Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Government Privacy Transportation

Starting Next Year, Brazil Wants To Track All Cars Electronically 178

Posted by Soulskill from the we-know-you-weren't-stuck-in-traffic dept.
New submitter juliohm writes "As of January, Brazil intends to put into action a new system that will track vehicles of all kinds via radio frequency chips. It will take a few years to accomplish, but authorities will eventually require all vehicles to have an electronic chip installed, which will match every car to its rightful owner. The chip will send the car's identification to antennas on highways and streets, soon to be spread all over the country. Eventually, it will be illegal to own a car without one. Besides real time monitoring of traffic conditions, authorities will be able to integrate all kinds of services, such as traffic tickets, licensing and annual taxes, automatic toll charge, and much more. Benefits also include more security, since the system will make it harder for thieves to run far away with stolen vehicles, much less leave the country with one."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Starting Next Year, Brazil Wants To Track All Cars Electronically More

Starting Next Year, Brazil Wants To Track All Cars Electronically

Comments Filter:

  • The big brother society (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ickleberry ( 864871 ) <web@pineapple.vg> on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @06:42PM (#41543843) Homepage
    Marches on steady. Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

    • Re:The big brother society (Score:5, Insightful)

      by wierd_w ( 1375923 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:15PM (#41544147)

      And we, the technicians, geeks, engineers, and software architects of the world, greedily line up to offer suggestions on how best to feed that pernicious appetite out of either being forced into it simply to have food to eat, or for fame and fortune.

      The result is the same. We make the very chains they enslave us with, and happily forge ever more diabolical pleasures to satisfy big brother.

      Who made DRM? It wasn't a media executive. It was somebody in a cubicle. Think about that.

      • Re:The big brother society (Score:5, Informative)

        by PRMan ( 959735 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:43PM (#41544385)
        I once told my boss that I would quit if he made me work on a spam engine. He finally gave the product to some of my co-workers, who gladly did it... :-(

      • Its a job description, not a moral code. Of course all sorts of people are going to get involved. Techies, engineers, geeks and scientists designed gas chambers. Quite a lot of the blame lies with the charismatic sociopaths who convinced them this was a good idea, aka politicians and CEOs - in other words if it wasn't for the talking heads at the top, the techies probably wouldn't have come up with this stuff of their own accord.

        • I disagree. "Spam" is very much a grassroots tech crime sector. It is very mature now, but it wasn't in the early 90s when it first came into the world.

          All that is needed are people with the skills, a person who wants the service, and money changing hands.

          Both the person accepting the money to do the deed, and the person giving the money for the service are culpable.

      • If it is possible, someone will make it. It might as well be us. In the US license plate readers, accomplish the same (though they are not that prevalent, yet(read, not that cheap yet)).
         
        What we really need is, for people to put pressure on govt to pass privacy laws. I would be fine with this idea, if the data is destroyed after a day or so. To store it beyond a day, you need a warrant signed by judge.

        • Re:The big brother society (Score:5, Interesting)

          by wierd_w ( 1375923 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @09:31PM (#41545059)

          I would rather see us do what doctors in ancient greece did.

          Make an oath not to willfully cause harm, and internally enforce it. Call it whatever, but we need some form of morality in our profession, and willfully creating code we KNOW to be malicious is clearly immoral, regardless of what moral compas you choose to employ.

          Simple things, like "I will not create mass mailers for commercial uses", "I will not create personally identifiable tracking systems of any sort.", "I will not create nor enforce systems to hinder political speech of any kind.", "I will not willfully penetrate another computer system without permission, and will not create tools to do so either.", "I will not willingly install backdoors for spying, monitoring, or sabotage, for any agency, in any software or systems I create.", etc.

          It doesn't need to be religious, like 'i will only make open code' or anything. Just things we can unilaterally agree are clear misuses of technology. Kinda like doctors refusing to create bioweapons. That kind of thing.

          • I am not sure how expect these to work. Most mass mailers I have seen were for legitimate use. They accept a list of email addresses (very often in excel format) and send an email to all of them. The mass mailer application cannot differentiate between legitimately obtained email address and illegitimately obtained ones. The same with tracking systems, there are legitimate uses for tracking. Every tracking system was created for legitimate use (gathering information for targeted advertisements is legitimate

            • Agreed; just like there are legitimate reasons to create monster viruses (biological) for medical research.

