DOJ: We Don't Need a Warrant To Track You 259
GovTechGuy writes "The Department of Justice maintains it does not need a warrant to track an individual using location data captured from their cellphone. 'Cellphone location records are currently lumped under Title 1 and Title 2 of the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act (PL 99-508), which cover stored communications and call details. Accessing those types of information typically requires only a court order, rather than a warrant, as is required for the contents of a phone call or digital message under Title 3.' That has prompted Maine and Montana to pass laws banning warrantless cellphone tracking; unfortunately, Congress doesn't appear close to doing the same."
Re:Turnabout is Fair Play, Right? (Score:4, Interesting)
Do as a say, not as I do? (Score:4, Interesting)
I wonder how the government would feel if someone were to put up a website that gives real-time information about the location of members of congress, based on cell-phone data? Surely that wouldn't make them feel a bit uneasy, even if there were no publicly-ill intentions, right?
Thank goodness we don't have fascists in change (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm so glad we have a two party system where one party is so very obviously good and virtuous and the other is evil for all to see. We should keep voting blindly along party lines based on the rhetoric these people speak rather than looking at their actions.
I must excuse myself, the Two Minute Hate is about to begin.
Ditto on license plates, says ACLU (Score:5, Interesting)
http://rt.com/usa/aclu-license-plate-surveillance-216/ [rt.com]