Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Crime Government Privacy The Internet

New Russian Law Criminalizes Online Searches For Controversial Content (washingtonpost.com) 81

Russian lawmakers passed sweeping new legislation allowing authorities to fine individuals simply for searching and accessing content labeled "extremist" via VPNs. The Washington Post reports: Russia defines "extremist materials" as content officially added by a court to a government-maintained registry, a running list of about 5,500 entries, or content produced by "extremist organizations" ranging from "the LGBT movement" to al-Qaeda. The new law also covers materials that promote alleged Nazi ideology or incite extremist actions. Until now, Russian law stopped short of punishing individuals for seeking information online; only creating or sharing such content is prohibited. The new amendments follow remarks by high-ranking officials that censorship is justified in wartime. Adoption of the measures would mark a significant tightening of Russia's already restrictive digital laws.

The fine for searching for banned content in Russia would be about a $65, while the penalty for advertising circumvention tools such as VPN services would be steeper -- $2,500 for individuals and up to $12,800 for companies. Previously, the most significant expansion of Russia's restrictions on internet use and freedom of speech occurred shortly after the February 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, when sweeping laws criminalized the spread of "fake news" and "discrediting" the Russian military. The new amendment was introduced Tuesday and attached to a mundane bill on regulating freight companies, according to documents published by Russia's lower house of parliament, the State Duma.

New Russian Law Criminalizes Online Searches For Controversial Content

Comments Filter:
  • by ArmoredDragon ( 3450605 ) on Thursday July 17, 2025 @05:49PM (#65527896)

    You lose everything. Liberty, democracy, you name it. Over time it goes away because you've lost basically the only defense against tyranny. Doesn't matter your ideology. But if your ideology requires giving up free speech, especially political speech, even if it's "only temporary" then you've given up the rest as well.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 17, 2025 @05:52PM (#65527908)

      You can be sure Trump is taking notes.

    • Russia has lost democracy years before losing free speech and decades before the ideology arrived?

      • by Z00L00K ( 682162 )

        TFA and all comments are now prohibited from viewing in Russia.

      • by mjwx ( 966435 )

        Russia has lost democracy years before losing free speech and decades before the ideology arrived?

        Did Russia ever have freedom of expression (why limit it to speech, if I want to call Pootin a cunt via the means of interpretive dance why shouldn't I)? I remember when I was in my 20s they regularly targeted Russian Celebrities that dared speak out against the government and now I'm a man in my 40s (Tatu was the famous one from the early 00s).

        I'm pretty sure they've never had a real democracy either, just something that kind of looked like it between despotic governments.

        But the OP has a good point,

    • by znrt ( 2424692 )

      this goes actually beyond supressing free speech, it's targeting the mere access of information.

      then again they are at war, and the enemy is known to play dirty. still, a poor decision. then again, i'm not really sure how this is even to be enforced. the whole point of using a vpn is obfuscating your traffic, and i hear a number of them are still accessible from within russia. i guess targeted individuals might indeed be compromised but ... the whole population? ai? or is this just supposed to scare off?

      • this goes actually beyond supressing free speech, it's targeting the mere access of information.

        This is true. This is suppressing mere questions, let alone actual thinking or communication of thoughts.

    • Except, Russia did it in reverse. All you have to do is criminalize something vague and arrest anyone based on your terms. Stalin101.
    • TURBULENT and TURMOIL NSA programs. research that.

    • by skam240 ( 789197 )

      I do agree with your assessment of the value of free speech but your "only temporarily" part was a bit amusing considering we've given up free speech rights during war time several times in US history and always gotten them back.

    • You don't need perfectly free speech. In many cases places like Australia, Germany, Netherlands, etc which don't have a perfectly codified idea of freedom of speech and in fact have criminalised certain elements of free speech are doing far better with the whole democracy thing than America.

      Evidently there's more to this than just freedom of speech.

  • by ukoda ( 537183 ) on Thursday July 17, 2025 @05:51PM (#65527902) Homepage

    The new amendments follow remarks by high-ranking officials that censorship is justified in wartime.

    So is Russia now officially at war, or are they still trying to pretend it is a SMO?

    Slava Ukraini!

    • by znrt ( 2424692 )

      So is Russia now officially at war, or are they still trying to pretend it is a SMO?

      it started as a smo, and that's still the official name, but putin, media and many other officials have referred to it as war on numerous occasions, indirectly and directly. everybody knows they are at war. and almost everybody is at war, this is actually world war 3 taking off.

      • by ukoda ( 537183 )
        Last I heard Russian citizens could face jail time for calling it a war, instead of an SMO. I was guessing that is still the case even if officials have occasionally used the word war, such as in the main post.
        • Yes, because I'm sure the Russian security apparatus is really gonna go arrest Big Bad Vlad for breaking his own repressive rules.

  • Russian lawmakers passed sweeping new legislation allowing authorities to fine individuals simply for searching and accessing content labeled "extremist" ...

    ....and once again MAGA goes green with envy.

  • With where the Internet is currently at with disinformation proliferation and a solid minority (if not majority) of netizens unable or unwillling to think critically and vet their sources, I'm not entirely convinced this is as bad as it sounds.

    Oh wait, this isn't the government stepping in to offer credible, third-party validation of information and sources, it's just Orwell in Russian form. Never mind.

  • For anything related to the war in Ukraine such as, "Has Russia lost over 1 million men in Ukraine?" or, "How many generals have been killed in Ukraine?", or, "What happened to the Moskva?".

    No way in hell they'll let that slip through.

  • There's a list with over 5k entries of forbidden subjects to search on the Internet.

    And how do people know what searches are forbidden without looking it up on the Internet?

    • And how do people know what searches are forbidden without looking it up on the Internet?

      The list is whatever they say it is, and the forbidden searches are whatever they say they are, and this will change whenever it is convenient.

    • by Creepy ( 93888 )

      That may very well be the point, they can get you for anything now.

      Search: Mommy says Daddy was killed by Al-Qaeda, what's that?
      Result: Child S-214, you have searched for a forbidden word. Please report to reprogramming center 201592 for reprogramming or termination. The Benefactor thanks you for your service!

      Since I'm sure most people haven't read it, that is a direct reference to the Yevgeny Zamyatin dystopian novel We, which Orwell and possibly Huxley borrowed from to write 1984 and Brave New World, resp

  • by Anonymous Coward

    The fact that they're trying to block LGBT content clearly proves that Russia has a big interest in it; Russia is gay.

  • America will be doing the same thing. Maybe worse.
  • Like invading neighboring Eastern European countries?

  • Just arrest and imprision everybody and let them out one-by-one after they profess their undying fealty to whatever moron is currently in power.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Some things that were recently auto-banned from US platforms due to very strong governmental "encouragement":

    * any discussion of covid vaccine harm, even just factual reporting/analysis of govrnment's own VAERS data.
    * discussion of people that died soon after taking covid vaccine.
    * discussion of ingredients in covid vaccines, or any vaccine, such as aluminum and thimerosol/mercury.
    * discussion about viruses having never been isolated or proven to exist.
    * discussion about harms associated (physical and psych

    • slashdot is a US platform. Can you start any of those discussions, and we see if your posts get removed?

  • And I thought they make a law about the cloud services scanning their user's data. That would be appropriate.

  • Russia is just following in the UK and China's footsteps.

"Anyone attempting to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin." -- John Von Neumann

Working...