              In this case, the oath is to assert "I will not willfully cause harm", where "willfully" is the operant conditional.

              Likewise, if you are compelled by the law to include a back door, you aren't strictly speaking doing it of your own free will, but are instead being compelled to do so by your government, etc.

              I agree about the regulatory licensing group. It adds beurocracy, which is deplorable, but for th

              • Agreed; just like there are legitimate reasons to create monster viruses (biological) for medical research.

                Unlike biological viruses, which are often never released to the public, the tool I release (be it a DDoS tool or mass mailer tool), can be used very easily for nefarious purposes. If most of my genuine tools can be used for nefarious purposes, then what is the point of the oath?

                • To add to that, if you build a tool with nefarious thing in mind, you can be arrested with current laws (criminal intent and all that). What makes you think an oath will make a difference?

                • Swearing in on the oath, with a community to go with it, gives a sanitized and enforced venue to communicate research and tools with less intrinic risk.

                  Blackhats would very quickly get permabanned by a whitehat community. By explicit need, bans really should be for life.

                  Think, XDAforum, but with a membership requirement, and replication prohibitions. Enforce with strong CA, and forced encryption.

                  • Re:The big brother society (Score:4, Interesting)

                    by wierd_w ( 1375923 ) on Thursday October 04, 2012 @02:47AM (#41546247)

                    As for purpose, that is more external. For that, we need a history lesson.

                    Hippocrates was not an ordinary physician. He was the lead physician at a well respected hospital/temple of apollo. He was greatly displeased that other doctors in other cities engaged in nefarious antics, and belived strongly that medicine should only be used to heal, and medical knowledge should never be used to cause injury or harm. He couldn't force the doctors in other cities to comply with that moral vision, and didn't really attempt to explicitly.

                    Instead, he made all of his students swear to an oath that is basicaly the granddaddy of viral licensing. It prohibited his students from delivering medical knowledge to any physician that wasn't an oath sworn one, in their tradition.

                    The external factor was that the citizenry held more trust in hippocratic doctors than doctors of other schools, because of the added and strongly enforced ethos of that school of medicinal practice. As such, over time, the hippocratic school simply stole all the customers and students.

                    Ok, history lesson over.

                    I am suggesting that a community be created with the express intent that technological knowledge should never be used to willfully harm people, with similar implicit and explicit restrictions as the hippocratic oath. We should protect information with very strong asymetric keys, and exchange information only with other members. Membership should be free, but be serious business. The idea is to foster trust with industry and the citizenry at large, by being a very highly sanitized specialist forum to discuss vulnerabilities and solutions to those vulnerabilities in a sanitized environment. Failure to comply with the restrictions of the community results in having your keypair banned for life, and having your real identity added to a (searchable) wall of shame. All exchanges in the community are always encrypted, and stored in the encrypted form. Community members authorize other members to read their posts by distributing public keys. Each message is to contain a cryptographically identifiable hash, such that decrypted messages can have a unique and positive identification of which public key did the decryption. Each member retains his/her private key. To an outsider viewing the forums, they will see only huge blocks of RSA style crypto streams in nested succession. A CA should fascilitate the assignment and revocation of keys.

                    This would allow community collaboration and exchanges on wild exploit discoveries in a more protected environment, and enable more controlled release of information with industries impacted, with the intent of proving and sustaining professional trust, making the community a preferential setting for such dicussion.

                    The idea is to passively win out over disreputable technology workers by concentrating information, and internally vetting members. Membership must always be free and easy to obtain. It should be difficult to RETAIN, except through strict adherence to the rules. Membership thus gives access to a potentially huge archive of very specific information, and a potentially valuable asset in security consultency.

                    It wouldn't hold any legal protection or authority. It would simply be a stongly enforced "club", with a strong code of conduct.

                    The reason for multiple keypair generation is to frustrate attempts at collecting and brute forcing the data, and just accepting the added complexity tradeoff.

                    • Re: (Score:2)

                      by mcgrew ( 92797 ) *

                      You missed a huge, glaring weak point in your plan: back in the ancient Greek days, there were few books, all hand-printed. The only place to learn was from a school.

