, Interesting)
And it sure as hell won't protect you from the million dollar settlement.
Besides, they might not even use the evidence they've illegally obtained. Rather, they would find some student/traitor that would be witness to the "awful theft of IP".
The law isn't a tool you can use, it's for them to use. Think of it as a smart gun that knows their fingerprints... you might punch them and take it, but it won't ever shoot them.
Re:No. (Score:3, Interesting)
The judge is not going to say "Since you're guilty of a $1000 offense, I'll let the defendant go on a $1,000,000 offense.". It doesn't work like that.
You remind me of the idiots that leave behind inadmissible evidence, that the point the cops in the direction of t
Re:DMCA? (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually, the RIAA bought me pizza once. They came to a class I had in 1997-98 (Legal Issues in Computing) to discuss music piracy with some college students. At the time, I wasn't very familiar with the concept, but, uh, shortly after, I became very well acquainted. They even gave us some free CDs!
Re:DMCA? (Score:2, Insightful)
RIAA® members create, manufacture and/or distribute approximately 90% of all legitimate sound recordings produced and sold in the United States.
Sounds somewhat monopolistic to me. How about getting the government to file an anti-trust case against the RIAA. It would be difficult to be an artist and not support the RIAA in some way monetarily.
Don't be silly (Score:5, Funny)
Re:DMCA? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:DMCA? (Score:3, Funny)
Do what I did. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Do what I did. (Score:2)
what next (Score:2, Funny)
This would be more like (Score:5, Interesting)
Shutting off all the TVs to prevent minors from viewing violence.
I mean really, its not the RIAA's job to be our parents. Its should be left up to the college. Capitalism is important yes, but its not everything, money is not more important than education, if you cannot have freedom of speech even in the educational enviornment well then I'm going to move to China, I mean if we have to be monitored by the RIAA, whats the point of staying in the RIAA's country, Its not ours anymore, if we had a vote right now most people would be for piracy, and for filesharing, this reminds me of prohibition, or people who try to outlaw porn.
Look, it will never work, give it up, the people want to share music, the RIAA can adapt to the industry, or they can hiijack our government and change the laws. If they are allowed to change our laws, we arent a democracy.
Duh. (Score:2)
After all, that's the most efficient way to extract value from a person, isn't it?
Stop listening to crap and go see the band. (Score:4, Insightful)
CNET has a story on it too.. (Score:5, Informative)
The recording industry has stepped up its campaign against campus music swapping, filing suit against four university students who operated file-search services on their school's internal networks.
The lawsuits, filed against two students at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), and one each at Princeton University and Michigan Technological University, ratchet up the pressure that the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) recently has been putting on universities to block campus file-trading. The trade group still has not filed suit against average file-swappers who use more common services such as Kazaa, however.
"The people who run these (campus) networks know full well what they are doing--operating a sophisticated network designed to enable widespread music thievery," RIAA President Cary Sherman said in a statement. "The lawsuits we've filed represent an appropriate step given the seriousness of the offense."
University students have been widely viewed as the core of the various file-swapping networks ever since the appearance of Napster on the digital scene in late 1999. Universities have seen half or more of their network bandwidth used by people uploading and downloading songs, software and movies over the past few years.
Schools have attempted to crack down on the practice of file swapping in various ways, ranging from blocking network traffic associated with Napster or Kazaa to confiscating computers used to trade files. In a recent congressional hearing, some lawmakers called for criminal prosecutions for campus file-swappers.
In its lawsuits, the RIAA compares the use of the campus search software--variously called "Phynd," "Flatlan" or "Direct Connect"--to the defunct Napster service, dubbing the services "local area Napster networks." The particular technology in these lawsuits in fact represents something different than the file-swapping techniques used by Napster or Kazaa, however.
"Phynd" and the other pieces of software set up servers--often on ordinary dorm room PCs--that search all the computers connected to a campus network that have Windows file-sharing turned on. Unlike Napster or Kazaa, which helped create a network of computers that would not have existed otherwise, "Phynd" and the others search a network that already exists.
