Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
IBM

Submission + - IBM Seeking 'Patent-Protection-Racket' Patent 2

theodp writes: "Wikipedia defines a protection racket as an extortion scheme whereby a powerful non-governmental organization coerces businesses to pay protection money which allegedly serves to purchase the organization's 'protection' services against various external threats. Compare this to IBM's just-published patent application for 'Extracting Value from a Portfolio of Assets', which describes a process by which 'very large corporations' impress upon smaller businesses that paying for 'the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio' would be 'a prudent business decision' for them to make, 'just like purchasing a fire insurance policy.' Sounds like Fat Tony's been to Law School, eh? Time for IBM to put-their-money-where-their-patent-reform-mouth-is and deep-six this business method patent claim!"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IBM Seeking 'Patent-Protection-Racket' Patent

Comments Filter:
  • I guess we have to mod all those funny posts [slashdot.org] insightful now! :-o
  • I think IBM may actualy have a VERY good reason for this. Can you think of any "large corporations" in competition with IBM, who have been bad-mouthing a product IBM is involved with, and encouraging smaller distributers of said product to pay for "the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio"?

    From the post:

    a process by which 'very large corporations' impress upon smaller businesses that paying for 'the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio' would be 'a prudent business decision' for t

"I got everybody to pay up front...then I blew up their planet." "Now why didn't I think of that?" -- Post Bros. Comics

Working...