                      Now, we have the internet. Anybody can learn anything (s)he has the grey matter to understand. Even when I was a kid, long before the internet existed, I had public libraries that taught me anything I wanted to know. Plus, we had an Encyclopedia Britannica (I read the whole thing when I was 12).

                      Learning is no longer hard. Keeping knowledge away

          • Simple things, like "I will not create mass mailers for commercial uses"

            Just like machinists will refuse to make guns for mass murderers? In theory, a great idea. In reality, well... more thought is needed.

            I have created at least one mass mailing program for "internal" use (the targets were the owner/user of certain configurations of computers). Internal is in quotes because the organization I wrote it for had locations on several continents and it seems weird to use the word internal in such a situation. Could the program have been repurposed and used outside of the organizati

            • I didn't mean for those suggestions to be strict cannon. I am only one person, and how I interperate the problem could be seen as oppressively restrictive by too many people. It was just a suggestion.

              I was thinking more along the lines of bulk mailers, being created and operated with the intention of defeating inbox filtering technologies, attempting to confuse, mislead, or defraud readers, and unwanted distribution of advertising materials.

              Newsletter mass mailed archives, mass mailed system messages concer

              • The road to hell is paved with good intentions. If you can get this idea to fly, I hope that you avoid hell.

                Regards,
                Dave

        • If it is possible, someone will make it. It might as well be us. In the US license plate readers, accomplish the same (though they are not that prevalent, yet(read, not that cheap yet)).

          What we really need is, for people to put pressure on govt to pass privacy laws. I would be fine with this idea, if the data is destroyed after a day or so. To store it beyond a day, you need a warrant signed by judge.

          Aha, but this is the next step. It would be easy to swap plates with some other vehicle in a garage or parking lot. However it probably is not nearly as easy to swap the chip in your car. Also you could smear mud on a plate rendering it unreadable. My brother used to do that when he was 14 and wanted to drive his unlicensed car. Out of date plate, back then they issued new ones every year with alternating colors, with mud or snow covering the year. N.Y. in the 50s.

      • mod parent the fuck up.

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Time we started actively fighting back then. If this system is deployed someone should make a device for reading the data back from the side of the road, ideally something like a box a person can put on their property to do it. Then upload that data to a web site which displays the location of vehicles on a map. Watch the public go ape shit as they realize their location is now public whenever they drive.

      • Richard Feynman was asked about the morality of the atomic bomb he helped create. He replied "I just didn't THINK about it," giving the impression of a scientist absorbed with science in the moment, and oblivious to morality and consequences. Until later. Here we info tech folk are thinking about the morality beforehand, and still doing it. Looks like it takes more than thinking, it takes doing; and frequently, not doing.

    • We already have this here in the US. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Ungrounded Lightning ( 62228 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:42PM (#41544379) Journal

      The big brother society ... Marches on steady. Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

      It also deploys very quietly these days. It's already up and running before people notice it's there.

      We already HAVE four federally mandated car trackers on all passenger cars (along with most other vehicles) since 2007.

      It's called a "Tire Pressure Monitoring System". It works by having (typically) a lithium-cell powered device in the valve stem on each wheel that transmits the tire pressure information along with a unique serial number (so your dashboard computer doesn't get confused by nearby cars). These can also be read by loops in the road.

    • Marches on steady. Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

      One might even go so far as to say that we've seen this movie [imdb.com] [Brazil (1985)] before.

      • you were faster than me :-D
        I was about to post "ha, now this is why the movie was given this name!"
        please mod parent up ;-)

    • Unstoppable and with an insatiable appetite for new technology

      Very handy for those of us technical in nature, since we can always choose to circumvent the technology...

      The day that all speeding tickets are issued by reading your car chip is the day I get to drive 120MPH wherever I go.

      Sure life sucks for the non-technical but then they were the ones that accepted it all.

      • The day that all speeding tickets are issued by reading your car chip is the day I get to drive 120MPH wherever I go.

        Sure life sucks for the non-technical but then they were the ones that accepted it all.

        Oh...I sure wish I had mod points!!!

        :)

        • The day that all speeding tickets are issued by reading your car chip is the day I get to drive 120MPH wherever I go. Sure life sucks for the non-technical...