"Dan," a university student who runs a similar server but has not been sued, said the RIAA is missing critical differences in the file-sharing technologies. He asked that his full name and university not be used.
"With or without these services, people would be able to share these files," the student said. "It's Microsoft that's allowing people to share these files; we're just accessing public information."
That difference in technology may or may not have any effect in court, attorneys said.
"It does seem like all it's doing is indexing resources that are available on a network that people are already a part of," said Fred Von Lohmann, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital civil liberties group that has defended file-swapping companies in court against the RIAA. "It doesn't seem like there's anything wrong with building a tool to do that. And it doesn't seem like there's anything wrong with running that tool."
Where the students could run into shadier legal territory is when those indexes and search results come back loaded with MP3 files, Lohmann said. According to the RIAA lawsuits, several of the students also maintained archives of hundreds of songs on their own machines.
All four civil suits were filed in federal court near the universities.
Re:CNET has a story on it too.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Wouldn't it be cheaper to offer an educational discount on music CD's, thus encourage more CD purchases?
Re:CNET has a story on it too.. (Score:2)
Gee, that almost sounds like Supply and Demand.
Maybe but (Score:2)
Setup mp3 vending machines with new released songs on them that I cant get anywhere else and I might plug in my mp3 player and load a song or two, otherwise I'm not going to do it, I dont use CDs anymore, CDs arent as portible as mp3s, and we dont go backwards in technology on the college campuses.
Re:no its not! (Score:3, Informative)
Has everyone forgotten Google, etc? (Score:5, Insightful)
Okay. Phynd is a straightforward SMB indexing server. As per comments here from one of the RPI students, one of the persons charged wrote some of the Phynd software, and the other person admined a Phynd server for RPI. The RIAA is *not* going after the people who are serving infringing data, but after the CS students who wrote indexing software...because it's more convenient for the RIAA.
When file indexing services become illegal because one of the servers that they index contains potentially infringing information (as just happened), the world has turned completely upside down. Google indexes copyright-infringing images and text every day, and in *far* larger quantities than these SMB indexers. Should *they* be served with a lawsuit and ordered to shut down? How about Yahoo? AllTheWeb has an FTP search engine, not that far from an SMB search engine...is *that* illegal as well? Hell, if you have a multi-user system, a user stores infringing information in his account, and your cron daemon runs updatedb, you're in the same boat as the students that got charged.
I'm very, very uncomfortable with this, and I feel that the RIAA has gone too far.
NFS will be illegal soon. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:NFS will be illegal soon. (Score:2)
Or they could just ban ID3 tags and the
(as an aside, sharing files using windows file sharing? blech. Better to use HTTP on a local apache server of some sort) If they are CS students, the RIAA should put an injunction against them for bad application design.
Re:NFS will be illegal soon. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:NFS will be illegal soon. (Score:4, Funny)
Hands should be made illegal.
Especially "idle hands", as they "do the devil's work" (ie sharing files).
Remember kids, it's good to share, until you become a teenager, at which point sharing is illegal and will result in prison time.
From this point forward, the only lawful act shall be giving money to companies working for or affiliated with the RIAA.
And doubly so if search engines are illegal. (Score:2)
And doubly so if anyone operating an engine that catalogs what is on the LAN is sued.
Correct me if I'm wrong. But isn't that what they're doing in these cases? Claiming that anything that catalogs the accessable shared files is a "piracy tool" that must be suppressed?
no, Harddrives will be made illegal. (Score:2)
Remember, anyone who copies anything is a Pirate, just like anyone who uses Kazaa is a Pirate.
They want to turn the internet into something more controlled like the TV industry. Freedom isnt allowed in this country, some people have to control everything.
What ever happened to individual freedom? If the masses decide they want to share files, why should you be able to stop them? What happened to democracy? If the masses vote to have file
In related news.. (Score:5, Funny)
The RIAA is taking legal action against the Department of Defense. It believes the DoD has caused serious harm to RIAA members, in its harbouring of and creation of the Internet.
