Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Privacy The Courts United States Your Rights Online

US Courts Approve 30,000 Secret Surveillance Orders Each Year 85

An anonymous reader writes "U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Smith estimates in a new paper (PDF) that 30,000 secret surveillance orders are approved each year in U.S. courts. 'Though such orders have judicial oversight, few emerge from any sort of adversarial proceeding and many are never unsealed at all.' Smith writes, 'To put this figure in context, magistrate judges in one year generated a volume of secret electronic surveillance cases more than thirty times the annual number of FISA cases; in fact, this volume of ECPA cases is greater than the combined yearly total of all antitrust, employment discrimination, environmental, copyright, patent, trademark, and securities cases filed in federal court.' He also adds a warning: 'Lack of transparency in judicial proceedings has long been recognized as a threat to the rule of law and roundly condemned in ringing phrases by many Supreme Court opinions.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Courts Approve 30,000 Secret Surveillance Orders Each Year

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @08:34AM (#40230965)

    Sure 30,000 is a big number. But on balance, this means that .01% of the U.S. population is being surveiled.

    That seems like a low number to me.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @08:35AM (#40230971)

    I think I see what the problem is.

    http://transparency.gov/
            The connection has timed out
            The server at transparency.gov is taking too long to respond.

    With that sort of response, you have got to go looking elsewhere in order to get anything done.

  • Re:Welp... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06, 2012 @08:45AM (#40231025)

    They all broke the same law. Not donating enough to the politicians and judges.

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...