          Oh...I sure wish I had mod points!!!

          Right, so you could mod that "-1, Jailtime"

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by ADRA ( 37398 )

      "Big Brother" has been tracking your cell phone for at least 15 years now, so I fail to see how tracking of a person's location could ever get more intrusive. This is an added benefit for law enforcement's real problem of tracking auto-theft / toll dodgers.

  • Soon to be hacked (Score:5, Insightful)

    by concealment ( 2447304 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @06:43PM (#41543851) Homepage Journal

    I clone your MAC address, I decrypt your Wi-Fi, and I own your basic electronics already.

    Apply these relative basic skills and what do you have? A high-tech integrated system which can actually be used to conceal the identity of a vehicle behind a false identity, and charge up all sorts of services to the legitimate owner besides.

    • I didn't RTFA, but... it seems to me that there is no wifi involved.

      It's just radio frequencies. this seems a lot harder to me.

    • Re: (Score:2)

      by epp_b ( 944299 )
      Right up until the point where they require licensing for any devices with this capability (or just outright ban them), no doubt ignoring the vast array of unintended consequences.

    • Re:Soon to be hacked (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Tom ( 822 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:41PM (#41544375) Homepage Journal

      You overestimate yourself and underestimate your enemies.

      Sure you can hack some home WiFi. Your enemy is one guy, statistically speaking most likely someone with just enough computer know-how to reinstall windows.

      Going up against a national system is a different game. Not just a different league, a different game. If they don't make the MPAA-stupidity-mistake (invent your own crypto and don't let anyone outside test it for weaknesses) or the typical software-company-mistake (do thinks cheap and fast so you have a great time-to-market, facepalm the day before release and say "oh btw, has anyone thought about security?"), or some other obvious ones, this can be very, very solid.

      Crack NSA's SELinux to get a feel for what you're up against. Sure it's possible. All you need is either a serious mistake in the policy configuration, or a ring-0 exploit.

      Yes, everything can be hacked. Don't expect to be the one doing it, though. If they do this properly, then a hundred other people have thought of your approach before, during the design, development and testing phases. Maybe they've put in an easter egg for you to find, to reward the effort.

      • Give me a running SELinux box with your data on it and it's likely I'll hack it.

        The issue here is they are then handing it to the end user, possibly the criminal end user who can then poke and prod at it endlessly. The other issue is the 'state' doesn't have limitless money in making it work, see:'the lowest bidder'.

        It's likely some group of researchers will find a way to break it quickly, and publish a paper on it. A group of technically inclined 'criminals' will turn the research in to a sell-able kit. Th

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Tom ( 822 )

          Give me a running SELinux box with your data on it and it's likely I'll hack it.

          I actually used that back when I was giving speeches about SELinux. I'd put my IP address and root password on the blackboard at the conference. Someone once managed to drop a file into the root home directory due to a policy configuration error. That's as far as anyone has ever gotten.

          I've not been doing SELinux for a few years, so I don't have a box around. But you can check if Russell's play machine is still up:
          http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/play.html [coker.com.au]

          The issue here is they are then handing it to the end user, possibly the criminal end user who can then poke and prod at it endlessly.

          And?

          Security by obscurity is worthless anyways. Nobo

          • You mis-understood. I said 'give' me your SELinux box. Not make it available online. Physical access opens far more avenues of attack, like plugging in to the PCI-E buss and reading all the memory for example. Securing a device against unchecked, unlimited physical access is probably impossible at least until we get quantum cryptography figured out.

            >Nobody can hack your machine because he could examine it

            Who said just examine it? When you give someone something they can modify it. You seem to have virtua

            • Re: (Score:2)

              by Tom ( 822 )

              Physical access opens far more avenues of attack

              Ah. Yes, I indeed misunderstood that part. Agreed, physical access changes the game. It means you need to add tamper-resistance and temper-evidence to the equation. Again, something that someone with a bug budget who wants to get it right can do.

              As with the electronic security, there is no 100% security, but you can definitely make it so costly and troublesome that your average murderer or bank robber can't get it done. And definitely not some random guy who wants to frame someone else.