"The people who built this huge network know full well what they are doing--operating a sophisticated network designed to enable widespread music piracy," RIAA President Cary Sherman said. "They built a protocol called TCP/IP that has been shown to provide ample opportunity for stealing music online."
Gestapo, anyone? (Score:5, Interesting)
They have an AUP I'm sure, but at the bigger schools, it becomes tough to enforce. The inability to control what the students do (at some level) somehow makes the admins responsible? I don't agree with that, but that's just me.
Re:Gestapo, anyone? (Score:2)
Re:Gestapo, anyone? (Score:2)
Solution: Use a decentralised method.
Re:Sick, Sick. (Score:4, Insightful)
As opposed, of course, to the idea of trivializing the countless murders, rapes, and thefts commited by pirates on the high seas by using the term "piracy" to describe someone breaking copyright law.
Sampling (Score:2)
Maybe true for older stuff, but somehow I don't think that's what the RIAA is pursuing people over.
Re: older stuff (Score:2)
Legal and right (Score:5, Insightful)
If they were locating and prosecuting some students engaged in illegally copying copyrighted content, that would be different.
This action may be legal, but it isn't right.
Apparently they are going after the students? (Score:2)
Although it doesn't mention if these people were just operating hubs,
Re:Apparently they are going after the students? (Score:5, Informative)
the web based search engine, phynd (http://www.phynd.net/) was written originally about 5 years ago by a student at RPI to scan SMB networks. the original author has since graduated, and the 3rd generation of phynd admins was the one sued. the win32 front end "flatlan" (http://www.flatlan.com/, currently slashdotted, i guess) was written by a current student at RPI.
"Baby with the bathwater dept" eh? (Score:2, Insightful)
How is this an example of throwing the baby out with the bathwater? These kids broke the law and the record companies are taking legal action against them for it. And as far as I'm concerned, they deserve to pay the price for their actions. Organized illegal file swapping is orga
Re:"Baby with the bathwater dept" eh? (Score:2)
Actually... (Score:2)
Re:"Baby with the bathwater dept" eh? (Score:2, Informative)
What these students were doing was simply providing an index of the locations on the SMB network of shared files. Not only music and movies, but research papers, free software, etc.
They did not pirate music by provinding these listings, they simply said "Hey - this kid over here has what looks like music on HIS computer whith the filename you are looking for"
The individual people sharring songs are at fault, not the technology provider that allows you to find songs.
An RPI Stude
Re:"Baby with the bathwater dept" eh? (Score:2)
Merf (Score:3, Interesting)
http://members.cox.net/datafox166/irony
I pulled this off an album circa 1965 or something like that. It _was_ that now its doing this? What happened?
Another assumption (Score:2)
It seems the whole article is based on the assumption that "Because the LAN operators are smart enough to install the P2P software, they have to know that it will be used to share copyrighted music." (paraphrased)
Bad, bad assumption.
Use Open Source DRM (Score:5, Funny)
Encode your files using OGG-S [slashdot.org]. I am sure your college's IT community would be a great testing and developing environment.
If they crack the encryption, unleash the DMCA on them. Settle only if they let CowboyNeal screw lightbulbs into Hilary Rosen's ears.
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHA! (Score:2)
Please, dear God! Stop! My sides hurt from laughing so hard!
My concern is... (Score:5, Insightful)
How? (Score:2, Interesting)
Lawsuits vs. Legal action (Score:3, Interesting)
What the hell is the point of forcing us to sit through 15 second FBI warnings before movies if they're not going to use the FBI?
Here is the text of the FAQ (doc :( (Score:2)
It's Illegal!
Local Area Napster Networks
This is a particularly flagrant way to illegally distribute millions of copyrighted works over the Internet. The people who run these Napster networks know full well what they are doing ñ operating a sophisticated network designed to enable widespread music thievery. The lawsuits we've filed represent an appropriate step given the seriousness of the offense. --Cary Sherman, President, RIAA
What do these systems do?
