UK ISP Filter Will Censor More Than Porn 329
The UK's on-by-default censorship, as you might expect, presses with a heavy thumb: coolnumbr12 writes "The Open Rights Group spoke with several ISPs and found that in addition to pornography, users will also be required to opt in for any content tagged as violent material, extremist and terrorist related content, anorexia and eating disorder websites, suicide related websites, alcohol, smoking, web forums, esoteric material and web blocking circumvention tools. These will all be filtered by default, and the majority of users never change default settings with online services."
Re:"Web forums" (Score:4, Funny)
Anyone that uses Facebook must be a terrorist and should burn...
We will start with a simple test where we tie their hands and feet and throw them in the river. If they float they must be a terrorist and we must burn them. Simple.
(Un)forseen beneficial side-effect (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Esoteric material? (Score:5, Funny)
No doubt opting in for porn will get you on the 'special attention at MI5' list.
Re:"Web forums" (Score:5, Funny)
Facebook's minimum age for signing up is 13, so there is a pretty good case for adding it to the list of blocked by default sites. At the very least there is a vast amount of hate material and pornography on individual pages which could be submitted.
Re:"Web forums" (Score:4, Funny)
So when exactly did the Usenet Cabal get into British politics? Who else would want the end of web forums, and be subtle enough to slip it into the middle of a list of bad stuff?