"Smart" Gun Seller Gets the Wrong Kind of Online Attention 1374
R3d M3rcury (871886) writes "How's this for a good idea? A gun that won't fire unless it's within 10 inches of a watch? That's the iP1 from Armatrix. Of course, don't try to sell it here in the United States." From the NY Times article linked: "[Armatrix employee] Belinda Padilla does not pick up unknown calls anymore, not since someone posted her cellphone number on an online forum for gun enthusiasts. Then someone snapped pictures of the address where she has a P.O. box and put those online, too. In a crude, cartoonish scrawl, this person drew an arrow to the blurred image of a woman passing through the photo frame. 'Belinda?" the person wrote. "Is that you?" ... "I have no qualms with the idea of personally and professionally leveling the life of someone who has attempted to profit from disarming me and my fellow Americans," one commenter wrote." The article paints a fairly rosy picture of the particular technology that Armatrix is pushing, but their ID-checking gun seems to default to an unfireable state, which might not always be an attractive feature. And given that at least one state — New Jersey — has hinged a gun law on the commercial availability of these ID-linked guns, it's not surprising that some gun owners dislike a company that advertises this kind of system as "the future of the firearm."
In a future cop movie... (Score:5, Funny)
The criminal is surrounded by cops... no escape. The cops yell "slowly, take off your watch.... no, you don't have to put your gun down, but you HAVE TO REMOVE YOUR WATCH... NOW!"
Re:Gun nuts (Score:4, Funny)
Should I continue?
Well that all depends. Did the person you plagarised this from actually write any more examples for you to pass off as your own research?
Re:By your definition... (Score:3, Funny)
You've just arrested and locked up every cop, the IRS, and half a dozen Federal agencies.
That sounds like a pretty good start to me. Can we find a way to include patent lawyers, or just lawyers in general, in that mix somehow?
Re:A firearm that depends on a battery? (Score:5, Funny)
They should just do something analogous to what smoke detectors do. Like every few minutes when the battery gets low, automatically fire off a round.
Re:A firearm that depends on a battery? (Score:5, Funny)
You should consider a sword and shield to defend yourself, they are less likely to fail. Or a small dagger eventually if your place is not big enough to swing a sword around.
If you need to fight long distance, consider a bow and arrow. According to the Predator documentary, it even works against aliens with superior technology.
My god (Score:3, Funny)
I just scrolled down past 600 messages and not one I stopped at was worth reading.
Now, that is the Slashdot I know and love.