The
What crap... (Score:2, Interesting)
The filesharing services that they are trying to shut down are internal to the college's network and as such does not have such a negative impact. In many cases, traff
A Slight Correction (Score:2)
I think he meant to say "it might get significantly harder for humble college students such as myself to sample an artist's music until he's sick of it and no longer has the need to go out and buy a disc".
Okay, I'm convinced. (Score:2)
It just so happens I live in Canada and my musical tastes lie mostly in stuff from Europe. Therefore, RIAA, as in America, shouldn't really apply. Does this mean I'm already set?
I used to run a Phynd server at UC Berkeley... (Score:4, Informative)
Basically, the Phynd concept is actually very basic: scan all SAMBA shares (i.e. windows shares), store the results, put in a file/DB and then make a searchable webfront or application. FlatLAN is actually a separate, user-friendlyish application to the webfront. Scanning only takes place every couple of hours, so it might miss a couple computers. Also, if people turn their computer off, the shares are still listed in the database, but aren't accessible. It isn't updated in real-time like Napster/KaZaA/
The reason this is popular, in case you don't know, is that you're just searching all available shares and downloading them at the speed of the internal network... mmm... 100Mbit switched network... it was quite useful, especially if you're looking for bigger files.
While I think that the RIAA does have a point, I mean, honestly, why would you put a compressed (.zip/.rar/.arc) category or a mp3 category to narrow searches down?
However, they do miss a really great aspect of Phynd: it can be used as a security scanner. Since a lot of new computers do come with their computers sharing the entire harddrive (in the same way some trojans do), it's easy to figure out who needs to secure their computer.
Another legit use is actually sharing ISOs... no, I'm not talking about your latest w4r3z fix, but the latest Linux ISOs. I was able to pull Slackware 7.1 (I think it was 7.1) off the network at a cool 2-4MB/s which is much faster than trying to grab it from a mirror at 50-100K/s.
Damn you RIAA...
1-800-BAD-BEAT (Score:5, Funny)
Once again, the RIAA demonstrates that it doesn't know who or what it's up against.
I can only imagine how many war-dialers will go into infinite-loop mode calling that number.
I'm beginning to think that RIAA really stands for Really Ignorant Arrogant Assholes.
--K.
Re:1-800-BAD-BEAT (Score:2)
An Example (Score:2)
From the Article:
"We hope that these suits serve as a stiff deterrent to anyone who is operating or considering setting up a similar system."
The RIAA's president also praised the higher education community for the steps that many colleges and universities are taking proactively to address the problem of peer-to-peer infringement on campus.
They don't really care how these lawsuits turn out. They just want to scare individuals and get more universities to do this [slashdot.org]. I think illegal copying is a rather
Spelling error (Score:2, Troll)
Don't feed your oppressors. (Score:2)
I know exactly where it's going, and I don't like it one bit. But the solution is not to buy CDs at all; only 4% of the profits go to the artists anyway. You'd actually be giving them more by just mailing them a dollar. (If only there were an easy way to do this) The only way to get rid of the RIAA disease is to quit
Um, sure, ok. (Score:2, Insightful)
Give me a fucking break. File sharing on college campuses is about nothing more than getting free music. Ask the average kid with a new Dell on a wired campus what he or she does with that computer - well, they "download music and burn cds, duh". Most of these kids aren't even aware that this type of stuff is a viola
sample (Score:2)
Why sue the NetOps? (Score:2, Insightful)
Just wait until.... (Score:2)
Also, it seems out of character for the RIAA to sue a couple of rich colleges. Did they have to make sure the kids' parents would have the dough to put up a decent fight? I would have expected to see them sue some poor-ass state colleges or something, not Princeton. You know, like all those patent-peddling bullshit companies that sue the little
Re:Just wait until.... (Score:2)
Yeah, when I was in college we had 100baseT.