              And, most importantly

      • It's either tragic or funny, but Brazil's traffic dept. doesn't have the first clue about IT security. They use ye olde Windows and don't even bother configuring anything. Which means every user is an administrator and autorun is enabled. Keylogging is a real problem, but I suspect no one wants to secure anything properly because "oh, all those traffic tickets disappeared? I guess someone broke into my system again" is a great excuse for when you want to bail a friend or make a few extra bucks.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by Dan667 ( 564390 )
        for every successful SELinux there are hundreds if not thousands of tsa. I think his chances are actually pretty good.

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Tom ( 822 )

          I knew the TSA would come up.

          Realize this: The TSA's job is not, never has been and never will be to provide any actual security worth mentioning. It's job is to create an impression of security and a reference for politicians that they've thought of the chiiiildren.

          Look to Ben Gurion International Airport if you want to know how to do air traffic security properly.

  • Let me guess... (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward

    .... It will take under 1 week for the organized crime elements to fully understand and then implement effective countermeasures.

    Now, back at square 1, enjoy your 3mph over the limit speeding tix!

  • Thank you, Big Brother! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Bill Dimm ( 463823 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @06:50PM (#41543909) Homepage

    authorities will be able to integrate all kinds of services, such as traffic tickets

    Remember the bad old days, when police inconvenienced you with long stops while they wrote you a ticket just when you most urgently needed to get somewhere? Well, those days are gone! Now, a pile of tickets will arrive in your mail each day without you ever being held up by those pesky police. We hope you appreciate the convenience we've brought you while you're speeding off to your destination.

    Sincerely,
        Big Brother

    • Hello, time traveler.

      It looks like you come from the middle XX century. We already have that automatic stream of tickets you are speaking of. Today we get them from cameras... But everybody knows it is just a matter of time untill we get a more aware system that tracks you everywhere.

      Anyway, computers are still quite stupid. The people that want to decieve those systems do. That too will change with time, and it will probably both remove the problem of unreliable humans operating cars, and create much bigge

  • But real-life reality.

  • Nope! No drawbacks here. Why would the headline be written in anything other than pure, positive spin? Especially since this was probably posted from a chipped car with big brother watching quite carefully for any accidents, traffic or wrong thoughts.

    -- Ravensfire

  • wont stop thierves; crooks (Score:5, Interesting)

    by wierd_w ( 1375923 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:05PM (#41544033)

    The "must be tagged" law will not prevent theft, and will not prevent other criminal activities.

    It does not prevent the criminals from disabling a tag, altering a tag, or replacing the tag.

    What the tracking system ultimately tracks are the tags. Not the vehicles.

    As such, removing the tags, and then transporting the vehicle under a different but "valid" tag would make an effective means of breaking this system.

    The real benefit to law enforcement/government is *NOT* combating criminals, it is tracking law abidding citizens.

    I would expect catch-22s like "we show your vehicle at the scene" in one case and "you can't prove that isn't a fake transponder being used to put you on the other side of the country" in another, with the difference being the desire of the prosecutor.

    (Eg, "iron-clad, irrefutable!" When used to show guilt, and "suspect, clearly a technological fabrication!" When used to assert innocense.)

    If anything, this masure will spawn a new form of criminal activity, buying, selling, and provisioning counterfiet/shady transponders.

    • The intent is neither to combat criminals, nor to track citizens. (If you think the Brazilian government is competent enough to track citizens, you must check your sanity again.)

      The intent of this law is to make a few corporations rich.

    • A lot depends on what one views as an effective long term crime prevention strategy.

      First there's the top down approach. Assuming that the majority of the worst criminal activity is perpetrated by experieced life long criminals (think ring leaders, organised crime, career criminals etc) then it stands to reason you want to target those individuals for arrest and incarceration. Yes, there are outliers; nutjobs going on shooting sprees, crimes of passion, serial killers, and the odd person who comes up with a

  • Does everyone have to buy a new car equipped with all the integrated RFID/transponder gadgetry to participate in the mandated tracking system?
    This type of thing, and the upcoming "black box" additions to new cars sold in the USA, are perfect examples of why you should not buy new cars frequently. Instead, repair whatever goes wrong with your current/old car and stop being so damn wasteful. Pick a good car that you like and keep it going.
    I learned how to do almost all of my own car repair for this purp

    • It's not nearly as hard as understanding C programming or being fluent with the Linux shell. You just have to man up and get your hands dirty.

