Judge Overrules Samsung Objection To Jury Instructional Video 232
itwbennett (1594911) writes "U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh on Sunday overruled Samsung Electronics' objections to showing jurors a recent instructional video on how patents work, ahead of a trial in a patent dispute between Apple and Samsung. The new video, called 'The Patent Process: An Overview for Jurors,' was developed by the Federal Judicial Center to provide jurors with an introduction to the patent system. Samsung's objection is to several scenes in which Apple products are depicted and used (and, by extension, seen as patentable and innovative)."
Re:Blatant conflict of interest (Score:5, Funny)
He was a Buddhists. So he's smiling from his position as a factory line worker in an iPhone plant.
Re:Queue the Samsung apologists (Score:5, Funny)
Nothing in this judge's history indicates any bias IN FAVOR of Apple.
Now it does...
Re:Bad law... (Score:5, Funny)
Don't be silly, everyone knows that apple invented the computer, the Internet, the MP3 player, the smartphone, the smart watch and that Steve Jobs figured out how to solve climate change and buried the secret deep within iTunes, if only we could get the damned program to run properly so we could save the world.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Funny)
Why did a second instructional video have to be made?
Because the first one, "Fucking patents - how do they work?" was thought to be in contempt.
Re:Blatant conflict of interest (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Bad law... (Score:5, Funny)
But, the chances of grouping 12 imbeciles from a random selection is very improbable.
In this country?
Re:Blatant conflict of interest (Score:5, Funny)
We have no guarantee you'd be reincarnated after your death, you might just as well be reincarnated years before. Who knows...
You might even run yourself over with your car ending your next life prematurely, so drive safe!