Encrypted Filesharing? (Score:2)
Calm down, nothing to see here...move along now... (Score:2)
It's pretty clear from reading the article, that the RIAA is suing the operators of the file sharing networks. Not the LAN admins. In other words, they are pursuing lawsuits against people that are actively engaged in copyright violations. Nothing more.
They are doing exactly what they should be.
We're running into this now (Score:2)
unlike a workplace, a college dorm is NOT just a room in a building with a network jack.
it also happens to be someone's residence. there are severe restrictions on what you can and can't do/listen to at someone's "home" per se.
this lawsuit may not be as cut and dried as the RIAA is
Princeton filesharing eh? Shocking! (Score:2)
No! He points the finger elsewhere in his Freedom to Tinker [freedom-to-tinker.com] blog back in November 2002: the campus paper, the Daily Princetonian then had a nice article [dailyprincetonian.com] with some details on how filesharing works (and is policed, not tightly enough for the RIAA apparently) at Princeton these days.
At least until today.
(I had to laugh at the frankness of the music professor quoted in that article.)
--LP
Bullshit (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sorry, I don't believe you.
Look, the rhetoric of "I want to have file sharing programs so I can legitimately and legally under fair use laws make backup reproductions" is getting old. Not only do I not believe you, but the media does not believe you, the law does not believe you, and the industry sure-as-hell does not believe you.
People want to steal and pirate music and movies. They are doing it, and no amount of legislation and regulation is going to change that.
What does this imply? Well, quite rightly, a fundemental transformation of the actual value of art and entertainment media itself.
This has been going on since the invention of the printing press -- since the age of the bard. Over time, the cost of reproduction goes down, and thus so does the value of the individual unit of media.
The industry can fight it, but it will lose over time. That is inevitable.
However, profit can still be made. The winners will be those who offer media that can not be reproduced digitally (vinyl, packaging, etc), and those who adapt the earliest and fastest to the future economies of entertainment. Those that predict the changing value will have a head start on capturing the emerging market.
In other words, an hour of music is no longer worth $15 - $20. The earlier the industry realizes that, they better they will do.
And the sooner consumers stop trying to deceive themselves, the lawmakers,and the industry, the better this will be for all of us. Legislature is being crippled by a lying consumer (fair use, my ass), a lying producer (free market, my ass), and people trying to take advantage of the deception (Microsoft DRM, my ass).
"As the present now will later be past, the order is rapidly fading. And the first one now will later be last, for the times they are a changing."
PS: Don't believe there is a trend? Think about music in the middle ages. You had to pay someone to play. And when they were done, they were done. You'd have to pay them again to hear the music again. By the beginning of the 20th century, you could spend a fortune on a record player and another fortune on some vinyl, but you could listen as often as you liked. By the end of the 20th century, cassettes and CDs were ubiqituous and cheap, but had a cost associated with physical reproduction. Today the physical costs are nil. See the trend?
Re:Bullshit (Score:3, Insightful)
this article is seriously confused... (Score:5, Interesting)
So far so good, no misinformation yet. But then the spin gets started:
"These systems are best described as 'local area Napster networks,' said Cary Sherman, President, RIAA. 'The court ruled that Napster was illegal and shut it down. These systems are just as illegal and operate in just the same manner."
Ok, so now we're defining a LAN as a LANL? And Sherman is saying that a LAN is the same thing as Napster? But wait, it gets better:
"This is a particularly flagrant way to illegally distribute millions of copyrighted works over the Internet,' added Sherman. 'The people who run these Napster networks know full well what they are doing ?'"
The first quote already differentiated between LANs and the internet, but now they're being lumped together. Also, that question mark at the end is in the original article, and I think that it deserves to be there, since now we are referring to LANs specifically as "Napster networks." But wait, now things get really confusing:
"The perpetrators of these internal Napster networks named in the suits filed by the RIAA make use of software known variously as Flatlan, Phynd or Direct Connect."