      And if you need an impact wrench or a valve spring compressor, you can't just download an open-source copy.

    • inability to comply with new-vehicle tracking mandates.

      What's to prevent them, some years down the line if not immediately, from requiring that you retrofit your existing older car to have this device installed ala LoJack or satellite radio or any number of other devices that owners currently voluntarily install into their older vehicles?

  • "Services" (Score:3)

    by epp_b ( 944299 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:22PM (#41544197)
    Traffic tickets are not a "service". A service implies that you actually get something useful in return.

    • Devil's advocate pedantry:

      It could be argued that pervasive and panopticon-like enforcement of traffic regulations could result in a fantastically superior motorist environment, where people speeding; performing rolling stops; and performing dangerous lane changes become a thing of the past due to automated creation of moving violations.

      *reality:*

      The problem however, will be with technological erros showing people speeding when they really aren't from multipath reflections, people being charged for driving

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by thogard ( 43403 )

        Victoria Australia has been doing this experiment with a 3% tolerance on speeding. The result is accident counts have not decreased since they started it, congestion has gone up , the deaths per km driven is increasing and the deaths per hour while traveling are also going up. The increased congestion seems to be killing pedestrians at a might higher rate too. We are not seeing any of the advantages that newer cars should be providing to the accident rates. The roads are moving fewer people and injuring

        • It sounds like they need to isolate traffic, and increase the speed limit.

          (Eg, isolate pedestrians from motorvehicle routes, with catwalks instead of crosswalks, install entry and exit lanes beside highways, and increase highway speeds.)

          See for example, the East Kellog (US 400) expansion in wichita kansas on google streetview. You will notice that there is an isolated entry/exit lane that fascilitates getting into the sidstreets, and a completely uninhibited arterial flow after that on the US 400 highway.

    • Re:"Services" (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Tom ( 822 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:46PM (#41544415) Homepage Journal

      Traffic tickets are not a "service". A service implies that you actually get something useful in return.

      You assume that the service always has to be towards the subject. It doesn't. The police performs a service when it arrests a burglar, but the service isn't towards the burglar, it is towards the house owner. Traffic tickets are a service to the other participants of traffic, because by punishing undesireable behaviour they limit it.

      Yeah, we can talk all night about how reality sometimes differs and how speeding traps are often put not at the spots where speeding is dangerous but where they'll catch the most people, etc. etc. - that's implementation details.

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by epyT-R ( 613989 )

        yeah.. details that make it less about safety and more about oppressive control and profit.

      • Re: (Score:3)

        by Mitreya ( 579078 )

        Traffic tickets are a service to the other participants of traffic, because by punishing undesireable behaviour they limit it. ... speeding traps are often put not at the spots where speeding is dangerous but where they'll catch the most people

        I think you may have contradicted yourself there.

        Punishing undesirable behavior would require targeting the "unsafe" places. That's not really an "implementation detail", that hijacking the original/stated purpose (keeping highways safe) and rerouting it to the new purpose (making money for the local municipality).

        Also, I am pretty sure that "unsafe" speeds are mostly relative. Someone going +30miles with traffic is nowhere near as dangerous as a person weaving around/passing at +15miles. So "implementa

        • Re: (Score:2)

          by Tom ( 822 )

          I think you may have contradicted yourself there.

          I don't think so. I juxtaposed theory and practice. As I said: I'm with you when you want to argue that the way in which this is actually being done is not always how it should be. But the point that traffic tickets aren't a service because you pay and get nothing in return is simply wrong for the reasons I stated.

  • All kinds of services (Score:3)

    by Attila Dimedici ( 1036002 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @07:32PM (#41544305)

    authorities will be able to integrate all kinds of services, such as traffic tickets, licensing and annual taxes, automatic toll charge, and much more.

    Such as keeping track of who attends opposition political meetings and making sure that they do not get government contracts (and do get extra visits from the police).

  • Great thing for us in Brazil (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Really, our traffic is terrible in most cities. Anything that can help to make it better is a good thing.