Ok, so LANs are "Napster networks" which use software? I thought that Napster was software too, but now I see that it was a network, though I'm still not clear on whether it used software or not. Anyway, I learned a lot from this article, like the RIAA's music piracy hotline, 1-800-BAD-BEAT. Call in and report a rival company or school that is hosting a "Napster network," and keep America running!
theft, plain and simple (Score:3, Insightful)
This is the most absurd thing I have read in recent days. The notion of stealing music inorder to preview it for later purchase is insane. Would you steal a CD from the music shop only to turn around and go make a purchase of the exact same thing. NO, you would not!
People think up the weirdest shit to justify that their actions are legitimate, and many times they belive their own lies. I can speculate that some folks steal music, and then go out and purchase some of the tunes they stole. But how many tunes are sampled, yet never purchased. Also, a sample of music is typically a segment of the audio, not the entire tune. People do not trade samples, they trade entire tracks/albums.
Simply put, napster is not designed to be a preview service. It is designed to move mp3 files from one computer to another, and search the data of remote computers for whatever your criteria is(genre, artists, albums, etc). I'm not sure what is worse, people who download music from napster, or peope who make their albums available on napster. The people who share their tunes are facilitating a criminal activity by the people who steal (aka download) the music.
My opinion on the entire mess is that if Napster could hurt the music industry, it probably does. Dowloading a binary file is inocent in of itself. A downloader has no notion if the binary they download (mp3's) are copyright, or not. The notion of a filename is meaningless as files can be renamed, so respect of copyrights based on recognition of the bands name in the filename is a flawed argument. Clearly the criminal liability points to the people who make music available for download, but since in napster downloaders, and publishers are one in the same. Thus, the method of correcting the criminal situation is to remove the napster servers.
</rant>
Re:theft, plain and simple (Score:4, Insightful)
You may have problem with your comprehension since you are mislabeling things. Downloading music is not stealing, it is copyright infringement since a physical object is not removed and nobody looses anything.
Would you steal a CD from the music shop only to turn around and go make a purchase of the exact same thing. NO, you would not!
No because that would be stealing not copyright infringement. You would take the physical thing from the store which the store has paid for and would be unable to sell.
The law understands the distinction, which is why it makes one.
Student at RPI (Score:3, Informative)
What's the gripe? (Score:4, Insightful)
Why would we revile RIAA for asserting these rights now. This isn't some technology regulation, like DMCA -- it is enforcement of entirely legitimate intellectual property rights against actual infringers.
I would rather they went after the students actually doing the swapping, but we lost the server battle, at least for now.
Re:What's the gripe? (Score:3, Interesting)
Listen to yourself, man. You are advocating monopolistic practices as well as the possibility of physical harm to real live human beings over the consuption of a small sample of media that could be infinitely replicated without costing the RIAA or anyone else a penny. You think it is right to hurt our students for "stealing" risking possible prison time and the real threat of physical harm over a few leaves th
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2)
I mean, if you can't, how are you finding them in the first place?
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2, Insightful)
Not all p2p is illegal though. Why should services be shut down if they have completely legal purposes?
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:5, Funny)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:4, Insightful)
because i'm not interested in who corporate america wants me to like/listen-to/buy. money/power to buy airtime does NOT constitute talent!
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:5, Funny)
Right. If you're careful about only trading MP3s that have only been legally downloaded from MP3.com, band websites, etc... then the RIAA won't bother you at all. They do extensive checking for each and every song to make sure that 1) The RIAA represents the artist in question, 2) that it's the right song, and not something with a similar name, and 3) that the band hasn't decided to make the MP3 available intentionally. Only then do they reluctantly issue a cease & desist order.
They would never abuse their position and simply issue a blanket C&D on the mere suspicion that there might be an infringement. Sure, it's more expensive to do the careful checking, but they can't take the chance that they might alienate their customers.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:4, Interesting)
Indy bands that give away a few mp3's on their websites get my vote however. Best way to promote your music online, IMO. And it heads off "music piracy" the RIGHT way.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:5, Insightful)
because it's not on the radio MTV,
because it's not on MTV or the short samples available on Amazon.com
because they are short, sound like crap, and take an awful lot of effort to listen to a series of them.