    Yeah, privacy is a concern, i hope they make it in a way that it won't be abused. But considering the total lack of respect brazilian motorists have in traffic this will help a lot. We have here a lot of fatal accidents with pedestrians and cyclists that the motorist simply just run away and no one sees who it was, with a system like this it'll be possible to get a list of suspects very easily in this k

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by epyT-R ( 613989 )

      Anything that can help to make it better is a good thing.

      Anything? really? How about all traffic violations punished with the death penalty? No? Why not?

      Yeah, privacy is a concern, i hope they make it in a way that it won't be abused.

      Yes because even without the electronics, governments have historically respected liberty, freedom, and due process when using the information gathered from monitoring policies.. What kind of crack are you smoking?

      The range of the signal is just 5 meters,

      Radio doesn't work like that.

      If the rang was big i would love to have it on my bike also, i would put it glue inside the frame, no way to remove it into the street.

      so, the abuse of your fellow citizens by your government is a-ok as long as the government protects your bike for you? You selfish twat. I hope you're not like most brazi

  • Pfft (Score:2)

    by tobiah ( 308208 )

    I've seen Brazil, it's like 90% illegal. As in the houses, utilities, economy. Rio has an unlicensed bus system by a loose affiliation of van-owners that is way more popular than the official one. There is not a single law there that a majority of the population obeys.

    • I lived in Brazil for 3 years, and while it's a lot easier to find the black market in Brazil than in the US, it's no where near 90% illegal. Even where Redock and Abbedias type knock-off options are available Brazilians recognize and would rather have the real deal.

      For the most part the people who have illegal utilities are shack dwellers (even poorer than those in brick-built favelas). Even most of the brick buildings in the favelas have an electric and water meter attached and in use.

      The combi vans are p

    • The government has no danm business into saying what bus I can or can not take. Except that people here don't complain about big government like in the US, they just ignore it.

  • Ya, they wont disable the transmitter, that would be against the law.

  • All cars? Presumably they only want to track cars in their own country.

  • How Brazil works (Score:4, Informative)

    by submain ( 856941 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:27PM (#41545575)

    Brasil is a communal society; we could care less for individual rights. Heck, if the entire country goes out on the streets naked every February, there is no need for individualism.

    That being said, it's really hard to enforce a law in Brasil, mostly because it is a matter of national pride to find a way around the rules. They can put as many transponders as they want, but if all the population gets are tickets, then even the dealerships will have an "unofficial" - official - system to remove the tags.

    The same thing happened with DVD players way back. Companies tried to force consumers to only get players for region 7. Except that, when you bought a DVD player, the salesman himself would write a code in a piece of paper that you could use to unlock all the regions.

    Of course, if the system is used properly, then people won't bother. They could care less if some random guy knows if they are going to churches or brothels.

  • Brazilian Explain (Score:3, Informative)

    by superflit ( 1193931 ) on Wednesday October 03, 2012 @11:55PM (#41545657) Homepage

    OK,

    It is VERY FUNNY how foreigners or first world people think about that.
    The REAL reason is:

    TAXES, FEES and revenues.

    The Brazilian gov. only cares about revenues and taxes to keep it's dysfunctional dept. and employees.
    Brazil was one of the first countries to have its IRS system on internet, paying taxes on INTERNET.

    In one of my country roads, there is a camera that read the tags and check if the license is ok.
    If not it sends a alert to the next police station with details.
    The police see: White car, tag xx xxx
    He stop and tow the car.

    But if you go at night that does not work.
    So the brazilian govt is going deeper.

    In sao Paolo you have SOME days you can use your car, if you use on 'not allowed' days and you get caught you get a fine.
    So this is the reason for the tags.

    'hmmmmm..you moved your car 1 mile in your not allowed day, please pay'

    Now I will wait for my fellows brazilians say that 'it is not like that.' and how our govt 'really ' cares about us..

  • On an unrelated note, bicycle sales have recently skyrocketed in Brazil

  • There is no possibility that anyone could get a system this comprehensive installed and functioning all over one of the largest countries in the world. They would do just as well to set a date upon which all lead in the country will turn into gold, it stands a better chance of succeeding!

Slashdot Top Deals

The Tao is like a glob pattern: used but never used up. It is like the extern void: filled with infinite possibilities.

Close