Seriously, there are a lot of us who don't listen to "the popular" music, and even if you do, you maybe get to hear one or two songs on the radio. (MTV is even worse.)
There is no way, short of borrowing a CD from a friend or using P2P to listen to an "album" a couple of times to see if you want to buy it.
Believe it or not, there are people who use P2P networks to listen to non-mainstream artists they've heard about, to evaluate new music, etc. And believe it or not there are people who buy more music because of what they've heard on P2P. I can say this because I am one of those people.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2)
Cool.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:4, Interesting)
Look, I don't mind paying $18 for a CD if its something I want. Honestly. I download stuff I think I might like, listen to it on my computer (which is a hassle still) and see if I like it enough to buy it. If I don't, I delete it. Honestly. How hard is it to grasp that there are mature people out there who's use of P2P actually benefits the RIAA and other (non-RIAA) artists?
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:5, Informative)
Because in practice you can't sell CDs for the same price you buy them, new or used.
In Japan, I used to rent CDs as a palatable method of evaluating music before I bought it. However, here in the good 'ol US of A, the RIAA in their infinite wisdom got legislation passed which prevents this. Thanks to them, I'm basically forced to buy it or "steal" it.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2)
Cant sample obscure music on radio (Score:3, Interesting)
Sampling via 'illegal' means is the only way you decide if you want to buy the rest of their stuff...
And a 10 second sample doesnt count, that is not representative of a artists work.
And yes ive bought many albums i never would have risked money on, unless i could hear the WHOLE thing.. I have to work for my music budget...
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, when it comes to the mainstream English music I only buy the CD under 2 conditions: 1) I actually like 80% of the songs on it and 2) after listening to those songs for about 2 weeks (not constantly, but often) I still like them. That's why I prefer to download an album (when I can't borrow it from a friend) before I buy it. Most music retail sites rarely have all the songs in an album up, and even when they do hearing only 30 seconds of a song is decieving because if there's an annoying interlude 2 minutes into it that makes me detest it then I'll hate the song (maybe I'm too picky). Also, from past experience, mainstream English music when I like it tends to wear itself out really fast about half the time. I'm hesitant to buy CDs I might be absolutely sick of even the sight of in a couple of weeks. With the price of American mainstream CDs these days, I don't want just "an idea" of what an artist is like, I want to be SURE I like the album I'm paying for. Every artist has good and bad albums.
I blame American mainstream music industry for the high occurrence of crap among their products. I've noticed I'm drastically less cautious when shelling out the cash for foreign albums, part of that is because their albums even look a lot spiffier. I appreciate a product that looks, as well as sounds, thoughtfully produced.
Re:"Sampling an artists music" (Score:2)
Hell, if they did that with video games there'd be a lot less crapola out there too.
Slight correction (Score:3, Funny)
The RIAA is horribly misguided. Those networks are used to share movies, not music. Yeesh.
Actually, to be more specific, those networks are used to share porn movies, not music. :)
GMD
Re:Sigh (Score:2, Informative)
~An anonymous Phynd User/RPI Student
Re:This is Terrible. (Score:2, Insightful)
Theres been censorship at college forever. Even a good science student like myself has been exposed to it.
Oregon State 1992 - History of Western Civ "no blasphemy" on the midterms or finals. That was tough, the instructor was a hardcore Catholic, how can one talk about the Reformation without it being blasphemy?
There is academic censorship everywhere.
Gee, I though College was about learning, not about downloading music without fetters.
I'm not there for downloading or going to part
Haha... (Score:2)
I don't have money. But I do have a brain. Let's fight this with technology.
Re:fuuuu (Score:4, Funny)
Re:great business sense.... *sarcasm* (Score:2, Insightful)